February 2013 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Re: [Air-L] Air-L Digest, Vol 103, Issue 11
by David Hakken 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

In some of the the various reviewers over the years of my book on _Cyborgs@Cyberspace?_ (Routledge 1999) have taken up my attempt to "realm" research on the social correlates of digital technologies. While there is now much more data, people sometimes still seem to think my efforts there to provide an integrated framework for this research still has some merit. David Hakken Information Ethnographer Professor of Social Informatics Social Informatics Group Leader School of Informatics 901 E. !0th Street Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47406 dhakken(a)indiana.edu Faculty Fellow, Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Trento, Italy http://www.informatics.indiana.edu/research/profiles/dhakken.asp Office Hours, fall, 2012: M 10-10:30; 1:30-3 On Feb 10, 2013, at 6:00 PM, air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:06:20 -0800 > From: Tom Boellstorff <tboellst(a)uci.edu> > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: Re: [Air-L] internet/flesh "realms" > Message-ID: <070E9757-2E54-493B-92AC-662549A84576(a)uci.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > In terms of the internet/flesh "realms" issue - this is something > I'm going to working on quite a bit I hope, and I discuss it in some > detail in "Rethinking Digital Anthropology" (In Digital > Anthropology. Heather A. Horst and Daniel Miller, editors. Pp. 39? > 60. London: Berg, 2012.) > > For details, goto http://faculty.sites.uci.edu/boellstorff/publications/ > > > On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:01 PM, air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > >> Send Air-L mailing list submissions to >> air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. internet/flesh "realms" (Barry Wellman) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:34:58 -0500 >> From: Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca> >> To: aoir list <air-l(a)aoir.org> >> Subject: [Air-L] internet/flesh "realms" >> Message-ID: >> <Pine.SGI.4.64.1302091427571.28287808(a)origin.chass.utoronto.ca> >> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed >> >> There's been a lot written and researched on this already. >> But the issue keeps coming on. (I really wish scholarship were more >> cumulative.) >> >> In addition to the items posted in the previous AoIR list, may I >> suggest >> >> Nathan Jurgenson's theoretical essays on "digital dualism", such as >> http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/09/13/digital-dualism-and-the-f… >> >> The Rainie-Wellman _Networked_ book, especially Part II >> http://www.amazon.com/Networked-New-Social-Operating-System/dp/0262017199/r… >> >> which itself picks up on writing I've done for 15 years, such as >> >> "An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network" >> "Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networking" >> ""Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet" (with Jeff Boase) >> "Social Connectivity in America" with Hua (Helen) Wang >> >> all get-able on my website >> http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html >> >> Enjoy, >> Barry Wellman >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> >> S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab >> Director >> Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room >> 388 >> University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 >> twitter:@barrywellman >> http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax: >> +1-416-978-3963 >> NETWORKED:The New Social Operating System. Lee Rainie & Barry >> Wellman >> MIT Press http://amzn.to/zXZg39 Print $19; Kindle >> $16 >> Old/newCybertimes http://bit.ly/c8N9V8 It's still rock & roll to >> me >> >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http:// >> aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ >> >> End of Air-L Digest, Vol 103, Issue 10 >> ************************************** >> > > > > > tom boellstorff/professor/department of anthropology/university of > california/irvine/website > > >

2 1

Registration now open - Queer feminist social media praxis, University of Sussex
by Aristea Fotopoulou 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

Queer, Feminist and Social Media Praxis workshop, Sussex Centre for Cultural Studies, 17 May 2013, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. Registration is now open. To register, please visit: http://queerfemdigiact.wordpress.com/registration/ In this workshop we will explore a range of themes around digital technology and social media in relation to gender/sexuality activism and social equality. Workshop keynote speaker: Alex Juhasz (Pitzer, USA, Fembot Collective) Closing plenary Radical art practices, feminism, new technologies and performance with : Maria Chatzichristodoulou (a.k.a. Maria X), Sally-Jane Norman (Attenborough Centre for Creative Arts), Kira O’Reilly, Kate O’Riordan (UCSC/Sussex), Joanna Zylinska (Goldsmiths). There will be over 30 academic papers, workshops, film screenings and performances over the workshop day. We have also scheduled a queer film-screening of The Owls on the evening of the 16th of May, with producer Alex Juhasz present for a Q&A session. The provisional programme will be coming out in the next few weeks. The workshop is linked to the second annual conference of the International Feminist Journal of Politics, (Im)possibly Queer International Feminisms, between May 17-19, 2013. The Workshop is organised by the Sussex Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Sussex and partly supported by the EPSRC/CC+ Network Sustaining networked knowledge: expertise, feminist media production, art and activism. We look forward to welcoming you to Brighton in May! The Queer, Feminist and Social Media Praxis Team. web: http://queerfemdigiact.wordpress.com/ facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Queer-Feminist-and-Social-Media-Praxis-Works… Dr Aristea Fotopoulou Research fellow EPINET Centre for Material Digital Culture University of Sussex Falmer, BN1 9RG Arts B337 Tel: 01273 678634 http://www.sussex.ac.uk/profiles/206365

1 0

physical/digital worlds
by Tacli Yazicioglu 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

