June 2014 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Routledge compendium of major mobile communication articles
by Rich Ling 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Dear all, Along with Gerard Goggin and Larisa Hjorth, I am helping to pull together a Routledge compendium of articles that encompasses the major works in mobile communication. I have my ideas as to which articles are most central, there is, for example the early article by Lana Rakow and Vija Navarro on the gendering of the mobile and Horst and Miller on Jamaica. However, I am always interested to hear what others might think. Please let me know which articles that have been the most important in developing the study of mobile communication and mobile media. -- Rich L.

1 0

CFP - Political Studies Association, Media & Politics Group Annual Conference
by Andy 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Hello Colleagues, A reminder: deadline for abstracts is 1 July 2014. Please publicise to your PhD students as well - this is a very supportive space for postgraduate work to be discussed (alongside leading luminaries) and there are some PG travel bursaries and prizes to boot. We look forward to welcoming you to autumnal Wales! Best wishes, Andy *Political Studies Association Media & Politics Group* *Annual Conference* *Theme: Media, Persuasion and Human Rights* *Hosted by Network for Media & Persuasive Communication* *Bangor University, Bangor, N.Wales* *Call for Papers* *Conference Date: *Mon. 10th - Tues. 11th Nov. 2014 *Website: * http://www.bangor.ac.uk/creative_industries/media-persuasion/index.php.en *Email: *mediapoliticsconference(a)bangor.ac.uk We welcome papers on any aspect of Media and Politics, or on this year’s conference theme of Media, Persuasion and Human Rights. While human rights may appear inalienable in international law and covenants, in fact they are sites of contestation, conflict and redefinition, variably implemented across the globe. Reflecting our theme, our key note speakers include Prof. Jon Silverman (University of Bedfordshire) who is currently working on the influence of the media's reporting of war crimes trials in West Africa on civil society. We seek papers on any of the following themes. 1. *Media and Politics* - any aspect. 2. *Media, Persuasion* *and Human Rights*, including: a) *Mediating Norms.* Jeremy Bentham once called human rights ‘nonsense upon stilts’. What is the philosophical status of human rights and how are deontic norms complicated, challenged and threatened by current geo-political events and their mediation? Are liberal social aspirations being redefined and eroded? Did they ever exist? What betterment do we have to aim for today? b) *Communicating Trade-offs.* When governments balance rights against each other (eg trading-off the right to privacy or freedom from torture in exchange for national security), how do the media respond? How does the complexity of decision-making and trade-offs get communicated? What are decision-makers’ insights on balancing and communicating rights? c) *Contestation and Articulation*. What human rights are privileged by, and contested through, the media? How have these changed over time? How do articulatory struggles play out across the media, and via what persuasive ‘actants’, including NGOs, investigative journalists, the public, lawyers, companies, corporations, governments, and international governance bodies? d) *Media Forms*. How does the struggle over articulation vary across different media forms and genres? How do minority media and the rise of mass self-broadcasting enable perverted viewing and production (eg torture porn, tour of duty war mementos), and with what implications for the normalization of abnormal situations (too taboo for mass view), and for the social enactment of human rights? e) *New Media, New Rights?* What novel opportunities and challenges do new media technologies present for human rights that intrinsically rely on the media, such as the right to privacy and freedom of speech? f) *Mobilisation*. In what ways do media inform and mobilise the public regarding their human rights? This may range from the practices of bearing witness (eg sousveillant communication); to the generation of empathy, intimacy, and a new solidarity through media forms that invoke engagement, identification and pleasure (eg Twitter, film, reality TV, comedy, music)? g) *Gender*. Is there such as thing as 'gendered' human rights? How does gender impact and influence mediated construction of human rights around the globe? How has the media engaged in the representation of gendered and sexualised human rights abuses (for example mass rape, comfort women, sex trafficking and enforced prostitution)? h) *Cultural Imperialism?* What are non-western insights on human rights liberal discourse, and how are these dealt with in various national and trans-national institutions ranging from satellite TV to the International Criminal Court? We encourage diverse responses to the theme, but are especially interested in interdisciplinary responses, not least from policy-makers, activists, philosophers, information-management specialists, computer scientists, journalists, security analysts, and those with expertise in law or politics. *Abstract submission* All proposals should include the following: title and name, institutional affiliation and address, and email address; together with, a paper title, an abstract of not more than 300 words, an indication of which theme(s) you are addressing, and up to five key words about your paper. Please also indicate whether or not you are a postgraduate student. Please indicate which section you wish your proposal to be considered under: 1. 10-15 minute panel presentation; 2. Practice-based work (15 mins - comprising showing of practice-based piece (or an extract) plus any accompanying discussion/context). Abstracts should be sent by 1st July to mediapoliticsconference(a)bangor.ac.uk All abstracts will undergo peer review and decisions on papers will be given within 3 weeks of the submission deadline. *Postgraduate Travel Bursaries* There are 3 travel bursaries of £100 each to support the travel expenses of postgraduate students (who must be PSA members to be eligible) to the November conference. This will be awarded competitively based on quality of submitted abstracts. *Postgraduates & James Thomas Memorial Prize (Prize **£100**)* Postgraduate students are invited to submit a full paper that will be entered into the James Thomas Memorial Prize. This annual award is presented to the most outstanding paper by a postgraduate student at the Media and Politics Group Annual Conference. While abstracts must be submitted by 1st July, full papers must be submitted by 1 October 2014, to allow time for them to be reviewed by the MPG conveners. Senior Lecturer for School of Creative Studies and Media Director of Media and Persuasive Communication (MPC) network Bangor University College Road Bangor Andy's Twitter: @digi-ad <https://twitter.com/digi_ad> Most recent book: Privacy and Philosophy: New Media and Affective Protocol <http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseite…> Other books: Digital Advertising <http://www.amazon.co.uk/Digital-Advertising-Dr-Andrew-McStay/dp/0230222412> ; The Mood of Information: A Critique of Online Behavioural Advertising <http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-mood-of-information-9781441176141/>; Creativity and Advertising <http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415519557/> MPC Network web: mpc.bangor.ac.uk MPC Network Twitter: @MPCBangor <https://twitter.com/MPCBangor> CFP Political Studies Association Media and Politics Group: Media, Persuasion and Human Rights <http://www.bangor.ac.uk/creative_industries/media-persuasion/index.php.en>

