March 2026 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Call for Abstract (4S 2026): Technopolitics of Knowledge Mobilization in Datafied Societies
by Lucas Wong 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Dear AoIR Community, We are organizing an open panel at the 4S 2026 (7-10 Oct in Toronto) titled “Technopolitics of Knowledge Mobilization in Datafied Societies.” The panel explores how platforms, data infrastructures, and AI reshape knowledge mobilization, public scholarship, and academic labour across different institutional and geopolitical contexts. Detailed panel description is included below. Interested participants are invited to submit a 250-word abstract through the official submission page: https://www.4sonline.org/accepted_open_panels_toronto.php. The submission link will be open until the end of April. We warmly welcome submissions from scholars working across STS, platform studies, critical data studies, and related fields. All the best, Lucas L. H. Wong Hiu-Fung Chung Julie Yujie Chen Panel Abstract In the wake of debates over public values of universities, knowledge mobilization has become an institutional imperative worldwide. It is codified through cross-sectoral partnerships, entrepreneurial and incubation initiatives, and professionalized regimes of evaluation that emphasize accessible and assessable public impacts, key performance indicators (KPIs), and codes of professional conduct. Within these arrangements, digital platforms and automated technologies are often positioned as the crux of innovative public engagement in datafied societies, where data—its massive collection and expansive use—constitutes a dominant mode of societal ordering and politico-economic governance (Fourcade & Healy, 2024; Halpern & Mitchell, 2023). In the context of knowledge mobilization, data-driven systems reconfigure how knowledge is produced, circulated, and valued, introducing infrastructures of classification and metricization that define what counts as “good” public pedagogy. This open panel invites deeper dialogue between STS, platform studies, critical data studies, and open science to rethink the technopolitics of knowledge mobilization and to unsettle contemporary university-society relations. In dialogue with STS’s long-standing interest in the ordering effects of knowledge practices (Law & Mol, 2002; Jasanoff, 2004), the panel treats knowledge mobilization and public pedagogy as sites where governance, expertise, and publics are co-produced and contested rather than pre-given. In particular, we invite panelists to examine how pedagogical practices are ruled through and negotiated across multiple governing regimes, including universities, state power, and platform regulation across contexts, around the following questions: * How do algorithms, data infrastructures, and artificial intelligence (AI) reconfigure authority, credibility, expertise, and boundaries in public-facing scholarship? * What forms of improvisation, negotiation, repair, or refusal emerge as scholars navigate multiple ruling regimes? * How do data-driven platforms and universities reconfigure digital academic labour? * How do these dynamics unfold across diverse geopolitical and institutional contexts? Extra Details In this open panel, we invite scholars to collectively investigate “unruly pedagogies” as a heuristic for examining the technopolitics of knowledge mobilization in datafied societies across diverse sociocultural and political contexts. Informed by feminist and postcolonial STS, we conceptualize pedagogy as a necessarily contested political project that defines, confronts, and challenges technoscientific, professional, and algorithmic rules governing how scholarly knowledge should travel, appear, and perform (Haraway 1988; Harding 2008). Pedagogical practices become unruly not because they escape power, but because they inhabit frictions between institutional mandates, platform governance, and situated commitments to publics and critique. Unruly pedagogies matter because they relocate questions of credibility and authority into data infrastructures of evaluation and visibility. STS scholarship demonstrates that expertise is socially accomplished through boundary work and civic epistemologies rather than intrinsic authority (Gieryn 1983; Jasanoff 2005), and that infrastructures and classifications shape what becomes visible and actionable as knowledge (Star and Ruhleder 1996; Bowker and Star 1999). Open science research similarly emphasizes that “openness” is a sociotechnical and political project whose infrastructures, norms, and participation are unevenly distributed (Fecher and Friesike 2014; Levin and Leonelli 2017). Critical data and platform studies extend these insights by showing how platformization, datafication, and content moderation reformat authority across professional domains such as childcare, health, and education (van Dijck, Poell, and de Waal 2018; Gillespie 2018; Ruckenstein and Schüll 2017; Mascheroni 2020). Bringing these fields into conversation, the panel particularly welcomes empirically grounded contributions from diverse geographical and socio-historical contexts that examine, but are not limited to: * Sociotechnical systems, infrastructures, and public engagement * AI innovation, data infrastructures, and epistemic authority in knowledge mobilization * Dynamics between institutional governance, platform regulation, and academic freedom * Academic labor and digital platforms * Comparative and de-Westernizing perspectives on public intellectualism

