February 2012 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

CfP: ICTs and the Structural Transformation of the Private Sphere
by Charles Ess 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Dear AoIRists - sent on behalf of our colleagues Fortunati and Bakardjieva - Call for papers: Special Issue of the European Journal of Cultural Studies ICTs and the Structural Transformation of the Private Sphere Edited by Maria Bakardjieva and Leopoldina Fortunati Dear Colleagues, The European Journal of Cultural Studies has expressed interest in publishing a special issue on the above topic. We invite scholars who conduct research in the area of new media in the private sphere and are interested in the questions we pose in our proposal to contribute original papers. Our goal is to have international diversity of contributions and hence experiences, sensitivities and conceptual perspectives. All submitted papers will undergo double-blind peer review. The deadline for submission of the completed papers is July 1, 2012. Please let us know if you have any questions. Feel free to send us your papers whenever you have them completed. Maria Bakardjieva (bakardji(a)ucalgary.ca)and Leopoldina Fortunati (fortunati.deluca(a)tin.it) ICTs and the Structural Transformation of the Private Sphere The objective of this special issue is to pick up the examination of ICTs in private spaces where domestication theory and research left off (Silverstone et al., 1992, Silverstone, 1994, Berker et al, 2006). The domestication perspective has enabled researchers to account for the active role of users in making sense of and appropriating new communication devices. The next step, in our view, is to ask what happens to the domesticators once the domesticated technologies have become deeply and intimately incorporated and inscribed into the spaces and rhythms of their daily lives. Do activities, relationships and roles in the household remain fundamentally the same, or may be some cultural and even civilizational changes take hold? Does the private sphere retain its basic structure, or does it undergo a significant re-configuration? Our main interest in this issue, then, would be to explore the transformations occurring in the private sphere as a result of the widespread use of ICTs. Sociological theory has considered the private sphere as typically exemplified by home life and family relationships as well as the very notions of the private that members of a culture share such as the proverbial bubble of personal space and the fuzzy, but nontheless persistent set of experiences individuals consider exclusively their own. Communication research, for its part, has shown how different media have systematically punctured and eroded the already porous boundary delineating the private sphere: from the startling ring of the telephone and the ensuing moral panic at the realization that any stranger could potentially disrupt the peace and quiet of the home to the intricate reconfiguration of the family?s routines and its members? relationships with the outside world that television brought about. The current generation of ITCs has carried that erosion further to the extent that the very idea of the private sphere has become problematic and almost untenable. The honoured abode of private life, the home, has been penetrated by gadgets and practices that decimate its introvert and intimate activities. At the same time fragments and instances of private life have broken out of the fragile boundaries of the home and have profusely populated the public world with the assistance of mobile devices. But if this is so, then how are some of the essential and defining functions of the private sphere being reconfigured and outsourced in the new media age? How, where and by whom is intimacy established as a central humanizing condition? How, where and by whom is the emotional nurturing of the human being and its moral education performed? How are human bodies and identities created and reproduced, if the primordial role of the family and the order of home space are being disrupted? Thus, the structural transformation of the private sphere poses also the question of the division of domestic labor and the personal and social position of women. Feminist research has already demonstrated that the appropriation and practices of use of ICTs have become a terrain of feminine initiative, creativity and social change. What has the influx of ICTs meant for women?s traditional responsibilities and the material and immaterial work they do in the household? Have women been able to appropriate new media technologies in ways consistent with their current role as mothers and ?handlers? of extended family networks? Or have they been swept away by the flood of new voices, enticements and imperatives channeled by ICTs? Have women been able to use ICTs for re-negotiating of their traditional roles and changing them? Have ICTs created ?more work for mother? (Cowan, 1983) and, if so, what kind of work is it? The private sphere, it can be argued, has been challenged by the market and, more broadly, by the economic system, on the one hand, and the public and semi-public world, on the other. It has been effectively taken over by interactions of commercial, ideological and sociable nature to the extent that its defining rituals ? the family dinner, the morning ?goodbye? kiss, the Sunday outing or game ? have been washed away by diversions that have drawn family members apart into their own individual enclaves of interest and sociability. Furthermore, the primary and most characteristic mode of communication among family members ? the immediate face-to-face and body-to-body encounter ? has been eclipsed by mediated exchanges such as the e-mail message