- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Positions, Copenhagen
by Charlie Breindahl 03 Mar '03

03 Mar '03

Positions available at the Department of Film and Media Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (http://www.media.ku.dk/Engelsk/) Two positions as assistant professor are available in connection with the launch of a BA program in "Digital Aesthetics and Communication" and of an MA program in "Multimedia, Communication, and Organizations". Assistant Professor in "Digital Aesthetics and Communication" Applicants must document research qualifications within one or more of the following areas: digital media of communication, strategic communication and digital media, digital media aesthetics, and digital media culture. One of the obligations of the successful candidate will be to participate in the development and planning of the new BA program, "Digital Aesthetics and Communication". Assistant Professor in "Multimedia, Communication, and Organizations" Applicants must document research qualifications within one or more of the following areas: media theory and analysis with a specific focus on multimedia, journalism, organizational communication, organizational theory and culture, and public relations. One of the obligations of the successful candidate will be to participate in the development and planning of the new MA program, "Multimedia, Communication, and Organizations". The positions are limited to three years. Further information on the positions and the department may be obtained from the Head of Department, Anne Jerslev, email jerslev(a)hum.ku.dk, phone +45 35328111, or from the Head of Studies, Casper Tybjerg, email: casper(a)hum.ku.dk, tel: +45 35328130. Terms of appointment and salary according to the agreement between the Ministry of Finance and AC (The Danish Confederation of Professional Associations) on academics in the State. The application must be in English and include: - A curriculum vitae - A short description of the research program which is intended to be undertaken - Documentation for teaching qualifications and other qualifications - A complete list of publications with indication of which papers the applicant considers particularly relevant (max. 6) - 3 copies of each of the selected papers considered particularly relevant. It should be noted that: - The applicants will be notified about the composition of the assessment committee - The assessment committee may require supplementary documentation, which the applicant must then provide - Letters of recommendation are not regarded as scientific material on which the assessment may be based. However they may be taken into account when the Dean decides to whom to offer the position. - When the assessment committee's report is submitted, each applicant will receive only the part of the report that relates to him/herself, as information about the other applicants is confidential and may not be revealed to other applicants. It should also be noted that if the applicants want their publications and other material returned by mail, it will be sent C.O.D. Any potential applicant is invited to apply irrespective of age, sex, race, religion or ethnic background. Closing date for application: 17th March, 2003 12 Noon

1 0

Fwd: <nettime> global public goods Network (gpgNet) www.gpgNet.net
by jeremy hunsinger 03 Mar '03

03 Mar '03

Begin forwarded message: > From: Vikas Nath <vikas.nath(a)undp.org> > Date: Thu Feb 27, 2003 9:37:29 AM US/Eastern > To: nettime-l(a)bbs.thing.net > Subject: <nettime> global public goods Network (gpgNet) www.gpgNet.net > Reply-To: Vikas Nath <vikas.nath(a)undp.org> > > Dear Colleagues, > > I invite you to visit the new website of global public goods Network > (gpgNet) at http://www.gpgNet.net > > gpgNet intends to serve researchers, policymakers, business and > civil > society as a platform for information exchange and discussion on > issues concerning the theory, policy design and practice of > providing > global public goods. > > On gpgNet you will find references to research and studies, > information on forthcoming events as well as commentaries, policy > statements and media reports concerning global public goods issues. > > I would like to invite your special attention to the discussion > forum. > The inaugural debate is on the topic of "What is Public? What > is Private?" Please join us for this debate at > http://www.gpgnet.net/discussion.php and share with us -and the > global > public- your observations on this topic. > > Your suggestions and feedback on the gpgNet website would be very > much > appreciated, and can be sent to info(a)gpgnet.net > > Yours sincerely, > > Inge Kaul > Director > Office of Development Studies > United Nations Development Programme > > Vikas Nath > gpgNet.net Manager > Policy Analyst, Office of Development Studies > United Nations Development Programme > 336 East 45 Street > New York NY 10017 USA > > Email: info(a)gpgnet.net > URL: http://www.gpgNet.net > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: majordomo(a)bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg > body > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)bbs.thing.net >