1 0

Call for studies for a meta-analysis (Deepfake vs. authentic video effects)
by Bumju Jung 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Hello Aoir colleagues, My name is Bumju Jung (University of Southern California). Lynn Miller, Ph.D., and I are conducting a meta-analysis examining how deepfake videos, compared with authentic videos, shape credibility-related evaluations (e.g., perceived credibility, accuracy, authenticity, believability). First: Are we missing your study? If you have a study that matches the criteria below (published, in press, working paper, or unpublished), I would be grateful if you could contact me. This will help us ensure we do not miss your work and that we can accurately include and cite it in our meta-analysis. Unpublished and null findings are especially valuable for reducing publication bias. Second: If the paper or repository does not include complete statistics, it would be incredibly helpful to receive the minimum information needed to compute effect sizes, ideally: * Sample size per condition (deepfake/synthetic vs. authentic; N per cell) * Means and SDs for relevant outcomes (or equivalent statistics: t/F, SE, CI, etc.) When you do not need to send anything: If all necessary statistics are already available in the paper, appendix, OSF, or another repository, you do not need to forward numbers. A link or citation is enough (so we do not miss it). High-level inclusion criteria: * Experimental or quasi-experimental design * Video stimuli: deepfake/AI synthesized vs. authentic video comparison * Measures: perceived credibility/accuracy/authenticity/believability (or closely related outcomes) Please email me at bumjujun(a)usc.edu<mailto:bumjujun@usc.edu> Many thanks! Bumju Jung (he/him/his) Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism University of Southern California

1 0

Gender and Technology: An Introduction; now available in the United States
by Holly Kruse 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Hi everyone, I just wanted to (humbly?) let you know that my book Gender and Technology: An Introduction has now been published in the United States by Polity. From https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=gender-and-technology-an-i… <https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=gender-and-technology-an-i…>: Technology has advanced significantly over the past 200 years, but have ideas about gender and technology also changed over time? Are modern technologies gendered? In this comprehensive text, Holly Kruse explores how notions of gender and technology have been socially constructed. Organized historically, the book provides a broad overview of global developments in technology and how these technologies have been (ideologically) gendered. Focusing on communication and media technologies and analysing an array of household and workplace devices, the text examines the ways in which they have been considered "feminine" or "masculine". These associations, as the text reveals, often have little to do with the complexity of the technology. Rich with historical and contemporary examples – from bicycles and washing machines to the telegraph and the computer - Gender and Technology encourages us to take a closer look at how and why modern technologies are gendered. By understanding the origins of our ideas about gender and technology, we can see how they have and have not changed over time. This text is essential reading for undergraduates taking courses on gender and technology, and will be of interest to general readers who want to learn more about the historical relationship between gender and technology. REVIEWS "This beautifully written history of technology, presented through the lens of gender, offers an exceptional amount of information and insight. It will delight and inspire both experts and those new to the topic." Nancy Baym, Partner Research Manager, Microsoft Research "A masterclass in unpacking the taken-for-granted, this book traces how technologies are gendered - and how gender is technologized - in ways that shape everything from children's toys to our most intimate relationships with domestic space." Alice E. Marwick, University of North Carolina "Critically astute and wide-ranging, this engaging and accessible text reveals the centrality of gender politics within everyday technologies." Kylie Jarrett, University College Dublin Best wishes, and thanks for reading my post! Holly Holly Kruse, Ph.D. Professor Department of Communications Rogers State University 1701 W. Will Rogers Blvd. Claremore, Oklahoma 74017 holly.kruse(a)gmail.com or hkruse(a)rsu.edu https://hollykruse.com