1 0

not so humble bragged
by Barry Wellman 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Unexpected, and overwhelming. What an honour and what company to keep. Barry Wellman _______________________________________________________________________ NetLab FRSC INSNA Founder Faculty of Information (iSchool) 611 Bissell Building 140 St. George St. University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 3G6 http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman twitter: @barrywellman NSA/CSEC: Canadian and American citizen NETWORKED:The New Social Operating System. Lee Rainie & Barry Wellman MIT Press http://amzn.to/zXZg39 Print $14 Kindle $16 Old/NewCyberTimes http://bit.ly/c8N9V8 ________________________________________________________________________ Network Theorist Barry Wellman Receives Lifetime Achievement Award from the Oxford Internet Institute (text for OII Awards website) Professor Barry Wellman, co-director of NetLab at the Faculty of Information (iSchool) of the University of Toronto, has been awarded an OII Lifetime Achievement Award in recognition of his extraordinary record of scholarship in social network theory and Internet research which has contributed so much to our understanding of life online. A Canadian-American sociologist, his overarching interest is in the paradigm shift from group-centered relations to networked individualism. His research examines virtual community, the virtual workplace, social support, community, kinship, friendship, and social network theory and methods. His methodological contributions have been for the analysis of ego-centered or "personal" networks - defined from the standpoint of an individual. This calls for somewhat different techniques than the more common social network practice of analysing a single large network. Barry Wellman said "I am deeply honoured by this. And want to pay tribute to the many NetLab members - and Networked co-author Lee Rainie - who have been my wonderful intellectual playmates through the years." OII Acting Director, Dr Victoria Nash said "Barry Wellman's approach to studying the networks that connect us as individuals has had a profound effect on the field of Internet research, reflected in much of the work of our colleagues and students. We are delighted to honour his contribution today. " The top-cited Canadian sociologist, Wellman's current work continues to focus on the interplay between information and communication technologies, especially the Internet, social relations and social structure. He was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2007. The award will be presented on 7th November in Oxford, at an awards dinner and ceremony that also includes Lifetime Achievement awards for Sir Tim Berners Lee and Dame Stephanie Shirley.

