I think you're right in that a more qualitative approach is good for the sort of exploratory research it sounds like you're doing. In general you probably want to move away from conceptualizing this as "hypothesis testing" and more toward thinking of it as exploring research questions. Qualitative inquiry is usually less good at saying "this is definitively true or false" and much better at giving you a picture of lived experience is within your focus, either through artifacts or speaking with/observing people directly. Instead of framing your question as "[x] statement" and proving it true or false, you instead as "How do the implicit and explicit assumptions of users affect their approach to privacy?" and run with the ball from there. http://www.amazon.com/Qualitative-Inquiry-Research-Design-Traditions/dp/0761... -- this was among the first qualitative research texts I ever used and I thought it was really valuable. http://www.amazon.com/Qualitative-Communication-Research-Methods-Lindlof/dp/... is another possibility, if this is an update to the book I'm thinking of (the cover used to have a picture of pebbles on it, I think?) Sorry, just got up and my recall's not the best. Hope this was of some help to you. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Seda Guerses <sguerses@esat.kuleuven.be>wrote:
i have a question about qualitative analysis methods. colleagues and i are studying different approaches to privacy within computer science. we want to analyze how they differ based on their implicit and explicit assumptions as well as their objectives. based on previous research, we already have some hypotheses about privacy research within computer science. in part of our study we want to use qualitative methods to inquire whether our hypotheses hold. we also plan to do content analysis to elicit further themes which may not be captured with our hypotheses. i am wondering if there are papers/books on qualitative analysis methods that could help us frame and design our study? it is not usual or accepted within my subfield of computer science to use qualitative methods, so all recommendations and tips are very welcome. thank you, s.
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Todd Harper Postdoctoral Researcher, Singapore-MIT GAMBIT Game Lab -- http://gambit.mit.edu laevantine@gmail.com