or Skype call from one bedroom to another, or the texted announcement of coming back late tonight. The key function of the private sphere in reproducing and nurturing human bodies has been even more undervalued in a culture where disembodied activities and interactions have become the venerable norm. The economic system, for its part, has not stopped at radio jingles and television ads, but has brought the shopping mall into the heart of the living room and has injected commercial appeal into the most personal pursuits and intimate friendly interactions. It has reached for the place of the ultimate moral and cultural authority that shapes identity. Even more profoundly, it has devised techniques for extracting economic value from the affective labour of ICT users carried out within private spaces and times in an unprecedented volume and intensity (Terranova, 2004). This special issue will cast light on these developments through theoretically informed empirical studies that will cover a broad spectrum of issues and experiences related to the transformation of the private sphere across a variety of national contexts. We are hoping to be able to put together a diverse and yet conceptually consistent collection of contributions that trace the structural transformation of the private sphere in rich empirical detail and imaginatively consider its social and cultural implications. References: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K., eds., (2006). Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press, pp. 80-102. Cowan, R. (1983) More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books. Silverstone, R. (1994) Television and everyday life. London and New York: Routledge. Silverstone, R.; Hirsch, E., and Morley, D. (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In Roger Silverstone and Eric Hirsch (eds), Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 15?31). London: Routledge. Terranova, T. 2004. Network culture: Politics for the information age. London, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press. ========================================================================== Format of mss: Each manuscript should contain: (i) title page with full title and subtitle (if any). For the purposes of blind refereeing, full name of each author with current affiliation and full address/phone/fax/email details plus short biographical note should be supplied on a separate sheet. Owing to the broad range of subject matter, authors are encouraged to supply the names of one or more potential referees with full address information included. (ii) abstract of 100-150 words (iii) up to 10 key words (iv) main text and word count -- suggested target is about 7000 words (including notes and references). Text to be clearly organized, with a clear hierarchy of headings and subheadings and quotations exceeding 40 words displayed, indented, in the text (v) end notes, if necessary, should be signalled by superscript numbers in the main text and listed at the end of the text before the references (vi) references should follow Harvard style, i.e. references are cited in the text by author and date with a full alphabetical listing at the end of the article. Articles in journals: Chen, K.H. (1996) 'Not Yet the Postcolonial Era', Cultural Studies 10(1): 37&BAD:ndash;70. Articles in books: Morris, M. (1988) The Pirate's Fiancée: Feminism Reading Postmodernism. London: Verso. Articles in edited books: Schudson, M. (1991) 'The Sociology of News Production Revisited', in J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds) Mass Media and Society, pp. 141&BAD:ndash;59. London: Arnold. Unpublished articles: Van Zoonen, L. (1996) 'One of the Girls? Or the Incipient Feminization of Journalism?', keynote address to the Norwegian Research Council, Oslo. Tables: tables should be typed (double line-spaced) on separate sheets and their position indicated by a marginal note in the text. All tables should have short descriptive captions with footnotes and their source(s) typed below the tables. Illustrations: all line diagrams and photographs are termed 'Figures' and should be referred to as such in the manuscript. They should be numbered consecutively. Line diagrams should be presented in a form suitable for immediate reproduction (i.e. not requiring redrawing), each on a separate A4 sheet. They should be reproducible to a final printed text area of 115 mm x 185 mm. Photographs should preferably be submitted as clear, glossy, unmounted black and white prints with a good range of contrast. All figures should have short descriptive captions typed on a separate sheet. AUTHORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMISSIONS FROM COPYRIGHT HOLDERS for reproducing through any medium of communication any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. Style: use a clear readable style, avoiding jargon. If technical terms or acronyms must be included, define them when first used. Use non-racist, non-sexist language and plurals rather than he/she. Spellings: UK or US spellings may be used with `-ize' spellings as given in the Oxford English Dictionary (e.g. organize, recognize). Punctuation: use single quotation marks with double quotes inside single quotes. Present dates in the form 1 May 1998. Do not use points in abbreviations, contractions or acronyms (e.g. AD, USA, Dr, PhD). Disks: on acceptance of your manuscript for publication, you will be asked to supply a diskette (preferably PC-compatible) of the final version. Proofs and offprints: authors will receive proofs of their articles and be asked to send corrections to SAGE within 3 weeks. They will receive a complimentary copy of the journal and 25 offprints of their article. Reviewers receive 5 offprints.