1 0

Announcing DML Competition's Trust Challenge: Building Trust in Connected Learning Environments #dmltrust
by Sheryl Grant 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

What could be more important than trust? Trust is at the heart of every meaningful learning experience, whether it's between educator and student, mentor and learner, or peers and their learning networks. As learners become more immersed in digital learning experiences, trust has also become increasingly important in connected learning environments. The press release announcing the Trust Challenge, the fifth Digital Media and Learning Competition, details how the MacArthur Foundation and HASTAC are responding to the Aspen Institute Task Force's report about Learners and the Internet, particularly challenges facing trust in connected learning environments. The $1.2 Million Learning Challenge: Building Trust Online Fifth Digital Media & Learning Competition responds to Aspen report citing the need for a safe and open internet to foster learning WASHINGTON – June 17, 2014 – HASTAC and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, responding to a landmark Aspen Institute report, announced a $1.2 million challenge to foster trust in online learning environments and help educators harness one of the most powerful tools of the digital age—online networks. The 5th Digital Media and Learning Competition, dubbed The Trust Challenge, will offer year-long development grants of up to $150,000 to teams with the most promising innovations for fostering trusted learning environments online. The open invitation for proposals is supported by the MacArthur Foundation through a grant to the University of California, Irvine, administered by HASTAC, an alliance of more than 14,000 humanists, artists, social scientists, scientists and technologists working together to transform the future of learning. The Trust Challenge is a response to a new report by the Aspen Institute Task Force on Learning and the Internet that called for innovations that enable people to pursue learning experiences online in an environment that is safe and private. The task force focused on American education, but the Trust Challenge is an international competition because the challenge is global. “The Aspen Institute Task Force on Learning and the Internet has highlighted the transformative role that digital media can play in helping every learner to reach his or her full potential,” said David Theo Goldberg, a HASTAC board member and the director of the University of California Humanities Research Institute. “Our competition seeks to advance solutions that build the trusted environments learners need online so they can safely and confidently access the rich learning opportunities the Internet affords.” In the Task Force report, Learner at the Center of a Networked World, also made public on Thursday, Honorary Co-Chairs Jeb Bush and Rosario Dawson argue a trusted online environment is necessary for effective learning. “Technology should revolve around the learner, not the other way around,” they wrote. “And the learner should possess the digital age literacy tools to use and understand the media in both the virtual and physical worlds.” The Aspen Institute report envisions a future of openness and innovation in education if America can shift away from a fear-based approach to using the Internet that unwittingly blocks access to valuable learning resources. “Just as the digital revolution changed many industries, its promise is now being realized in learning environments inside and outside schools,” said Connie Yowell, MacArthur’s Director of Education and a leading proponent of Connected Learning. “The Internet is a vital link, and innovative educators are helping learners create unique and personalized learning pathways as they follow their interests online, connect to supportive peers and mentors, and become the creative makers and producers today’s economy rewards. Our goal is to support this explosion of interest-driven learning by ensuring all learners can safely and confidently leverage these rich digital resources.” The Trust Challenge is open to museums, libraries, school districts, schools, higher education institutions, community organizations, developers, researchers and others committed to creative, open connected learning. Successful projects will develop digital projects and tools designed to build privacy, security, and safety into its digital offerings and build awareness around data and trust. Projects might include web or online applications, digital badge systems, data management platforms, online learning content or other innovations. Winners will receive grants of $10,000 to $150,000 as well as a year of programming designed to support successful project development. Grantees will be networked with each other and more broadly into a highly innovative, cross-disciplinary community of technologists, educators, scholars and leading thinkers. Organizations and institutions can also win three $5,000 People’s Choice Awards that will support the purchase of approved technology. People’s Choice Winners will be determined by an online vote. For more information about the Trust Challenge, visit www.dmlcompetition.net . Contact: Sheryl Grant Director of Social Networking, HASTAC/MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Competition sheryl.grant(a)duke.edu Useful Links: Trust Challenge: Building Trust in Connected Learning Environments: www.dmlcompetition.net MacArthur Foundation Digital Media & Learning Initiative: macfound.org/programs/learning/ HASTAC: hastac.org Connected Learning Alliance: CLAlliance.org Sheryl Grant Director of Social Networking HASTAC/MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Competition sheryl.grant(a)duke.edu Duke University 114 South Buchanan Blvd. Smith Warehouse Durham, NC 27708