1 0

CFP for 4s Toronto: AI as a performative phenomenon
by JOBIN Anna 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Dear AoIRistas, If you are researching the performativity of Artificial Intelligence or working on related work, please consider submitting a paper abstract to our Open Panel accepted to 4s Toronto. ***** CFP ***** TITLE: Artificial Intelligence as a performative phenomenon PANEL ABSTRACT: STS has shown that AI is never “agentic on its own” (Suchman 2023), “never pure” (Shapin 2010) and “never alone” (Mol 2002). The ubiquity of “AI” reshapes the world not because it acts by itself, but because it is a profoundly performative phenomenon. It circulates through politics, media, investment portfolios, art, and everyday practices. The performativity of AI shows in how discourses of intelligence, autonomy and efficiency are not merely descriptive but materially shape infrastructures, economies, regulation, and visions of the future. This panel starts from AI as a phenomenon with no clear boundaries, neither from a technical, social, nor definitional viewpoint but enacted through discourses, which give it meaning, legitimacy, social and material presence. To understand its performativity we must understand how discourses become action-ascribing, and how they translate into infrastructures and policies. In short, we are interested in what AI does to the social world, to institutions, to citizens, to bodies. We therefore ask: What makes AI discursively performative and materially consequential? How can we analyze its discursive power in ways that show the performativity and the “performation” (Callon 2006) of AI? Importantly, performative discourse does not operate as a self-fulfilling prophecy, but requires a material apparatus – that is, a set of arrangements, techniques, rules, and structures – to ensure the conditions of its realization. One possible focus hence lies on what this material apparatus is made of. How does it manage to transform expectations, reorganize resources, and alter social-cultural arrangements? Other contributions might examine what the performativity of AI mobilizes, highlights, hides or conceals. Although AI seems to operate across various societal arenas, the stories it tells (efficiency, growth, automation) appear strikingly homogeneous. What material, social, and ecological alternatives get sidelined when AI is performed through these dominant discourses, and what new assemblages might arise? ***** Submission link (panel 207): https://www.4sonline.org/call_for_submissions_toronto.php * Submission due date: 30 April 2026 * Notification of Acceptance: 29 May 2026 * Conference: 4s Meeting, 7-10 October 2026, Toronto * Panel convenors: Anna Jobin, Jascha Bareis, Olivier Glassey, Christopher Salter and Philippe Sormani ***** _____ Prof. Anna Jobin | Asst. Professor Human-IST<https://human-ist.unifr.ch/>; <https://human-ist.unifr.ch/en/studies/master/digital-society-ma-minor-progr…> Study Advisor M.A. Digital Society<https://human-ist.unifr.ch/digitalsociety/> Institute HUMAN-IST | University of Freiburg, CH-1700 Fribourg anna.jobin(a)unifr.ch<mailto:anna.jobin@unifr.ch>

1 0

Last call for registration to The Digital Conference (KCL) for paper presenters: 8th March
by g. tavmen 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Dear colleagues, This is the last reminder to register for The Digital Conference 2026, for paper presentation before the deadline, 8th March. The participants who are not presenting can register until 1st May. The conference theme, Digital Humanities Today: Critical Inquiry With and About the Digital, foregrounds discussion, debate, and exchange across disciplines. Please note that there will be no keynote lectures; instead, the programme is designed to centre collective inquiry through panels, presentations, and conversations. 📍 Dates: 23–26 June 2026📍 Location: Bush House, King’s College London 📝 Registration:Please click here or use this link to register for the conference: https://estore.kcl.ac.uk/conferences-and-events/academic-faculties/faculty-… | | | | | | | | | | | Digital Humanities Today: Critical Inquiry with and about the Digital | ... King's College London >From the 23-26 June 2026, the Department of Digital Humanities at King’s College London will host an internation... | | | The webpage for The Digital Conference is now live up here: www.kcldigitalconference.com | | | | The Digital Conference 2026 @ King's College London | | | Dr Güneş Tavmen Lecturer in Digital Infrastructures Department of Digital Humanities King’s College London

1 0

New open access titles in Science Technology and Society
by Bahar Celik Muller 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

