- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

2024 Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute
by Nicole Stremlau 19 Feb '24

19 Feb '24

The 2024 Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute is open for applications! 2024 Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute Jesus College, Oxford July 29-August 9, 2024 https://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/oxford-media-policy-summer-institute-2024/ In the tradition of the Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute, now in its third decade, this year’s edition — Technology, Policy and Democracy in Flux: From Inequalities to Inclusion — brings together regulators, policymakers, graduate students, academics, NGOs and others to engage with issues at the heart of technology law and policy: democracy, justice, and security in the digital age. 2024 is a year of unprecedented electoral contests. Around 4 billion people are expected to vote across 50 countries. As generative AI becomes more sophisticated, there are growing concerns about the accelerating spread of mis/disinformation around elections and the increasing use of internet shutdowns and surveillance as a response to both domestic and international threats. As some have suggested, we are in the midst of a ‘polycrisis’ turned ‘permacrisis’. In this year’s Summer Institute, we will focus on several core themes, including AI for development and human rights, its growing application in anticipating crises, the role of technology in conflict, and the regulation of new technologies, including AI and social media. With the participation of speakers from around the world, we will explore these themes in the context of 2024’s year of elections and the pressures facing a range of polities. By focusing on current events such as the continuing wars in Ukraine and Ethiopia, the politics of AI policymaking across the Global South, and efforts to curb hate speech in countries that have markets marginal to Big Tech, we will explore issues of infrastructure, inequalities, and ways to foster inclusion. Our approach is decidedly global, with an emphasis on the Global South. We will also use our vantage point from the UK to discuss emerging issues in the EU and engage with local actors, including Ofcom, the BBC, and the European Commission. As with Summer Institutes in the past, we will have speakers from across Oxford, as well as prominent guests from policy, government and the private sector. One of the most exciting aspects of the Summer Institute is the vibrant and engaged group of participants and the lasting networks created. For over two decades, the Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute has built a dynamic cohort of alumni worldwide. Join us to discuss contemporary issues of global media policy over breakfast, during seminars, and on long walks through the Oxford countryside! Please get in touch with us if you have any questions: pcmlp(a)csls.ox.ac.uk<mailto:pcmlp@csls.ox.ac.uk> . Apply by March 24, 2024 for an early decision. The final application deadline is April 24, 2024. https://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/oxford-media-policy-summer-institute-2024/

1 0

TikTok Cultures Research Network's OA report <A Retrospect on Young People and COVID-19 Discourse on TikTok>
by Jin Lee 19 Feb '24

19 Feb '24

Dear colleagues, I hope this email finds you well. On behalf of TikTok Cultures Research Network [TCRN], a scholarly network for academic resources and events about TikTok studies (founded in 2020), I'm excited to share our recent Open Access report here that might be of interest to you. - *A Retrospect on Young People and COVID-19 Discourse on TikTok (*Curated and Authored by Crystal Abidin & Naomi Robinson, 2023) < https://tiktokcultures.com/covid-19-report/> - This report is a summary of findings on pandemic-related discourses by young people on the short video platform - It is based on a series of projects undertaken by TCRN from 2019 to 2023. You can find more about TCRN's work; please visit our website < https://tiktokcultures.com/> and our socials < https://twitter.com/tiktokcultures>, < https://www.instagram.com/tiktokcultures_ig/>. If you have any questions about TCRN's recent projects and membership, please direct your queries to <tiktokcultrues(a)gmail.com> Best, Jin -- Jin Lee, PhD Research Fellow, Internet Studies, Curtin University & ARC Centre of Digital Child Affiliate researcher, Korean Research Centre of Western Australia Visit my website <https://ljin8788.wixsite.com/website> for more

1 0

CFP: Science Misinformation Panel
by Rod Abhari 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

Do you research science misinformation, politicization, or conspiracy theories? I am putting together a preconstituted panel of 4-5 papers for The 2024 AoIR Conference. This panel will discuss the role of digital media in contributing to, and addressing, epistemic problems in public science. If you are interested in contributing to this exciting discussion, please reach out to me by Friday, February 23rd. Best, Rod Rod Abhari Northwestern University School of Communication abhari(a)u.northwestern.edu

1 0

Reminder: Submission deadline for #AoIR2024 is 1 March 2024
by Michelle, Association of Internet Researchers 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