1 0

Call for Chapters: Alternate Reality Games and the Cusp of Digital Gameplay
by Antero Garcia 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

*Call for Chapters: Alternate Reality Games and the Cusp of Digital Gameplay* Series: Approaches to Digital Game Studies, Bloomsbury Editors: Antero Garcia, Colorado State University & Greg Niemeyer, University of California, Berkeley Alternate Reality Games (ARGs) challenge what players understand as “real.” Though prominent examples of ARGs have persisted over the past two decades, only recently have ARGs come to the prominence as a unique and highly visible digital game genre. Adopting many of the same strategies as online video games, ARGs blur the distinction between the “real” and the “virtual.” We seek chapter proposals for a proposed collection that explores and defines the possibilities of ARGs. With ARGs continuing to be an important and blurred space between digital and physical gameplay, this collection offers clear analysis of game design, implementation, and ramifications for game studies. Divided into three distinct sections (noted below), this collection emphasizes first hand accounts by leading ARG creators, scholarly analysis of the meaning behind ARGs from noted critics and researchers, and explication of emerging visualization and data collection methodologies. We are particularly interested in cultivating research from various disciplinary perspectives; by balancing the voices of designers, players, and researchers, this work highlights how the Alternate Reality Game genre is transforming the ways we play and interact today. We seek chapter proposals that fit within one of the following three book sections: *Section One – Development and Execution* Chapters in this section of the book detail the design and implementation of ARGs. Authors pay attention to specific fictions, audiences, and goals within these ARGs and offer a clear step-by-step behind the scenes look at how these game designers engineer new modes of play and participation. *Section Two – Alternating Reality – how ARGs are changing games and society* These chapters focus on analysis and critique of ARGs. While some chapters may focus on specific games, other chapters in this section invoke larger trends in ARGs. *Section Three – Data Visualization and Collection* As the ARG genre is dependent on responding to the ways participants interact with one another and with a story’s content, this section of the book looks at how we interpret and construct data. In particular, the genre of digital games is reinventing new data visualization methodologies and this section should illuminate ways games display information during play and as synopsis after a game concludes. This edited volume has received initial interest from the Digital Game Studies series editors and we are currently seeking additional chapters to share with the editors and secure a book contract. *The deadline for proposals of 300-500 words is August 15, 2014. Please email your abstract and a 100 word biography to anterobot(a)gmail.com <anterobot(a)gmail.com> (please indicate to which section of the book your proposal is directed). All authors will be notified of acceptance by September 2nd and full chapter manuscripts would be due in April, 2015. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions at the above address.* -- Antero Garcia, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of English Education Ethnic Studies Faculty Associate English Department, Colorado State University 359 Eddy Building Campus Delivery 1773 Fort Collins, CO 80523-1773 http://www.antero.org/

1 0

doc film: rights re discovery of corp info
by Sandra Braman 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

Folks on the list who are concerned about our civil and human rights in the digital environment may be interested in a new documentary film that is showing on June 21 in Manhattan. A Decade of E-Discovery is about collaborative decision-making among attorneys and judges regarding how to best facilitate the use of electronic discovery to ensure that the legal system has access to information in corporate records. Both the process and the content of the outcomes of the process are of interest. A trailer can be found at http://www.10thmountainfilms.com. Sandra Braman

1 0

A survey about your media experiences
by Matthew Lombard 16 Jun '14

16 Jun '14

Have you ever felt present in or connected to the people or things in a media experience like watching a movie or TV show, reading a book, playing a video game using Skype, etc.? We're studying these and other common experiences with technology and would very much appreciate and value your help with a short survey. It's online, completely anonymous and will take from 5 to 20 minutes. If you're interested and willing, please click on the link below for more information and the survey. http://tinyurl.com/presence-survey Please help us spread the word about the survey by sharing this message with others who might be interested! Thank you so much, The students of Psychological Processing of Media (MSP 4446/8446) at Temple University and Matthew Lombard, PhD Associate Professor, Media Studies & Production, Temple University President, International Society for Presence Research (ISPR) lombard(a)temple.edu

