Updates to opensource.mit.edu: AQ commentary, 8 new papers, 2 Theses
Hello All, Well its democracy day today in the USA. I am encouraging all my American friends to go out and vote. Meanwhile I have caught up with all the submissions to our website over the last month. First, thanks to the valiant efforts of Chris Kelty and Biella Coleman, the Anthropological Quarterly has agreed to release their Social Thought and Commentary on Culture's Open Source (Vol 77, No 3)under a Creative Commons License - and we have of course posted the contents on our website. We also received eight new working papers, one PhD thesis and one masters thesis. They are all below! Enjoy! Many thanks to all the members of our community to making this website so vibrant. We now have 192 papers list. Best Karim ******************************************** Papers from Anthropological Quarterly (Vol 77, No 3) - Social Thought and Commentary: Culture's Open Source http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/aq_cultures_opensources.pdf Editor: Christopher M. Kelty Listing of papers: Christopher M. Kelty | Culture's Open Sources: Software, Copyright, and Cultural Critique Gabriella Coleman | The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast Alex Golub | Copyright and Taboo Anita Chan | Coding Free Software, Coding Free States: Free Software Legislation and the Politics of Code in Peru Christopher M. Kelty | Punt To Culture Rosemary J. Coombe & Andrew Herman | Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web Glenn Otis Brown | Commentary **************** *Working Papers* **************** Paper 1 Authors: Dalle, Jean-Michel & Paul A. David Title SimCode: Agent-based Simulation Modelling of Open-Source Software Development http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/dalledavid2.pdf Abstract: We present an original modeling tool, which can be used to study the mechanisms by which free/libre and open source software developers' code-writing efforts are allocated within open source projects. It is first described analytically in a discrete choice framework, and then simulated using agent-based experiments. Contributions are added sequentially to either existing modules, or to create new modules out of existing ones: as a consequence, the global emerging architecture forms a hierarchical tree. Choices among modules reflect expectations of peer-regard, i.e. developers are more attracted a) to generic modules, b) to launching new ones, and c) to contributing their work to currently active development sites in the project. In this context, we are able - particularly by allowing for the attractiveness of "hot spots"-- to replicate the high degree of concentration (measured by Gini coefficients) in the distributions of modules sizes. The latter have been found by empiric al studies to be a characteristic typical of the code of large projects, such as the Linux kernel. Introducing further a simple social utility function for evaluating the mophology of "software trees," it turns out that the hypothesized developers' incentive structure that generates high Gini coefficients is not particularly conducive to producing self-organized software code that yields high utility to end-users who want a large and diverse range of applications. Allowing for a simple governance mechanism by the introduction of maintenance rules reveals that "early release" rules can have a positive effect on the social utility rating of the resulting software trees. =================== Paper 2 Authors: Bitzer,Jurgen, Wolfram Schrettl & Philipp J.H. Schroder Title: Intrinsic Motivation in Open Source Software Development http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bitzerschrettlschroder.pdf Abstract: This papers sheds light on the puzzling evidence that even though open source software (OSS) is a public good, it is developed for free by highly qualified, young and motivated individuals, and evolves at a rapid pace. We show that once OSS development is understood as the private provision of a public good, these features emerge quite naturally. We adapt a dynamic private-provision-of-public-goods model to reflect key aspects of the OSS phenomenon. In particular, instead of relying on extrinsic motives for programmers (e.g. signaling) the present model is driven by intrinsic motives of OSS programmers, such as user-programmers, play value or homo ludens payoff, and gift culture benefits. Such intrinsic motives feature extensively in the wider OSS literature and contribute new insights to the economic analysis. =================== Paper 3 Authors: MacCormack,Alan, John Rusnak & Carliss Baldwin Title: Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/maccormackrusnakbaldwin.pdf Abstract: This paper reports data from a research project which seeks to characterize the differences in design structure between complex software products. In particular, we adopt a technique based upon Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) to map the dependencies between different elements of a design then develop metrics that allow us to compare the structures of these different DSMs. We demonstrate the power of this approach in two ways: First, we compare the design structures of two complex software products the Linux operating system and the Mozilla web browser that were developed via contrasting modes of organization: specifically, open source versus proprietary development. We find significant differences in their designs, consistent with an interpretation that Linux possesses a more modular architecture. We then track the evolution of Mozilla, paying particular attention to a major re-design effort that took place several months after its release as an open source product. We show that this effort resulted in a design structure that was significantly more modular than its predecessor,and indeed, more modular than that of a comparable version of Linux. ==================== Paper 4 Authors: Giuri, Paola, Matteo Ploner, Francesco Rullani & Salvatore Torrisi Title: Skills and Openness of OSS Projects: implications for performance http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/giuri_etal.pdf Abstract: This paper is about open source software projects, activity and the characteristics of different categories of contributors. Our empirical analysis draws on a very large sample of OSS projects registered at the Sourceforge website. For each project we have access to information about individual contributors such as skills, roles, and tasks assigned. Key variables at the project level are the number of project members or internal contributors (i.e., people who have subscribed to the project),the number of external contributors (project openness), the overall skill combination of contributors, the number of different intended audiences (e.g., developers and end users), and various measures of activity (e.g., number of file releases, bugs and patches closed over time). We conduct a multinomial logit analysis to see whether skills? level, experience and variety of project members predict their role played in the project (e.g., developer or project manager). We then carry out an econometric analysis to estimate the contribution of skills and openness to projects' survival and activity. ===================== Paper 5 Authors: Coleman, Biella & Benjamin Mako Hill Title: How Free Become Open and Everything Else Under the Sun http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/colemanhill.pdf Abstract: Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) has been adopted as a political tool by leftist activists. At the same time, it has been embraced by large corporations to extend profits and has been criticized as an integral force in late capitalism. It has been adopted by members of the growing Commons movement as a model for limiting the power of capitalism. This essay attempts to confront the variability of these relationships through a cursory analysis of each field and through an look at FOSS philosophy and practice. It argues that Free Software exists as a politically agnostic field of practice--built on and through a broadly defined philosophy. It analyzes the way that this philosophy is well suited for the spread of FOSS technologies and its translation into the terms of radically different, even oppositional, social and political movements. ====================== Paper 6 Henkel, Joachim Title: Patterns of Free Revealing – Balancing Code Sharing and Protection in Commercial Open Source Development http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/henkel2.pdf Abstract: Commercial firms increasingly contribute to the development of open source software (OSS). However, a conflict often arises between the requirements of the General Public License to make "derived work" available, and firms’ interest to protect their intellectual property embodied in the code. If there are ways to mitigate or solve this conflict, the conditions under which OSS will be an appealing solution to firms become much more general. This paper is the first to provide a quantitative empirical study of this conflict and the ways firms deal with it. I present a study of embedded Linux, based on an online-survey that yielded 268 valid responses. It turns out that firms routinely use various means to protect their developments, while keeping the GPL. Still, they do reveal a considerable share of their code— on average, 49%. Heterogeneity between firms is analyzed using multivariate analysis. I show how the relative importance of various benefits and downsides of revealing determines a firm’s pattern of revealing. An analysis of reported reasons for revealing and of the type of code that is revealed provides further insights into these patterns. Putting the different dimensions of revealing behavior together, I find that consistent patterns of revealing can be identified for different types of firms. ====================== Paper 7 Authors: O'Mahony,Siobhan & Fabrizio Ferraro Title: Hacking Alone? The Effects of Online and Offline Participation on Open Source