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Difference between social network analysis and analysisof social networks
by Norman Pena 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Thanks for the notes and resources shared. 1) There is something interesting in Hansen etc book on page 34 which speaks of vertices: "Often they represent people or social structures... At other times they represent content such as web pages, keyword tags or videos." The research I am actually doing involves more the keyword tag categories rather than people (whose identity as declared especially in YouTube is a bit fluid). Have you had experience in an analysis of social media network with content key word tag as vertices? 2) While it is possible to speak of difference between SNA and analysis of social network, is there a possiblity of convergence for them too. What would be the common elements in this convergence if at all it is possible? Thanks again. Norman -------------------------------------------------- From: "Márcio Carneiro" <slz38545(a)terra.com.br> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:56 PM To: "Simone Gabbriellini" <simone.gabbriellini(a)gmail.com>; "Norman Pena" <norman.pena(a)paulus.net> Cc: <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Difference between social network analysis and analysisof social networks > Norman > > About the beginning of SNA you can take a look in Hansen,Shneiderman and > Smith - Analyzing Social Media Networks with Node XL . According them, > the social science roots of SNA can be found in the 1800s in Comte and > Simmels 's work . But the core concepts and methods of modern SNA date > from the 1930s with the work of Jacob Moreno. ( See "Moreno, J.L. (1934) . > Who shall survive ?" - Its an analysis of relationships among members of a > football team.) > > Márcio Carneiro > DCS/UFMA and TIDD-PUC/SP > > -----Mensagem Original----- > From: Simone Gabbriellini > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:18 AM > To: Norman Pena > Cc: <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Difference between social network analysis and > analysisof social networks > > dear Norman, > > one temptative answer: analysis of social networks often stands for > analysis of ONLINE social network. social network analysis (SNA) does not > limit itself to online networs. SNA conceives its object as made by nodes > and links and use graph and maths tecniques to describe or model such > networks of nodes and links. > > analysis of social networks does not limit itself to SNA as the only tool > to understand its object, it could include data mining, traditional > statistics... of course, if you model your online social network as a > graph with nodes (users) and links (friendship) and you calculate > centrality measures on it, then you are doing SNA inside your analysis of > the social network. > > HTH, > Simone Gabbriellini > > Sent from my iPhone > > > Il giorno 27/feb/2012, alle ore 14:00, "Norman Pena" > <norman.pena(a)paulus.net> ha scritto: > >> Dear AIR list members, >> >> I would really appreciate help in finding additional referenced dealing >> with the differences and/or converegence betweek social network analysis >> and analysis of social networks. One such reference could be the work >> published in 2008 by psychologists Cheryl _Coyl and Heather Vaughn >> "Social Networking: Communication Revolution or Evolution?" wherein they >> confirmed, "social networking was not created in the age of the internet >> but existed even before". >> >> Thank you. >> >> Norman Pena >> Doctoral candidate, Pontifical Salesian University >> Rome, Italy >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/