For online data collection Robert V. Kozinet's Netnography (2010) must be the source as he is both the founder of the method and the first academic who published in online ethnography in 1996. On 2/11/13 1:00 AM, "air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org> wrote: >Send Air-L mailing list submissions to > air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. physical/digital worlds (Baker, Andrea) > 2. Re: physical/digital worlds (Natalya Godbold) > 3. Re: internet/flesh "realms" (Tom Boellstorff) > 4. Re: physical/digital worlds (Charles Ess) > 5. Re: physical/digital worlds (Mark C. Lashley) > 6. Re: physical/digital worlds (Peter Gloviczki) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:54:27 -0500 >From: "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu> >To: "air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> >Subject: [Air-L] physical/digital worlds >Message-ID: <C9C537E8-1ED3-4524-899C-CB4BB2C4A9D9(a)ohio.edu> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Hi, everyone, > >Thanks so much for all your help, from those of you commenting both here >in the list and off of it. > >Yes, Barry, it was Nathan Jurgenson's work that first inspired me to >carry on with my current project, sorry I didn't mention knowing about >it. I also consulted with him initially, well before posting my inquiry. > Nathan and PJ Rey are running their third Theorizing the Web >conference, this year in NYC. > >Of course, much work has dealt with the issue some, including mine on >relationships, identities and communities, and thanks for your own >important list of contributions, your references. Thankfully there is >now such a wealth of writing and research available. However, some of us >think we still have a way to go in, to use your words, "flesh"-ing out >dimensions of the processes. There's really still much more to say about >it at this time, imo. Most these days seem to not only accept that >online/mobile/cmc interaction is real but that it is less discrete from >other activities than many of us early internet researchers and private >citizens had originally conceived, and experienced back then. > >Anyone else who has specific references, please feel free to continue >sending them to me and/or posting them. > >Here are my original questions previously posted to the aoirlist. I'm >hoping the formatting is better this time: >"For a piece I'm preparing on interaction back and forth between online >and offline or from digital to physical worlds and back, I'm looking for >references about how that works for people, especially those who are >members of online communities. > >More than particular data to show this communication in process, although >that is good too, I want to conceptualize themovement, the "flow" from >one realm to another, to describe what is happening. Also, how does the >online communication, including that through mobile phones, affect the >offline interaction, and how do the offline encounters affect what goes >on inside the online communities and in other social media containing >some of the same people interacting offline. This project is part of my >music fan research on fan communities, identities, and relationships. >I'm already aware of the articles in the first issue of Mobile Media and >Communication (January, 2013), and of Lauren Sessions-Goulet's excellent >paper of a few years back on offline meetings and online communities, and >have a few other helpful sources. I've done a body of work on romantic >online relationships so I understand many of the dynamics there. > >Please feel free to write off list or on. Thanks so much in advance! >cheers, >andee (andrea baker)" > >thanks! --a > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:33:02 +1100 >From: Natalya Godbold <ngodbold(a)gmail.com> >To: "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu>, air-l(a)aoir.org >Subject: Re: [Air-L] physical/digital worlds >Message-ID: > <CALu7UUaKP5M0gHs3VVCWVVuLvnCcXtb5F3o2TPtS85tsHwNdvw(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >You might find this useful? >Orgad, S. (2009). Question Two: How can researchers make sense of the >issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data? >Internet inquiry : conversations about method. A. N. Markham and N. K. >Baym. Los Angeles, Sage Publications: 33-53. > > >On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Baker, Andrea <bakera(a)ohio.edu> wrote: > >> Hi, everyone, >> >> Thanks so much for all your help, from those of you commenting both here >> in the list and off of it. >> >> Yes, Barry, it was Nathan Jurgenson's work that first inspired me to >>carry >> on with my current project, sorry I didn't mention knowing about it. I >> also consulted with him initially, well before posting my inquiry. >>Nathan >> and PJ Rey are running their third Theorizing the Web conference, this >>year >> in NYC. >> >> Of course, much work has dealt with the issue some, including mine on >> relationships, identities and communities, and thanks for your own >> important list of contributions, your references. Thankfully there is >>now >> such a wealth of writing and research available. However, some of us >>think >> we still have a way to go in, to use your words, "flesh"-ing out >>dimensions >> of the processes. There's really still much more to say about it at >>this >> time, imo. Most these days seem to not only accept that >>online/mobile/cmc >> interaction is real but that it is less discrete from other activities >>than >> many of us early internet researchers and private citizens had >>originally >> conceived, and experienced back then. >> >> Anyone else who has specific references, please feel free to continue >> sending them to me and/or posting them. >> >> Here are my original questions previously posted to the aoirlist. I'm >> hoping the formatting is better this time: >> "For a piece I'm preparing on interaction back and forth between online >> and offline or from digital to physical worlds and back, I'm looking for >> references about how that works for people, especially those who are >> members of online communities. >> >> More than particular data to show this communication in process, >>although >> that is good too, I want to conceptualize themovement, the "flow" from >>one >> realm to another, to describe what is happening. Also, how does the >>online >> communication, including that through mobile phones, affect the offline >> interaction, and how do the offline encounters affect what goes on >>inside >> the online communities and in other social media containing some of the >> same people interacting offline. This project is part of my music fan >> research on fan communities, identities, and relationships. >> I'm already aware of the articles in the first issue of Mobile Media and >> Communication (January, 2013), and of Lauren Sessions-Goulet's excellent >> paper of a few years back on offline meetings and online communities, >>and >> have a few other helpful sources. I've done a body of work on romantic >> online relationships so I understand many of the dynamics there. >> >> Please feel free to write off list or on. Thanks so much in advance! >> cheers, >> andee (andrea baker)" >> >> thanks! --a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ >> > > > >-- >Natalya Godbold >PhD Candidate (Human Information Behaviour / Health Communication) >Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences >University of Technology, Sydney > >Autonomous, Responsible, Alone (Interdisciplinary Press): >https://www.interdisciplinarypress.net/online-store/medical-humanities/aut >onomous-alone-responsible >Social Information Research (Emerald) >http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?issn=1876-0562&volume=5 > > > > >?`~.. ?><((((?>?. .~??`~.. ?><((((?>?. .~??`~.. ?><((((?>?. >.><((((?>`~.??.~??`~.?.~??`~...?><((((?> .,,.~??`~.. ?><((((?>?. >.....,,.><((((?>`~.??.~??`~.?.~??`~...?><((((?> .~??`~.. ?><((((?>?. >.,,.~??`~.. ?><((((?>?. .~??