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Best way to work with translation provider and Qualtrics?
by Marco Toledo Bastos 16 Jun '14

16 Jun '14

Hi Cory, You don't have to grant the translator access to your account (and you shouldn't). If the tab "Collaboration" is available for your survey (My Surveys >> Tasks), you can simply type the translator's email and she'll be granted access to the survey. Qualtrics allow for this kind of collaboration even if the invited user is not under the same license as you. More details here: http://www.qualtrics.com/university/researchsuite/basic-building/getting-sta rted/collaboration/ I've never tried this workaround by transferring CSV files back and forth between you and another user, but I wonder how you're planning to merge the two survey questionnaires later on. That looks like an exhausting task. -- mtb -----Original Message----- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:05:20 +0000 From: "Robinson,Cory" <cory.Robinson(a)colostate.edu> To: "air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> Subject: [Air-L] Best way to work with translation provider and Qualtrics? I?m preparing a cross-national survey using Qualtrics.com, and will deploy the survey in two languages. My translation provider is not familiar with the Qualtrics platform, and I?m leery of providing access to my account. Does anyone have recommendations for how to best translate a survey without having to provide account access to the translator? It does appear that Qualtrics allows one to download the survey as a CSV file, and then create a second survey upon importing a CSV file. A possible workflow: 1. Send the CSV file in the first language to the translator, 2. having translation completed on the sent file, 3. and then creating the second language survey by uploading the translated CSV file to Quatrics. Open and grateful for any suggestions! - Cory Robinson -- Stephen Cory Robinson cory.robinson(a)colostate.edu<mailto:cory.robinson@colostate.edu> Office: Clark C258A http://colostate.academia.edu/StephenCoryRobinson

2 1

IIP Fall 14 Workshop CFP "Whose Information is It Anyway?
by Richard Denny Taylor 16 Jun '14

16 Jun '14

Colleagues, Kindly consider the following Call for Papers. Thank you. Richard Taylor Penn State Institute for Information Policy Whose Information Is It Anyway? In Search of a New Balance A by-invitation experts' workshop New America Foundation September 10-12, 2014 CALL FOR PAPERS Traditional notions of individual and public rights with respect to information are being redefined across a broad front, raising profound challenges to freedom of speech, assembly, association, and communication. The aggregation, archiving and use of information also have profound implications for the future of national security and business strategy. Currently, decision-makers are responding to capabilities enabled by new technologies, for which appropriate usage norms have not yet emerged, and are struggling to formulate coherent strategies addressing some fundamental questions. Can and should the legitimate demands of border security, law and order and the prevention of terrorism limit an individual's rights over personal and/or private information? What restraints on the collection, aggregation and use of personal information should exist? How do we balance the principles of zones of personal privacy, the right to control one's most personal information, and ownership rights over digital media, with the benefits of vibrant markets in information goods and services? Is there a general right to have one's personal information removed from all commercial digital databases? Are there practical models that respect human dignity without crippling data aggregators? Vociferous information ownership debates are taking place in the copyright and intellectual property fields as well. The digitization of content has enabled access to works that have not been in circulation for years, if not centuries. Yet some copyright/IP holders have suggested that works in the public domain, if not actively defended, should be privatized, and works that currently benefit from the time-limited protection of law for the public s benefit should become the permanent property of private rights holders, effectively ending the public domain. There are modest examples of alternatives: the Open Source community; the Creative Commons/copyleft movement; the increasing emergence of collaborative no-charge academic journals, etc. What are the practical models that strengthen the public domain, and still provide sufficient incentives for creative productions? We've heard the traditional answers to these questions and invite prospective authors to comment in an independent, scholarly, and innovative way on topics regarding control of information in the 21st Century. Multidisciplinary approaches are encouraged that combine theory and evidence to evolve integrative and long-term perspectives on information rights. The Institute for Information Policy (IIP) at Penn State and the X-Lab at the New America Foundation (NAF) are pleased to announce this call for papers that offer new (or updated) perspectives and theories about the balance between the rights of individuals, states, businesses and the public in information and personal data. Authors of selected papers will be invited to present them during a three day, invitation-only workshop designed to bring together a diverse group of experts and to be held at the New America Foundation in Washington, DC. This Workshop is the 9th in a series of events on "Making Policy Research Accessible," organized by the IIP, with the support of the Ford Foundation and the Media Democracy Fund. Presenters at the workshop will be invited to submit their completed papers for review by the Journal of Information Policy ( <http://www.jip-online.org> www.jip-online.org) The workshop will take place on September 10-12, 2014, the days leading to the 42nd annual TPRC conference. Invited topics include, but are not limited to: . Information policy and national security . Balancing privacy and security . Data mining and privacy . The SOPA/PIPA debate aftermath . New avenues for academic publishing . Personal freedoms in the digital age . Cybersecurity . Patent reform and patent "trolls" . Individual ownership of personal information . The "right to be forgotten" . The relationship of government agencies and data-based enterprises . New theories of digital intellectual property . The future (if any) of the "first sale" doctrine . Are we compromising our security? The U.S. role in data insecurity . Are commercial/trade secrets the same as national security secrets? . "Big Data," AI, and data security and privacy in the inter-cloud . Extraterritoriality of the U.S. I.P. regime . Privacy and the "Internet of Things" . Bio-enhancements and privacy . Smart infrastructure, surveillance, and privacy Abstracts of up to 500 words and a short bio of the author(s) should be submitted to <mailto:pennstateiip@psu.edu> pennstateiip(a)psu.edu by July 18, 2014. Please write IIPXLABWS: YOUR NAME in the subject line. Abstracts not sent according to the above instructions will not be reviewed. Accepted presenters will be notified by July 25, 2014.

