June 2006 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Fwd: [Asis-l] FW: Invitation to complete Digital Curation Centre on-line survey
by Jeremy Hunsinger 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

> > ***Apologies for cross-posting*** > > Scientists, researchers and scholars across the UK generate > increasingly > vast amounts of digital data. JISC and EPSRC have funded the > establishment > of a Digital Curation Centre (DCC) to support curation activities > within UK > institutions that create, store, manage and/or preserve these data. > For more > information on the DCC, please see http://www.dcc.ac.uk. > > To evaluate the level of current curation activity and the DCC’s > effectiveness in raising awareness regarding digital curation > issues, we > would like to invite you to complete our on-line survey. Whatever > your role > in the life-cycle of digital information – from researchers to > archivists to > data re-users - we would like to hear from you. The survey will take > between 15 and 20 minutes to complete and as a small token of our > appreciation, we are offering one lucky entrant the chance to win > an iPod > nano (competition rules apply). > > The results of this survey, together with the results of focus > groups and > one-to-one interviews will help us to determine how we might better > serve > the digital curation, preservation, and eScience communities. > > To complete the on-line survey, please go to > http://www.dcc.ac.uk/adding/public_survey/. > > The deadline for completing this survey is July 28th, 2006. > > Best regards, > > Joy Davidson > DCC Training Coordinator and ERPANET British Editor > Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute (HATII) > George Service House, 11 University Gardens, > University of Glasgow > Glasgow G12 8QJ > Scotland > Tel: +44(0)141 330 8592 > Fax: +44(0)141 330 3788 > http://www.dcc.ac.uk > http://www.erpanet.org > > > ____ > ________________________________________ > Asis-l mailing list > Asis-l(a)asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-l jeremy hunsinger jhuns(a)vt.edu www.cddc.vt.edu wiki.tmttlt.com www.tmttlt.com () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments http://www.stswiki.org/ sts wiki http://cfp.learning-inquiry.info/ Learning Inquiry-the journal http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary Studies:the book series

1 0

Webcam article recommendations?
by Sarah Michele Ford 28 Jun '06

28 Jun '06

Hi all, I'm looking for recs for work on webcams, particularly as they relate to issues of publicity & privacy. Any and all suggestions will be happily entertained! Thanks, Sarah *********************** Sarah Michele Ford Department of Sociology University of Massachusetts - Amherst ford(a)soc.umass.edu