`~.. > > > > > >UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F >DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may >contain >confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not >read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. >If >you have received this message in error, please notify the sender >immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message >are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and >with authority, states them to be the views of the University of >Technology >Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and >defects. > >Think. Green. Do. > >Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:06:20 -0800 >From: Tom Boellstorff <tboellst(a)uci.edu> >To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org >Subject: Re: [Air-L] internet/flesh "realms" >Message-ID: <070E9757-2E54-493B-92AC-662549A84576(a)uci.edu> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > >In terms of the internet/flesh "realms" issue - this is something I'm >going to working on quite a bit I hope, and I discuss it in some detail >in "Rethinking Digital Anthropology" (In Digital Anthropology. Heather A. >Horst and Daniel Miller, editors. Pp. 39?60. London: Berg, 2012.) > >For details, goto http://faculty.sites.uci.edu/boellstorff/publications/ > > >On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:01 PM, air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > >> Send Air-L mailing list submissions to >> air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. internet/flesh "realms" (Barry Wellman) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:34:58 -0500 >> From: Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca> >> To: aoir list <air-l(a)aoir.org> >> Subject: [Air-L] internet/flesh "realms" >> Message-ID: >> <Pine.SGI.4.64.1302091427571.28287808(a)origin.chass.utoronto.ca> >> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed >> >> There's been a lot written and researched on this already. >> But the issue keeps coming on. (I really wish scholarship were more >> cumulative.) >> >> In addition to the items posted in the previous AoIR list, may I suggest >> >> Nathan Jurgenson's theoretical essays on "digital dualism", such as >> >>http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/09/13/digital-dualism-and-the >>-fallacy-of-web-objectivity/ >> >> The Rainie-Wellman _Networked_ book, especially Part II >> >>http://www.amazon.com/Networked-New-Social-Operating-System/dp/0262017199 >>/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1325258020&sr=1-1 >> >> which itself picks up on writing I've done for 15 years, such as >> >> "An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network" >> "Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networking" >> ""Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet" (with Jeff Boase) >> "Social Connectivity in America" with Hua (Helen) Wang >> >> all get-able on my website >> http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/index.html >> >> Enjoy, >> Barry Wellman >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> >> S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab Director >> Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388 >> University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 twitter:@barrywellman >> http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax:+1-416-978-3963 >> NETWORKED:The New Social Operating System. Lee Rainie & Barry Wellman >> MIT Press http://amzn.to/zXZg39 Print $19; Kindle $16 >> Old/newCybertimes http://bit.ly/c8N9V8 It's still rock & roll to me >> >> >>________________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ >> >> End of Air-L Digest, Vol 103, Issue 10 >> ************************************** >> > > > > >tom boellstorff/professor/department of anthropology/university of >california/irvine/website > > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:32:31 +0100 >From: Charles Ess <charles.ess(a)gmail.com> >To: "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu>, Air list > <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> >Subject: Re: [Air-L] physical/digital worlds >Message-ID: <CD3CE16F.56F4E%charles.ess(a)gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > >Hi Andrea and colleagues, >Two sorts of quick suggestions - > >1. In the direction of the history of the broader conceptualizations of >the >relationships/interactions you describe: >A) partly by way of invoking both Barry Wellman's taxonomy of "the three >ages of Internet Studies" and Heidi Campbell's similar taxonomy of three >waves of research on religion online (both in Consalvo and Ess, The >Handbook >of Internet Studies, Blackwell, 2011), I developed an overview chapter on >the history of the virtual/online // >actual-real-material-"meatspace"/offline distinctions-relationships for >our >2011 anthology: >Self, Community, and Ethics in Digital Mediatized Worlds.? In C. Ess and >M. >Thorseth, eds., Trust and Virtual Worlds: Contemporary Perspectives, >3-30.? >Oxford: Peter Lang, 2011. >B) For a variety of reasons, AoIRists will likely want to also be aware >generally of the now publicized results of the Onlife Initiative, a >European >Commission "Digital Futures" project - ><https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-initiative>. >Broadly, the project sought to move us conceptually further down the road >regarding the basic assumptions that have undergirded most of our >thinking, >research, and policy-making in conjunction with, e.g., "the information >society" over past several decades. As the phrase "onlife" is meant to >suggest, the once hard (with the usual caveats) distinctions asserted >between "the online" and "offline life" have been (largely) shifted >towards >strong interrelationality (a point that is now made in many, many ways, of >course, but is also one of the characterizations of the third Age / Wave >in >Campbell and Wellman's taxonomies). >In addition to what the Onlife Manifesto articulates in terms of >developing >new conceptual approaches towards what is characterized as a >hyperconnected >era, AoIRists may find some of the background papers that contributed to >the >development of the manifesto helpful as well: ><https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-web-output> > >2. In terms of more specific analyses, I find especially helpful >A) Lomborg, Stine. Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication: A >Case >Study of the Blogging Self. Philosophy and Technology 25 (2012):415?434. >DOI >10.1007/s13347-011-0018-7. >Stine draws on Simmel's understanding of the sociable self - i.e., as >first >used to theorize and describe "offline" sociabilities - to analyze >interactions and negotiations online between a prominent blogger and her >readers/respondents. This analysis I found to be particularly useful in a >number of ways, beginning with the details Stine careful documents of the >negotiations between those engaged with the blog, as these negotiations >involve perspective-taking and phatic communication that work to both >preserve individual privacy while simultaneously constructing and >maintaining the shared personal space (in Danish and other Germanic >language, the _intimsf?re_ - the "intimate sphere" of close(r/est) >relationships) online. These details, among other things, show how such >online processes are extremely similar to their offline counterparts - >again, challenging especially 1990s' tendencies towards hard dualisms >between the online and the offline. >More broadly - though this may take you beyond your primary focus - >Stine's >work thereby provides an empirically-grounded analysis that fits with both >other similar work in Internet Studies as well as in contemporary >philosophy >on identity and, most basically, conceptions/assumptions regarding >selfhood >- hence the article's inclusion in this special issue of the journal >Philosophy and Technology, as dedicated to these matters. >For the introduction: >?At the Intersections Between Internet Studies and Philosophy: ?Who Am I >Online?? (Introduction to special issue), Philosophy & Technology: Volume >25, Issue 3: (September, 2012): 275-284. DOI 10.1007/s13347-012-0085-4. > >(In these directions - of course, "the networked self" from Wellman and >Haythornthwaite has worked prominently over the past decade, e.g., most >recently in Julie Cohen's 2012 _Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, >and the Play of Everyday Practice_. New Haven: Yale University Press. ><http://www.juliecohen.com/page5.php>. At the same time, however, still >more strongly relational notions of selfhood have been emerging in >neurobiology (e.g., enactivism, the embodied mind, and other umbrella >terms) >and ethics (beginning with ecological ethics and feminist ethics / ethics >of >care - now with feminist concepts of "relational autonomy" and parallel >notions of distributed epistemic and ethical responsibility). Such >strongly >relational emphases, most broadly, appear to have been characteristic of >notions of selfhood in the pre-modern "West" and still typically function >strongly in societies shaped by Confucian and Buddhist traditions, for >example. >What's of interest here regarding ethics is how such relational selves >draw >on virtue ethics: hence the importance of Shannon Vallor's work on virtue >ethics vis-a-vis social networking - most recently, Social Networking and >Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), >Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = ><http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/ethics-social-networki >ng >/>. >As well, the relational emphases in several Confucian and Buddhist >societies >appear to be shift towards more individual emphases, e.g., >Hansen, Mette Halskov and Rune Svarverud (eds.). 