***Apologies for cross posting*** We are delighted to share latest open access titles from BUP's Science, Technology and Society list: * The App Economy - Making Sense of Platform Power in the Age of AI, By Konrad Kollnig<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/monobook-oa/book/9781529247725/97…> * Revealing Relations - Knowledge Infrastructures for Liveable Futures, By Anne Beaulieu<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/monobook-oa/book/9781529231540/97…> Please feel free to share these titles with your network and your students. Our aim is to ensure that the vital work of our authors reaches the lecturers, researchers and policymakers who can use it to drive meaningful, real-world change. You can request access to all Science, Technology and Society<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/collection/SOC-Collection?bot=bot…> titles from BUP as part of our Sociology Collection<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/subject/SOC-Collection?utm_source…> via your institution’s library. We offer EBA options and tiered pricing on our collections tailored to smaller organisations and their libraries. For more details, institutions can contact our team at bup-digital(a)bristol.ac.uk. You may also be interested in our Sociology journals<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/page/journals?utm_source=listserv…>, including the open access Global Social Challenges Journal<https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/gsc/view/journals/gscj/gscj-overv…>. Publish with us: If you are writing in this field, consider publishing your work with an ethical university press. To discuss your publishing projects, please contact our editor pul.stevens(a)bristol.ac.uk. Bahar Muller Senior Marketing Executive New books Asian Crucible<https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/asian-crucible?utm_source=signat…> by Nick Bisley The Green Handprint at Work<https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/professional-business/the-green-handpr…> by Barbara Kump and Babette Brinkmann Nature’s Boardroom: Giving Nature a Voice and a Vote<https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/professional-business/natures-boardroo…> by Simeon Rose Liberation and Corruption: Why Freedom Movements Fail<https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/liberation-and-corruption…> by Peter Hain Reckoning: Creating Positive Change Through Radical Empathy<https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/reckoning?utm_source=sign…> by Terri Givens Keep up with all our news and get a 25% discount on ALL Bristol University Press and Policy Press books by signing up to our newsletter<https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/signup-bup-pp?utm_source=signature&utm…>. Follow us on all social channels: Bluesky<https://ow.ly/8Eo050UfPKH> | Bluesky (Journals)<https://ow.ly/gNXc50UfPKG> | Instagram <https://ow.ly/GFZB50UfPKB> | LinkedIn<https://ow.ly/CXSX50UfPKF> | Threads <https://ow.ly/hONt50UfPKE> | Facebook<https://ow.ly/GFZB50UfPKB> | X (Twitter)<https://x.com/BrisUniPress> Our charity for 2026 is One25. Find out more and donate here.<https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/charity?utm_source=signature&utm_mediu…>

