April 2013 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Trouble convincing reviewers social media is legitimate?
by Karissa McKelvey 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

More tweets, More votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior New work by Joseph DiGrazia, Karissa McKelvey, Johan Bollen and Fabio Rojas. We hope this paper can convince your reviewers that social media aren't just spam-infested pools of emoticons. We show that random samples are significant predictors of vote margin in house elections. No sentiment needed -- only raw counts of the names of the candidates. We do it by measuring simply the number of times a candidate was mentioned by full name (first last). Handles and hashtags don't work as well. There will be another paper later about that. The working paper (short!) is here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2235423 We'd appreciate your comments -- Karissa McKelvey rissarae.net

1 0

STUDY ON SOCIAL MEDIA & ONLINE RISK
by BRANLEY D.B. 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

You are invited to take part in an online study investigating social media and online risk. Social Media refers to Social Networking websites and digital applications that enable people to interact and share information; this includes sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn, YouTube etc. The purpose of this study is to investigate how and why people may be using social media, including their attitudes and perceptions of it and also to investigate any positive and/or negative consequences associated with its use. If you have used any form of Social Media in the last 3 months, you are eligible to participate. Participation is anonymous and simply involves completing an online questionnaire which will take approximately 25 minutes. The survey includes questions about your use of Social Media, your perceptions of Social Media and any positive and/or negative experiences you have had as a result of using Social Media. You will also be asked for some basic demographic information. No identifiable information will be requested. Everyone who completes the survey has the chance to win a £50 Amazon voucher. I am more than happy to repay the favour by participating in your study. Also, if you would like to do a link swop and share my survey via your social media sites, I am happy to do the same in return :) Please visit this website to take part: https://durhambs.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_5gt9rX6RB8Q9pNr If you have any questions please email the principle researcher, Dawn Branley at dawn.branley(a)durham.ac.uk<mailto:dawn.branley@durham.ac.uk>, or tweet @TheCyberPsyche

1 0

(advice sought) Public safety and configuration of list
by Michael Allan 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