2010. The Rise of the >Individual in Modern Chinese Society, Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of >Asian >Studies.) > >For my part, I find the "flow" you refer to helpfully analyzed especially >from phenomenologically-informed frameworks (where such flow experiences >are >initially described in offline contexts) as well as, classically, in >Cs?kszentmih?lyi et al. I know there's some work along these lines in >Game >Studies, for example, and, when I get a few more minutes, can cobble >together a list of those references. In the meantime, someone(s) else on >this list may have such a bibliography ready to hand? > >In any event, hope some of this is of some use - and hope to hear more >about >your work at AoIR in Denver! > >Best, >- charles >Associate Professor in Media Studies >Department of Media and Communication > >Director, Centre for Research on Media Innovations ><http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/research/center/media-innovations/> > >University of Oslo >P.O. Box 1093 Blindern >NO-0317 >Oslo Norway >email: charles.ess(a)media.uio.no > > > > >On 10.02.13 00:54, "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu> wrote: > >> Hi, everyone, >> >> Thanks so much for all your help, from those of you commenting both >>here in >> the list and off of it. >> >> Yes, Barry, it was Nathan Jurgenson's work that first inspired me to >>carry on >> with my current project, sorry I didn't mention knowing about it. I >>also >> consulted with him initially, well before posting my inquiry. Nathan >>and PJ >> Rey are running their third Theorizing the Web conference, this year in >>NYC. >> >> Of course, much work has dealt with the issue some, including mine on >> relationships, identities and communities, and thanks for your own >>important >> list of contributions, your references. Thankfully there is now such a >>wealth >> of writing and research available. However, some of us think we still >>have a >> way to go in, to use your words, "flesh"-ing out dimensions of the >>processes. >> There's really still much more to say about it at this time, imo. Most >>these >> days seem to not only accept that online/mobile/cmc interaction is real >>but >> that it is less discrete from other activities than many of us early >>internet >> researchers and private citizens had originally conceived, and >>experienced >> back then. >> >> Anyone else who has specific references, please feel free to continue >>sending >> them to me and/or posting them. >> >> Here are my original questions previously posted to the aoirlist. I'm >>hoping >> the formatting is better this time: >> "For a piece I'm preparing on interaction back and forth between online >>and >> offline or from digital to physical worlds and back, I'm looking for >> references about how that works for people, especially those who are >>members >> of online communities. >> >> More than particular data to show this communication in process, >>although that >> is good too, I want to conceptualize themovement, the "flow" from one >>realm to >> another, to describe what is happening. Also, how does the online >> communication, including that through mobile phones, affect the offline >> interaction, and how do the offline encounters affect what goes on >>inside the >> online communities and in other social media containing some of the same >> people interacting offline. This project is part of my music fan >>research on >> fan communities, identities, and relationships. >> I'm already aware of the articles in the first issue of Mobile Media and >> Communication (January, 2013), and of Lauren Sessions-Goulet's >>excellent paper >> of a few years back on offline meetings and online communities, and >>have a few >> other helpful sources. I've done a body of work on romantic online >> relationships so I understand many of the dynamics there. >> >> Please feel free to write off list or on. Thanks so much in advance! >> cheers, >> andee (andrea baker)" >> >> thanks! --a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:16:09 -0500 >From: "Mark C. Lashley" <lashley.mark(a)gmail.com> >To: Charles Ess <charles.ess(a)gmail.com> >Cc: Air list <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org>, "Baker, Andrea" > <bakera(a)ohio.edu> >Subject: Re: [Air-L] physical/digital worlds >Message-ID: <DDD2503F-70B6-489A-9ED2-2CE9AECC9643(a)gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > >Mark C. Lashley >Doctoral Candidate, >Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication >Graduate Assistant, >George Foster Peabody Awards >The University of Georgia >Room 320, Journalism Building > >Email | Twitter | Academia.edu | HuffPostTV > >On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:32 PM, Charles Ess <charles.ess(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andrea and colleagues, >> Two sorts of quick suggestions - >> >> 1. In the direction of the history of the broader conceptualizations of >>the >> relationships/interactions you describe: >> A) partly by way of invoking both Barry Wellman's taxonomy of "the three >> ages of Internet Studies" and Heidi Campbell's similar taxonomy of three >> waves of research on religion online (both in Consalvo and Ess, The >>Handbook >> of Internet Studies, Blackwell, 2011), I developed an overview chapter >>on >> the history of the virtual/online // >> actual-real-material-"meatspace"/offline distinctions-relationships for >>our >> 2011 anthology: >> Self, Community, and Ethics in Digital Mediatized Worlds. In C. Ess >>and M. >> Thorseth, eds., Trust and Virtual Worlds: Contemporary Perspectives, >>3-30. >> Oxford: Peter Lang, 2011. >> B) For a variety of reasons, AoIRists will likely want to also be aware >> generally of the now publicized results of the Onlife Initiative, a >>European >> Commission "Digital Futures" project - >> <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-initiative>. >> Broadly, the project sought to move us conceptually further down the >>road >> regarding the basic assumptions that have undergirded most of our >>thinking, >> research, and policy-making in conjunction with, e.g., "the information >> society" over past several decades. As the phrase "onlife" is meant to >> suggest, the once hard (with the usual caveats) distinctions asserted >> between "the online" and "offline life" have been (largely) shifted >>towards >> strong interrelationality (a point that is now made in many, many ways, >>of >> course, but is also one of the characterizations of the third Age / >>Wave in >> Campbell and Wellman's taxonomies). >> In addition to what the Onlife Manifesto articulates in terms of >>developing >> new conceptual approaches towards what is characterized as a >>hyperconnected >> era, AoIRists may find some of the background papers that contributed >>to the >> development of the manifesto helpful as well: >> <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-web-output> >> >> 2. In terms of more specific analyses, I find especially helpful >> A) Lomborg, Stine. Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication: A >>Case >> Study of the Blogging Self. Philosophy and Technology 25 >>(2012):415?434. DOI >> 10.1007/s13347-011-0018-7. >> Stine draws on Simmel's understanding of the sociable self - i.e., as >>first >> used to theorize and describe "offline" sociabilities - to analyze >> interactions and negotiations online between a prominent blogger and her >> readers/respondents. This analysis I found to be particularly useful >>in a >> number of ways, beginning with the details Stine careful documents of >>the >> negotiations between those engaged with the blog, as these negotiations >> involve perspective-taking and phatic communication that work to both >> preserve individual privacy while simultaneously constructing and >> maintaining the shared personal space (in Danish and other Germanic >> language, the _intimsf?re_ - the "intimate sphere" of close(r/est) >> relationships) online. These details, among other things, show how such >> online processes are extremely similar to their offline counterparts - >> again, challenging especially 1990s' tendencies towards hard dualisms >> between the online and the offline. >> More broadly - though this may take you beyond your primary focus - >>Stine's >> work thereby provides an empirically-grounded analysis that fits with >>both >> other similar work in Internet Studies as well as in contemporary >>philosophy >> on identity and, most basically, conceptions/assumptions regarding >>selfhood >> - hence the article's inclusion in this special issue of the journal >> Philosophy and Technology, as dedicated to these matters. >> For the introduction: >> ?At the Intersections Between Internet Studies and Philosophy: ?Who Am I >> Online?? (Introduction to special issue), Philosophy & Technology: >>Volume >> 25, Issue 3: (September, 2012): 275-284. DOI 10.1007/s13347-012-0085-4. >> >> (In these directions - of course, "the networked self" from Wellman and >> Haythornthwaite has worked prominently over the past