Call For Submissions
Symbolic Interaction, a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly by the
University of California Press and the Society for the Study of Symbolic
Interaction, invites submissions for a special issue dedicated to the
application of symbolic interactionism to internet research.
Erving Goffman's concept of "the presentation of self" has become
foundational to much scholarly understanding of online identity in chat,
email, game environments, blogs, and social networks. Yet other aspects
of the rich tradition of symbolic interaction -- including other
concepts developed by Goffman -- have been largely ignored by internet
researchers.
For this special issue, we welcome a broad range of approaches to
studying computer-mediated interactions between individuals and within
communities online, that utilize other lines of thought by Goffman, or
the works of George H. Mead, Charles Cooley, Herbert Blumer, James
Carey, Carl Couch, Norman Denzin or other theorists in the
interactionist tradition. Definitions of the social situation,
negotiation of meanings, social processes, framing, and other
interactionist principles are possible theoretical foundations.
Qualitative studies will be privileged in the evaluation of submissions,
as well as those reflecting recent theoretical developments in symbolic
interaction theory. Topics may include online communities, virtual
environments, games, social networking sites and any other forms of
computer-mediated communication.
Papers that are supplemented by online materials are encouraged, and
space will be made available on the journal’s website
(http://is.gd/gQ4Z) for authors to place links, examples, illustrations,
or further discussion of the published texts.
Please send submissions electronically to mjohns(a)luther.edu Deadline
for submissions is August 1, 2009.
Denise N. Rall, PhD. Special Projects, Faculty of Arts & Science, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW 2480 AUSTRALIA
Mobile +(61) (0)438 233 344 http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/staff/pages/drall/
Join the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
Internet Research 10.0, October 7-11, Milwaukee, WI, USA
No offense taken from anyone! I've never had so much interest generated in e-research, and perhaps e-scholarship or digital scholarship.
I have just reviewed for RCCS, I think it will be posted soon, Christine Borgman's Digital Scholarship (2007, MIT Press) and I found similar problems with her definitions there.
We may all be very erudite, in generating definitions that are the most useful for us as scholars. In this case, I am an internet scholar, but a really lousey internet researcher or e-researcher as I do have more interest in how knowledge is derived rather than how it appears to be derived through online or e-research based methodologies.
Let me just give one paragraph from my review of Borgman (2007) that may or may not make it through the editor's knife:
Christine L. Borgman
Scholarship in the Digital Age (2007)
Cambridge MA: MIT Press
336 pp.; includes bibliography and indices
Christine Borgman's scholarly exercise of “databasing the world”
by Denise N. Rall
Summary: The scholarly exercise of “databasing the world” (Borgman, citing Bowker, 2005) is a daunting task which Christine L. Borgman addresses with care in her text, Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure and the Internet. For, the construction of a useful and universal archive for scholarly activity and achievement cannot rest on the voluntary contributions of individuals, as she aptly states, “the incentives are too low and the barriers too high” (2007:225). She details the project – the construction of an e-Research infrastructure that must serve scholars, researchers, governmental requirements, libraries, museums and other archival bodies in the sciences, social sciences and humanities – with appropriate and detailed references. Her literature includes the familiar classics (from authors such as Crane, Latour & Woolgar, Hughes, Merton, de Sola Price) as well as recent contributions (from authors such as Bowker,
Hine, Star, Nentwich, Thelwall and Wouters, among others). She makes excellent use of Michael Nentwich’s Cyberscience (2003) throughout. While important scholars in new media are omitted, the information science side of the literature is thoroughly represented. Overall, the book is a valuable resource to anyone with an interest in the significance of e-Research infrastructures in both academe and within the community at large, with an emphasis on the necessity of appropriate policies and economic models to identify, maintain, and archive the ‘value chain’ of scholarly work.
a closing note from the review:
As mentioned above, the book is a valuable resource to anyone with an interest in the significance of e-Research infrastructures in both academe and within the community at large, with an emphasis on the necessity of appropriate policies and economic models to identify and maintain the ‘value chain’ of scholarly work. It is a rare commodity – a book both brief and thorough. The only drawback for me was a slightly skewed point of view. For example, Borgman states: “Scientists want e-Research infrastructure in order to do science” (2007:201, emphasis added) and continues that social scientists want e-Research to do social science, but they also want to interact with framework of knowledge that infrastructure holds in place. In my opinion, these confident assertions seem misplaced. Some scientists might want infrastructure, but many only tolerate the information requirements of their profession, and some despise the reporting aspects of their
research. Scientists generally are interested in solving particular problems, not trolling through databases, and sometimes the literature review is delegated to students."
Ok, perhaps too much on the subject, but there are critical differences between those who want to understand internet-based knowledge, its generation and its assumptions, those who would like to frame the approaches, and those who use it as a platform for research.
Cheers, Denise
--- On Sun, 31/5/09, Robert Ackland <robert.ackland(a)anu.edu.au> wrote:
> From: Robert Ackland <robert.ackland(a)anu.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] AoIR in Second Life - Scholar vs. researcher
> To: "Jankowski" <nickjan(a)xs4all.nl>
> Cc: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org
> Received: Sunday, 31 May, 2009, 12:27 PM
> Nick,
>
> Thanks for your comment. I've also received some very
> useful comments off-list
>
> I should apologise to Marj Kibby and Denise N. Rall for
> jumping on this thread, which was initially unrelated to
Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG…
Dear all
I am pleased to announce that AoIR has now commenced the process of electing
a new Executive Committee to take office in October of this year to serve
until October 2011. We are seeking members' interest in nominating for the
new executive and providing notice for everyone of the voting timeline and
procedures.