To the experts in Liberationtech, Air-L and Mailman lists, (cc General Counsel of Stanford University) Stanford University has configured the Liberationtech mailing list in a manner that is potentially unsafe. University staff are aware of the problem and are evalutating the situation, but have yet to take action. I'm a subscriber to the list, and I ask your advice. SITUATION The Liberationtech mailing list is run by Stanford University in connection with its Program on Liberation Technology. That program investigates the use of IT "to defend human rights, improve governance, empower the poor, promote economic development, and pursue a variety of other social goods." [1] Experts on the list advise and inform on matters such as encrypting communications, protecting infrastructure from cyber attack, and protecting onself from personal danger. Often those seeking help are in vulnerable situations. They include aid workers, reporters and activists who live and work in environments where human rights are not well respected, or where the government is too weak to protect people from organized criminals, rival militias, and so forth. The list software is GNU Mailman. The administration interface includes the following configuration items: [2] (a) Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be stripped? If so, this will be done regardless of whether an explict Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not. X No - Yes (b) Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* recommended for most mailing lists. X Poster - This list - Explicit address (c) _________ Shown above is the default, recommended setting of (1 No, 2 Poster). It leaves the sender's Reply-To headers (if any) unaltered during mail transfer. Instead of this, the Liberationtech mailing list is configured as follows: (b) Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* recommended for most mailing lists. - Poster X This list - Explicit address (c) _________ With this setting, whenever a subscriber Q sends a message to the list, the software adds a Reply-To header pointing to L, which is the address of the list itself. The message is then passed on to the subscribers. The meaning of the added Reply-To header is, "Q asks that you reply to her at L." [3] Note that this is false information; Q does not ask that. EXAMPLE OF DANGER Matt Mackall has suggested that, "here of all places", people might get hurt as a consequence of this configuration [4]. I agree. Here's a brief example of how people might get hurt: 1. Subscriber P is in a vulnerable situation. P is distacted by the situation and is not getting a lot of sleep. 2. P asks the mailing list for advice on the situation, because that's the purpose of the list. 3. Subscriber Q replies with helpful information. The mailing list adds a Reply-To header to Q's message that points to address L. Again, the mis-information is, "Q asks that you reply to her at L". [3] 4. P replies with private information, including (as Matt puts it) a "potentially life-endangering datum". Tired and distracted, P replies by hitting the standard Reply button. In the mail client, this means "reply to Q". The reply goes instead to L, which is the public mailing list. Oh my god! What have I done! 5. People get hurt. Isn't this a danger? POSSIBLE EXPLOIT THAT INCREASES THE DANGER Suppose that P is actually a police operative in an authoritarian state, or a criminal operative in a failed state. He only pretends to be a vulnerable activist (say). His real aim is to hurt the activists and other opponents; damage the university's reputation; close down the mailing list; make democracy look foolish [5]; and finally make some money in the bargain [6]. The likelihood of his success is roughly proportional to the amount of harm suffered by the activists and other innocent people. If such an exploit were even *perceived* to be feasible, then the mis-configuration of the mailing list would not only be exposing the public to a haphazard danger, but also providing the means and incentive to orchestrate and amplify that danger. Might not this exploit be perceived as feasible? INTERIM RECOMMENDATION While Stanford University is evaluating these safety concerns and has yet to make a decision, it should return the configuration to its default setting. The default setting is known to be safe. -- Michael Allan Toronto, +1 416-699-9528 http://zelea.com/ NOTES [1] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech http://liberationtechnology.stanford.edu/ [2] The meaning of configuration variables (a,b,c) is defined here: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html [3] 'The "Reply-To" field is added by the message originator and is intended to direct replies.' Section 4.4.3, RFC 822. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt Note that the mailing list is not the "message originator", and is not supposed to add a Reply-To header. It is mis-configured. [4] Matt Mackall originally pointed to the danger in this post: https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-March/007762.html [5] The current configuration of the mailing list was approved by the subscribers in a vote. https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-March/007973.html [6] America is a litigious society.

2 1

Final reminder: social media conference London 2-3 Sep, abstracts due Friday 26 April
by Graham Meikle 22 Apr '13

22 Apr '13

CALL FOR PAPERS Social Media The fourth international transforming audiences conference making connections | creative cultures | open everything Date: 2 – 3 September 2013 Venue: University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 5LS The previous Transforming Audiences conferences, in 2007, 2009 and 2011, have seen this event become Europe’s major international conference series for audience/user studies, bringing together researchers from all over the world. Now we are delighted to invite you to Social Media, the fourth in the Transforming Audiences series, in central London in September 2013. The Social Media conference is organised by the Centre for Social Media Research at the University of Westminster’s Communication and Media Research Institute. The event will present a rich set of analyses of the current situation and raise important questions about the future. We strongly encourage papers from new scholars as well as more established researchers. Keynote speakers include Stuart Allan (author Citizen Witnessing), Megan Boler (co-editor DIY Citizenship and Critical Making), Larissa Hjorth (co-author Understanding Social Media) and D.E. Wittkower (editor Facebook and Philosophy). We particularly invite papers that connect with the themes making connections, creative cultures and open everything. Making connections — friends | followers | connections | networks | communities | tags | favourites | playlists | channels | emotions | affect | information | knowledge | circulation | movement | share Creative cultures — critical making | memes | do-it-yourself | do-it-with-others | collaboration | participation | read-write | edit | hacking | modding | coding | creativity Open everything — Big Data | data journalism | visualisation | mapping | activism | commons | business models | access | education | MOOCs | private | public | surveillance | visibility SUBMISSION GUIDELINES You can submit proposals for individual papers or for themed panels. Individual papers will each have 15 minutes plus discussion time. Panels should consist of three presentations of 15 minutes each, to be followed by fifteen minutes of discussion for a total session of one hour. For individual papers, please send a 300-word abstract and brief biographical note of up to 70 words. Abstracts should highlight the original theoretical or empirical contribution. They should also include the presenter’s name, institutional affiliation, title of paper, email and work address. Proposals for panels or alternative formats should include a 300-word overview as well as individual abstracts following the guidelines above. All proposals should be sent by 26 April 2013 to TA4(a)westminster.ac.uk<mailto:TA4@westminster.ac.uk> Electronic submissions only. Successful applicants will be notified by mid-May. REGISTRATION The registration fee for the two days will be £285, for one day will be £180. ICA, AoIR, IAMCR and ECREA members will be given a preferential rate of £245 for the two day event. The special rate for students will be £130 for the two days, or £75 for one day. This covers all conference documentation, refreshments, lunches, wine reception and administration costs. Registration will open mid-May. http://www.transformingaudiences.org.uk<http://www.transformingaudiences.org.uk/> http://www.westminster.ac.uk/research/a-z/camri/events/camri-events-calenda… ----------------------- Professor Graham Meikle Communication and Media Research Institute, School of Media, Arts and Design, University of Westminster, HA1 3TP, UK Twitter: @graham_meikle Phone: +44 (0)20 7911 5000 ext 4755 http://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/our-people/directory/meikle-graham The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.