1 0

archiving past tweets
by Burns, Kelli 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

I have been using Martin Hawksey's Google spreadsheets to archive tweets. It only collects 1,500 at a time, but you could run several to collect all your tweets. Kelli Burns, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of South Florida ________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces(a)listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces(a)listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org [air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 6:00 PM To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org Subject: Air-L Digest, Vol 91, Issue 27 Send Air-L mailing list submissions to air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org You can reach the person managing the list at air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." Today's Topics: 1. FINAL REMINDER: 1 MARCH DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION TO IR 13.0 TECHNOLOGIES (Attwood, Feona) 2. Archiving Past Tweets (Kurniawan Saputro) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:56:59 +0000 From: "Attwood, Feona" <F.Attwood(a)shu.ac.uk> To: aoir <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> Subject: [Air-L] FINAL REMINDER: 1 MARCH DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION TO IR 13.0 TECHNOLOGIES Message-ID: <CB71907C.140F8%scsfa(a)exchange.shu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Internet Research 13.0: Technologies The 13th Annual International and Interdisciplinary Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) October 18-21, 2012 MediaCity:UK - University of Salford Salford - Greater Manchester - UK http://ir13.aoir.org<http://ir13.aoir.org/> Submission here: https://www.conftool.com/aoir-ir13/ Internet Research 13.0 will focus on the theme of technologies, understood in the broadest sense as crafts, techniques, and systems. The conference will examine the place of the Internet in the contemporary world and in relation to a range of existing and emerging technologies, considering its impact in a context where life is entangled with technologies of all kinds as never before. The conference will bring together scholars, researchers, students and practitioners from many disciplines to map and situate the development of the Internet as part of the history of human technology. To this end, we call for papers, panel and pre-conference workshop proposals from any discipline, methodology, community or a combination of them that address the conference themes, including, but not limited to, papers that intersect and/or interconnect with the following: * the speed and acceleration of technological change * the past, present and future of technology * emerging and converging technologies * educational technology * cultures of crafting * connectivity and access * space, location and mobile technologies * technology, networks and attachments * technology and the body * technologies of the self * technology, regulation and ethics Sessions at the conference will be established that specifically address the conference themes, and we welcome innovative, exciting, and unexpected takes on those themes. We also welcome submissions on topics that address social, cultural, political, legal, aesthetic, economic, and/or philosophical aspects of the internet beyond the conference themes. In all cases, we welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary submissions as well as international collaborations from both AoIR and non-AoIR members. SUBMISSIONS We seek proposals for several different kinds of contributions. As in the past, we welcome proposals for traditional academic conference PAPERS, organized PANEL PROPOSALS that present a coherent group of papers on a single theme, as well as PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS which focus on a particular topic. We also invite proposals that will focus on discussion and interaction among conference delegates. A common form of this type is the ROUNDTABLE SESSION, but we would also like to encourage other formats, such as OPEN FISHBOWL SESSIONS. (See the Wikipedia entry under ?Fishbowl (conversation)? for a description of this format. Fishbowl sessions should cover broad topics of interest to a wide segment of the AoIR community.) Finally, we invite short 5-minute talks on topics of interest to the community as part of our Ignite-IR panels. Please see below for more information on this format. DEADLINES Submissions Due: 1 March 2012 (Papers, Panels and Pre-Workshops. Details below.) NOTE: The submission deadline is a HARD DEADLINE; there will be NO extensions to this date. Notification: 1 May 2012 Full Papers Submissions Due for inclusion in Selected Papers of IR: 1 July 2012 Ignite-IR Final Proposal Deadline: 1 August 2012 Ignite-IR Slides Due: 15 September 2012 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All papers and presentations will be evaluated in a standard blind peer review. PAPERS (individual or multi-author) ? submit abstract of 600-800 words PANEL PROPOSALS ? submit a description of 600-800 words on the panel theme, plus a 250-500 word abstract for each paper or presentation. The panel organizer must assemble these materials for submission ROUNDTABLE and FISHBOWL PROPOSALS ? submit a statement indicating the nature of the discussion and form of interaction, and listing initial participants. (In the case of a fishbowl proposal, this will include the name of the moderator, and the names of the first four speakers for the fishbowl.) PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS ? please submit all workshop proposals via email to attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org>. Workshop proposals should include names of presenters and a 1,000-word description. IGNITE-IR ? please submit a one-paragraph abstract and other information. Details at http://ir13.aoir.org/ignite-ir Papers, presentations and panels will be selected from the submitted proposals on the basis of multiple blind peer review, coordinated and overseen by the Program Chair. Each individual may present only one paper during the conference, though they may be listed as a co-author on multiple papers. In addition to this one presentation, they may also appear on a panel, roundtable, or performance. The exception is the Ignite-IR lightening talk, which may be in addition to any other presentations. PUBLICATION OF PAPERS Full papers submitted by the 1 July 2012 deadline will undergo review to be published in an open-access, online collection, Selected Papers of Internet Research (ISSN 2162-3317). A template and guidelines for preparing your final paper are available on the conference website (http://ir13.aoir.org/papers) Selected papers from the conference will alternatively be published in a special issue of the journal Information, Communication & Society. Authors selected for submission for this issue will be contacted prior to the conference. PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS On 18 October 2012, there will be a limited number of pre-conference workshops and symposia that will provide participants with in-depth, hands-on and/or creative opportunities. We invite proposals for these pre-conference workshops. Local presenters are encouraged to propose workshops that will invite visiting researchers into their labs or studios or locales. Proposals should be no more than 1,000 words, and should clearly outline the purpose, methodology, structure, costs, equipment and minimal attendance required, as well as explaining its relevance to the conference as a whole. Proposals will be accepted if they demonstrate that the workshop will add significantly to the overall program in terms of thematic depth, hands on experience, or local opportunities for scholarly or artistic connections. These proposals and all inquiries regarding pre-conference proposals should be submitted as soon as possible to the program chair (attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org>) and no later than 1 March 2012. IGNITE-IR For the second year, the Internet Research conference will offer the opportunity to present short, five minute talks in rapid succession. Presenters provide a deck of twenty slides, which will auto-advance each fifteen seconds. Details on the session maybe found at the conference website. Because talks are intended to be of the moment, the submission deadline is much later than for papers: 1 August 2012. CONTACT INFORMATION Program Chair: Feona Attwood, Communication, Sheffield Hallam University, UK, email attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org> Local Conference Chair: Ben Light, School of Media, Music, and Performance, University of Salford, email: light(a)aoir.org<mailto:light@aoir.org> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:01:03 -0800 (PST) From: Kurniawan Saputro <kurniawansaputro(a)yahoo.com> To: "air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> Subject: [Air-L] Archiving Past Tweets Message-ID: <1330376463.47293.YahooMailNeo(a)web38908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear internet researchers, As part of my research on public's communication during a crisis response, I have been looking for ways to archive past tweets of a public twitter account. Up until now, I have not seen any satisfactory ways to do it. It is always partial, whereas the accounts I want to archive have more than 10.000 posts. I wonder if anyone of you would be so kind to tell me how to do it or show me a software/application to do it. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thank you very much. Regards, Kurniawan Saputro Phd student - Sheffield Hallam University ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ End of Air-L Digest, Vol 91, Issue 27 *************************************