decade, e.g., most >> recently in Julie Cohen's 2012 _Configuring the Networked Self: Law, >>Code, >> and the Play of Everyday Practice_. New Haven: Yale University Press. >> <http://www.juliecohen.com/page5.php>. At the same time, however, still >> more strongly relational notions of selfhood have been emerging in >> neurobiology (e.g., enactivism, the embodied mind, and other umbrella >>terms) >> and ethics (beginning with ecological ethics and feminist ethics / >>ethics of >> care - now with feminist concepts of "relational autonomy" and parallel >> notions of distributed epistemic and ethical responsibility). Such >>strongly >> relational emphases, most broadly, appear to have been characteristic of >> notions of selfhood in the pre-modern "West" and still typically >>function >> strongly in societies shaped by Confucian and Buddhist traditions, for >> example. >> What's of interest here regarding ethics is how such relational selves >>draw >> on virtue ethics: hence the importance of Shannon Vallor's work on >>virtue >> ethics vis-a-vis social networking - most recently, Social Networking >>and >> Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), >> Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = >> >><http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/ethics-social-network >>ing >> />. >> As well, the relational emphases in several Confucian and Buddhist >>societies >> appear to be shift towards more individual emphases, e.g., >> Hansen, Mette Halskov and Rune Svarverud (eds.). 2010. The Rise of the >> Individual in Modern Chinese Society, Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of >>Asian >> Studies.) >> >> For my part, I find the "flow" you refer to helpfully analyzed >>especially >> from phenomenologically-informed frameworks (where such flow >>experiences are >> initially described in offline contexts) as well as, classically, in >> Cs?kszentmih?lyi et al. I know there's some work along these lines in >>Game >> Studies, for example, and, when I get a few more minutes, can cobble >> together a list of those references. In the meantime, someone(s) else on >> this list may have such a bibliography ready to hand? >> >> In any event, hope some of this is of some use - and hope to hear more >>about >> your work at AoIR in Denver! >> >> Best, >> - charles >> Associate Professor in Media Studies >> Department of Media and Communication >> >> Director, Centre for Research on Media Innovations >> <http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/research/center/media-innovations/> >> >> University of Oslo >> P.O. Box 1093 Blindern >> NO-0317 >> Oslo Norway >> email: charles.ess(a)media.uio.no >> >> >> >> >> On 10.02.13 00:54, "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hi, everyone, >>> >>> Thanks so much for all your help, from those of you commenting both >>>here in >>> the list and off of it. >>> >>> Yes, Barry, it was Nathan Jurgenson's work that first inspired me to >>>carry on >>> with my current project, sorry I didn't mention knowing about it. I >>>also >>> consulted with him initially, well before posting my inquiry. Nathan >>>and PJ >>> Rey are running their third Theorizing the Web conference, this year >>>in NYC. >>> >>> Of course, much work has dealt with the issue some, including mine on >>> relationships, identities and communities, and thanks for your own >>>important >>> list of contributions, your references. Thankfully there is now such >>>a wealth >>> of writing and research available. However, some of us think we still >>>have a >>> way to go in, to use your words, "flesh"-ing out dimensions of the >>>processes. >>> There's really still much more to say about it at this time, imo. >>>Most these >>> days seem to not only accept that online/mobile/cmc interaction is >>>real but >>> that it is less discrete from other activities than many of us early >>>internet >>> researchers and private citizens had originally conceived, and >>>experienced >>> back then. >>> >>> Anyone else who has specific references, please feel free to continue >>>sending >>> them to me and/or posting them. >>> >>> Here are my original questions previously posted to the aoirlist. I'm >>>hoping >>> the formatting is better this time: >>> "For a piece I'm preparing on interaction back and forth between >>>online and >>> offline or from digital to physical worlds and back, I'm looking for >>> references about how that works for people, especially those who are >>>members >>> of online communities. >>> >>> More than particular data to show this communication in process, >>>although that >>> is good too, I want to conceptualize themovement, the "flow" from one >>>realm to >>> another, to describe what is happening. Also, how does the online >>> communication, including that through mobile phones, affect the offline >>> interaction, and how do the offline encounters affect what goes on >>>inside the >>> online communities and in other social media containing some of the >>>same >>> people interacting offline. This project is part of my music fan >>>research on >>> fan communities, identities, and relationships. >>> I'm already aware of the articles in the first issue of Mobile Media >>>and >>> Communication (January, 2013), and of Lauren Sessions-Goulet's >>>excellent paper >>> of a few years back on offline meetings and online communities, and >>>have a few >>> other helpful sources. I've done a body of work on romantic online >>> relationships so I understand many of the dynamics there. >>> >>> Please feel free to write off list or on. Thanks so much in advance! >>> cheers, >>> andee (andrea baker)" >>> >>> thanks! --a >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >>> >>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >>> http://www.aoir.org/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:29:31 -0600 >From: Peter Gloviczki <glovi002(a)umn.edu> >To: "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu> >Cc: Air list <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> >Subject: Re: [Air-L] physical/digital worlds >Message-ID: > <CAHhM1_ZP_smznfeY5qELQPk9aSHwGJoCrz-sr35i4dmzmUKN5Q(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >Good morning, Andrea, > >This is a great question. I like Turkle's book Life on the Screen and >I think it might be of some use for you in regards to this issue. I >also wanted to mention Licklider & Taylor's essay, The Computer as a >Communication Device (1968), because I think it might be helpful in >terms of the conceptualization questions that you raise in your note. >It is linked here: <http://memex.org/licklider.pdf>. > >Sincerely, Peter > >>> Hi Andrea and colleagues, >>> Two sorts of quick suggestions - >>> >>> 1. In the direction of the history of the broader conceptualizations >>>of the >>> relationships/interactions you describe: >>> A) partly by way of invoking both Barry Wellman's taxonomy of "the >>>three >>> ages of Internet Studies" and Heidi Campbell's similar taxonomy of >>>three >>> waves of research on religion online (both in Consalvo and Ess, The >>>Handbook >>> of Internet Studies, Blackwell, 2011), I developed an overview chapter >>>on >>> the history of the virtual/online // >>> actual-real-material-"meatspace"/offline distinctions-relationships >>>for our >>> 2011 anthology: >>> Self, Community, and Ethics in Digital Mediatized Worlds. In C. Ess >>>and M. >>> Thorseth, eds., Trust and Virtual Worlds: Contemporary Perspectives, >>>3-30. >>> Oxford: Peter Lang, 2011. >>> B) For a variety of reasons, AoIRists will likely want to also be aware >>> generally of the now publicized results of the Onlife Initiative, a >>>European >>> Commission "Digital Futures" project - >>> <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-initiative>. >>> Broadly, the project sought to move us conceptually further down the >>>road >>> regarding the basic assumptions that have undergirded most of our >>>thinking, >>> research, and policy-making in conjunction with, e.g., "the information >>> society" over past several decades. As the phrase "onlife" is meant to >>> suggest, the once hard (with the usual caveats) distinctions asserted >>> between "the online" and "offline life" have been (largely) shifted >>>towards >>> strong interrelationality (a point that is now made in many, many >>>ways, of >>> course, but is also one of the characterizations of the third Age / >>>Wave in >>> Campbell and Wellman's taxonomies). >>> In addition to what the Onlife Manifesto articulates in terms of >>>developing >>> new conceptual approaches towards what is characterized as a >>>hyperconnected >>> era, AoIRists may find some of the background papers that contributed >>>to the >>> development of the manifesto helpful as well: >>> <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-web-output> >>> >>> 2. In terms of more specific analyses, I find especially helpful >>> A) Lomborg, Stine. Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication: A >>>Case >>> Study of the Blogging Self. Philosophy and Technology 25 >>>(2012):415?434. DOI >>> 10.1007/s13347-011-0018-7. >>> Stine draws on Simmel's understanding of the sociable self - i.e., as >>>first >>> used to theorize and describe "offline" sociabilities - to analyze >>> interactions and negotiations online between a prominent blogger and >>>her >>> readers/respondents. This analysis I found to be particularly useful >>>in a >>> number of ways, beginning with the details Stine careful documents of >>>the >>> negotiations between those engaged with the blog, as these negotiations >>> involve perspective-taking and phatic communication that work to both >>> preserve individual privacy while simultaneously constructing and >>> maintaining the shared personal space (in Danish and other Germanic >>> language, the _intimsf?re_ - the "intimate sphere" of close(r/est) >>> relationships) online. These details, among other things, show how >>>such >>> online processes are extremely similar to their offline counterparts - >>> again, challenging especially 1990s' tendencies towards hard dualisms >>> between the online and the offline. >>> More broadly - though this may take you beyond your primary focus - >>>Stine's >>> work thereby provides an empirically-grounded analysis that fits with >>>both >>> other similar work in Internet Studies as well as in contemporary >>>philosophy >>> on identity and, most basically, conceptions/assumptions regarding >>>selfhood >>> - hence the article's inclusion in this special issue of the journal >>> Philosophy and Technology, as dedicated to these matters. >>> For the introduction: >>> ?At the Intersections Between Internet Studies and Philosophy: ?Who Am >>>I >>> Online?? (Introduction to special issue), Philosophy & Technology: >>>Volume >>> 25, Issue 3: (September, 2012): 275-284. DOI 10.1007/s13347-012-0085-4. >>> >>> (In these directions - of course, "the networked self" from Wellman and >>> Haythornthwaite has worked prominently over the past decade, e.g., most >>> recently in Julie Cohen's 2012 _Configuring the Networked Self: Law, >>>Code, >>> and the Play of Everyday Practice_. New Haven: Yale University Press. >>> <http://www.juliecohen.com/page5.php>. At the same time, however, >>>still >>> more strongly relational notions of selfhood have been emerging in >>> neurobiology (e.g., enactivism, the embodied mind, and other umbrella >>>terms) >>> and ethics (beginning with ecological ethics and feminist ethics / >>>ethics of >>> care - now with feminist concepts of "relational autonomy" and parallel >>> notions of distributed epistemic and ethical responsibility). Such >>>strongly >>> relational emphases, most broadly, appear to have been characteristic >>>of >>> notions of selfhood in the pre-modern "West" and still typically >>>function >>> strongly in societies shaped by Confucian and Buddhist traditions, for >>> example. >>> What's of interest here regarding ethics is how such relational selves >>>draw >>> on virtue ethics: hence the importance of Shannon Vallor's work on >>>virtue >>> ethics vis-a-vis social networking - most recently, Social Networking >>>and >>> Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), >>> Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = >>> >>><http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/ethics-social-networ >>>king >>> />. >>> As well, the relational emphases in several Confucian and Buddhist >>>societies >>> appear to be shift towards more individual emphases, e.g., >>> Hansen, Mette Halskov and Rune Svarverud (eds.). 2010. The Rise of the >>> Individual in Modern Chinese Society, Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of >>>Asian >>> Studies.) >>> >>> For my part, I find the "flow" you refer to helpfully analyzed >>>especially >>> from phenomenologically-informed frameworks (where such flow >>>experiences are >>> initially described in offline contexts) as well as, classically, in >>> Cs?kszentmih?lyi et al. I know there's some work along these lines in >>>Game >>> Studies, for example, and, when I get a few more minutes, can cobble >>> together a list of those references. In the meantime, someone(s) else >>>on >>> this list may have such a bibliography ready to hand? >>> >>> In any event, hope some of this is of some use - and hope to hear more >>>about >>> your work at AoIR in Denver! >>> >>> Best, >>> - charles >>> Associate Professor in Media Studies >>> Department of Media and Communication >>> >>> Director, Centre for Research on Media Innovations >>> <http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/research/center/media-innovations/> >>> >>> University of Oslo >>> P.O. Box 1093 Blindern >>> NO-0317 >>> Oslo Norway >>> email: charles.ess(a)media.uio.no >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10.02.13 00:54, "Baker, Andrea" <bakera(a)ohio.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, everyone, >>>> >>>> Thanks so much for all your help, from those of you commenting both >>>>here in >>>> the list and off of it. >>>> >>>> Yes, Barry, it was Nathan Jurgenson's work that first inspired me to >>>>carry on >>>> with my current project, sorry I didn't mention knowing about it. I >>>>also >>>> consulted with him initially, well before posting my inquiry. >>>>Nathan and PJ >>>> Rey are running their third Theorizing the Web conference, this year >>>>in NYC. >>>> >>>> Of course, much work has dealt with the issue some, including mine on >>>> relationships, identities and communities, and thanks for your own >>>>important >>>> list of contributions, your references. Thankfully there is now such >>>>a wealth >>>> of writing and research available. However, some of us think we >>>>still have a >>>> way to go in, to use your words, "flesh"-ing out dimensions of the >>>>processes. >>>> There's really still much more to say about it at this time, imo. >>>>Most these >>>> days seem to not only accept that online/mobile/cmc interaction is >>>>real but >>>> that it is less discrete from other activities than many of us early >>>>internet >>>> researchers and private citizens had originally conceived, and >>>>experienced >>>> back then. >>>> >>>> Anyone else who has specific references, please feel free to continue >>>>sending >>>> them to me and/or posting them. >>>> >>>> Here are my original questions previously posted to the aoirlist. >>>>I'm hoping >>>> the formatting is better this time: >>>> "For a piece I'm preparing on interaction back and forth between >>>>online and >>>> offline or from digital to physical worlds and back, I'm looking for >>>> references about how that works for people, especially those who are >>>>members >>>> of online communities. >>>> >>>> More than particular data to show this communication in process, >>>>although that >>>> is good too, I want to conceptualize themovement, the "flow" from one >>>>realm to >>>> another, to describe what is happening. Also, how does the online >>>> communication, including that through mobile phones, affect the >>>>offline >>>> interaction, and how do the offline encounters affect what goes on >>>>inside the >>>> online communities and in other social media containing some of the >>>>same >>>> people interacting offline. This project is part of my music fan >>>>research on >>>> fan communities, identities, and relationships. >>>> I'm already aware of the articles in the first issue of Mobile Media >>>>and >>>> Communication (January, 2013), and of Lauren Sessions-Goulet's >>>>excellent paper >>>> of a few years back on offline meetings and online communities, and >>>>have a few >>>> other helpful sources. I've done a body of work on romantic online >>>> relationships so I understand many of the dynamics there. >>>> >>>> Please feel free to write off list or on. Thanks so much in advance! >>>> cheers, >>>> andee (andrea baker)" >>>> >>>> thanks! --a >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >>>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >>>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >>>> >>>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >>>> http://www.aoir.org/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>>http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >>> >>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >>> http://www.aoir.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >>http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org >> >> Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >> http://www.aoir.org/ > > > >-- >Peter Joseph Gloviczki, Ph.D. >http://petergloviczki.com > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list >is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org >Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: >http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > >Join the Association of Internet Researchers: >http://www.aoir.org/ > >End of Air-L Digest, Vol 103, Issue 11 >************************************** >