3 2

Re: [Air-l] overstated media inference from fine study
by Greg Elmer 27 Jun '06

27 Jun '06

Barry, >From what I can tell, the study discussed in the Post does not directly discuss the Internet. Perhaps people that you've studied (The Strength of Internet Ties) have more social ties because they use the net more? Or at least this is how the Post article, posits your critique of the Lynn Smith-Lovin study... -GE ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca> Date: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:02 am Subject: [Air-l] overstated media inference from fine study > Re the Washington Post story below (and a similar USA Today story): > > To my mind, it's an interesting case of media distortion. > > The good news: the accounts are based on a high-quality survey (US > GeneralSocial Survey) by first-class reseachers (Lynn Smith-Lovin > & Miller > McPherson) + Matthew Brashaers whom I don't know, in sociology's > leadingjournal, American Sociological Review. I was a referee on > this paper, btw, > and revealed myself at appropriate time to the authors. > > The study replicates one stimulus Q from the General Social Survey 20 > years ago about who do you have to discuss important matters with. It > finds a mean of about 2 in 2004, down from 3 in 1984 (or was it 1985)? > > Here's the problem: > > Based on this, the 2 newspapers have created a huge social > isolation spin > on this, when it's well known that people have lotsa ties, not just > 2 or > 3. See our data from Pew Internet, Connected Lives study) + lotsa > others.Indeed, altho we are not as parallel as the US GSS, > comparing Connected > Lives (3rd East York study, 2004) with the second East York study > (1979data) shows more active ties now, both intimate and > significant ties. > > Thus the media spin is a huge inferential leap from a decline in the > super-core ties to saying Americans are socially isolated. > > If you read further in the Washington Post and USA Today articles, > you'llsee me quoted as suggesting that we now have more ties -- and > more contact > with ties -- but that relationships are differentiated. In other > words,the relative decline in discussion partners shouldn't be > generalized to > either absolute isolation or even growing isolation. > > Of course, YMMV. > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director > wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman > > Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto > 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 > > > > Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:56:00 -0400 > From: Richard Forno <rforno(a)infowarrior.org> > Subject: [Air-l] Americans and social isolation > > It would be interesting to see how this fits into the whole "being > alonetogether" argument within a technology context....for example, > someone who > doesn't want to be around people but who socializes happily in a > MMORPGenvironment or spends hours upon hours on AIM or IRC. > > > Social Isolation Growing in U.S., Study Says > The Number of People Who Say They Have No One to Confide In Has Risen > > By Shankar Vedantam > Washington Post Staff Writer > Friday, June 23, 2006; A03 > > Americans are far more socially isolated today than they were two > decadesago, and a sharply growing number of people say they have no > one in whom > they can confide, according to a comprehensive new evaluation of > the decline > of social ties in the United States. > > A quarter of Americans say they have no one with whom they can discuss > personal troubles, more than double the number who were similarly > isolatedin 1985. Overall, the number of people Americans have in > their closest > circle of confidants has dropped from around three to about two. > > The comprehensive new study paints a sobering picture of an > increasinglyfragmented America, where intimate social ties -- once > seen as an integral > part of daily life and associated with a host of psychological and > civicbenefits -- are shrinking or nonexistent. In bad times, far > more people > appear to suffer alone. > > --- > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201763_pf.html > > _______________________________________________ > The air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ >

1 0

Americans and social isolation
by Richard Forno 27 Jun '06

27 Jun '06

It would be interesting to see how this fits into the whole "being alone together" argument within a technology context....for example, someone who doesn't want to be around people but who socializes happily in a MMORPG environment or spends hours upon hours on AIM or IRC. Interesting ponderage for a Friday afternoon.... -rick Infowarrior.org Social Isolation Growing in U.S., Study Says The Number of People Who Say They Have No One to Confide In Has Risen By Shankar Vedantam Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, June 23, 2006; A03 Americans are far more socially isolated today than they were two decades ago, and a sharply growing number of people say they have no one in whom they can confide, according to a comprehensive new evaluation of the decline of social ties in the United States. A quarter of Americans say they have no one with whom they can discuss personal troubles, more than double the number who were similarly isolated in 1985. Overall, the number of people Americans have in their closest circle of confidants has dropped from around three to about two. The comprehensive new study paints a sobering picture of an increasingly fragmented America, where intimate social ties -- once seen as an integral part of daily life and associated with a host of psychological and civic benefits -- are shrinking or nonexistent. In bad times, far more people appear to suffer alone. < - > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201 763_pf.html

5 4

electronic writing piece
by Nathaniel James 27 Jun '06

27 Jun '06

Good day. I have been looking for a copy of your 2005 AoIR presentation "The electronic collectives" for my literature review for my dissertation on Wikipedia. I can't seem to find it on the AoIR conference pages. If it's not too much trouble, would you mind e-mailing me a copy? I appreciate your time and look forward to reading your research. Sincerely, Nathaniel James M.Sc. Student, Media and Communications Regulation and Policy The London School of Economics and Political Science