1 0

Re: Air-l digest, Vol 1 #646 - 10 msgs
by Shelia Cotten 02 Mar '03

02 Mar '03

Hello everyone. I would hope that there are enough methodological issues to be addressed to merit having two panels for AoIR 4.0. In contrast to Nancy and Annette's session, my panel session will focus moreso (although not 100%) on quantitative methodological issues associated with Internet research. For example, one topic will address applying Don Dillman's 'tailored design' to Internet surveys with college student populations. Another topic to be discussed includes ways of collecting data via the Internet that may be missed with telephone surveys, and issues of nonresponse for sensitive questions in Internet surveys. Other topics will be included as abstracts are received. Hopefully this session will advance our understanding of various methodological issues as they are applied to Internet research. If anyone is still interested in submitting an abstract for this session, please do so by Tuesday. Please submit it to me directly at cotten(a)umbc.edu. Thanks. Shelia ********************************* Shelia R. Cotten, PhD Dept. of Sociology University of Maryland Baltimore County 1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore, MD 21250 410-455-6330 cotten(a)umbc.edu

2 1

2003 International Conference on CYBERWORLDS
by Merlyna Lim 01 Mar '03

01 Mar '03

FYI, apology for crossposting -- http://www.ntu.edu.sg/sce/cw2003/cw2003.htm 2003 International Conference on CYBERWORLDS 3-5 December 2003, Marina Mandarin Hotel, Singapore organized by: School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University in cooperation with: IEEE Computer Society SIGGRAPH Call for Submissions Cyberworlds are information worlds being formed on the web either intentionally or spontaneously, with or without design. As information worlds, they are either virtual or real, and can be both. In terms of information modelling, the theoretical ground for the cyberworlds is far above the level of integrating spatial database models and temporal database models. This conference will deal with large distributed information worlds in the web as well as methods and tools used for creating such worlds. The conference topics include but are not limited to the following areas: Group A: Cyber Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms Philosophy and disciplines Methodologies of cybergenesis Cyberworlds and their impact on the real world Cyberethics and cyberlaws Cybersecurity Datamining and warehousing in cyberworlds Distributed simulation Distributed virtual environments Shared and virtual worlds Simulation and visualisation for cyberpresentations Computer vision and augmented reality for cyberworlds Intelligent agents and robotics Group B: Applications, Case Studies, and Industrial Practices Bioinformatics for cyberlife and medicine Healthcare in cyberworlds Cyberworlds for bioengineering Cyberinformation systems E-business in cyberworlds Cyberworlds for education Cyberworlds for manufacturing Cyber fairs Cyber museums Cyber parenting Multi-user web games CW2003 will provide an opportunity for scientists, engineers, and researchers from around the world to share the latest research, ideas, and developments in these fields. The conference will consist of formal paper sessions, tutorials, industrial seminars and hands-on demonstrations where research groups and vendors will show the state-of-the-art in the field. Paper submission is to be done electronically through the Submission page. Keynote talks: * Tosiyasu L. Kunii (Hosei University, Japan) "Cyberworlds as the Leading Power of World Evolution" * Daniel Thalmann (Virtual Reality Lab, EPFL, Switzerland) "Believable Cyberpeople: A True Challenge for the Decade" * Anatoly T. Fomenko (Moscow State University, Russia), "Computer geometry for singularities in dynamical systems with symmetries" Industrial seminars and exhibitions: * Silicon Graphics Inc. * Hewlett-Packard Company * Christie Digital Systems, USA Inc. * NTUC Income The conference proceedings will be published by the IEEE Computer Society. Extended versions of select papers will be also printed in special issues of Computers & Graphics (28:4, 2004), The Journal of Visualization & Computer Animation, and The International Journal of Distance Education Technologies If you want to receive the original poster and the conference flyers, email your request to cw2003(a)ntu.edu.sg Important Dates Seminar/exhibition proposals: Potential sponsors are welcome Abstract: 5 May 2003 Paper/tutorial submission: 12 May 2003 Notice of Acceptance: 4 Aug 2003 Camera-ready paper: 1 Sep 2003 Contact Information CW 2003 Secretariat: Ms Merlin Toh Conference Management Centre/CCE Nanyang Technological University Administration Annex Building #04-06 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639815 Phone: +65-6790-4723 Fax: +65-6793-0997 Email: cw2003(a)ntu.edu.sg Program Chair: Alexei Sourin, assourin(a)ntu.edu.sg phone: +65 6790 4292, fax: +65 6792 6559 School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University Blk N4, #2a-32, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798 General Conference Co-Chairs: Tosiyasu Laurence Kunii, tosi(a)kunii.com Seah Hock Soon, ashsseah(a)ntu.edu.sg Conference web-site: http://www.ntu.edu.sg/sce/cw2003 -- MERLYNA LIM website: www.geocities.com/olohok_99 email: merlyn(a)bdg.centrin.net.id ------------------------------------------------------------------- Research Fellow Ph.D. candidate SCoT Research Group Technology & Society Studies Bandung University of Twente Indonesia Enschede - The Netherlands

