The UPI one is really beyond the pale. It's one thing to mock academia in general. But this is just a vicious, ignorant personal attack. -z On Dec 17, 2007 12:53 PM, Christian Nelson <xianknelson@mac.com> wrote:
The UPI version is much more problematic. The reporter suggests that danah boyd's critics are correct, and casts all the SNS research as worthless. Quite an unfair synopsis. --Christian Nelson
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
What's worse than a poorly researched and skewed WP article? The UPI crib-note version, of course:
<http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Quirks/2007/12/16/ majoring_in_facebook_at_uc_berkely/4780/>
Yikes.
-mz
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/