2 1

2006 Conference update - important dates
by Matthew Allen 27 Jun '06

27 Jun '06

Dear all Writing on behalf of Fay Sudweeks, Program Chair and Axel Bruns, Conference Chair, may I provide the following important information about the upcoming 2006 AoIR Conference in Brisbane. Firstly, our thanks to the 70+ people who have already registered, including many who took advantage of the earlybird registration rate. We welcome you to AoIR, since your registration includes a membership of the association for a year. On the matter of registrations, we are pleased to announce that the EARLYBIRD REGISTRATION is now extended until 7 July 2006. This will be the only extension for earlybird registration, which saves you $40 USD. Secondly, here are some important dates: 1) 7 July: Student papers to be submitted for judging in the Best Student Paper competition. (1 week extension). Email papers to m.allen(a)curtin.edu.au (I will collect them and pass them onto Fay for judging). 2) 31 July: First submission of papers for inclusion in the conference archive (which will be available to all conference attendees in advance via the AoIR website) . You will receive an email in late July notifying you of the submission procedure. 3) mid-August: Final call for registrations for paper presenters to secure your place in the program. Dr Matthew Allen Associate Professor in Internet Studies President Association of Internet Researchers Faculty of Media Society and Culture Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J http://smi.curtin.edu.au/NetStudies/allen.htm +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 92663166 (f)

1 0

Re: [Air-l] Internet and new media studies book published
by M White 26 Jun '06

26 Jun '06

Sorry folks, something garbled my first message. Hopefully the correct text follows: Hello, I announced this on AoIR's FPTQ listserv but thought I would mention it on this list as well. My book on Internet and computer spectatorship--The Body and the Screen: Theories of Internet Spectatorship--was just published by MIT Press. Many of you have contributed time and suggestions to this project and I want to thank you once again for your support. I thought that it would be of interest to some AoIR readers because I consider such things as the interface, the use of the term "user," how Internet engagements are gendered, the varied forms of Internet work, programmers' embodiment, and the issues surrounding computer "demanufacturing." In this book, I pose hybrid critical models and suggest how theories of authorship, feminist and psychoanalytic film, gender and queer studies, hypertext, television, and postcolonial and critical race studies offer ways to understand Internet sites and spectatorship. My hope is that the critical models indicated in this book can support ongoing Internet and computer research. I am including full publication details and the table of contents below. I would be happy to answer any questions. All my best, Michele White, Michele. The Body and the Screen: Theories of Internet Spectatorship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. ISBN 0-262-23249-9 The Body, the Screen, and Representations: An Introduction to Theories of Internet Spectatorship 1. Making Internet and Computer Spectators Introduction Rendering Liveness, Materiality, and Space Notions of the Empowered User Addressing the Spectator Stabilizing Identity Erasing the Interface Conclusion: Active Users by Design 2. Visual Pleasure through Textual Passages: Gazing in Multi-user Object-oriented Settings (MOOs) Introduction MOOs The Look and the Gaze Character Creation and Attributes in MOOs The Look and the Gaze in MOOs Gendered Gazing in MOOs Graphical MOOs Conclusion: Between Multiple and Coherent Identity 3. Too Close to See, Too Intimate a Screen: Men, Women, and Webcams Introduction Feminism and Spectatorship Critical and Journalistic Considerations of Webcams Webcams Women and Webcams Regulating the Spectator Women Webcam Operators and Authority Visibility and Webcams Making Texts Real Some Problems with Webcam Viewing Just a Guy Conclusion: The Politics of Being Seen 4. The Aesthetic of Failure: Confusing Spectators with Net Art Gone Wrong Introduction Aesthetics and Net Art Net Art An Aesthetic of Failure Jodi Peter Luining Michaël Samyn Conclusion: The Limits of Failure and Repetition 5. Can You Read Me? Setting-specific Meaning in Virtual Places (VP) Introduction Virtual Places Avatars Painters and Avatar Galleries Owning Texts Criteria for Originality Theories of Internet Authorship Gender, Race, Sexuality, and the Avatar Making Differences in Virtual Places Conclusion: Authorship in Other Internet Settings 6. This Is Not Photography, This Is Not a Cohesive View: Computer-facilitated Imaging and Fragmented Spectatorship Introduction Making the Digital Imaging Spectator Photography Digital or Post-photography The Scanner as Camera Carol Selter's Animalia and Punctum Susan Silton's Self Portraits and Images of the Partial Self Ken Gonzales-Day's Skin Series and the Cut The New Media Grid Conclusion: The Morphed Spectator Afterword The Flat and the Fold: A Consideration of Embodied Spectatorship Introduction Carol Selter, Susan Silton, Ken Gonzales-Day, and the Fold The Body Folded and Evacuated Hierarchy and Control The Spectator in Pain The Fat and the Fold Men and the Weight Loss "Challenge" Erotic Folding Conclusion: A Technology of Waste