1 0

<nettime> Thing.net press release re Verio/NTT (fwd)
by robert m. tynes 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:36:04 +0100 From: brian(a)thing.net To: nettime-l(a)bbs.thing.net Subject: <nettime> Thing.net press release re Verio/NTT February 28, 2003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THING.NET REMAINS ONLINE WITH NEW PROVIDER; SEEKS GREATER INDEPENDENCE Contact: thing-group(a)rtmark.com Contribute to Thing.net's independence drive at https://secure.thing.net/backbone/ As has been widely reported in the press, NTT/Verio, Thing.net's upstream service provider, recently informed Thing.net that it would unilaterally terminate its service contract. While the original date given for the cutoff was February 28, it is now timed for March 14, 2003. In the meantime Thing.net has signed with other providers to assure continued connectivity and will remain safely online. Socially and politically critical groups and artists with similar concerns continue to feel the chilling effects of unfounded legal threats from large corporations, who currently believe they can intimidate an ISP simply by complaining to the upstream provider. As C. Carr reported in the Village Voice, "technically, what's happened to Thing.net is not censorship. It's worse. 'What we have here is something that doesn't even go to court,' says Svetlana Mintcheva, coordinator of the Arts Advocacy Project at the National Coalition Against Censorship. "'They were just preemptively closed. It sets a kind of precedent where corporations can take away free speech, no matter what kind of First Amendment protections we have, and there isn't much to be done legally.' Verio reps declined to comment." Thing.net plans to fight such actions by working to achieve more independence from censorious upstream providers. Thing.net is in dialog with European ISPs about relocating some of its "mission-critical" elements there. "The advantage of this approach is that the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) doesn't apply there and the European Union just failed to get a majority for a similarly flawed law," says Wolfgang Staehle, Thing.net Director. "This will provide greater security with no compromise in service." Since an article in the New York Times on December 23, 2002, Thing.net has received many donations from individual and institutional supporters around the world, in addition to international press coverage. Among organizations that have contributed or promised to do se are The Nathan Cummings Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the Warhol Foundation, and the Creative Capital Foundation. http://www.thing.net https://secure.thing.net/backbone/ http://bbs.thing.net http://thing.net/switch Background: In addition to terminating their contract with Thing.net, NTT/Verio took the dramatic measure, in response to legal complaints about a parody web site, of shutting down the entire Thing.net network for fifteen hours on December 3-4 virtually without warning. This affected web sites for such organizations as Artforum and P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center (and many more), seriously compromising Thing.net's service to its clients. The shutdown stemmed from a complaint by Dow Chemical Corporation over a web site created by artists' collective RTMark that parodied Dow and was hosted by Thing.net (http://rtmark.com/thingpr.html) Dow invoked the intellectual property and cybersquatting provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) - a law that is regularly used by corporations to prevent free speech - in demanding that the site be taken offline. NTT/Verio, in turn, claimed to be obliged both to shut down Thing.net and to terminate their service under the DMCA. When NTT/Verio was unable to contact a representative of Thing.net during the evening hours, they shut down the entire network - rather than just the parody Web site - and subsequently threatened to terminate their service to thing.net. "Thing.net is a commercial ISP with years of solid service," says Wolfgang Staehle, Thing.net Executive Director. "Verio's arbitrary and punitive interruption of our services has made us look unstable and inflicted serious damage to our reputation." "What Verio has done," asserts Ray Thomas of RTMark, the group responsible for the Dow parody site, "is like a phone company cutting off a whole neighborhood for one prank phone call." To receive donations for the expenses associated with the switchover and for building a more secure network, Thing.net has set up a donation page at http://secure.thing.net/backbone/. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo(a)bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)bbs.thing.net

1 0

Re: Air-l digest, Vol 1 #646 - 10 msgs
by CRAIG MURRAY 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

I will be away and unable to read e-mail until 10th March

1 0

Need Website based online survey software
by KeithDoyon＠aol.com 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

