Hi Nicole, I concur that the gender and technology approach might be helpful too, and Hacker's work Doing IT the hard way would definitely be a good suggestion. I might also suggest framing the course around the central question: how does technology affect organizations?
From this general problematic, I would suggest three lines of inquiry:
1. Technology as Savior: The Long Tail could work here, but I think the Cluetrain Manifesto is a must read. Wikinomics fits in here. 2. Technology as socially constructed: SCOT approach suggests that tech and orgs mutually affect one another. Good overview: Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865-899. 3. Feminist critiques: Technology and its design is indicative of gender relations. Hacker would work here. or: Cockburn, C. (1999). The Material of Male Power. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology (pp. 177-198): Open University Press. 4. Technology as tool of capital: Barney's work dismisses Marx as a technological determinist: Barney, D. (2000). Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy In The Age of Network Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 5. Technology as network actor: Actor Network Theory, with readings from Akrich: Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge: MIT Press. and if you want to be really crazy, the easiest and (I think) most interesting piece by Heidegger... 6. Technology as Shaper of Reality: phenomenologist approaches: Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row. Good luck! -s.