RE: [Air-l] Using Online Citations to Defunct Web Sites
John White wrote:
This raises a host of interesting copyright questions. Archiving a website for research purposes is probably not a violation. Redistributing reprints of it, without the original author's/poster's permission, is. Mirroring it locally, without permission, is. In this day and age, even "deep linking" can be considered copyright infringement.
What is "deep linking" and how can it be considered copyright infringement? ~Jenny Stromer-Galley
This case was actually decided in one of the auction houses I think, Ebay? I'd have to look. But deep linking is providing a link from your page, to a page several layers deep in someone elses website. For example, to download adobe acrobate reader, adobe quite naturally wants to get some information from the user. Lets say that I want my visitors to use adobe, but not to plow through five+ pages of questions and advertisements, so I figure out a way to link directly to the file download (copy the meta-refresh or something similar). This is an example of a deep link. I've circumvented the planned navigation of the website and altered their product in the process. Does that help? --JW Jennifer Stromer-Galley wrote:
John White wrote:
This raises a host of interesting copyright questions. Archiving a website for research purposes is probably not a violation. Redistributing reprints of it, without the original author's/poster's permission, is. Mirroring it locally, without permission, is. In this day and age, even "deep linking" can be considered copyright infringement.
What is "deep linking" and how can it be considered copyright infringement?
~Jenny Stromer-Galley
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
Actually, it was a case involving TicketMaster, I believe. Someone was linking to internal pages for tickets and TicketMaster was annoyed because users were then bypassing ads on the front page, and those ads weren't getting the eyeballs that TicketMaster had suggested to the advertisers that they would get. --Amanda Lenhart Pew Internet & American Life Project At 03:19 PM 2/15/2002 -0600, you wrote:
This case was actually decided in one of the auction houses I think, Ebay? I'd have to look. But deep linking is providing a link from your page, to a page several layers deep in someone elses website.
For example, to download adobe acrobate reader, adobe quite naturally wants to get some information from the user. Lets say that I want my visitors to use adobe, but not to plow through five+ pages of questions and advertisements, so I figure out a way to link directly to the file download (copy the meta-refresh or something similar). This is an example of a deep link. I've circumvented the planned navigation of the website and altered their product in the process.
Does that help?
--JW
Jennifer Stromer-Galley wrote:
John White wrote:
This raises a host of interesting copyright questions. Archiving a website for research purposes is probably not a violation. Redistributing reprints of it, without the original author's/poster's permission, is. Mirroring it locally, without permission, is. In this day and age, even "deep linking" can be considered copyright infringement.
What is "deep linking" and how can it be considered copyright infringement?
~Jenny Stromer-Galley
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
Correct. Ebay was an earlier case. :) A google search turned up the following: http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Law/Legal_Information/Computer_and_T... Where found this site of international linking articles and cases: http://www.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~s-bes1/lcp.html Enjoy! --JW Amanda Lenhart wrote:
Actually, it was a case involving TicketMaster, I believe. Someone was linking to internal pages for tickets and TicketMaster was annoyed because users were then bypassing ads on the front page, and those ads weren't getting the eyeballs that TicketMaster had suggested to the advertisers that they would get.
--Amanda Lenhart Pew Internet & American Life Project
participants (3)
-
Amanda Lenhart -
Jennifer Stromer-Galley -
John B. White