I'm doing some research, putting together a website based online survey, and am in need of appropriate survey design software that is "student priced" and not excessively technical. or challenging to set up. And I am certainly open to used software if anyone upgraded. Can anyone suggest anything or point me in the right directions? Please feel free to write to me off-list. Thank you. Keith

2 1

RE: [Air-l] IMPORTANT - AoIR conference submission clarification and extension
by Matthew Allen 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

The suggestion about different submission dates has merit - I am sure I will add that to the list 'things to consider' for 2004 when I hand over to the next chair. Best wishes Matt Dr Matthew Allen Associate Professor Internet Studies Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia m.allen(a)curtin.edu.au http://smi.curtin.edu.au/internet +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3152 (f) Program Chair, Internet Research Conference Toronto 2003 'Broadening the Band' -----Original Message----- From: Laszlo Ropolyi [mailto:ROPOLYI@ludens.elte.hu] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 10:51 PM To: air-l(a)aoir.org Cc: SUELY(a)icaro.unisinos.br; sjones(a)uic.edu; Matthew Allen Subject: RE: [Air-l] IMPORTANT - AoIR conference submission clarification and extension Hello, There seems to be a natural solution of the problem: shifting the deadline of panels and that of the individual papers. A first deadline for panels and the second one for individual papers. In the cases of unsuccesful panel proposals every people could apply again as individual participant. Best wishes, Laszlo Ropolyi On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Matthew Allen wrote: > Hi there > > you submit EITHER in a panel OR separately. - basically you have to choose > and hopefully this ensures only very good panels are proposed, with good > papers all through > > We have found previously that some panels really were not of strong quality > and this is the way we are trying to ensure they improve - by making people > responsible for organising their paper into a good panel or submitting it > singly > > Best wishes > Matt Allen > > _______________________________________________ > Air-l mailing list > Air-l(a)aoir.org > http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l >

1 0

RE: [Air-l] Methodological panel session (competing panels?)
by Matthew Allen 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

Dear all just to assure you that we will ensure that, as best we can, the conference organising process will deal with any hiccups or problems. Dr Matthew Allen Associate Professor Internet Studies Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia m.allen(a)curtin.edu.au http://smi.curtin.edu.au/internet +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3152 (f) Program Chair, Internet Research Conference Toronto 2003 'Broadening the Band' -----Original Message----- From: Annette Markham [mailto:amarkham@uic.edu] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 11:56 PM To: air-l(a)aoir.org Subject: Re: [Air-l] Methodological panel session Hi Shelia, Nancy Baym and I have also put together a panel on methodological issues. Ours is structured as a roundtable among methodologists discussing various questions regarding quality, rigor, and procedures in qualitative inquiry and internet studies. What is yours going to be focused on? Maybe we can coordinate or cross discussions in some way? Cheers, Annette Markham At 10:33 AM 2/26/2003 -0500, you wrote: >cotten(a)umbc.edu ****************** Annette N. Markham, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago 1007 W. Harrison St. (m/c 132) Chicago, IL 60607-7137 Tel: 312-413-2124 amarkham(a)uic.edu ****************** _______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l(a)aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l

1 0

new reviews in cyberculture studies (march 2003)
by david silver 27 Feb '03

27 Feb '03

New Book Reviews in Cyberculture Studies (March 2003) Each month, the Resource Center for Cyberculture Studies (RCCS) <http://www.com.washington.edu/rccs> publishes a number of full-length book reviews. The reviews reflect a modest attempt to locate critically various contours of the emerging and interdisciplinary field of cyberculture studies. New reviews for March 2003 include: Steven Holtzman, Digital Mosaics: The Aesthetics of Cyberspace. Reviewed by Kevin Moist. Sally R. Munt, ed. Technospaces: Inside the New Media. Reviewed by Helen Kennedy. Lisa Nakamura, Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. Reviewed by Julian Bleecker and Graham J. Murphy, with a response from Lisa Nakamura. Georgette Wang, Jan Servaes, and Anura Goonasekera, eds. The New Communications Landscape: Demystifying Media Globalization. Reviewed by Josh Heuman. If you or your colleagues are interested in reviewing books for RCCS, contact us directly at <dsilver(a)u.washington.edu>. As always, please feel free to forward this message. david silver http://faculty.washington.edu/dsilver To SUBSCRIBE to cyberculture-announce, a low volume announcement list for RCCS events and updates, email: listproc(a)u.washington.edu; No subject is needed. In the body, type: subscribe cyberculture-announce

1 0