1 0

CFP: Prototype Turn, Workshop at ACM Creative & Cognition, Sydney, June 17, 2013
by Jaz Choi 21 Apr '13

21 Apr '13

PROTOTYPE TURN ACM Creative & Cognition 2013 Workshop Sydney, Australia June 17, 2013 ---- From citizen science to critical design and the “maker” movement we are witnessing a “prototype turn” that emphasizes collaborative and open design practices that challenge and redefine the existing social, political, and technical limits (of software and hardware). In recent years, design trends in technological platforms have widely applied concepts such as quantified self, gamification, DIY/maker culture, highlighting and in many cases, advocating open access and (re-)use of data. However, this emphasis towards “openness” is not without problems and drawbacks. This workshop will bring together scholars, researchers, and practitioners interested in emergent and critical perspectives related to open data across diverse fields from science to arts. The workshop will serve as an active forum to discuss a diverse set of perspectives in order to examine and interrogate the notion of “openness” by looking at specific cases and related social, cultural, political, and technological phenomena surrounding the open access to and (re-)use of data. The specific goals of this workshop are to: - Document the emerging and fast evolving space of communities focused around open approaches towards data - Reflect upon specific instances of open data practices and uses that would benefit from critical thinking around the ‘open ethics’ - Produce a toolkit that helps develop practical and critical strengths for new open data projects. WORKSHOP STRUCTURE Participants will be asked to present their papers in this half-day workshop and we will also archive everyone’s papers on the workshop’s website. In the second half of the workshop, we will prepare datasets from existing projects and ask the diverse groups to work together to develop potential kits and tools for stakeholders and communities to deliberate upon the use of open data. These kits and tools will provide the users with pragmatic, as well as critical/theoretical, considerations when working with open data. Participants will present their prototypes and ideas after which we will discuss the results and plan future events and dissemination of output from the workshop. SUBMISSION FORMAT Please submit a 2 – 3 page position statement, which includes the following: - Description of your current project or applications that are related to the open approach towards the use and reuse of data. - Questions about how theoretical and critical perspectives would inform your own project. - Ideas or speculations about the trajectory of open ethics in your field of expertise. - A short biography of the author wishing to attend the workshop (100-150 words). Applications should be single-authored. We highly encourage teamwork on the day, but would like social interaction, idea iteration, and group formation at the event. We ask participants to submit their applications to prototypeturn(a)gmail.com by May 16th, 2013 ORGANISERS Jude Yew, National University of Singapore Denisa Kera, National University of Singapore Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Queensland University of Technology, Australia Andreas Schlegel, Lasalle College of Arts, Singapore ---- dr. jaz hee-jeong choi deputy director, urban informatics research lab school of design, creative industries faculty, qut // e: h.choi(a)qut.edu.au // w: www.nicemustard.com // p: +617 3138 8190 // m: +61 433 167 151