1 0

Internet and new media studies book published
by M White 26 Jun '06

26 Jun '06

Hello, I announced this on AoIRFPTQslistservstserv but thought I would mention it on this list as well. My book on Internet and comspectatorshiporship--The Body and the Screen: Theories of IntSpectatorshiporship--was just published by MIT Press. Many of you have contributed time and suggestions to this project and I want to thank you once again for your support. I thought that it would be of interest toAoIRe AoIR readers because I consider such things as the interface, the use of the term user, how Internet engagements are gendered, the varied forms of Internet work, programmers' embodiment, and the issues surrdemanufacturingr "demanufacturing." In this book, I pose hybrid critical models and suggest how theories of authorship, feminist and psychoanalytic film, gender and queer studies, hypertextpostcolonial, and postcolonial and critical race studies offer ways to understand Ispectatorship and spectatorship. My hope is that the critical models indicated in this book can support ongoing Internet and computer research. I am including full publication details and the table of contents below. I would be happy to answer any questions. All my best, Michele White, Michele. The Body and the Screen: TheSpectatorshiprnet Spectatorship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. ISBN 0-262-23249-9 The Body, the Screen, and Representations: An Introduction to TheSpectatorshiprnet Spectatorship 1. Making Internet and Computer Spectators IntroducLivenessRendering Liveness, Materiality, and Space Notions of the Empowered User Addressing the Spectator Stabilizing Identity Erasing the Interface Conclusion: Active Users by Design 2. Visual Pleasure through Textual PaMultis: Gazing in Multi-user Object-oMOOsted Settings (MOOs)MOOstroduction MOOs The Look and the Gaze Character Creation MOOsAttributes in MOOs The LooMOOsd the Gaze in MOOs GMOOsred Gazing in MOOs Graphical MOOs Conclusion: Between Multiple and Coherent Identity 3. Too Close to See, Too Intimate a ScreenWebcamsWomen, and Webcams IntroductioSpectatorship and Spectatorship Critical and Journalistic WebcamsratiWebcamsWebcams WebWebcams Women and Webcams Regulating the SWebcamor Women Webcam Operators and Authority Webcamsbility and Webcams Making Texts Real SWebcamoblems with Webcam Viewing Just a Guy Conclusion: The Politics of Being Seen 4. The Aesthetic of Failure: Confusing Spectators with Net Art Gone Wrong Introduction Aesthetics and Net Art Net Art An Aesthetic of FailureLuiningi MichaëlLSamyng Michaël Samyn Conclusion: The Limits of Failure and Repetition 5. Can You Read Me? Setting-specific Meaning in Virtual Places (VP) Introduction Virtual Places Avatars Painters and Avatar Galleries Owning Texts Criteria for Originality Theories of Internet Authorship Gender, Race, Sexuality, and the Avatar Making Differences in Virtual Places Conclusion: Authorship in Other Internet Settings 6. This Is Not Photography, This Is Not a Cohesive View: Computer-facilitated ImagiSpectatorshipnted Spectatorship Introduction Making the Digital Imaging Spectator Photography Digital or Post-photography The Scanner aSelter's Animalia SeltPunctumimalia andSilton's Susan Silton's Self Portraits and Images of the Partial Self Ken Gonzales-Day's Skin Series and the Cut The New Media Grid Conclusion: The Morphed Spectator Afterword The Flat and the Fold: A ConsiderSpectatorshipdied Spectatorship IntrSelteron CaSiltonlter, Susan Silton, Ken Gonzales-Day, and the Fold The Body Folded and Evacuated Hierarchy and Control The Spectator in Pain The Fat and the Fold Men and the Weight Loss "Challenge" Erotic Folding Conclusion: A Technology of Waste

