Dear colleagues, First of all, a thousand thanks to all who have responded both on-list and off-list: all most helpful as I continue to work through these issues. Because of various logistical considerations, I will need another week or so to garner more of some of the relevant information as suggested by both on-list and off-list responses. Presuming I thereby gain some clarity that can further be appropriately reported on this list, as I anticipate will be the case, I will most happily do so. (In addition, this would seem to make for a good case study to append to the AoIR ethics guidelines 2.0 - with any luck, will be able to write this up one of these days.) Again, a thousand thanks and I hope to have something useful soon as a return favor for all of the excellent responses and helpful suggestions. Best in the meantime, - c. On 05/08/14 00:59, "McLaughlin, Lisa" <mclauglm@miamioh.edu> wrote:
It seems to me that the compelling argument for 'fair use' is that the individuals being represented in the article are public persons who clearly have made public statements or created artifacts meant to circulate publicly.
As for the question of 'commercial' v. 'non-commercial' use, of course publishers such as Taylor and Francis and Elvevier are making commercial uses of the contents of journals. Taylor and Francis Ltd was bought in 2004 by Informa plc, a multi-national conglomerate that specializes in pub- lishing and conferences in areas that include maritime and transport, yacht shows, finance, real estate, health insurance, telecoms, and law. As a former editor for a T&F/Routledge journal, I can attest to the fact that publishing is a commercial activity for such journals (journals which fail to produce a profit after a few years are no longer published). Most definitely, it helps to turn a profit when a publisher is able to rely on the unpaid labor of editors, reviewers, and authors.
However, there is a fuzzy area when it comes to authors and commercialization. If the journal is not open access, I assume that Charles will have to assign ownership of the article to the journal. But, Charles has no commercial interest in the article (or so I assume;-) and will not benefit financially after the publication of the article. Following the embargo period, however, he has more ownership rights over the article--for example, Charles can re-publish it in his own edited collection.
Regardless, I continue to think that the bottom line is that the twitter feeds and FB pages were made available by public figures for public consumption and are being used for educational purposes.
Regards,
Lisa
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Charlie Balch <charlie@balch.org> wrote:
Is publication in an academic journal "non-commercial"?
Charles Balch PhD Faculty, Department of Business & Administration Northern Arizona University - Yuma
Office/cell: (928) 317-6455 <tel:%28928%29%20317-6455> / 287-3906 Skype: NAUCharlie Google+: cvb23@nau.edu
-----Original Message----- From: Air-L [mailto:air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of Dan L. Burk Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 2:32 PM To: Charles Ess Cc: Air list Subject: Re: [Air-L] an ethical question or two
Dear Charles:
You are asking two (at least two) different questions.
The first is about the right of publicity and/or privacy of the politicians. In the jurisdictions with which I am familiar, they have very little: as you have pointed out, they are public figures, acting in the public sphere, and in a democratic society there is a much stronger interest in robust discussion and examination of their actions than there is in maintaining a personal right to control their images.
Stated differently, they chose to place themselves in elected office, so autonomously chose to place themselves under public scrutiny. That will tend to negate their personal interest in controlling the images.
I would hope that this analysis would play out similarly in most democratic jurisdictions, but YMMV.
The second question, regarding copyright, is much trickier. Copyright does not lie with the subject of the photo, but with the photographer (unless of course it is a selfie). You indicated that the photos were drawn from Facebook and Twitter, which suggests that there may be some implied permission for public use, but this is only a supposition and to know you would need to check.
Several people have now suggested that the use would be fair. First, fair use exists only in a handful of jurisdictions (the U.S., and more recently Israel, and to some extent Korea and Taiwan). Some other jurisdictions will have exemptions (such as "fair dealing" which is NOT fair use, although in Canada it is creeping closer) that might allow the use. The EU is a patchwork, with exemptions varying from country to country.
However you should not assume that non-commercial use of a photo of a politician is necessarily fair, even in jurisdictions that recognize the defense (witness, for example, the famous and protracted litigation between the Associated Press and Shepard Fairey for unauthorized use of a photo of Barak Obama that formed the basis for Fairey's "Hope" poster -- summarized here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_%22Hope%22_poster . Admittedly, Fairey did not help his case any by committing perjury/spoliation).
Best, DLB
Dear AoIRists,
I am editing a piece for a forthcoming journal issue; it includes two screenshots of tweets from Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and a screenshot of the Facebook page of a politician running for office in 2014, including their pictures and names. These are public figures very intentionally engaged in a public activity in a medium that functions as a de facto public sphere (or at least an approximation thereof). There is nothing in the screenshots that could be construed as potentially embarrassing, much less libelous, much less potentially warranting protection as private.
I have gained the impression over the past few years that both in practice and in emerging guidelines codes, and law (specifically, based on what [little] I know of law surrounding freedom of speech and privacy issues in journalism in the U.S., the E.U., and Scandinavia), it is permissible to publish these without permission from the politicians in question.
At most, if these were tweets and FB pages posted by U.S. politicians aimed at U.S. voters, we would have to note that the tweets and pictures were de facto copyright by their authors; to my knowledge, however, there is no parallel requirement on this side of the pond.
Of course, it's usually when I think I know a good response to an ethical dilemma that I turn out to be missing something crucial - so: am I missing something crucial, or are we indeed on reasonably safe ground to publish the screenshots as is, no permissions required, no copyright notices included?
Many thanks in advance, - charles ess
Professor in Media Studies Department of Media and Communication University of Oslo P.O. Box 1093 Blindern NO-0317 Oslo Norway email: charles.ess@media.uio.no
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- School of Law University of California, Irvine 4500 Berkeley Place Irvine, CA 92697-8000 Voice: (949) 824-9325 <tel:%28949%29%20824-9325> Fax: (949)824-7336 <tel:%28949%29824-7336> bits: dburk@uci.edu
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- For MJF course waitlist, go to this site: http://units.miamioh.edu/mjf/
Please note that my e-mail address has changed to mclauglm@miamioh.edu. Messages sent to my former address will no longer be forwarded after May 31, 2014.
Lisa McLaughlin, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Department of Media, Journalism & Film and Women's, Gender, & Sexuality Studies Program Miami University-Ohio USA
Contact: Department of Media, Journalism & Film Williams Hall Miami University Oxford, OH 45056 USA Tele: 513-529-3547 Fax: 513-529-1835 Email: mclauglm@miamioh.edu