1 0

New book: Internet Vulgarities in China — Cultures, Governance and Politics
by Jian Xu 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Dear colleagues, We are thrilled to announce the publication of the edited book Internet Vulgarities in China: Cultures, Governance and Politics, edited by Jian Xu (Deakin University) and Dino Ge Zhang (City University of Hong Kong). The book has been published by Routledge as part of its Asian Visual Cultures series. https://www.routledge.com/Internet-Vulgarities-in-China-Cultures-Governance… The book is the first comprehensive study to critically examine the cultures, governance and politics of internet vulgarities in Chinese society. Comprising twelve chapters, the authors present empirically rich case studies to explore the nature, regulation and evolution of the internet cultural products, vernacular internet cultures and subcultural online communities which have been officially deemed ‘vulgar’ by the state, official media and policy documents. >From ‘vulgar’ online music, internet literature, memes, web dramas, influencers, video games to online fandoms, this timely book demonstrates that the disciplinary power of China’s ‘anti-vulgarity’ campaigns stems from the state’s strategic use of the ambiguous concept of ‘vulgarity’ to judge and regulate the aesthetic and ethical dimensions of popular digital media cultures. This process of turning language into law—a form of ‘linguistification of rule’—functions as a key technique of digital and cultural governance, ensuring that these cultures evolve in accordance with the ideological, moral and cultural values of the party-state. The book will make a significant contribution to the fields of China’s digital media studies, popular culture studies, internet and cultural governance. It is an essential resource for scholars, researchers and students seeking a critical understanding of China’s digital media cultures and its governance and politics. Table of Contents Chapter 1 (Introduction): Judgement of ugliness: The politics of ‘anti-vulgarity’ in China’s media and cultural governance — Jian Xu & Dino Ge Zhang Part I: Internet Cultural Products Chapter 2: Messy realities and power secrecy: Contested and persistent presences of vulgarities in the governance of Chinese web novels — Renren Yang Chapter 3: Legitimising musical taste: ‘Vulgar internet songs’ from ‘Mice loves rice’ to PG-One — Nathanel Amar Chapter 4: Boy’s love as ‘vulgar’ culture? The discourse of anti-boys’ love and the cis-heteronormative governance against BL-adapted web dramas in China — Liang Ge, Tingting Hu and Ziyao Chen Chapter 5: Vulgar spirits of games and play from state to society: An alternative history of videogames in China — Dino Ge Zhang & Jing Sun Part II: Vernacular Internet Cultures Chapter 6: ‘Toxic Chicken Soup’ as a genre: The dialectics of hope and its governance on We Media — Shaohua Guo Chapter 7: Ball-ache, dick hair and serial cunt words: The role of vulgarity in Chinese internet language — Gabriele de Seta Chapter 8: Negativity as vulgar? The rise of self-mockery culture and its governance — Junqi Peng Chapter 9: In search of the opposite of the canonical: eGao Red Classics and its regulation — Qian Gong Part III: Subcultural Online Communities Chapter 10: Vulgarising a subaltern taste on Chinese social media: The rise and fall of hanmai rap and social shake dance — Jiaxi Hou Chapter 11: Eroticised internet celebrity and vulgarity in China: The case of Aoi Sola — Jamie Coates Chapter 12: ‘Chasing idols in a rational way’: Governing toxic ‘fan circle’ culture in China — Jian Xu & Ling Yang >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards Jian Xu Associate Professor in Communication Deakin University, Australia Profile: https://experts.deakin.edu.au/40550-jian-xu Important Notice: The contents of this email are intended solely for the named addressee and are confidential; any unauthorised use, reproduction or storage of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and any attachments immediately and advise the sender by return email or telephone. Deakin University does not warrant that this email and any attachments are error or virus free.

1 1

Join us for our first CCSN book event of 2026! Global South Creator Cultures
by Zoe Glatt 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Hello AoIRistas! We are thrilled to invite you to the first Content Creator Scholars Network (CCSN) event for 2026, a roundtable discussion about the new book Global South Creator Cultures (Routledge, 2025). We’ll be joined by editors Tuğçe Bidav and Smith Mehta , as well as several of the contributing authors, to talk about creators cultures and economies around the world. When: Monday 30th March, 8am EST/1pm BST/11pm AEDT Where: on zoom Book a (free) ticket HERE: https://tinyurl.com/4mun5a73 ABOUT THE BOOK Global South Creator Cultures situates creator labour within the geographic specificities of nation-states and examines the working conditions of social media creators and the geographical challenges of their work, offering a four-part conceptual framework for studying creator cultures. Rather than placing creator cultures in the Global South against those in the Global North to produce a series of binaries, it prioritises expanding our frames of reference for studying creator labour. It does so by examining creator cultures in India, Turkey, Brazil, Chile, Pakistan, Nigeria, Hong Kong, and China through approaches from media, communication, and cultural studies, as well as internet, platform, and creator studies. Rich with grounded subjective experiences of Global South creators, this collection is essential reading for students and academics of media, communication, and cultural studies, and appeals to anyone interested in understanding the complex relationship between nation-states, social media platforms, and creators. *** We’d also like to take this opportunity to invite you become part of the CCSN community, below are some ways we can connect! <3 * Join our mailing list, where we share news, events and publications from our 600+ members every month: https://tinyurl.com/ytv2t33u * Join our Discord server for deeper engagement with a lovely community of 200 creator scholars: https://tinyurl.com/5m6ecdt8 * Check out our website, which has lots of cool teaching and research resources: https://www.ccsn.site/ * Follow us on Instagram @weareccsn We hope you’ll join us for this vital conversation about developments in creator studies from around the world and we look forward to seeing you around the interwebs! The CCSN operating team, on behalf of the wider core team Tom Divon & Zoë Glatt (CCSN Co-Directors) Brandon Harris (Programming & Events Officer) PB Berge & Celeste Oon (Discord Community Officers) Chris Persaud (Grievance Officer) ________________________ Dr Zoë Glatt LSE Fellow in Interdisciplinary Social Science www.zoeglatt.com<http://www.zoeglatt.com/> // LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/zo%C3%AB-glatt-2b333861/> // YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/Zedstergal> Co-Founder/Director: The Content Creator Scholars Network<https://www.ccsn.site/> The Digital Ethnography Collective<https://zoeglatt.com/?page_id=545> LSE100 Feedback and Advice sessions: visit Student Hub<https://studenthub.lse.ac.uk/welcome> to view my availability and book a slot.