1 0

literature on friendship
by Eden Medina 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

A colleague of mine in computer science wants to develop a deeper understanding of what friendship means in online environments and how it compares with understandings of friendship in offline environments. She is specifically interested in the following two questions and is looking for literature suggestions: 1) Is there research that characterizes friendship in either qualitative or quantitative ways? 2) Is there research that distinguishes the characteristics of online friendships based on the nature of the origin (i.e. was the friendship established prior to online interaction vs during the online interaction)? All literature suggestions appreciated. Many thanks! -- Eden Medina Associate Professor of Informatics Adjunct Associate Professor of History School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University, Bloomington edenm(a)indiana.edu www.edenmedina.com Learn about "Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile" (MIT Press, 2011) @ www.cyberneticrevolutionaries.com

1 0

SAMLA Visual Rhetoric Regular Session CFP
by Shawn Apostel 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

The South Atlantic Modern Language Association’s (SAMLA) focus this year is Cultures, Contexts, Images, and Texts: Making Meaning in Print, Digital, and Networked Worlds, and this Call for Papers invites submissions that explore and examine the ways that images are used to make meaning in print and online. In keeping with the rhetorical focus of this session, we are interested in papers that inquire how visual artifacts make meaning by persuading using one or more of Aristotle’s appeals: ethos, logos, and/or pathos. Papers may examine how visuals persuade in print, digital, and networked worlds through moving images such as videos and movies, artwork, static online or printed images, and video games. The Visual Rhetoric session is a regular session of SAMLA, and we invite submissions that engage with the theme of this year's conference as well as engaging with other issues and topics that represent the field of visual rhetoric. Please send abstracts of 500 words or less to the session’s chair, Shawn Apostel, sapostel(a)bellarmine.edu, no later than May 24, 2013, and include with your abstract any audio / visual needs you have. All presenters must be members of SAMLA at the time of presentation. Please be sure to include your contact information and any other special needs you may have. SAMLA will be held in Atlanta, GA on November 8-10, 2013. For more information about the conference, visit http://samla.memberclicks.net/. Best regards, Shawn -- Shawn Apostel, Ph.D -- Instructional Technology Specialist Bellarmine University -- @apostels shawn.apostel(a)gmail.com

1 0

Fwd: 5 year post-doctoral position at Fraunhofer ISI
by Seda Guerses 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