Community Leadership http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/omahonyferraro2.pdf Abstract: Research on computer mediated communication has examined how a lack of social presence affects participation, communication and leadership in online groups, but until recently, has not examined offline relations or emergent social structures. The few studies examining these issues have not been integrated with research on open source communities. Online communities producing open source software face even greater problems of governance than affinity or interest based online communities, as leadership responsibilities extend beyond mailing list management to managing release dates, public relations, and collaborations with firms. With data from one open source community's online and offline networks over three consecutive years, we assess factors affecting voting participation and leadership. We find that the more developers one has met face to face, the more likely one was to vote in a leadership election. Controlling for contributions of code, developers are more likely to hold a top leadership position when they participate more in online discussions. However, online participation in technical discussions did not affect leadership as much as occupying a structurally advantaged position in the community's social network. We conclude with theoretical implications that consider the dynamics of online and offline networks for governing distributed online communities. ======================= Paper 8 Author: Francesca Antonacci Title: Free software development communities as a pedagogic model Link to full paper in italian (PDF): http://www.tttt.it/francesca/dottorato/ Abstract in english: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/antonacci.pdf Abstract The pedagogic interest arising from the emergence of free software development communities is twofold. Firstly, in their production practices these communities set out formative processes as well as educational ones. These practices characterise these communities and are not accessory, to the point that without them the communities could not survive. Secondly, these communities are interesting as they make up a particularly rich epistemological model for the understanding of formative, educational and didactical themes. Having embraced the hacker culture, these communities promote and create an incentive to the free circulation of knowledge without protectionist barriers. However, freedom of knowledge alone is not enough, both in the educational and productive fields, unless it is introduced in an organisational model promoting the participation and engagement of the individuals. The communities of free software development are a particularly interesting organisational model because their structure, based on co-operation and solidarity and opposing centralisation, promote the participation of programmers and users all over the world. Thanks to this kind of organisation, which owes much to a model of delegating leadership, authoritative but not authoritarian, charismatic but not idealised these communities are putting together a very large number of work groups. These are geographically, methodologically and culturally non-homogeneous groups, which despite all predictions create highly competitive products of high quality. ======================= PhD Thesis Author Lin, Yuwei Title: Hacking Practices and Software Development: A Social Worlds Analysis of ICT Innovation and the Role of Free/Libre Open Source Software http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/lin2.pdf Abstract: Through use of social worlds theory and qualitative research methods, this thesis explores hackers’ practices and their relationships with the computing world and the wider society from a socio-technical perspective. Through engaging with a constellation of open source practices (OSPs), actors and actants communicate, negotiate, and shape each other’s identities, practices and understandings of the innovation structure and system in various aspects. In examining the diverse articulations and performances in which hacker culture and hacker identity are both reflected and constructed, the thesis tries to contextualise and deconstruct the ICT architecture we take for granted, as well as the innovations made possible by this architecture. ======================== MS Thesis Author: Bosco, Gianluca Title: Implicit theories of "good leadership" in the open-source community http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bosco.pdf The goal of this paper is to uncover the implicit theories (a.k.a. personal believes) of open-source developers concerning the characteristics and behaviors of a "good project leader". Three main behavioral factors are discovered to describe such implicit theories: competence, task orientation and person consideration. The conclusions of this study have been drawn from an analysis conducted on data gathered through 138 respondents. -- Karim R. Lakhani MIT Sloan | The Boston Consulting Group Mobile: +1 (617) 851-1224 http://spoudaiospaizen.net http://web.mit.edu/lakhani/www | http://opensource.mit.edu -- Karim R. Lakhani MIT Sloan | The Boston Consulting Group Mobile: +1 (617) 851-1224 http://spoudaiospaizen.net http://web.mit.edu/lakhani/www | http://opensource.mit.edu -- Karim R. Lakhani MIT Sloan | The Boston Consulting Group Mobile: +1 (617) 851-1224 http://spoudaiospaizen.net http://web.mit.edu/lakhani/www | http://opensource.mit.edu
Does anyone have a recommendation for a good, graduate level textbook for a seminar on CMC? Thanks! You can email me off-list. JS --------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jamie S. Switzer Assistant Professor Department of Journalism and Technical Communication Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1785 970.491.2239 fax 970.491.2908 jamie.switzer@colostate.edu
On Nov 2, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Dr. Jamie S. Switzer wrote:
Does anyone have a recommendation for a good, graduate level textbook for a seminar on CMC? Thanks! You can email me off-list. JS
--------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jamie S. Switzer Assistant Professor Department of Journalism and Technical Communication Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1785 970.491.2239 fax 970.491.2908 jamie.switzer@colostate.edu
this does not directly answer the question. but a colleague just forwarded this reading list to me . . . thought I'd pass it along From: "Chris R. Kasch" <ckasch@kaschassociates.com> Date: October 30, 2004 6:15:48 PM CDT To: <ell@bradley.edu> Subject: perhaps of interest 471 Things to Read About CMC Joseph B. Walther July, 2004 Adkins, M., & Brashers, D. (1995). The power of language in computer-mediated groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 289-322. Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E. (1999). Group processes in solving two problems: Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 179-198. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, K. (1994). A blackboard framework for the design of group decision support systems. Behavior & Information Technology, 13, 277-284. Alemi, F., Mosavel, M., Stephens, R. C., Ghadiri, A., Krishnaswamy, J., & Thakkar, H. (1996). Electronic self-help and support groups. Medical Care, 34(10), OS32-OS44. Angell, D., & Heslop, B. (1994). The elements of e-mail style: Communicate effectively via electronic mail. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Archer, N. P. (1990). A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9, 307-317. Bailey, E. K., & Cotlar, M. (1994). Teaching via the internet. Communication Education, 43, 186-193. Baird, P. M., & Borer, B. (1987). An experiment in computer conferencing using a local area network. The Electronic Library: The International Journal for Minicomputer, Microcomputer, and Software Applications in Libraries, 5, 162-169. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590. Barnes, S., & Greller, L. M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in the organization. Communication Education, 43, 129-142. Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language choice. Visible Language, 18, 118-141. Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 272-292. Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated interaction. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Baym, N. K. (1999). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377-383. Beauclair, R. A. (1989). An experimental study of GDSS support application effectiveness. Information Science, 15, 321-332. Benson, T. W. (1994). Electronic-network resources for communication scholars. Communication Education, 43, 120-128. Berge, Z. L. (1994). Electronic discussion groups. Communication Education, 43, 102-111. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgeon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456-480. Black, S. D., Levin, J. A., Mehan, H., & Quinn, C. N. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 59-75. Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Video, audio, and computing. Communications of the ACM, 36, 28-61. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Norwood, NJ: Erlbaum. Booth, F. V. M. (1989). Effective staff communications in a large I.C.U. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 6, 81-86. Borenstein, N. S. (1992). Computational mail as network infrastructure for computer-supported cooperative work. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 67-74). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H. (1995). The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 153-178. Bowers, J. (1992). The politics of formalism. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 232-261). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11(2), 123-151. Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for persons with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123-151. Bresler, L. (1990). Student perceptions of CMC: Roles and experiences. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 9, 291-307. Broome, B. J., & Chen, M. (1992). Guidelines for computer-assisted group problem solving: Meeting the challenges of complex issues. Small Group Research, 23, 216-236. Brothers, L., Hollan, J., Nielsen, J., Stornetta, S., Abney, S., Furnas, G., & Littman, M. (1992). Supporting informal communication via ephemeral interest groups. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 84-90). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. Bullen, C. V., & Bennett, J. L. (1991). Groupware in practice: An interpretation of work experiences. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (Eds.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 257-287). Boston: Academic Press. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 553-574. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677. Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidambaram, L., & Johnson, J. J. (1999). A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Research, 30, 453-490. Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidambaram, L., & Johnson, J. J. (1999). A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time perceptions and performance. Small Group Research, 30(4), 453-490. Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553-575. Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction - A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625-648. Carey, J. (1980). Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. In N. K. Sondheimer (Ed.), The 18th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and parasession on topics in interactive discourse: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 67-69). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1994). Channel expansion theory: A dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions. In D. P. Moore (Ed.), Academy of Management: Best papers proceedings 1994 (pp. 280-284). Madison: Omnipress. Cathcart, R., & Gumpert, G. (1983). Mediated interpersonal communication: Toward a new typology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 267-277. Chan, D. K. S., & Cheng, G. H. L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305-320. Cheng, H., Lehman, J., & Armstrong, P. (1991). Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 5, 51-64. Chesebro, J., & Bonsall, D. (1989). Computer-mediated communication: Human relationships in a computerized world. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Chesebro, J. W. (1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 202-222). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-163. Chidambaram, L., & Bostrom, R. P. (1993). Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 443-469. Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R. P., & Wynne, B. E. (1991). The impact of GDSS on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 3-25. Chilcoat, Y., & DeWine, S. (1985). Teleconferencing and interpersonal communication perception. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 14-32. Coleman, L. H., Paternite, C. E., & Sherman, R. C. (1999). A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 51-65. Colley, A., & Todd, Z. (2002). Gender-linked differences in the style and content of e-mails to friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 380-392. Collins, M. (1994). Internet information management tools. Communication Education, 43, 112-119. Colvin, J., Chenoweth, L., Bold, M., & Harding, C. (2004). Caregivers of older adults: Advantages and disadvantages of Internet-based social support. Family Relations, 53(1), 49-57. Compton, D. C., White, K., & DeWine, S. (1991). Techno-sense: Making sense of computer-mediated communication systems. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 23-43. Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 97-120. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7, 119-136. Cook, J., & Salvendy, G. (1989). Perception of computer dialogue personality: An exploratory study. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 717-728. Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 5-29. Cooper, A., McLoughlin, I. P., & Campbell, K. M. (2000). Sexuality in cyberspace: Update for the 21st century. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(4), 521-536. Cooper, R. B. (2003). Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 263-299. Cornwell, B., & Lundgren, D. C. (2001). Love on the Internet: involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 197-211. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cummings, J., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45 (7), 103-108. Curtis, P. (1992). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In D. Schuler (Ed.), DIAC-92: Directions and implications of advanced computing (pp. 48-68). Palo Alto, CA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. Czaja, S. J., Guerrier, J. H., Nair, S. N., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). Computer communication as an aid to independence for older adults. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12, 197-207. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N.B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-368. Daly, J. A., Weber, D. J., Vangelisti, A. L., Maxwell, M., & Neel, H. (1989). Concurrent cognitions during conversations: Protocol analysis as a means of exploring conversations. Discourse Processes, 12, 227-244. Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask: Gender, play and performance on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0 (pp. 129-158). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Danowski, J. A., & Edison-Swift, P. (1985). Crisis effects on intraorganizational computer-based communication. Communication Research, 12, 251-270. Davie, L. E., & Wells, R. (1991). Empowering the learner through computer-mediated communication. American Journal of Distance Education, 5, 15-23. Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 256-274. Dennis, A. R., George, J. F., Jessup, L. M., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. R. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 591-624. Dennis, A. R., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. R. (1990). A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 107-135. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Dickson, G. W., & Jackson, B. M. (1993). Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 1-30. Dietz-Uhler, B., & Bishop-Clark, C. (2001). The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 269-283. Donath, J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). New York: Routledge. Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 25-59). London: Routledge. Donn, J. E., & Sherman, R. C. (2002). Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 107-123. Downing, J. D. H. (1989). Computers for political change: Peacenet and public access data. In M. Siefert, G. Gerbner, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The information gap How computers and other new communication technologies affect the social distribution of power (pp. 154-162). New York: Oxford University Press. Dubinskas, F. A. (1993). Virtual organizations: Computer conferencing and organization design. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 389-416. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146. Dunham, P. J., Hurshman, A., Litwin, E., Gusella, J., Ellsworth, C., & Dodd, P. W. D. (1998). Computer-mediated social support: Single young mothers as a model system. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(2), 281-306. Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 743-757). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Dutton, W. H., Rogers, E. M., & Jun, S. (1987). Diffusion and social impacts of personal computers. Communication Research, 14, 219-250. Eastman, D. V. (1992). Effective facilitation of computer conferencing. Continuing Higher Education Review, 56, 23-34. Easton, G. K., George, J. F., Nunamaker, Jr., J. F., & Pendergast, M. O. (1990). Using two different electronic meeting systems tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 85-100. Ekman, P. F., W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98. Elam, J. J., Huber, G. P., & Hurt, M. E. (1986). An examination of the DSS literature (1975-1985). In E. E. McLean & H. H. Sol (Eds.), Decision support systems: A decade in perspective (pp. 1-17). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experience. Communications of the ACM, 34, 38-58. Eveland, J. D., & Bikson, T. K. (1987). Evolving electronic communication networks: An empirical assessment. Office: Technology and People, 3, 103-128. Eveland, J. D., & Bikson, T. K. (1989). Work group structures and computer support: A field experiment. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6, 354-379. Eveland, W. P. (2003). A "mix of attributes" approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53, 395-410. Feenberg, A. (1989). A user's guide to the pragmatics of computer mediated communication. Semiotica, 75, 257-278. Feenberg, A. (1992). From information to communication: The French experience with videotex. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 168-187). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Feldman, M. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101. Feldman, M. S. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101. Ferguson, J. A. (1977). PLANET: A computer conferencing system and its evaluation through a case study. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9, 92-95. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34. Ferry, D. L., Kydd, C. T., & Sawyer, J. E. (2001). Measuring facts of media richness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(4), 69-78. Finholt, T., & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41-64. Finholt, T., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1990). Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups. In J. Galagher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Edigo (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 291-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Finn, T. A. (1988). Process and structure in computer-mediated group communication. Information and Behavior, 2, 167-193. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 48-61. Fowler, G. D. W., M. E. (1980). Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 236-252. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921-950. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. A., & Schwarz, D. (1992). The dynamics of context-behavior interactions in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 7-29). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. A., & Schwarz, D. (1992). The dynamics of context-behaviour interactions in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 7-29). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 529-552. Fulk, J. S., J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Furlong, M. S. (1989). An electronic community for older adults: The seniornet network. In M. Siefert, G. Gerbner, & J. Fisher (Eds.), The information gap How computers and other new communication technologies affect the social distribution of power (pp. 145-153). New York: Oxford University Press. Fussell, S. R. (2002). The verbal communication of emotion: Introduction and overview. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Galagher, J., & Kraut, R. (1990). Technology for intellectual teamwork: Perspectives on research and design. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Galagher, J., & Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5, 110-138. Galagher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: : Erlbaum. Galagher, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1998). Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530. Gale, S. (1991). Adding audio and video to an office environment. In J. M. Bowers & S. D. Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer-supported collaborative work (pp. 49-62). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. Galegher, J., & Kraut, R. E. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and collaborative writing: media influence and adaptation to communication constraints. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 155-162). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. Gallupe, R. B., & McKeen, J. D. (1990). Enhancing computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Information & Management, 18, 1-13. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142. Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 434-453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gattiker, U. E., Gutek, B. A., & Berger, D. E. (1988). Office technology and employee attitudes. Social Science Computing Review, 6, 328-340. Godin, S. (1993). The smiley dictionary. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Goldberg, Y., Safran, M., & Shapiro, E. (1992). Active mail: A framework for implementing groupware. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 75-83). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E. S., Kimble, C. E., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J. L. (1998). Information sharing face-to-face teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29(6), 714-743. Gray, P. (1986). Group decision support systems. In E. R. McLean & H. G. Sol (Eds.), Decision support systems: A decade in perspective (pp. 157-251). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. Greenberg, S. (1991). Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. London: Academic Press. Greif, I. (1988). Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 6(1), 38-51. Guéguen, N. (2001). Fund-raising on the web: The effect of an electronic foot-in-the-door on donation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 705-709. Guéguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2003). Fund-raising on the web: The effect of an electronic door-in-the-face on on compliance to a request. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 189-193. Gumpert, G. (1990). Remote sex in the information age. In G. Gumpert & S. L. Fish (Eds.), Talking to strangers: Mediated therapeutic communication (pp. 143-153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and its implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147-166. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11 (3), 8-27. Gurbaxani, V. (1990). Diffusion in computing networks: The case of bitnet. Communications of the ACM, 33, 65-75. Gutek, B. A., Bikson, T., & Mankin, D. (1984). Individual and organizational consequences of computer-based office information technology. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 5, 231-254. Haas, C. (1989). Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 149-169. Haken, J. D. T., Love, S. J., Calhoun, J. G., & Barclay, M. L. (1989). The integration of computer conferencing into the medical school curriculum. Medical Teacher, 11 (2), 213-220. Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325-347. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Bibliography on educational CMC. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 229-264). New York: Praeger. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 39-64). New York: Praeger. Harasim, L. M. (1993). Global networks: Computers and international communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Harasim, L. M. (1993). Networlds: Networks as social space. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 15-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Harrington, K. V., McElroy, J. C., & Morrow, P. C. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer-based training: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 343-358. Harwood, J. (2000). Communication media use in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 56-78. Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B. & Mantei, M. (1995). Work relationships and media use: A social network analysis. Group Decision and Negotiations, 4, 193-211. Heath, C. L., P. (1992). Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 315-346. Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society, 6(1), 26-36. Hesse, B. W., Werner, C. M., & Altman, I. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 147-165. Hill, S. (1988). Technology and organizational culture: The human imperative in integrating new technology into organizational design. Technology in Society, 10, 233-253. Hiltz, S. R. (1978). The human element in computerized conferencing systems. Computer Networks, 2, 421-428. Hiltz, S. R. (1984). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The "virtual classroom": Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36, 95-104. Hiltz, S. R. (1988). Productivity enhancement from computer-mediated communication: A systems contingency approach. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1438-1454. Hiltz, S. R. (1992). Constructing and evaluating a virtual classroom. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 188-208). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1990). User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems. Management Science, 36, 739-764. Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1991). Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems. Journal of the American Society for Information, 40, 386-397. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1981). The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system. Communications of the ACM, 24, 739-762. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation: Human communication via computer (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision-making - communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252. Hiltz, S. R., Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232. Hobbs, J. R. (1980). Interactive discourse: Influence of social context. In N. K. Sondheimer (Ed.), The 18th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and parasession on topics in interactive discourse: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 65). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett, & G. Lynch (Eds.), CHI '92 conference proceedings: ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 119-125). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making - The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 193-219. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333. Holmes, M. E. (1987). A conversational analysis of computer-mediated discourse. In J. Wilson (Ed.), Belfast working papers in language and linguistics (Vol. 11, pp. 1-14). Jordanstown, Northern Ireland: University of Ulster. Holmes, M. E. (1991). Is anybody here in Pittsburgh?: An analysis of place deixis in synchronous computer-mediated discourse. In J. Wilson (Ed.), Belfast working papers in language and linguistics (Vol. 7, pp. 96-117). Jordanstown, Northern Ireland: University of Ulster. Huff, C., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational committment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 1371-1391. Hulin, C. L., & Roznowski, M. (1985). Organizational technologies: Effects on organizations' characteristics and individuals' responses. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 39-85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Hunter, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Adaptation to electronic mail. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 254-274. Huseman, R. C., & Miles, E. W. (1988). Organizational communication in the information age: Implications of computer-based systems. Journal of Management, 14, 181-204. Jaffe, J. M. (1999). Gender identification, interdependence, and pseudonyms in CMC: Language patterns in an electronic conference. Information Society, 15(4), 221-234. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there?: The implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-64. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Rao, V. S., & Huber, G. P. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645-666. Jessup, L. M., & Tansik, D. A. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22, 266-279. Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Group support systems: New perspectives. New York: Macmillan. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 312-321. Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer support for business teams. New York: Free Press. Johansen, R., & O'Hara-Devereaux, M. (1994). Globalwork: Bridging distance, culture, & time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Johansen, R., DeGrasse, R., & Wilson, T. (1978). Group communication through computers, volume 5: Effects on working patterns. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1988). Teleconferencing: Electronic group communication. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samover (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (5th ed., pp. 140-154). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Johnston, J. (1989). Commentary on issues and concepts in Research on computer-mediated communication. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 12 (pp. 490-497). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Joinson, A., & Banyard, P. (2002). Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 95-102. Jonas, K. J., Boos, M., & Sassenberg, K. (2002). Unsubscribe, pleeezz!!!: Management and training of media competence in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(4), 315-329. Jones, S. G. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 10-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 187-213. Kayani, J. M., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1996). Relational control and interactive media choice in technology-mediated communication situations. Human Communication Research, 22, 399-421. Kayany, J. M., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1996). Relational control and interactive media choice in technology-mediated communication situations. Human Communication Research, 22, 399-421. Keay, J. M., Kenny, G. N., Daly, D. W., Adams, R. H., & Calman, K. C. (1989). Information technology in postgraduate medical education. Medical Education, 23, 472-475. Kerr, E. B., & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer-mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press. Kettelhut, M. C. (1991). Using a DSS to incorporate expert opinion in strategic product development funding decisions. Information & Management, 20, 363-371. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1987). Computing and change on campus. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Pool halls, chips, and war games: Women in the culture of computing. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 451-462. Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104. Kiesler, S. B. (1987). Social aspects of computer environments. Social Science, 72, 23-28. King, W. C., Dent, M. M., & Miles, E. W. (1991). The persuasive effect of graphics in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 269-279. Kinney, S. T., & Dennis, A. R. (1994). Re-evaluating media richness: Cues, feedback, and task. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 21-30. Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383. Komsky, S. H. (1991). A profile of users of electronic mail in a university. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 310-340. Korzenny, F. (1978). A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communications in organizations. Communication Research, 5, 3-24. Korzenny, F., & Bauer, C. (1981). Testing the theory of electronic propinquity. Communication Research, 8, 479-498. Kraemer, K. L., & Pinsonneault, A. (1990). Technology and groups: An assessment of the empirical research. In J. Galagher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 375-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kraut, R., Galegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaborations. Human Computer Interaction, 3, 31-58. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10, 287-303. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 13-49. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. Kriebel, C. H., & Strong, D. M. (1984). A survey of the MIS and telecommunications activities of major business firms. MIS Quarterly, 8, 171-177. Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43, 171-183. LaCoursiere, S. P. (2001). A theory of online social support. Advances in Nursing Science, 24(1), 60-77. LaRose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Gregg, J. (2001). Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(2), http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/paradox.html. Lea, M. (1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 153-172. Lea, M. (1992). Contexts of computer-mediated communication. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Lea, M. (1992). Introduction: Recontextualizing computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 1-6). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). "Flaming" in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations and implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). "Flaming" in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Lebie, L., Rhoades, J. A., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Interaction processes in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 127-152. Lederberg, J. (1978). Digital communications and the conduct of science: The new literacy. Proceedings of the IEEE, 66, 1314-1319. Lee, E. J., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 349-381. Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Academy of Management Executive, 2, 225-232. Leon, D. T., Rotunda, R. J., Sutton, M. A., & Schlossman, C. (2003). Internet forewarning effects on ratings of attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 39-57. Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40, 1-18. Levine, D. (2000). Virtual attraction: What rocks your boat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 565-573. Lewis, L. F. (1987). A decision support system for face-to-face groups. Journal of Information Science, 13, 211-219. Lievrouw, L. A., & Finn, T. A. (1990). Identifying the common dimensions of communication: The communication systems model. In B. Ruben & L. Lievrouw (Eds.), Mediation, information, and communication: Information and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 37-65). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Lin, C. A. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345-365. Lipton, M. (1996). Forgetting the body: Cybersex and identity. In L. Strate, R. Jocobson, & S. B. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and cyberspace Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 335-349). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. Liu, Y. L., Ginther, D., & Zelhart, P. (2002). An exploratory study of the effects of frequency and duration of messaging on impression development in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 73-80. MacGregor, S. K., & Thomas, L. B. (1988). A computer-mediated text system to develop communication skills for hearing-impaired students. American Annals of the Deaf, 133, 280-284. MacKinnon, R. C. (1995). Searching for the Leviathan in Usenet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 112-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Markey, P. M., & Wells, S. M. (2002). Interpersonal perception in Internet chat rooms. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(2), 134-146. Markus, M. L. (1987). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research, 14, 491-511. Markus, M. L. (1992). Asynchronous technologies in small face-to-face groups. Information Technology & People, 6, 29-48. Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5, 502-527. Markus, M. L. (1994). Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 119-149. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press. Mason, R. (1992). Computer conferencing for managers. Interactive Learning International, 8, 15-28. Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Hung, Y. T. (2003). Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 129-155. Matheson, K. (1991). Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137-145. Matheson, K. (1992). Women and computer technology. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 66-88). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233. Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication. Social Behaviour, 4, 99-111. Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Social Science Computer Review (Special Issue: Computing: Social and policy issues), 8, 1-12. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 173-191. Maznevski, K. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492. McComb, M. (1994). Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses. Communication Education, 43, 159-170. McCormick, N. B., & McCormick, J. W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379-405. McCormick, N. B. M., J. W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379-405. McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork Social and technical foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. McGrath, J. E. (1992). Groups interacting with technology: The complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 4). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. McGrath, J. E. (1993). Introduction: The JEMCO workshop--description of a longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 24, 285-306. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D. H., Hollingshead, A. B., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology: The effects of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24, 406-420. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930. McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on Usenet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 90-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280. McLeod, P. L., & Liker, J. K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research, 3, 195-223. McMillan, S. J. (1999). Health communication and the internet: Relations between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content, and purpose. Health Communication, 11(4), 375-390. Melone, N. P. (1990). A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 36, 76-91. Menneke, B. E., Hoffer, J. A., & Wynne, B. E. (1992). The implications of group development and group history for group support system theory and practice. Small Group Research, 23, 524-572. Merkle, E. R., & Richardson, R. A. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49(2), 187-192. Mickelson, K. D. (1997). Seeking social support: Parents in electronic support groups. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Intertnet (pp. 157-178). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Migliarese, P., & Paolucci, E. (1993). Cooperation support through the use of group decision systems. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 215-243. Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393-401. Morkes, J., Kernal, H. K., & Nass, C. (1999). Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(4), 395-435. Morrison, J., Morrison, M., & Vogel, D. (1992). Software to support business teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 91-115. Mühlfelder, M., Klein, U., Simon, S., & Luczak, H. (1999). Teams without trust? Investigations in the influence of video-mediated communication on the origin of trust among cooperating persons. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 349-360. Murray, D. E. (1988). The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in Society, 17, 351-373. Myers, D. (1987). Anonymity is part of the magic. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 251-266. Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face to face communication in distributed work. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work: New research on working across distance using technology (pp. 83-110). Cambridge: MIT Press. Nardi, B. A., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83-112). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Nass, C., & Mason, L. (1990). On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 46-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A Knopf. Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2003). Rethinking communication in the E-health era. Journal of Health Psychology, 8(1), 7-23. Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Jourenal of Communication, 46, 4-13. Newlands, A., Anderson, A. H., & Mullin, J. (2003). Adapting communicative strategies to computer-mediated communication: An analysis of task performance and dialogue structure. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 325-348. Nowak, K. L. (2003). Sex categorization in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise. Media Psychology, 5(1), 83-103. O'Brien, J. (1999). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online interaction. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 76-104). New York: Routledge. Olaniran, B. A. (1994). Group performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication media. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 256-282. Olaniran, B. A. (1996). A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings. Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 24-36. Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., & Kraut, R. E. (1992). Introduction to this special issue on computer-supported cooperative work. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 251-256. Olson, M. H., & Bly, S. A. (1991). The Portland experience: A report on a distributed research group. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 211-228. Ord, J. G. (1989). Who's joking? The information system at play. Interacting with Computers, 1, 118-128. O'Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431. Palmer, M. T. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In F. Biocca & M. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 277-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Papa, M. J. (1989). Communicator competence and employee performance with new technology: A case study. Southern Communication Journal, 55, 87-101. Papa, M. J. (1990). Communication network patterns and employee performance with new technology. Communication Research, 17, 344-368. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97. Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). 'Making MOOsic'" The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537. Perkins, D. N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14, 11-17. Phillips, G. M., & Santoro, G. M. (1989). Teaching group discussion via computer-mediated communication. Communication Education, 38, 151-161. Pickering, J. M., & King, J. L. (1992). Hardwiring weak ties: Individual and institutional issues in computer mediated communication. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW '92: Sharing perspectives (pp. 356-361). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press. Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1990). The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research. European Journal of Operational Research, 46, 143-161. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19, 5-49. Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22, 90-127. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M., & Reicher, S. D. (2000). SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of deindividuation in groups. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Postmes, T. S., R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715. Quarterman, J. S., & Carl-Mitchell, S. (1993). The computing paradigm shift. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 31-50. Rafaeli, S. (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium. Computers and the Social Sciences, 2, 123-136. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Randolph, W. A., & Finch, F. E. (1977). The relationship between organizational technology and the direction and frequency dimensions of task communications. Human Relations, 30, 1131-1145. Rapaport, M. (1991). Computer mediated communications: Bulletin boards, computer conferencing, electronic mail, information retrieval. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Reardon, R. (1989). Essentials of successful corporate electronic mail. Computer Communications, 12, 359-364. Reese, S. D. (1988). New communication technologies and the information worker: The influence of occupation. Journal of Communication, 38, 59-70. Reid, E. (1995). Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 164-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Reid, F. J. M., Ball, L. J., Morley, A. M., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (1997). Styles of group discussion in computer-mediated decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 241-262. Reid, F. J. M., Malinek, V., Stott, C., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication. Ergonomics, 39, 1017-1037. Rein, G. L., Holsapple, C. W., & Whinston, A. B. (1993). Empirical research in electronic meeting systems: Computer support of organization design and learning. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 87-120. Reynolds, M. (1994). Decision-making using computer conferencing: A case study. Behavior & Information Technology, 13, 239-252. Rezabek, L. L., & Cochenour, J. J. (1998). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18, 210-215. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Rice, R. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 65-94. Rice, R., & Shook, D. (1988). Access to, usage of, and outcomes from an electronic messaging system. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6, 255-276. Rice, R., & Shook, D. (1990). Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 27, 195-229. Rice, R. E. (1980). Computer conferencing. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 7, pp. 215-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Rice, R. E. (1980). The impacts of computer-mediated organizational and interpersonal communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 15, 221-249. Rice, R. E. (1982). Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 925-944). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rice, R. E. (1984). Mediated group communication. In R. E. Rice & Associates (Eds.), The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 129-156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rice, R. E. (1987). Communication technologies, human communication networks and social structure in the information society. In J. Schement & L. Lievrouw (Eds.), Competing visions, complex realities: Social aspects of the information society (pp. 107-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Rice, R. E. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 65-94. Rice, R. E. (1987). New patterns of social structure in an information society. In J. R. Schement & L. Lievrouw (Eds.), Competing visions, complex realities: Social aspects of the information society (pp. 107-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Rice, R. E. (1989). Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 12 (pp. 436-476). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rice, R. E. (1990). Computer-mediated communication system network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32, 627-647. Rice, R. E. (1990). From adversity to diversity: Applications of communication technology to crisis management. In T. Housel (Ed.), Advances in telecommunications management, vol. 3: Information technology and crisis management (pp. 91-112). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Rice, R. E. (1991). Organic organizations and centralized units: Use, contexts, and outcomes of word processing. In J. Morrell & M. Fleischer (Eds.), Advances in the implementation and impact of computer systems (Vol. 1, pp. 111-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Rice, R. E. (1992). Contexts of research on organizational computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 113-144). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244. Rice, R. E., & Boan, K. M. (1985). Periodicals on computer-mediated communications technologies and their use. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 13, 70-77. Rice, R. E., & Contractor, N. S. (1990). Conceptualizing effects of office information systems: A methodology and application for the study of alpha, beta, and gamma changes. Decision Sciences, 21, 301-317. Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108. Rice, R. E., and Associates. (1984). The new media: Communication, research and technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rice, R. E., Chang, S., & Torobin, J. (1992). Communicator style, media use, organizational level, and use and evaluation of electronic messaging. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 3-33. Rice, R. E., Grant, A. E., Schmitz, J., & Torobin, J. (1990). Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging. Social Networks, 12, 27-55. Rice, R. E., Hughes, D. & Love, G. (1989). Usage and outcomes of electronic messaging at an R&D organization: Situational constraints, job level, and media awareness. Office: Technology and People, 5, 141-161. Rice, R. E., Kraut, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. (1994). Individual, structural, and social influences on use of a new communication medium. In D. P. Moore (Ed.), Academy of Management best papers, proceedings 1994 (pp. 285-289). Madison: Omnipress. Riedel, E., Gangl, A., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M., Sullivan, J. L., & Sullivan, E. (2003). The role of the Internet in national and local news media use. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(3), http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n3/riedel.html. Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communication, and Society, 2, 521-540. Robinson-Stavely, K., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender, and reactions to computers: Studying human-computer interaction in the social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 168-183. Rockart, J. F., & DeLong, D. W. (1988). Executive support systems: The emergence of top management computer use. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin. Rogers, E. M. (1988). Information technologies: How organizations are changing. In G. M. Goldhaber & W. C. Redding (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 437-452). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., Knouse, S. B., Doherty, L. M., Vicino, S. M., Kantor, J., & Greaves, J. (1991). Impression management, candor, and microcomputer-based organizational surveys: An individual differences approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 23-32. Rowland, L. M. (1994). Libraries and librarians on the internet. Communication Education, 43, 143-150. Rubinyi, R. M. (1989). Computers and community: The organizational impact. Journal of Communication, 39, 110-123. Russ, G. S., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communications. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 151-175. Ryan, M. G. (1976). The influence of teleconferencing medium and status on participants' perception of the aestheticism, evaluation, privacy, potency, and activity of the medium. Human Communication Research, 2, 255-261. Ryan, S. M. (1994). Uncle Sam online: Government information on the internet. Communication Education, 43, 151-158. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658. Salomon, G., & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15, 13-19. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 623-637. Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224-251. Sanderson, D. W. (1993). Smileys. Sabastopol, CA: O'Reilly & Associates. Santoro, G. M. (1994). The internet: An overview. Communication Education, 43, 73-86. Saunders, C., & Jones, J. W. (1990). Temporal sequences in information acquisition for decision making: A focus on source and medium. Academy of Management Review, 15, 29-46. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Oesterreich, E. (1999). Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 185-194. Schaefermeyer, M. J., & Sewell, E. H. (1988). Communicating by electronic mail. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 112-123. Scheerhorn, D., Warisse, J., & McNeilis, K. (1995). Computer-based telecommunication among an illness-related community. Health Communication, 7, 301-325. Schmitz, J. F., J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model. Communication Research, 18, pp. Selfe, C. L., & Meyer, P. R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192. Shamp, S. A. (1991). Mechanomorphism in perception of computer communication partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 147-161. Sharda, R., Barr, S. H., & McDonnell, J. C. (1988). Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Science, 34, 139-159. Sherblom, J. (1988). Direction, function, and signature in electronic mail. The Journal of Business Communication, 25, 39-54. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley. Siefert, M., Gerbner, G., & Fisher, J. (1989). The information gap: How computers and other new communication technologies affect the social distribution of power. New York: Oxford University Press. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Mcguire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187. Simon, H. A. (1987). Computers and society. In S. Keisler & L. Sproull (Eds.), Computing and change on campus (pp. 4-15). New York: Cambridge University Press. Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Barrios-Chopilin, J. R. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18, 563-598. Smilowitz, M., Compton, D. C., & Flint, L. (1988). The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 311-321. Smith, C. (1988). The educational value of computer-mediated communications. Media in Education and Development, 21, 169-171. Smith, J. Y., & Vanecek, M. T. (1990). Dispersed group decision making using nonsimultaneous computer conferencing: A report of research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 71-92. Smith, S. A. (1994). Communication and the constitution in cyberspace. Communication Education, 43, 87-101. Smolensky, M. W., Carmody, M. A., & Halcomb, C. G. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure and extraversion on uninhibited speech in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 261-272. Smolensky, M. W., Carmody, M. A., & Halcomb, C. G. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure and extraversions on uninhibited speech in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 261-272. Sof, L. L., & Markus, M. L. (1993). Technological or social utility? Unraveling explanations of email, vmail and fax use. The Information Society, 9, 213-236. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon?: The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Postmes, T. (2001). Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: Social pain or social gain. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 601-623). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Spelt, P. F. (1977). Evaluation of a continuing computer conference on simulation. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9, 87-91. Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The Net as a social technology. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Cultures of the Internet (pp. 35-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social-context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Two-level perspective on electronic mail in organizations. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 125-134. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sproull, L. S. (1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 159-169. Stafford, L., Kline, S. L., & Dimmik, J. (1999). Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 659-669. Steinfield, C. (1992). Computer-mediated communications in organizational settings: Emerging conceptual frameworks and directions for research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 348-365. Steinfield, C. W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 777-804). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Steinfield, C. W. (1990). Computer-mediated communications in the organization: Using electronic mail at Xerox. In B. D. Sypher (Ed.), Case studies in organizational communication (pp. 282-294). New York: Guilford Press. Steinfield, C. W., & Fulk, J. (1987). On the role of theory in research on information technologies in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 479-490. Stodolsky, D. (1981). Automatic mediation in group problem solving. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13, 235-242. Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Apllied Psychology, 79, 87-97. Thompson, P. A., & Foulger, D. A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 225-243. Thomson, R. M., T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 193-208. Thurlow, C., & McKay, S. (2003). Profiling "new" communication technologies in adolescence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 94-103. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 19, 539-573. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19, 539-573. Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., Bodensteiner, W., Gerloff, E. A., & Muir, N. K. (1990). The richness imperative and cognitive style: The role of differences in media choice behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 176-197. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster. Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51, 231-251. Turoff, M. (1990). Foreword. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. ix-xiii). New York: Praeger. Turoff, M. (1991). Computer-mediated communication requirements for group support. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 85-113. Tydeman, J., Lipinski, H., & Spang, S. (1980). An interactive computer-based approach to aid group problem formulating. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16, 311-320. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1), http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting support: The GroupSystems concept. In S. Greenberg (Ed.), Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware (pp. 133-154). London, UK: Academic. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73. Van Gelder, L. V. (1991). The strange case of the electronic lover. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (Eds.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 364-375). Boston: Academic Press. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. Walther, J. B. (1992). A longitudinal experiment on relational tone in computer-mediated and face to face interaction. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1992, 4, 220-231. Walther, J. B. (1992). A longitudinal experiment on relational tone in computer-mediated and face to face interaction. In J. F. Nunamaker & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1992 (Vol. 4, pp. 220-231). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. Walther, J. B. (1993). Construction and validation of a quantitative measure of impression development. Southern Communication Journal, 59, 27-33. Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations. Organization Science, 6, 186-203. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1-43. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369. Walther, J. B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 235-257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88. Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 323-345. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Walther, J. B., & Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105-134. Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F. & Park, D.W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487. Watson, R. T., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478. Watson, R. T., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using GDSS to facilitate group concensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478. Weedman, J. (1991). Task and non-task functions of a computer conference used in professional education: A measure of flexibility. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 303-318. Weeks, G. D., & Chapanis, A. (1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem solving in three telecommunication modes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 879-917. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., and Connolly, T. (1995). Electronic communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151. Whitaker, R. (1994). GDSS' formative fundamentals: An interpretive analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2, 239-260. Whittaker, S., & O'Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision on face-to-face and mediated communication. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 23-49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Williams, E. (1975). Medium or message: Communications medium as a determinant of interpersonal evaluation. Sociometry, 38, 119-130. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976. Williams, F., & Rice, R. E. (1983). Communication research and the new media technologies. In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7 (pp. 200-224). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press. Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 827-833. Wright, K. B. (2000). Social support satisfaction, on-line communication apprehension, and perceived life stress within computer-mediated support groups. Communication Research Reports, 17, 139-147. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: An approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326. Zack, M. H. (1993). Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Information Systems Research, 4, 207-239. Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L. (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644. Zimmerman, D. P. (1987). Effects of computer conferencing on the language use of emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 224-230. Zimmerman, D. P. (1989). Electronic language: A study of word processing by emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in residential treatment. Behavior Research Methods, 21, 181-186.
Edward Lee Lamoureux, Ph. D. Director, Multimedia Program and New Media Center Associate Professor, Speech Communication 1501 W. Bradley Bradley University Peoria IL 61625 309-677-2378 http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~ell http://gcc.bradley.edu/mm/
And in case you don't want to print the whole thing right now, or you want to check in a month or two whether Joe's updated this list, here is the URL to his website (bibliography is linked off his site): http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/jbw29/ Ulla Bunz ---------------------------------------------------- Ulla Bunz Assistant Professor Department of Communication Rutgers University 4 Huntington Street New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Email: bunz@scils.rutgers.edu ----------------------------------------------------
this does not directly answer the question. but a colleague just forwarded this reading list to me . . . thought I'd pass it along From: "Chris R. Kasch" <ckasch@kaschassociates.com> Date: October 30, 2004 6:15:48 PM CDT To: <ell@bradley.edu> Subject: perhaps of interest 471 Things to Read About CMC Joseph B. Walther July, 2004
Dear AIr'ers - Well - I'm not a communications scholar. So I had a difficult time understanding communication generally. This textbook helped me a great deal: Burgoon, J. K., D. B. Buller, et al. (1996/1989) Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. (New York: McGraw-Hill). Nonverbal sounds like a strange option until one realizes that most of what happens on a computer screen is non-spoken. Regarding CMC, Lucy Suchman's book is THE place to start (IMHO). Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). I have also found that much of the CMC material doesn't do justice to HIP - Human Information Processing. While that's a difficult subject, here's my favorite textbook on that: Proctor, R. W. and T. Van Zandt (1994) Human factors in simple and complex systems. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon). Another textbook that I refer to, time and again: Fiske, S. T. and S. E. Taylor (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd Ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill). I know there is an updated edition of the Fiske & Taylor. It was very very helpful on human cognition and covered a lot of ground that I found helpful when looking at CMC later on. This came from our list a while ago, I haven't read it: Wood, A, & Smith, M. (2004, in press). Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity, and Culture - Second Edition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. Cheers, Denise ===== Denise N. Rall, PhD candidate, School of Environ. Science, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW 2480 - Mobile 0438 233 344 Sustainable Forestry Mentoring Coordinator & Internet Researcher http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/rsm/staff/pages/drall/index.html
Hi! Try http://www.chat-bibliography.de/ Bye Steffen --------------------------------------- University of Trier Media Studies D-54286 Trier office: +49(0)651-2012273 mobile: +49(0)176-21204435 online: http://www.medien.uni-trier.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: air-l-aoir.org-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [mailto:air-l-aoir.org-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] Im Auftrag von Dr. Jamie S. Switzer Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. November 2004 20:17 An: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Betreff: [Air-l] CMC Textbook for a Graduate Seminar Does anyone have a recommendation for a good, graduate level textbook for a seminar on CMC? Thanks! You can email me off-list. JS --------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jamie S. Switzer Assistant Professor Department of Journalism and Technical Communication Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1785 970.491.2239 fax 970.491.2908 jamie.switzer@colostate.edu _______________________________________________ The Air-l-aoir.org@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://aoir.org/airjoin.html
I have also been looking for such a textbook for long. I am now studying China's online communities based on BBS and found it was a field of CMC, yet which is rarely introduced to China. Thanks and Look forward.. Maria Hu Xianhong Doctoral Student School of Journalism and Communication Peking Univeristy, Beijing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Jamie S. Switzer" <jamie.switzer@colostate.edu> To: <air-l@listserv.aoir.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:17 AM Subject: [Air-l] CMC Textbook for a Graduate Seminar Does anyone have a recommendation for a good, graduate level textbook for a seminar on CMC? Thanks! You can email me off-list. JS --------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jamie S. Switzer Assistant Professor Department of Journalism and Technical Communication Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1785 970.491.2239 fax 970.491.2908 jamie.switzer@colostate.edu _______________________________________________ The Air-l-aoir.org@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://aoir.org/airjoin.html
participants (7)
-
Denise N. Rall -
Dr. Jamie S. Switzer -
Ed Lamoureux -
Karim R. Lakhani -
Steffen Bueffel -
Ulla Bunz -
Xianhong Hu