1 0

The Onlife Manifesto -Digital Agenda for Europe - European Commission
by Charles Ess 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

Dear AoIRists, This may be of interest to many of us, for a variety of reasons: Digital Agenda for Europe European Commission The Onlife Initiative - A Europe 2020 Initiative Chairman: Luciano Floridi Members: Stefana Broadbent - Nicole Dewandre - Charles Ess - Jean-Gabriel Ganascia - Mireille Hildebrandt - Yiannis Laouris - Claire Lobet-Maris - Sarah Oates - Ugo Pagallo - Judith Simon - May Thorseth - Peter-Paul Verbeek The Onlife Manifesto and the book ("user's manual") accompanying it are now publicly and freely available online: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/Onlife_Initia tive.pdf The Onlife Initiative - Concept Reengineering: rethinking public spaces in the digital transition The deployment of ICTs and their uptake by society affects radically the human condition by modifying our relationships to ourselves, to others and to the world around us. The increasing pervasiveness of ICTs upsets established reference frameworks and blurs the boundaries between real and virtual, shifting the primacy from entities to connections & information. Concept reengineering puts us in the best position to reflect meaningfully on what is happening to us, and thereby helps us envision the future in positive terms. Fear of the new or rejection of the unknown can be overcome by better understanding of the concepts we are dealing with. The "Onlife initiative" aims to help us better understand these concepts. For more information about the Onlife Initiative see: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-initiative Enjoy! - charles Associate Professor in Media Studies Department of Media and Communication Director, Centre for Research on Media Innovations <http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/research/center/media-innovations/> University of Oslo P.O. Box 1093 Blindern NO-0317 Oslo Norway email: charles.ess(a)media.uio.no

2 2

world social science forum: deadline for institutional panel proposals 28. february
by Seda Guerses 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

dear all, apologies for x-posting. you can still apply for panels as organizations or institutions at the world social science forum! Organisations and institutions are invited to submit panel proposals online until February 28, 2013. http://www.wssf2013.org/ > > > > The World Social Science Forum will be held 13-15 October 2013 in Montreal. It is hosted by the International Social Science Council (ISSC) and the Canadian Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). The theme of the Forum is ‘social transformations and the digital age’. There are two main sub-themes – one to examine what digital technologies mean for social, political life (everything from security, dating, new forms of work, etc.) and another about what digital technologies mean for the social sciences, humanities and research practices more generally. The full call for papers is attached, and details can be found at: http://www.wssf2013.org > > Please feel free to distribute this more widely, >

1 0

CFP: M/C Journal 'mining' Issue
by Axel Bruns 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

Dear AoIR friends, some of you may be interested in the following journal CFP on the topic of 'mining' (including both literal and figurative meanings of the term - e.g. data mining). Given the renewed attention on public access to scholarship, I should also note that M/C Journal has always been an online, open-access publication; all articles are published under a Creative Commons licence. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 14 Jan. 2013 M/C - Media and Culture http://www.media-culture.org.au/ is calling for contributors to the 'mining' issue of M/C Journal http://journal.media-culture.org.au/ M/C Journal is inviting new contributors. Founded in 1998, M/C is a crossover journal between the popular and the academic, and a blind- and peer-reviewed journal. Our Website at http://journal.media-culture.org.au/provides open access to all past issues. To find out how and in what format to contribute your work, visit http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/about/submissions. Call for Papers: 'mining' Edited by Dean Laplonge and Axel Bruns It's hard to escape the practices of mining. In some ways, we have become obsessed with mining. Mining occupies discussions about the economy, the environment, the labour market, politics and land rights. Our airports are packed full with high-vis people flying to and from mine sites. We seem to view mining as a limitless pit of gold which we can explore/exploit for personal financial gain and to secure research funding. And it's as if there are no limits to what we are willing to mine. The literal interpretation of 'mining' is the extraction of something from the ground. But in addition to such mining of physical resources, the exploitation of information at large scale - known as data mining - is also turning into a burgeoning industry, generating new intellectual and economic opportunities while raising complex ethical concerns. In all its forms, 'mining' therefore is easily associated with engineering, geology, mathematics, economics, sociology, and other scientific practices. But where are the cultural analyses of 'mining'? Where are the articles that engage critically and cleverly with the business and stories of mining? If we consider 'mining' through the lens of gender or ethnicity, through queer studies, poststructuralism or feminism, through the media or critical accounts of academic intervention, what do we come up with? Are there ways of viewing mining that are not tied to the 'hard' sciences? What different views of mining emerge when we view it through a more comprehensive, multidisciplinary lens? The business of mining is not just a matter of extracting minerals from the ground which we can then use for their intended purpose. Data mining is also not just an extraction of 'big data' that uncovers some hidden, absolute truths waiting to be found. The ways we choose to analyse mining result in the way we view this business. This issue of M/C Journal will focus on the differing interpretations and application of 'mining'. Specifically, we hope to re-envision mining as a cultural practice which can be read in multiple ways. We therefore invite authors to offer some innovative interpretations of how mining works, and to explore and expand on the cultures of mining. We encourage authors to speak outside the dominant narrative of mining as a process of extraction of the real and to explore how mining can be viewed otherwise. Areas for consideration include: * the workplace cultures of mine site workplaces and the behaviours of miners * reinterpretations of the history of mining * reinterpretations of the practice of mining as a site of economic development or environmental damage * critiques of emerging practices in data mining * explorations of the data mining industry as it establishes itself * analyses of the relationship between mining and community, environment and people * feminist approaches to mining * gender, sex and sexuality-and their relationship to mining * mining and ownership, privacy, security Prospective contributors should email an abstract of 100-250 words and a brief biography to the issue editors. Abstracts should include the article title and should describe your research question, approach, and argument. Biographies should be about three sentences (maximum 75 words) and should include your institutional affiliation and research interests. Articles should be 3000 words (plus bibliography). All articles will be refereed and must adhere to MLA style (6th edition). Article deadline: 1 Mar. 2012 Issue release date: 1 May 2012 M/C Journal was founded (as "M/C - A Journal of Media and Culture") in 1998 as a place of public intellectualism analysing and critiquing the meeting of media and culture. Contributors are directed to past issues of M/C Journal for examples of style and content, and to the submissions page for comprehensive article submission guidelines. M/C Journal articles are blind peer-reviewed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further M/C Journal issues scheduled for 2012 and 2013: 'catastrophe': article deadline 18 Jan. 2013, release date 20 Mar. 2013 'mining': article deadline 1 Mar. 2013, release date 1 May 2013 'cookbook': article deadline 26 Apr. 2013, release date 26 June 2013 'remix': article deadline 21 June 2013, release date 21 Aug. 2013 'resilient': article deadline 16 Aug. 2013, release date 16 Oct. 2013 'augment': article deadline 11 Oct. 2013, release date 11 Dec. 2013 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/C - Media and Culture is located at <http://www.media-culture.org.au/>. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/C Journal is online at <http://journal.media-culture.org.au/>. All past issues of M/C Journal on various topics are available there. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- end Dr Axel Bruns -- General Editor editor(a)media-culture.org.au M/C - Media and Culture http://www.media-culture.org.au/ -- Dr Axel Bruns http://snurb.info/ - http://produsage.org/ ARC Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation http://cci.edu.au/ Associate Professor, Media & Communication a.bruns(a)qut.edu.au Creative Industries Faculty, Z1-515, CIP Twitter: @snurb_dot_info Queensland University of Technology +61 7 31385548 Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, Qld. 4059, Australia CRICOS No.: 00213J