1 0

Re: [Air-l] overstated media inference from fine study
by Kathy Mancuso 25 Jun '06

25 Jun '06

Indeed! I actually just reposted it on my Behavioral Science & Health Education class discussion board as an example of applying the Theory of Social Support, Networks, and Coping (which is just what it sounds like: public health theory is not rocket science . . . although I don't know why rocket science should be so epistemologically privileged, come to think of it) within the ICTs in health communication context. --kathy mancuso > From: "Ericka Menchen Trevino" <emtrevino(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Air-l] overstated media inference from fine study > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > > Thanks for sharing this. I think it's a good example for an > introductory course if you want to show the importance of academic > sources and the difference between academic research and journalism. > -Ericka Menchen Trevino > clipping barry's response for space: > > Social Isolation Growing in U.S., Study Says > > The Number of People Who Say They Have No One to Confide In Has Risen -- . . . connection in an isolating age . . . Katherine Mancuso, graduate student, Emory University Web 2.0 research, life, and meta: http://museumfreak.livejournal.com, http://del.icio.us/museumfreak, http://www.last.fm/museumfreak, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Museumfreak "You remind me that 'It's not all about the programming, stupid!'"--Vicki Hertzberg, on me "'When is the moment that experientially you experienced what it was to be a cyborg?', Donna Haraway's answer was fabulous: 'I guess it would have to be the first time I realized how like a leaf I am.'" --Thyrza Goodeve

1 0

CFP - Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge
by Charles Ess 25 Jun '06