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Seeking references to philosophical perspective on digital culture and social media
by Carmel Vaisman 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Thank you for all your on and off list recommendations. Carmel.

1 0

FINAL REMINDER: 1 MARCH DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION TO IR 13.0 TECHNOLOGIES
by Attwood, Feona 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

Internet Research 13.0: Technologies The 13th Annual International and Interdisciplinary Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) October 18-21, 2012 MediaCity:UK - University of Salford Salford - Greater Manchester - UK http://ir13.aoir.org<http://ir13.aoir.org/> Submission here: https://www.conftool.com/aoir-ir13/ Internet Research 13.0 will focus on the theme of technologies, understood in the broadest sense as crafts, techniques, and systems. The conference will examine the place of the Internet in the contemporary world and in relation to a range of existing and emerging technologies, considering its impact in a context where life is entangled with technologies of all kinds as never before. The conference will bring together scholars, researchers, students and practitioners from many disciplines to map and situate the development of the Internet as part of the history of human technology. To this end, we call for papers, panel and pre-conference workshop proposals from any discipline, methodology, community or a combination of them that address the conference themes, including, but not limited to, papers that intersect and/or interconnect with the following: * the speed and acceleration of technological change * the past, present and future of technology * emerging and converging technologies * educational technology * cultures of crafting * connectivity and access * space, location and mobile technologies * technology, networks and attachments * technology and the body * technologies of the self * technology, regulation and ethics Sessions at the conference will be established that specifically address the conference themes, and we welcome innovative, exciting, and unexpected takes on those themes. We also welcome submissions on topics that address social, cultural, political, legal, aesthetic, economic, and/or philosophical aspects of the internet beyond the conference themes. In all cases, we welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary submissions as well as international collaborations from both AoIR and non-AoIR members. SUBMISSIONS We seek proposals for several different kinds of contributions. As in the past, we welcome proposals for traditional academic conference PAPERS, organized PANEL PROPOSALS that present a coherent group of papers on a single theme, as well as PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS which focus on a particular topic. We also invite proposals that will focus on discussion and interaction among conference delegates. A common form of this type is the ROUNDTABLE SESSION, but we would also like to encourage other formats, such as OPEN FISHBOWL SESSIONS. (See the Wikipedia entry under “Fishbowl (conversation)” for a description of this format. Fishbowl sessions should cover broad topics of interest to a wide segment of the AoIR community.) Finally, we invite short 5-minute talks on topics of interest to the community as part of our Ignite-IR panels. Please see below for more information on this format. DEADLINES Submissions Due: 1 March 2012 (Papers, Panels and Pre-Workshops. Details below.) NOTE: The submission deadline is a HARD DEADLINE; there will be NO extensions to this date. Notification: 1 May 2012 Full Papers Submissions Due for inclusion in Selected Papers of IR: 1 July 2012 Ignite-IR Final Proposal Deadline: 1 August 2012 Ignite-IR Slides Due: 15 September 2012 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All papers and presentations will be evaluated in a standard blind peer review. PAPERS (individual or multi-author) – submit abstract of 600-800 words PANEL PROPOSALS – submit a description of 600-800 words on the panel theme, plus a 250-500 word abstract for each paper or presentation. The panel organizer must assemble these materials for submission ROUNDTABLE and FISHBOWL PROPOSALS – submit a statement indicating the nature of the discussion and form of interaction, and listing initial participants. (In the case of a fishbowl proposal, this will include the name of the moderator, and the names of the first four speakers for the fishbowl.) PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS – please submit all workshop proposals via email to attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org>. Workshop proposals should include names of presenters and a 1,000-word description. IGNITE-IR – please submit a one-paragraph abstract and other information. Details at http://ir13.aoir.org/ignite-ir Papers, presentations and panels will be selected from the submitted proposals on the basis of multiple blind peer review, coordinated and overseen by the Program Chair. Each individual may present only one paper during the conference, though they may be listed as a co-author on multiple papers. In addition to this one presentation, they may also appear on a panel, roundtable, or performance. The exception is the Ignite-IR lightening talk, which may be in addition to any other presentations. PUBLICATION OF PAPERS Full papers submitted by the 1 July 2012 deadline will undergo review to be published in an open-access, online collection, Selected Papers of Internet Research (ISSN 2162-3317). A template and guidelines for preparing your final paper are available on the conference website (http://ir13.aoir.org/papers) Selected papers from the conference will alternatively be published in a special issue of the journal Information, Communication & Society. Authors selected for submission for this issue will be contacted prior to the conference. PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS On 18 October 2012, there will be a limited number of pre-conference workshops and symposia that will provide participants with in-depth, hands-on and/or creative opportunities. We invite proposals for these pre-conference workshops. Local presenters are encouraged to propose workshops that will invite visiting researchers into their labs or studios or locales. Proposals should be no more than 1,000 words, and should clearly outline the purpose, methodology, structure, costs, equipment and minimal attendance required, as well as explaining its relevance to the conference as a whole. Proposals will be accepted if they demonstrate that the workshop will add significantly to the overall program in terms of thematic depth, hands on experience, or local opportunities for scholarly or artistic connections. These proposals and all inquiries regarding pre-conference proposals should be submitted as soon as possible to the program chair (attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org>) and no later than 1 March 2012. IGNITE-IR For the second year, the Internet Research conference will offer the opportunity to present short, five minute talks in rapid succession. Presenters provide a deck of twenty slides, which will auto-advance each fifteen seconds. Details on the session maybe found at the conference website. Because talks are intended to be of the moment, the submission deadline is much later than for papers: 1 August 2012. CONTACT INFORMATION Program Chair: Feona Attwood, Communication, Sheffield Hallam University, UK, email attwood(a)aoir.org<mailto:attwood@aoir.org> Local Conference Chair: Ben Light, School of Media, Music, and Performance, University of Salford, email: light(a)aoir.org<mailto:light@aoir.org>

1 0

New Living Book about Life: Extinction by Claire Colebrook
by Gary Hall 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