1 0

Fwd: Towards Mapping and Defining Critical Hype Studies: Multi-author-position paper 🦄
by Jascha Bareis 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

Dear Air community, After nearly two years of preparation, our 26 scholars-multi author-position paper 'Towards Mapping and Defining Critical Hype Studies: Multidisciplinary Insights and Future Directions' is finally out! 🦄 We hope that this position paper will stand as inspiration across academic, industry, civil society, activist, and other social circles, aiming to become a key reference for future hype-related research. https://zenodo.org/records/18764034 📖 The paper offers a programmatic analysis of the field of critical hype studies, acknowledging and identifying intellectual origins and research and hype literacy agenda, theoretical-methodological frameworks, a summative potpourri of our wide authoring team's empirical works, an attempt to capture our dilemmas and obstacles in pursuing critical hype studies, and...a long list of bibliography. And while we recognise academic overlaps with studying *Trends, Buzz feeding**, Vision Assessment* or the *Sociology of Expectations*, we understand Hype Studies as a distinct academic research field that tries out new avenues. See here why--> https://hypestudies.org/blog/is-hype-studies-just-sociology-of-expectations… 🎊 It is worth noting that we decided to release the paper independently through the Zenodo depository, using the 21 co-authors' judgements and satisfiable review - we are nevertheless exploring options to publish with a scholarly journal as well - so more news on this to come! All the best, J.Bareis in the name of the members of Hype Studies https://hypestudies.org/

1 0

IEEE SMARTCOMP 2026 Workshops – Submission Deadline: March 9th, 2026
by h-yonekura+ist 04 Mar '26

04 Mar '26

====================================================================== Call for Workshop Papers: IEEE SMARTCOMP 2026 ====================================================================== **** Deadline: March 9th, 2026 **** --------------------------- SMARTCOMP 2026, the 12th edition of the premier conference on smart computing, will be held in Messina, Italy, from 22nd to 25th June 2026. https://smartcomp2026.unime.it/ This year, IEEE SMARTCOMP 2026 hosts a rich program of international workshops addressing cutting-edge research in smart computing and smart systems, including: - DM-SmartHealth: Third International Workshop on Digital and Mobile Smart Health Systems - LIFESEC: Second International Workshop on Whole-Lifecycle Security for Smart Systems: Methods and Tools - QCNS: First International Workshop on Quantum Computing and Networking for Smart Systems - SmartAIDa: Second International Workshop on Smart AI Models & Data Sharing and Monetisation - SmartAgr: Fifth International Workshop on Smart Agriculture - SmartSys: Eleventh International Workshop on Smart Service Systems - SSC: Twelfth Workshop on Sensors and Smart Cities - SMVG: First International Workshop on Smart Moving These workshops provide a focused venue for discussing emerging topics, interdisciplinary approaches, and innovative applications in smart computing ecosystems. Full details, workshop links, and workshop-specific CFP/submission instructions are available here: https://smartcomp2026.unime.it/workshops/ We apologize if you receive multiple copies of this message, and we would appreciate it if you could kindly forward it to colleagues who may be interested. Don’t miss the opportunity to submit your work to one of the IEEE SMARTCOMP 2026 Workshops! We look forward to your submissions and to welcoming you in Messina, Italy, in June 2026! Sincerely, --------- Haruki Yonekura Publicity and Social Media Co-Chair, IEEE SMARTCOMP 2026 https://smartcomp2026.unime.it/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/ieee-smartcomp/ Graduate School of Information Science and Technology The University of Osaka, Japan Mobile Computing Laboratory

1 0