those articles are certainly useful and timely. but a clarification in relation to all the stuff I've been saying about inter...etc.. disciplinarity - the problem is not "peer reviewing" of research (again who *counts* as a "peer") but the fact that some journals emphasized as top tier within certain disciplines dont even allow the insertion of certain kinds of questions (thus while claiming that their process is "objective" it is very political ) - so people who tend to do ask these questions find other - peer reviewed - publication venues but get named as "interdisciplinary" in a negative manner ... (just for the record, though, I personally havent faced major problems in this regard - I just try and find publishing venues that allow my questions and this has not so far been a major issue - but that may be because of reasons other than issues of "disciplinarity" as a problem for tenure and promotion - or maybe I am speaking too soon!)