fyi, s. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Friedewald, Michael" <Michael.Friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de> > Date: April 19, 2013 9:53:12 AM GMT+02:00 > To: "Friedewald, Michael" <Michael.Friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de> > Subject: 5 year post-doctoral position at Fraunhofer ISI > > sorry for cross-posting. please distribute widely! > --- > The Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI) in Karlsruhe, Germany (http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de<http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/>) is seeking a > Post-Doctoral Researcher/Senior Analyst for Innovation Research and Technology Assessment in the field of Information and Communication Technologies (Reference No. ISI-2013-39) > The position will be in the "Emerging Technologies" department and will commence on 01.07.2013 (or earlier). The researcher will work on research projects focussing mainly on the analysis of scientific-technological, economic, societal and policy aspects of the development and utilisation of information and communications technologies. > You will be working in both German and international projects, focussing on topics such as security, reliability, and societal compatibility of ICT applications. Recent FP7 projects include PRESCIENT (SiS, 2010-13), SAPIENT (Security, 2011-14), PRISMS (Security, 2012-15) and IRISS (SSH, 2012-15). > You are an engineer or natural scientist with good knowledge of information and communications technologies and experience in analysing the socio-economic aspects of ICT, or an economist or social scientist with experience in analysing all aspects of innovation in information and communications technology. > You should have good knowledge in IT security research and privacy. You should also have an interest in current ICT trends such as ’Big Data’ or ‘Cloud Computing’. > You should have experience/interest in interdisciplinary research in the fields of policy, industry and technology. > Applications are welcomed from experienced scientists who will be able, after a short training period, to acquire projects independently and to further develop their main work focuses both conceptually and methodologically. Professional experience in the information and communications branch, as well as a doctorate, would be desirable. > You should have very good knowledge of English. German language skills are desirable. If the applicant does not have German language skills, he/she will be expected to acquire them. You should have good computer skills and the willingness and ability to work in interdisciplinary teams. > You can expect interesting projects, contact with leading international research institutions, a well equipped infrastructure and communicative and friendly colleagues. The results of your work will form part of the strategic consultations for decision-makers in politics and industry. > Employment terms, remuneration and social security benefits are in accordance with the TVöD (collective wage agreement for German public sector employees). The employment contract is limited to five years. > Please send your application until 5 May 2013 to Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, attn. Ms. Julia Roth, Breslauer Straße 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany, mailto: julia.roth(a)isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:julia.roth@isi.fraunhofer.de> > http://www.academics.de/jobs/wissenschaftlerin_wissenschaftler_87255.html > > -- > Dr. Michael Friedewald > Coordinator ICT Research > Competence Center Emerging Technologies > Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI > Breslauer Straße 48 | 76139 Karlsruhe > fon: +49 721 6809-146 | fax: +49 721 6809-77-146 > assistent: +49 (0) 721/6809-189 (Silke Just) > mailto: michael.friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.de> > http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de<http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/> > http://works.bepress.com/michael_friedewald/ > >

1 0

:: INTERACT 2013 Workshop || (Re)Creating Lively Cities through Ambient Media Technologies: Arts, Culture, and Gastronomic Experiences || 12th May 2013 deadline || South Africa::
by artur.lugmayr＠tut.fi 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR PAPERS, DEMONSTRATIONS, AND POSTERS IN CONJUCTION WITH INTERACT 2013, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA - 6th-9th September 2013 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON (RE)CREATING LIVELY CITIES THROUGH AMBIENT TECHNOLOGIES: ARTS, CULTURE AND GASTRONOMIC EXPERIENCES (CLCAT) http://www.tut.fi/emmi/WWW/ameamain/relci2013 Deadline for 2-5 pages position papers: 12th May 2013 (strict deadline) Artur Lugmayr (Tampere Univ. of Technology), Tampere, Finland, lartur(a)acm.org Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Urban Informatics Research Lab, QUT, Brisbane Australia, h.choi(a)qut.edu.au Kirralie Houghton, Urban Informatics Research Lab, QUT, Brisbane Australia, kirralie.houghton(a)qut.edu.au --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digital and interactive technologies are becoming increasingly embedded in everyday lives of people around the world. Application of technologies such as real-time, context-aware, and interactive technologies; augmented and immersive realities;, social media; and location-based services has been particularly evident in urban environments where technological and sociocultural infrastructures enable easier deployment and adoption as compared to non-urban areas. There has been growing consumer demand for new forms of experiences and services enabled through these emerging technologies. We call this ambient media, as the media is embedded in the natural human living environment. This workshop focuses on ambient media services, applications, and technologies that promote people?s engagement in creating and re-creating liveliness in urban environments, particularly through arts, culture, and gastronomic experiences. The workshop takes a multidisciplinary and future oriented approach, and welcomes participants from diverse disciplinary domains for open discussions about technological, sociocultural, and content-related aspects of ambient media services that support people?s engagement in (re)creating their urban environments into a livelier place through art, cultural, and gastronomic experiences. Within this context, we welcome submissions relating to (but not limited to) the following: ? case-studies (successful, and especially unsuccessful ones); ? speculative and innovative concepts or design; ? demonstrations of services and applications; ? user-experience studies and evaluations; ? artistic installations and contents; ? social and/or economic studies, businesses models, and marketing ? technological novelties, evaluations, and solutions; The following topics fit within the scope of the workshop: ? Analysis of videos related to art, culture, and gastronomy ? Ubiquitous environments and interfaces in lively city environments ? Intelligent appliances and gadgets supporting art, culture and gastronomy ? Multimedia learning for activities around smart city environments ? Locative media and context sensor technologies ? Artistic, cultural, and gastronomic services and applications; ? Socio-economic studies, business models, advertising, and marketing; ? Applied ambient media technologies in city environments (e.g. P2P, 3D, augmented reality, QoE, protocols, networks, security, and privacy); ? Engagement and persuasion in smart environments; ? QoE and for ambient urban city applications. PUBLICATIONS ? Submit your contribution by using the INTERACT template: [--> http://www.interact2013.org/Interact2013/media/Store/documents/Paper%20form…] ? To the following submission system: [--> http://webhotel2.tut.fi/emmi/Conferences/2012same/ (!!!) NOTE (!!!): PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO TICK RELCI 2013 AS SUBMISSION TYPE!!! SUBMISSION DEADLINE 12th May 2013 MORE INFORMATION http://www.ambientmediaassociation.org/relci2012