25 Jun '06

Dear AoIR-ists, I cordially invite your attention to the following - please distribute to interested colleagues and students NTNU Globalization Programme and The Norwegian Air Force Academy Invitation and Call for Papers to the Conference: Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge The Norwegian University of Science and Technology December 1416 2006, Trondheim, Norway Conference website: <www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu> Fundamentalism and globalisation are two widely contested concepts. While some analysts claim that both terms refer to increasingly powerful political forces, others argue that neither refers to anything empirically real. This conference seeks to address the following questions: What distinguishes modern fundamentalism from other forms of religious revivalism and political activism? How do global media communicate ³fundamentalist knowledge²? Participants are invited to address these wider questions within the three thematic areas outlined below: 1. Community, people and state Since religious communities are constituted in contexts of peoples, states and territories, their aims and ambitions are necessarily worked out in relation to these entities. What is specific to fundamentalism in its relation to these entities? We solicit proposals addressing this question in relation to the following issues: * Concepts of power, religion and law in formations of communities and states. * Concepts of power, religion and law in territorial disputes and international relations. 2. Fundamentalism and exegesis The fundamentalist principle of ³return to scripture² is usually associated with literal readings, but it also means bypassing literal readings in order to acquire scripture¹s hidden (esoteric) knowledge and to empower ³true believers² in relation to their ³others². Proposals are solicited which analyse fundamentalist hermeneutics in relation to the following themes: * Principles of epistemic and communal authority in exegesis. * Esotericism, aestheticism and linguistics in exegesis. * Exegeses and changes in communities, societies, states, and international relations. 3. Media and fundamentalist knowledge Through global media, individuals can avail themselves of a wide range of sources, including religious websites and scriptures. Is this development changing the way religion serves ethnic and national interests? Or is it challenging ethnic and national interests and creating new forms of religious and political activism? Proposals are solicited which seek to define fundamentalism from the following perspectives: * The ways in which religious actors (whether states or trans-national networks) use global media to serve ethnic and national interests. * The ways in which non-religious actors (whether states or trans-national networks) use global media to defend ethnic and national interests against religion Keynote Speakers Robert A. Pape, Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago. Professor Pape is author of Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (2005); "Soft Balancing against the United States," International Security (2005); "Explaining Costly International Moral Action" (with Chaim Kaufmann), International Organization (1999); Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (1996). David S. Katz, Professor of History, Tel-Aviv University. Professor Katz is founder of the Global Security Group and author of The Occult Tradition from the European Renaissance to American Fundamentalism (2005), God¹s Last Words: Reading the English Bible from the Reformation to Fundamentalism (2004) and Messianic Revolution: Radical Religious Politics to the End of the Second Millennium (1999) Stewart M. Hoover, Professor of Journalism and Adjunct Professor of Religious Studies, University of Colorado at Boulder. Professor Hoover is author of The Electronic Giant (1979), Mass Media Religion: The Social Sources of the Electronic Church (1988) and Religion in the News: Faith and Journalism in American Public Discourse (1998), and is co-editor of Religious Television: Controversies and Conclusions (1990) and Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture (1997). Deadlines September 15, 2006: Deadline for abstracts (300-400 words). Abstract proposals should include a provisional title, full name of author(s), institutional affiliation, correspondence details and should be sent to global(a)hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no> Paper presentations must not exceed 20 minutes. September 30, 2006: Replies to proposals November 20, 2006: Deadline for registration for all participants (with and without papers) to global(a)hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no> Please use the registration form on the conference website [address of website] Practical information There is no conference fee. The conference will cover the cost of coffees and lunches but participants are expected to cover the costs of all other meals. Dinner reservations will be organized by the conference committee. Conference hotels: Quality Hotel Augustin, Kongensgt 26, NO-7011 Trondheim Tel.:(+47) 73547000, Fax: (+47) 73547001, nok 800 (single) 900 (double) hotel-augustin(a)hotel-augustin.no <mailto:hotel-augustin@hotel-augustin.no> www.hotel-augustin.no P-hotels, Nordregate 24, NO-7010 Trondheim, Tlf.:(+47) 73 80 23 50 Fax (+47) 73 80 23 51, nok 585 (single) 700 (double) post(a)p-hotels.no <mailto:post@p-hotels.no> Accomodation should be booked and paid for by participants. Special rates for this conference have been agreed with the two hotels above, where participants are encouraged to stay. Venues The conference will be held at the following locations: Thursday 14th December: The Norwegian Air Force Academy, Persaunetveien 61. Bus number 20 from Dronningens gate. Friday 15th and Saturday 16th December: NTNU, Dragvoll Campus. Bus numbers 5, 9 and 66 depart from Trondheim city centre (Munkegate Street) to Dragvoll every 15 minutes Contact Website: www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu <http://www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu> Postal Address: NTNU Globalization Programme NTNU Dragvoll, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway E-mail: global(a)hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no> Trondheim Sites About NTNU: http://www.ntnu.no/indexe.php <http://www.ntnu.no/indexe.php> About Trondheim: http://www.trondheim.com/engelsk/ <http://www.trondheim.com/engelsk/> http://www.trondheim.no/content.ap?thisId=1117612882 <http://www.trondheim.no/content.ap?thisId=1117612882> Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge The Norwegian University of Science and Technology December 1416 2006, Trondheim, Norway Preliminary program - may be reviewed on the conference website, <www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu> Cheers! Charles Ess Distinguished Research Professor, Interdisciplinary Studies <http://www.drury.edu/gp21> Drury University 900 N. Benton Ave. Voice: 417-873-7230 Springfield, MO 65802 USA FAX: 417-873-7435 Home page: http://www.drury.edu/ess/ess.html Co-chair, CATaC'06: http://www.catacconference.org Co-chair, ECAP'06: http://www.eu-cap.org Professor II, Globalization and Applied Ethics Programmes Norwegian University of Science and Technology NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway http://www.anvendtetikk.ntnu.no/pres/bridgingcultures.php Exemplary persons seek harmony, not sameness. -- Analects 13.23

1 0