ooh, interesting sounding thread! like frank, i'm not sure if the study was an example of unethical research rather than methodologically flawed research. along those lines, in addition to the notorious rimm report (for a great summary of the controversy see http://www.fair.org/media-beat/950719.html) i'll add two more: 1. Carnegie Mellon's HomeNet study the study: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/copetas/www/public/pr/aug31-98.h... reaction: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-3.4/featherstone.html 2. wall street "research" in pricing dot.com's valuations. pick and choose: amazon.com, yahoo!, and my personal favorite, theglobe.com. four recent books explore this terrain in interesting ways: cassidy's dot.con, kuo's dot.bomb, ashbrook's the leap, and paternot's a very public offering. david silver On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Dr Chris Mann wrote:
Summer quiz!!!