EXTINCTION, edited by Claire Colebrook http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Extinction Open Humanities Press is pleased to announce the publication of Extinction, the 22nd book in its open access Living Books About Life series. The essays in this collection, edited by Claire Colebrook, Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of English at Penn State University, evidence an increasingly destructive, world-disturbing human force, albeit one that is part of a complexity that precludes any simple causal interpretation of life’s processes. For Colebrook there can be no question that survival and fitness tell only part of the story of life. Evolution therefore has to be thought together with extinction. It is a mode of thinking that might allow us to imagine a future beyond ourselves in order to transform the time that remains. *** LIVING BOOKS ABOUT LIFE http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org Living Books About Life (http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org) was launched by Open Humanities Press (OHP) (http://openhumanitiespress.org) in October 2011. Funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), and edited by Gary Hall, Joanna Zylinska and Clare Birchall, Living Books About Life is a series of curated, open access books about life -- with life understood both philosophically and biologically -- which provide a bridge between the humanities and the sciences. Produced by a globally-distributed network of writers and editors, the books in the series repackage existing open access science research by clustering it around selected topics whose unifying theme is life: e.g., air, agriculture, bioethics, cosmetic surgery, electronic waste, energy, neurology and pharmacology. Peter Suber, Open Access Project Director, Public Knowledge, said: ‘This book series would not be possible without open access. On the author side, it takes splendid advantage of the freedom to reuse and repurpose open-access research articles. On the other side, it passes on that freedom to readers. In between, the editors made intelligent selections and wrote original introductions, enhancing each article by placing it in the new context of an ambitious, integrated understanding of life, drawing equally from the sciences and humanities’. By initially creating twenty one ‘living books about life’ in just seven months, the series represents an exciting new model for publishing, in a sustainable, low-cost, low-tech manner, many more such books in the future. These books can be freely shared with other academic and non-academic institutions and individuals. Nicholas Mirzoeff, Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University, commented: ‘This remarkable series transforms the humble Reader into a living form, while breaking down the conceptual barrier between the humanities and the sciences in a time when scholars and activists of all kinds have taken the understanding of life to be central. Brilliant in its simplicity and concept, this series is a leap towards an exciting new future’. One of the most important aspects of the Living Books About Life series is the impact it has had on the attitudes of the researchers taking part, changing their views on open access and raising awareness of issues around publishers’ licensing and copyright agreements. Many have become open access advocates themselves, keen to disseminate this model among their own scholarly and student communities. As Professor Erica Fudge of the University of Strathclyde and co-editor of the living book on Veterinary Science, put it, ‘I am now evangelical about making work publicly available, and am really encouraging colleagues to put things out there’. These ‘books about life’ are themselves ‘living’, in the sense they are open to ongoing collaborative processes of writing, editing, updating, remixing and commenting by readers. As well as repackaging open access science research -- together with interactive maps and audio-visual material -- into a series of books, Living Books About Life is thus involved in rethinking ‘the book’ itself as a living, collaborative endeavour in the age of open science, open education, open data, and e-book readers such as Kindle and the iPad. Tara McPherson, editor of VECTORS, Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular, said: ‘It is no hyperbole to say that this series will help us reimagine everything we think we know about academic publishing. It points to a future that is interdisciplinary, open access, and expansive.’ Funded by JISC, Living Books About Life is a collaboration between Open Humanities Press and three academic institutions, Coventry University, Goldsmiths, University of London, and the University of Kent. Books: * Astrobiology and the Search for Life on Mars, edited by Sarah Kember (Goldsmiths, University of London) * Bioethics™: Life, Politics, Economics, edited by Joanna Zylinska (Goldsmiths, University of London) * Biosemiotics: Nature, Culture, Science, Semiosis, edited by Wendy Wheeler (London Metropolitan University) * Cognition and Decision in Non-Human Biological Organisms, edited by Steven Shaviro (Wayne State University) * Cosmetic Surgery: Medicine, Culture, Beauty, edited by Bernadette Wegenstein (Johns Hopkins University) * Creative Evolution: Natural Selection and the Urge to Remix, edited by Mark Amerika (University of Colorado at Boulder) * Digitize Me, Visualize Me, Search Me: Open Science and its Discontents, edited by Gary Hall (Coventry University) * Energy Connections: Living Forces in Creative Inter/Intra-Action, edited by Manuela Rossini (td-net for Transdisciplinary Research, Switzerland) * Extinction, edited by Claire Colebrook (Penn State University) * Human Genomics: From Hypothetical Genes to Biodigital Materialisations, edited by Kate O’Riordan (Sussex University) * Medianatures: The Materiality of Information Technology and Electronic Waste, edited by Jussi Parikka (Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton) * Nerves of Perception: Motor and Sensory Experience in Neuroscience, edited by Anna Munster (University of New South Wales) * Neurofutures, edited by Timothy Lenoir (Duke University) * Partial Life, edited by Oron Catts and Ionat Zurr (SymbioticA, University of Western Australia) * Pharmacology, edited by Dave Boothroyd (University of Kent) * Symbiosis, edited by Janneke Adema and Pete Woodbridge (Coventry University) * Another Technoscience is Possible: Agricultural Lessons for the Posthumanities, edited by Gabriela Mendez Cota (Goldsmiths, University of London) * The In/visible, edited by Clare Birchall (University of Kent) * The Life of Air: Dwelling, Communicating, Manipulating, edited by Monika Bakke (University of Poznan) * The Mediations of Consciousness, edited by Alberto López Cuenca (Universidad de las Américas, Puebla) * Ubiquitous Surveillance, edited by David Parry (University of Texas at Dallas) * Veterinary Science: Animals, Humans and Health, edited by Erica Fudge (Strathclyde University) and Clare Palmer (Texas A&M University) Contact the Living Books about Life series editors: Gary Hall, Joanna Zylinska and Clare Birchall E: gary.hall(a)coventry.ac.uk E: j.zylinska(a)gold.ac.uk E: c.s.birchall(a)kent.ac.uk W: http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org Open Humanities Press is a non-profit, international Open Access publishing collective specializing in critical and cultural theory. OHP was formed by academics to overcome the current crisis in scholarly publishing that threatens intellectual freedom and academic rigor worldwide. OHP journals are academically certified by OHP’s independent board of international scholars. All OHP publications are peer-reviewed, published under open access licenses, and freely and immediately available online at http://openhumanitiespress.org. -- Gary Hall Research Professor of Media and Performing Arts School of Art and Design, Coventry University Co-editor of Culture Machine http://www.culturemachine.net Co-founder of the Open Humanities Press http://www.openhumanitiespress.org Website http://www.garyhall.info Latest: 'There Are No Digital Humanities', in Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold

1 0

looking for references on online conversational analysis and discourse analysis
by Wang Airong 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

Dear list members, I am looking for references on online conversational dynamics, who initiate the talk, who support the talk, who respond the talk, who end the talk, etc. I am trying to see how various factors such as gender, age, language proficiency, subject knowledge and culture, all contribute to relative power structures in the conversations, especially in 3D virtual world. I tried to find some references concerning conversational or discourse analysis , but have not got much. Thus, I am very appreciated that you have some recommendations especially about conversational or discourse analysis for online activities or 3d virtual world activities. Best regards, Airong Wang Doctoral candidate, Sweden

2 2

Reminder: CFP- Policy and Internet Special issue on 'Online Collective Action and Policy Change'
by Anastasia Kavada 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

** Apologies for cross-posting** Call for Papers 'Policy and Internet' Special Issue on "Online Collective Action and Policy Change" Guest Editors Andrea Calderaro (PhD, European University Institute) Anastasia Kavada (PhD, University of Westminster) Policy and Internet, the first major peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary journal investigating the impact of the internet on public policy, is inviting submissions for a special issue on 'Online Collective Action and Policy Change', to be published in January 2013 (paper deadline: 31 March 2012). The journal is edited by the Oxford Internet Institute (University of Oxford) for the Policy Studies Organization (PSO). Please find more information at: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news/?id=595 The Internet has created a new interface between collective action and policy making: it opens new channels for social coordination and mobilisation, and it offers multiple platforms from where to influence public opinion and policy makers. The recent wave of protests that has swept authoritarian regimes like Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, but also western liberal democracies like Greece, Spain, and the UK, offers new empirical evidence of the impact that online interactions and information exchange can have on policy making. In addition to these recent instances of contentious politics, advocacy and grassroots groups are increasingly using online technologies to empower local communities and direct change in the policies that most affect them. And issues at the heart of online governance, like Internet regulation, are motivating many collective efforts directed to shaping file-sharing policies, free software, or digital communication rights. This special issue calls for academic papers reporting novel empirical research on how online collective action drives policy change, in any of its ramifications. This includes topics such as: - The coordination of protests and mobilisations using online technologies, and their impact on public opinion and policy making. - The mechanisms through which online collective action grows and diffuses, and how or when they trigger a policy reaction. - The impact of online activity on issue salience, and the responsiveness of policy makers. - The interplay between online collective action and the offline policy cycle, or how policy makers deal with new sources of instability and disruption. This list of topics is not exhaustive, and other questions related to online collective action and its impact on policy making will be considered. Please contact the guest editors Andrea Calderaro (andrea.calderaro(a)eui.eu<mailto:andrea.calderaro@eui.eu>) and Anastasia Kavada (a.kavada(a)westminster.ac.uk<mailto:a.kavada@westminster.ac.uk>) if you have any queries about how your paper might fit in the issue. Paper Submissions The online submission deadline for papers is 31 March 2012. Please indicate in the cover letter that the paper is intended for the special issue 'Online Collective Action and Policy Change'. Authors are advised to consult the journal's Guide for Authors before submitting their paper. -- The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW, UK.

1 0

apology
by Murray Turoff 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

I apologize that the message i sent below was not more transparent. I expected most people here to have some knowledge of the early history of arpanet and other associated developments. But email/message systems were started very early in the late 60's and by 1978 they were all over the place with companies and universities using them. To put out a newspaper article that someone in 1978 had sort of invented the field was a bit much for many old timers. Since that message lots of comments have appeared on the Washington post article and the paper has made corrections and realized that a copyright of a single program is not a trademark for the term. It was as pad as claims by some politicians that they are responsible for the INTERNET. In 1971 i approached Larry Roberts and asked him to release some data and specifications on the use of messaging on the arrpanet so i could compare it to what i was doing at OEP with EMISARI. This had a complete message subsystem. i was told by an anonymous party that they did not want to admit that messaging was teh most popular and used application on the ARPANET for fear congress would cut off some of their funding for using such an expensive research system for replacing 10 cent letters rather than the types of applications they had sold the arpanet on!! Message: 1 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:45:03 -0500 From: Murray Turoff <murray.turoff(a)gmail.com> To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] A rewrite of our history Message-ID: <CAD-aGywFSj+gn0cP167j7j3cPOkzavy=aF23USHTWCcY4a2NWg(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Some of you who are interested in the history of our field might find this as disturbing as i did. * The inventor of e-mail on innovation and his path to the Smithsonian< http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/MEPMRJ/NSC4SB/ZCNCKZ/FVLP7K/7278IF/5… > * V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai spoke about the discovery he made at the age of 14, and his path from a New Jersey high school to the Smithsonian. ( by Emi Kolawole , The Washington Post) he discovered e-mail in 1978!!!! It seems MIT and the Smithsonian have agreed on this.. *Distinguished Professor Emeritus Information Systems, NJIT homepage: http://is.njit.edu/turoff * -- *Distinguished Professor Emeritus Information Systems, NJIT homepage: http://is.njit.edu/turoff *