1 0

mandatory reporting for online health research
by Yukari Seko 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

Dear AoIRists, I'm facing a tricky problem and would like to borrow your wisdom! I am designing a small pilot project to interview creators of self-injury imagery via email or text chat. Last week I received comments from the REB at my institution (a mental health hospital + research institution) that raised a couple of concerns about ethical responsibility. In particular, I am seeking help/suggestion for the following two questions; 1. How can distress and sucidality be determined by email? 2. How can mandatory reporting requirements be met? Seemingly, these comments are directed to clinical professionals who are eligible to assess the level of urgency in situ (i.e. distress and/or suicidality). So I am not sure how non-medical professionals like myself address this issue to convince the REB. I'm consulting with clinicians but they don't have much experience conducing studies online. Also, mandatory reporting for online researchers is a tricky one. I'm planning to recruit participants at an online forum for self-injurers, where members come from all over the world. How can an online research fulfill mandatory reporting requirements if participants are from different jurisdictions? To whom should I report? Thanks a lot in advance for your help. Yukari Seko, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow Social Aetiology of Mental Illness [SAMI] Training Program Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Toronto, ON

1 0

2nd Call: Special Issue on Measuring Influence in Social Media - American Behavioral Scientist
by Anatoliy Gruzd 11 Feb '13

11 Feb '13

Call for Papers: American Behavioral Scientist, Special Issue on *Measuring Influence in Social Media* Editors: - Anatoliy Gruzd <gruzd(a)dal.ca>, School of Information Management, Dalhousie University, Canada - Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca>, Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, Canada Submission deadline: *April 30, 2013* Please send your expression of interest to Anatoliy Gruzd <gruzd(a)dal.ca>. More info at http://bit.ly/cfpInfluence

1 0

Hampton et al; Pew in general
by Barry Wellman 10 Feb '13

10 Feb '13

Andee, See the big report that Keith Hampton and associates did for Pew, with complex findings. Some papers spun off of it. Find on Keith's Rutgers website. I think that we need to honor repeatedly the entire Pew Internet crew -- starting with Lee --- but including Amanda, Mary, Susannah, Aaron, John Horrigan, (days of yore), pollster Evans Witt et al for the great sustained work they've done. y Barry Wellman _______________________________________________________________________ S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab Director Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388 University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 twitter:@barrywellman http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax:+1-416-978-3963 NETWORKED:The New Social Operating System. Lee Rainie & Barry Wellman MIT Press http://amzn.to/zXZg39 Print $19; Kindle $16 Old/newCybertimes http://bit.ly/c8N9V8 It's still rock & roll to me ________________________________________________________________________

2 1

NEW BOOK - Facebook Democracy
by jose marichal 10 Feb '13

10 Feb '13

Colleagues, I thought my recently published book might be of interest to some of you. Cheers, Jose FACEBOOK DEMOCRACY: THE ARCHITECTURE OF DISCLOSURE AND THE THREAT TO PUBLIC LIFE <http://www.ashgate.com/isbn/9781409444305> Description - In July 2010, Facebook had over 500 million subscribers worldwide and the rapid rise of the site prompted Time magazine to name Facebook's founder Mark Zuckerberg its person of the year for 2010. This novel book advances our understanding of how democratic citizens are transformed by the "Facebook revolution". Despite increasing interest in politics and popular media, there has been little academic work on the impact of Facebook on politics in general, and on democratic processes in particular. The work that does exist has been limited to Facebook's impact on politics as a mobilization tool used by social movement activists. In this book, José Marichal argues that understanding Facebook's impact on political processes requires an understanding of how Facebook's architecture of disclosure shapes the construction of individuals' political identities by drawing users further into their pre-selected social networks. Drawing on a number of disciplines and an ethnographic analysis of 250 Facebook political groups, Marichal explores how Facebook's emphasis on social connection impacts key dimensions of political participation: e.g., mobilization, deliberation, and attitude formation. - *Contents: *Introduction: the allure of Facebook; Facebook and the utopian/dystopian dialectic; Facebook and the architecture of disclosure; Facebook and the decline of the public; The personal citizen; Engagement as personal citizens; The digital front stage and deliberation; Facebook and mobilization: beyond the Facebook revolution; Privacy in the age of personal politics; Friending the nation-state: social networking and power; Conclusions: how to listen on Facebook; Bibliography; Index. - *About the Author: *José Marichal is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at California Lutheran University, USA. - *Reviews: *‘Conceptualizing Facebook (and social media more generally) as architectures that structure political behavior is an original way of examining what difference social media make. This study provides fresh insights about both the problems and potential offered by these new communication tools.’ Karen Mossberger, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA ‘A fascinating and much needed account of how online connectedness and disclosure impact mobilization, deliberation, engagement, friendship, privacy and more. A must read for all those interested in the breathtaking changes that the Internet, and particularly social media, introduces to both public and private domains of our everyday experiences.’ Azi Lev-On, Ariel University Centre, Israel -- _______________________________________________________________________________________ josé marichal, ph.d. | associate professor | political science <http://about.me/marichal> department | california lutheran university 60 w. olsen road | #3800 | thousand oaks, ca 91360 805-493-3328

1 0