December 2005 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

netlabels
by Antina 20 Dec '05

20 Dec '05

As far as i understand: a netlabel is a platform, to where musicians (music producers) can upload their (often electronic) music. net users can download the (mostly) mp3-music for free. up-coming artists are promoted by that platform: sometimes, the netlabel organizes events. Normally, the netlabel music is licensed by creative commons. Does anybody know studies over netlabels? Greetings from Berlin, Antina Michels --------------------------------- Sarah Connor, Moshammer oder Papst Benedikt die Top-Suchen 2005.

1 0

it's complicated
by Derek McMillan 19 Dec '05

19 Dec '05

Some of the more advanced MUDs have for many years had such options as "ask" or "none of your business" or "prefer not to say" under gender. With regard to sexual orientation one of our local youth groups has adopted the abbreve LGBU, I do not know how widespread this is: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Undecided. ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Photos � NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com

1 0

2nd CfP - Workshop CHI2006 - new user experience challenges in iT V: mobility & sociability
by A.C.Roibas＠bton.ac.uk 19 Dec '05

19 Dec '05

(apologies for cross-posting) -------------------------------------------------------- Workshop CHI2006 - Call For Papers Investigating new user experience challenges in iTV: mobility & sociability -------------------------------------------------------- *Extended deadline: 9 January 2006* http://soc.kuleuven.be/com/mediac/chi2006workshop/ Position papers are invited on the design of future interactive television (iTV) scenarios characterized by pervasive communications in contexts of entertainment, work and government, with special attention to the social character of these applications and the implications for interface design. The workshop will include thematically organized moderated group discussions. Submissions are invited on the following topics: * unfolding experimental research methodologies to understand user- experience in future pervasive communication scenarios; * sharing a roadmap of feasible scenarios and representative applications for ubi-iTV; * exploring the potential of novel interfaces within pervasive communication scenarios for entertainment, work and government; * accounts of the particular challenges of studying and designing for sociability in social electronic media * understanding and supporting sociability in social electronic media * evaluating sociability This one-day workshop wants to address these issues by bringing together practitioners and researchers from different domains, but with the same concern for social interfaces on pervasive interactive television. We will select participants with diverse backgrounds based upon the relevance, insightfulness, and originality of their submissions. Submissions are expected in the form of 2-4 pages position papers, describing the area of research, specific work (empirical or theoretical) on the workshop topic and the innovative character of the research at hand. Submissions (in Conference Proceedings Publication Format) can be uploaded on the website: http://soc.kuleuven.be/com/mediac/chi2006workshop/ Timescale: * Deadline for submissions: 9 January 2006 (extended) * Feedback to authors: 31 January 2006 * Workshop at CHI2006: 22 April 2006 Organizers: Dr. Anxo Cereijo Roibás (University of Brighton, UK) David Geerts (University of Leuven, Belgium) Prof. Elizabeth Furtado (University of Fortaleza, Brazil) Dr. Licia Calvi (University of Leuven, Belgium) Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

2 1

I spoke too soon - some data re message board use
by David Brake 19 Dec '05

19 Dec '05

I spoke too soon! Some data is available after all. More would be welcome however as there still isn't much! Livingstone, S. M. and M. Bober (2004) "Uk Children Go Online: Surveying the Experiences of Young People and Their Parents" ESRC London. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/bober/UKCGOsurveyreport.pdf reveals that of 12-19 year old regular internet users 17% contributed to message boards (doesn't separate out 'lurkers' from 'participants' though. Survey data from Pew's first Teen and Parent survey in 2000 reveals 38% of 12-17 year olds go to “web sites and bulletin boards where they can write their opinions about things”. Unfortunately, this question disappeared from (what seems to be?) Pew's only other survey data with teens in it - in 2004. And while I think of it here are the other sources I checked unsuccessfully (but which other researchers interested in young people and Internet use may find handy): Dutton, W. H., C. di Genarro and A. M. Hargrave (2005) "The Internet in Britain: The Oxford Internet Survey (Oxis)" Oxford Internet Institute Oxford. http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/oxis/ OxIS_2005_Internet_Survey.pdf Roberts, D. F., U. G. Foehr and V. M. A. Rideout (2005) "Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year Olds" Kaiser Family Foundation http://www.kff.org/entmedia/7251.cfm doesn't seem to have anything in it. NetRatings Australia Pty Ltd (2005) "Kidsonline@Home: Internet Use in Australian Homes" Sydney. http://www.aba.gov.au/newspubs/internet.shtml --- David Brake, Doctoral Student in Media and Communications, London School of Economics & Political Science <http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/study/ mPhilPhDMediaAndCommunications.htm> Also see http://davidbrake.org/ (home page), http://blog.org/ (personal weblog) and http://get.to/lseblog (academic groupblog) Author of Dealing With E-Mail - <http://davidbrake.org/ dealingwithemail/> callto://DavidBrake (Skype.com's Instant Messenger and net phone)

2 1

studies over netlabels
by Antina 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Hello all, Does anybody know any studies over NETLABELS? I only found one of Bram Timmers from Utrecht, which is already helpful. Are there more?? I´m a graduate student at Humboldt-Uni in Berlin and I'll write my final thesis about netlabels (in European Ethnology). Thanks for your help, Antina Michels Antina Michels Bernhard-Lichtenberg-Str. 20/I 10407 Berlin Tel: ++ 49-30- 41 72 32 70 Handy: 0173/ 251 38 74 --------------------------------- Telefonieren Sie ohne weitere Kosten mit Ihren Freunden von PC zu PC! Jetzt Yahoo! Messenger installieren!