1 0

Final Reminder: HICSS 48 minitrack – Social Media and Location Information
by Jim T 15 Jun '14

15 Jun '14

Hi everyone, Apologies, but we wanted to remind folks of the *June 15* deadline for submission to this mini-track. It's shaping up to be quite a good one. *Obligatory apologies for cross-posting.* *HICSS 48 minitrack – Social Media and Location Information* Jim Thatcher and Britta Ricker would like to announce and invite submission to a new minitrack at the HICSS 48 <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/hicss_48/apahome48.htm> conference to be held this January 5-8, 2015 in Hawaii. The minitrack, *Social Media and Location Information <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_48/Tracks/DSM/DSMLocation.pdf>, *is a sub-track of the *Digital and Social Media <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_48/Tracks/DigitalandSocialMedia.htm>* track. The Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) will be held at the Grand Hyatt Kauai <http://kauai.hyatt.com/en/hotel/home.html> (more information on the venue is here <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/hicss_48/accommodation48.htm>). The conference CFP is found here <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/hicss_48/48CFP-final.pdf>. In addition to the amazing venue, HICSS is one of the top conferences in paper citation index rating. Papers are peer-reviewed and all accepted papers are published in the IEEE Digital Library and made available for free to all parties. The conference attracts a diverse, transdisciplinary set of researchers and promotes lively, interactive sessions and the cross-pollination of ideas. *Our Call for Papers follows:* This minitrack focuses broadly on the location information generated through the use of digital and social media with a particular emphasis on how that information may be collected and interpreted to better understand how location and environment intersect with social, political, and economic forces. We would like to attract papers that examine social media through an explicitly spatial lens. These would include papers interested in the technical praxis of gathering and visualizing spatial information as well as theoretical papers exploring the generation, capture, use, and exchange of spatial information with respect to social science theory. We call for papers that address the production, capture, and study of location information in social media through both technical and theoretical perspectives. Papers are encouraged to address “location information” in a broad sense that includes both precise geolocated coordinates and more general expressions of space and place. This includes, *but is not limited to*, papers that: - Offer new technical solutions to the capture, interpretation, or visualization of spatial media; - Examine the epistemological and ontological effects of spatial social media upon users; - Present empirical work on the creation or consumption of spatial social media; - Advance our understanding of how spatial social media relate to social and political processes; - Present new work on the role of economic forces in the creation and use of spatial social media, for example, location-specific advertising; or - Explore spatial social media as a means of better understanding urban and non-urban environments. The deadline for submission is *June 15th. *Please take a look at the *author instructions.* <http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/hicss_48/authorinstructions.htm> If you have any additional questions, don’t hesitate to contact Jim or Britta. http://jimthatcher.net/?p=104

1 0