8 Jan
2008
8 Jan
'08
10:21 a.m.
I hope you'll pardon me if observe that your response is kind of funny--it finds anthropology "sub-scientific," something that a lot of anthropologists would find quite disrespectful, though you've objected to the implication that you are "sub-human." On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Barry Saunders wrote:
indeed, but i'm interested in the scientific proof. Anthropological evidence doesn't really count as 'scientific proof'.
No disrespect to anthropology intended though - I'm curious as to how anyone could scientifically test the hypothesis - particularly how they judge what a fulfilled human is.