3 2

heterotopias and the internet?
by Katherine Mancuso 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

One of my colleagues would like to know if anyone is working on the internet as a Foucauldian heterotopia. Please address your responses to Jere Tesser jtesser(a)emory.edu. thanks, kathy -- Katherine Mancuso, PhD student Graduate Institute of the Liberal Arts S415 Callaway Center Emory University Atlanta, GA 30322 katherine.mancuso(a)emory.edu AAA 2005 Media/Technology sessions: http://wiki.oxus.net/wiki/AAA2005 Anthropologists and labor unions allied: http://AAAUnite.blogspot.com Orphans V: Science, Industry, Education: http://www.sc.edu/filmsymposium Social software linkage: http://del.icio.us/museumfreak My weblog: http://museumfreak.livejournal.com "My life is not a quota or an action to affirm an idea of equality. My life is my life." ~Jamaica Kincaid "she's nothing more than fiction / she dreams in digital / compose your dreams / and don't be afraid to expose yourself." ~Orgy

3 2

FW: Wikipedia vs Britannica
by Niels Windfeld Lund 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

sometimes it is good to be a member of more than one discussion list ! best Niels W.L. member of Air-l, Jesse-list and ph.d. design list -----Original Message----- From: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum on behalf of Sloan, Bernie Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 10:24 PM To: JESSE(a)LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: Wikipedia vs Britannica The following interesting item was forwarded to me by a colleague (Sharon Stoerger): Giles, Jim. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature. Published online: 14 December 2005; | doi:10.1038/438900a http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Bernie Sloan Senior Information Systems Consultant Consortium of Academic & Research Libraries in Illinois 616 E. Green Street, Suite 213 Champaign, IL 61820-5752 Phone: (217) 333-4895 Fax: (217) 265-0454 E-mail: bernies(a)uillinois.edu

4 3

Re: [Air-l] heterotopias and the internet?
by Martijn Stevens 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Hi Mark, Jere, Kathy and others, I'm a phd student at the Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands and my research is about the 'musealization' of Internet art. Recently, I've written a piece which was on the Internet as heterotopia. I'm not using Foucault in relation to the Other or the Panopticum, but I'm trying to analyse the net as the actualisation of virtual relationships. That's where I bring in the heterotopia, but it's actually a rather Deleuzian point of view. Furthermore, I want to describe processes of musealization as constituting discourses of power, which is resisted by the very nature of the net. Also, I was wondering if anyone is working with Foucault's concept of heterochrony. I hope this makes sense and I would really like to discuss these matters with you all. Best, Martijn Stevens Department of Cultural Studies and Comparative Arts Raboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands m.stevens(a)let.ru.nl

1 0

Wikipedia on NPR's "All Things Considered" tonight
by Holly Kruse 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

To hear the Wikipedia story that aired tonight on "All Things Considered," including discussion of the _Nature_ article and the Seigenthaler episode, go to: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5055388 Holly -- Holly Kruse Faculty of Communication The University of Tulsa 600 S. College Ave. Tulsa, OK 74104 918-631-3845 holly-kruse(a)utulsa.edu

1 0

Re: [Air-l] Wikipedia vs Britannica
by Bram Dov Abramson 15 Dec '05

15 Dec '05

> Nature, the best in science journalism as they say about themselves, has > compared Wikipedia with (the old and edited and therefore better???) > Encylopaedia Britannica. You know, it seems to me that what comparisons such of these are missing is the time arrow. It compared Wikipedia as of 1 Oct 2005 to the 2002 edition of Encyclopedia Brittanica, say. For instance: > Only eight serious errors, such as misinterpretations of important > concepts, were detected in the pairs of articles reviewed, four from each > encyclopaedia. But reviewers also found many factual errors, omissions or > misleading statements: 162 and 123 in Wikipedia and Britannica, > respectively. You'd think that, by 25 Dec 2005, at least some of those errors will have been worked on -- particularly if the reviewers disclosed what they came up with. Yes, this was of course a sampling approach, and the error-counting meant to represent some larger set. But to the extent that Wikipedia is an infrastructure for peer-based content creation, not a frozen product with a release date, it seems to me if journalists wish to represent it more accurately they should be adding the time dimension to their descriptions. Otherwise it's a bit like announcing definitively what The Web has to say about something, isn't it? True at some particular point in time, but not a done deal. cheers Bram

1 0