the choice it seems to me is between maintaining your independent archive or relying on existing archives. I would do the latter, but I do know what I use to do the former(because other people have projects that I advised them about). I use the capture facility in adobe acrobat 4+ it captures the visual image, the links, etc, which you can then export the whole site to postscript. once it is in a standard language like postscript you are very safe for preserving it in the future on your own machine. However, any time that you do save something, it is important to also save something that can read it. There are for instance huge sections of netart that are very hard to access now because they were written in hypercard, there are files written in obscure wordprocessors that we will probably never be able to access again because most of the knowledge to read it has passed on. Bunz, Ulla K wrote:
Ken Friedman brings up an important, related issue to giving reference to online citations (first posted by Ed Lamoureux). What if the website itself IS the object of inquiry?
I am just now finishing up research that investigated nine entire websites (not pages). I cannot possibly be required to print out every page in these sites in case someone wants to look at it 10, 20, 50 years from now, can I?
As part of my research process and methodology, I downloaded the websites using WebCopier, and uploaded them on a local server. I did this more to prevent the sites from changing throughout the research process than to save them into all eternity. So, theoretically, I could point people to my local server address and ask them to look at the sites there (at least until I change university affiliation this summer, and who knows whether I'll "pack" these digital belongings and take them with me). And the original sites may have changed since I downloaded them! By definition, websites are dynamic documents. A screen shot or printout is just a momentary, Polaroid-like memorabilia. And in a way, so are my downloaded sites.
If quoting text or a paragraph from an online document, I would strongly support Joe Walther's viewpoint (paraphrased) - to provide up-to-date specific reference, if at all possible. But if we're talking about whole pages or sites - I honestly don't know.
Once I figure it out, I'll write a book and make big bucks from it ;) ulla ************************* Ulla K. Bunz University of Kansas 102 Bailey Lawrence, KS 66045 785-864-1160 ulla@ukans.edu *************************
-----Original Message----- From: jeremy hunsinger [] Subject: Re: [Air-l] Using Online Citations to Defunct Web Sites
Ken Friedman wrote:
When the Web site itself is the object of inquiry, I print out images of the relevant pages.
while this is a tactic that one can use, I think it really is a waste of resources to a great extent. I do not support the effort of making personal copies of everything on the web that people use or cite. Memory is cheap, that is true, effort is not, parsing data and knowledge is not, etc. I'd much prefer to rely on large archives, and if something disappears, as things do, books disappear and so do articles, they get lost, they will either reappear eventually somewhere or they will be traces of what was. [snip]
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
-- jeremy hunsinger http://www.cddc.vt.edu/jeremy cddc/political science http://www.cddc.vt.edu 526 major williams hall 0130 http://www.dromocracy.com virginia tech -under construction blacksburg, va 24061 540-231-7614