Here is an overview of the election timeline, procedures and positions for
nomination, as determined strictly by the Association's by-laws. Voting
instructions will be provided later and separately.
**Please note the different timing for officers and other positions**
TIME FRAME OF THE ELECTION:
1. Call for Nominations: opens June 8, 2009
2. Nominations close for the 4 officer positions: July 15, 2009
Nominations close for the 1 grad student and 3 open seats on the
executive: July 30, 2009
3. Ballot sent to members August 7, 2009
4. Voting begins: August 10, 2009
(Ballot-counter to be announced by 1. August, 2009)
5. Voting ends for 4 officer positions: August 24, 2009
Voting ends for 1 grad student and 3 open seats: September 7, 2009
The new committee is formally announced and assumes its duties at the end of
the Annual General Meeting during the AoIR conference, 7-11 October 2009.
(Specific time of the AGM to be announced soon.)
During the period of voting, a forum will be available for discussion with
candidates. Candidates' statements will also be made available with the
ballot sent to members.
A QUICK ORGANIZATIONAL PRIMER:
The organizational structure of AoIR is simple. There are 4 officers, 3
open seat representatives, 1 graduate student representative and 2 appointed
positions who together with the Immediate Past President make up the
11-member executive committee that runs the show. Elected officials hold
their positions for two years. In this election, you are invited to nominate
yourself or anyone else whom you think would do a good job, for any
position other than the President - the current Vice President assumes the
Presidency.
Here are brief descriptions of positions
1. President: the "CEO", supervises the organization, performs certain
legally required duties. [The Current VP becomes the President]
2. Vice President: "back up" for President, various duties as they arise;
*becomes President after 2 years*
3. Secretary: Handles records and membership matters.
4. Treasurer: liaises with Secretary to maintain membership records; takes
care of financial and related administrative duties (e.g., annual report to
membership and U.S. tax authorities), including close attention to the
annual Internet Research (IR) conference budget.
5. Graduate Student Representative: responsible for running graduate
student activities (must be a grad student, but all can vote)
6-8. Open Committee Seats: Three open Seats on the Executive Committee
Represent membership of AoIR, contribute to decision making. Take
responsibility for specific projects or activities to promote the
association within their term.
9-10. Appointed positions to manage systems and email lists
11. Immediate Past President
Candidates should also familiarise themselves formal statement of duties
and responsibilities in the Association's by-laws:
<http://aoir.org/?page_id=10>
NOMINATIONS AND ELECTION PROCESSES
Only a member of AoIR can run for a position, nominated by anyone. If
nominated for more than one position a nominee must choose to run for one
(and only one) position in this election. You may nominate yourself or
another person (or people).
Self Nominations: Email AoIR Secretary Sabryna Cornish <sabrynac(a)niu.edu>
and indicate the position for which you are nominating and you will be added
to the list of nominees. Please provide, in your nomination email a short
candidate statement addressing the questions below.
Nominating Others: Email AoIR Secretary Sabryna Cornish <sabrynac(a)niu.edu>
with the name of the person you want to nominate, the position for which you
are nominating this person, contact information for that person, and an
indication of whether you know if this person would accept this nomination
(if you don't know, we'll contact them and ask).
All candidates for election will be required to provide answers to the
questions listed at the end of this email, have the answers posted to the
AoIR election forum website, and participate in an online candidate forum.
In addition the Graduate Student candidates must confirm in their response
that they comply with the by-laws: the Graduate Student Representative must
be actively enrolled in a degree program at the time of nomination and
election and intends to be enrolled for the coming northern academic year
(defined to be September 2009-June 2010)
The voting system used by AoIR is one vote per member for each of the seven
positions for election listed above. Votes are counted by a ballot counter
who is a member of the Association but not a member of the executive. In the
case of the four officers, the candidate with the highest number of votes
shall be declared the winner; in the case of the open seats, the three
candidates with the highest, second-highest and third highest votes shall be
declared the winners of the open seats. In the case of the Graduate Student
representative, the candidate with the highest number of votes shall be
declared the winner
In the case of tied results for the officer positions, the winner shall be
determined by the ballot counter, by drawing of lots, using a method that
ensures each of the tying candidates has an equal chance of success and
witnessed by at least 1 person independent of the association. In the case
of tied results for the open seat positions, the drawing of lots shall be
used only when there are more tied candidates than seats available.
QUESTIONS FOR CANDIDATES
1) What is your interest in this position?
2) What are your qualifications for this position (including prior
experience and participation in AoIR)?
3) What are two or three short-term goals you would like to achieve through
membership of the executive (include a rationale for each and how you would
contribute to their achievement)?
4) What is your long-term vision for AoIR?
5) What else should voters consider when deciding whether or not to vote
for you?
In answering the questions, please be concise and give information specific
to the position for which you are nominating and which will permit voters to
assess your case for election to that position.
In closing - please consider carefully contributing your time and energy to
making AoIR even better in the upcoming years!
I would also encourage persons interested in running for a specific position
to contact the current office-holder(s) with any specific questions, etc.
Looking forward to it! Many thanks in advance to all who will consider
running and serving AoIR in this way.
- charles ess
Distinguished Research Professor, Interdisciplinary Studies
Drury University, Springfield, Missouri 65802 USA
Professor MSO (med særlige opgaver),
Department of Information and Media Studies
Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
President, Association of Internet Researchers
Co-editor, International Journal of Internet Research Ethics
<http://ijire.net/>
Co-chair, CATaC conferences <www.catacconference.org>
Exemplary persons seek harmony, not sameness. -- Analects 13.23