1 0

IEEE VIS 2013 Arts Program // Art+Experiment Atlanta, GA // October 13th-18th, 2013
by Lorna Gonzalez 18 Apr '13

18 Apr '13

Please give widest distribution: Overview There is a reciprocal relationship between art and visualization research — New media artists redefine the way that we view science and information, while experts in science, medicine, informatics, and visualization impact art practice through new ideas, technologies, and collaborations. The IEEE VIS 2013 Arts Program showcases high-quality artwork and research that demonstrates and investigates the exciting and increasingly prominent intersections between art and visualization. Through an *art show* that runs concurrently with the IEEE 2013 VIS conference and a dedicated *papers track*, the Arts Program aims to foster new thinking, discussion, and collaboration between artists, designers, technologists, visualization scientists, and others working at the intersection of these fields. The theme for this year's arts program is *Art+Experiment*. Visualization research encompasses not only data representation, but also the development of interaction techniques, explorations of display aesthetics, and examinations of applied perception. Increasingly, empirical justification for new visualization techniques is derived through well-designed experiments. And in fact, much recent research is concerned with the creation, implementation, replication, and evaluation of user studies in order to propel the fields of information and scientific visualization. At the same time, the new media arts community is interested in the creative possibilities offered by new technologies and new techniques, but also in developing new methods and presentations to explore and question their cultural meaning and impact. What does it mean for an art installation to produce experimental results? Can an artwork be expressive, challenging, and conceptual, yet simultaneously rigorous, practical, and empirical? We invite artists and researchers to think about the connections and chasms between art and research, and to explore the nature of experimental design and creative experimentation. Papers Track For this year's Arts Program we are including a papers track. Artists, reseachers, and scholars are invited to submit papers related to the theme of *Art+Experiment*. There is no fixed minimum or maximum length for the papers, but they are generally expected to be between 5 and 10 pages. Papers could discuss any of the following topics: - the influence of information visualization techniques on art practice - the influence of contemporary art practice on visualization techniques - exploration of the history of visualization - art and information - data visualization art - database aesthetics - creative visualization techniques - experimental interaction techniques - design and information aesthetics - infographics and art - cybernetic art and visualization - telematic art and visualization - aesthetics of experiment Accepted authors will present their papers at the Arts Program session during the conference. Accepted papers will be published in the IEEE VIS 2013 Arts Program proceedings. Detailed submission instructions can be found below. There is also an art show track. For more information, visit: http://w3.sista.arizona.edu/VISAP2013/ or contact *Angus Forbes*: angus.forbes(at)sista.arizona.edu *Lauren Thorson*: lauren-thorson(at)uiowa.edu Best, Lorna Gonzalez Doctoral Student Language, Literacy, and Composition Studies Technology & Society University of California, Santa Barbara

1 0