6 5

Call for Conference Papers: "IPP2012: Big Data, Big Challenges?"
by David Sutcliffe 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

** Call for papers ** ** Internet, Politics, Policy 2012: Big Data, Big Challenges? ** ** 20-21 September 2012, University of Oxford ** ** http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp2012 ** ** Rationale ** Recent years have seen an increasing buzz around how 'Big Data' can uncover patterns of human behaviour and help predict social trends. Most social activities today leave digital imprints that can be collected and stored in the form of large datasets of transactional data. These data are already being used to prevent epidemics or combat fraud and crime, but the research potential of these data is still underexploited. The impact of Big Data goes beyond academic research: the behavioural insights gained from transactional information can also be used to drive evidence-based policy making and 'nudge' political behaviour. However, the technical skills necessary to analyse large datasets often prevent social scientists from exploiting its potential. Much detail is also lost in the analysis of Big Data, which emphasises aggregated patterns over mechanisms operating at the individual level and lacks the demographic information of survey data, for example. This conference calls for papers that explore the new research frontiers opened up by Big Data as well as its limitations. We are looking for research that uses large datasets to inform old debates in political science, and papers that develop innovative methodological tools (from experiments, to crowd-sourcing, to online ethnography) to overcome the omissions of big datasets. The Internet, Politics, Policy 2012 conference aims to serve as a forum to encourage discussion across disciplinary boundaries on how to exploit Big Data to inform policy debates and advance social science research. ** Programme ** The conference aims to attract papers from a range of disciplines analysing Big Data or developing approaches that dig into the mechanisms that large datasets do not consider. Panels will be organised in twin tracks: - Papers in the Politics track will explore the insights that large datasets and complementary methodological tools offer in the analysis of political behaviour, including - but not limited to - mobilisations, collective action, or public opinion formation; - Papers in the Policy track will look at how behavioural insights gained from Big Data analysis, and from experiments in online settings, can inform policy debates and shape policy making, including e-health, on-line education, cybercrime, security and privacy. These two areas are intertwined, and will be merged in plenary sessions, investigating the intersection of policy and politics in the Big Data era. ** Keynotes ** - Duncan Watts, Principal Research Scientist, Yahoo! Research - Second keynote pending confirmation ** Submissions ** We welcome papers reporting on innovative research exploiting large datasets or applying novel methodological tools aimed to overcome the limitations of Big Data. We particularly welcome papers that report empirical results and employ analytical approaches that would not have been possible without access to digital information. Perspectives from any academic discipline are welcomed, particularly: political science, economics, law, sociology, information science, communications, philosophy, computer science, psychology, management, geography and medicine. Paper proposals: Proposals should include a title and a 1000 word abstract specifying the research question, describing the methods and data used, and summarising the main findings. Abstracts will be peer reviewed, and the authors of accepted proposals are expected to submit full papers prior to the conference. Paper submissions will be considered for a Best Paper Award of 300 GBP (sponsored by the journal Policy and Internet). The prize will be awarded at the closing session of the conference. As the paper is intended to be published in a future issue of the journal, authors should indicate whether they would like their paper to be considered for the prize. Poster proposals: Posters should summarise in a visually engaging manner the purpose, methods and results of an original piece of research. All accepted submissions will be considered for a Best Poster Award of 300 GBP (sponsored by Google). The prize will be awarded at the closing session of the conference. Paper and poster proposals should be submitted using the online form at http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp2012/submissions Travel Bursaries: We will support a limited number of competitive bursaries to contribute to the cost of attendance for doctoral students and recent postdocs (doctorate finished 2011). Preference will be given to paper or poster presenters. Please indicate in your submission if you would like to be considered for such a bursary. ** Deadlines ** Abstract deadline: 15 March 2012 Decision on abstracts: 15 April 2012 Poster deadline: 15 April 2012 Decision on posters: 15 May 2012 Full paper submission: 15 August 2012 Conference correspondence can be sent to: ipp2012(a)oii.ox.ac.uk Best wishes, Internet, Politics, Policy 2010 http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp2012 Contact: ipp2012(a)oii.ox.ac.uk Twitter: #ipp2012 Professor Helen Margetts (Oxford Internet Institute) Dr Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon (Oxford Internet Institute) David Sutcliffe (Oxford Internet Institute)

1 0