*This is a reminder that the deadline to make submissions for #AoIR2024 is just two weeks away: 1 March 2024, 23:59 UTC.* If you are unsure what time this is where you are, please check here <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AoIR2024+Submissi…>. In the meantime, submissions for AoIR 2024 are already being uploaded daily. We would greatly appreciate your help with the review process, even if you are unable to submit a proposal this year. As ever, our goal is to create a broad, engaging, and diverse selection of conference presentations that reflect the breadth of our research community, and we can only do that with engaged and thoughtful reviewers. If you are submitting to the conference this year, please consider volunteering to review. *More details on submitting and reviewing below, but the deadline of Friday, 1 March 2024 is the same for both!* - - - *Submitting* The 2024 conference welcomes contributions that address the theme of Industry (https://aoir.org/aoir2024/aoir2024cfp) as well as submissions on topics that address social, cultural, political, legal, aesthetic, economic, and/or philosophical aspects of the internet beyond the conference theme. To re-familiarize yourself with the types of submissions solicited, please see here: https://aoir.org/aoir2024/subtypes. The submission deadline is 1 March 2024 for papers, panels, roundtables, fishbowls, experimental sessions, and pre-conference workshops. When submitting, please take the time to read the submission categories and topics carefully; this helps us match your submission to suitable reviewers. To learn more about how submissions are reviewed, please see here: https://aoir.org/sub_review_info_aoir. *If accepted as a presenting author, you must register for the conference by the Early Bird deadline of 1 August 2024*. Accepted paper and panel submissions will be included in our open access conference paper archive, Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR). SPIR helps us further publicize the work of our members and introduce our research to a wider audience. All paper and panel submissions must therefore follow our SPIR formatting requirements, which includes a consistent header and style format for the papers that will enable people to easily locate author and title information, and identify the papers as part of the AoIR conference. This format is only intended to bring consistency to basic elements (such as typeface and spacing), not to impose any disciplinary constraints. Please download the Word template here: https://aoir.org/aoir2024/subtemplate/. AoIR 2024 relies on our community for reviewing, and every person who is submitting this year appreciates your assistance as a reviewer. When submitting, please take a moment to also update your reviewing preferences. - - - *Reviewing* Please double check that you have indicated that you have volunteered to review (or change that to a no if you cannot review this year). Based on feedback from previous conferences we have revised our list of reviewer expertise topics. Please update your topics to help us match proposal submissions to reviewer interests, instructions on how to do this are here: https://aoir.org/aoir_reviewer_instructions/ To learn more about how submissions are reviewed, please see here: https://aoir.org/sub_review_info_aoir/. On behalf of AoIR, we thank you for your time, attention, and contribution to the AoIR conference. If you do not have the time to be a reviewer this year, no problem. You can reply to AoIRConfChair @ aoir.org and we will remove your reviewer status from your profile. We look forward to working with you toward a fantastic conference! Please login and update your reviewer expertise topics by Wednesday, 1 March 2024 at the very latest. If you have any questions or any difficulties updating your information, please let us know. Sincerely, Lianrui Jia & Tim Highfield AoIR2024 Program Chairs

1 0

Protocols/Policies for Politicians on Social Media across Countries
by Behrooz Rasuli 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

Dear AIR-L Members, I am writing to solicit your expertise on a research project exploring the regulations and protocols governing how politicians utilize social media platforms across different countries. A friend of mine is currently conducting a content analysis on this topic and asked me for a database or website collecting these protocols/policies. He wants to know whether countries have established protocols or policies specifically concerning the use of social media by governmental bodies, governmental institutions, and government-affiliated members (including congress members, governors, etc). For example, which platform they can use or what content they can share, as a governmental representative. If your country has established protocols or policies related to this topic, we would be incredibly grateful if you could share any relevant information or resources (e.g. links to official documents or government websites outlining these protocols). Sincerely, Behrooz -- *Behrooz Rasuli* Ph.D. in LIS *Department of **Library & Information Science, Irandoc* *Skype: rasuli99*

2 2

Hillary Clinton on Internet Freedom (2011)
by Joly MacFie 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

On this day, February 15, in 2011, United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered an address 'Internet Freedom' at George Washington University in Washington DC. This was her second speech on the topic, following an earlier one on January 10, 2010. <https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/135519.htm> I urge countries everywhere instead to join us in the bet we have made, a > bet that an open Internet will lead to stronger, more prosperous countries. > At its core, it’s an extension of the bet that the United States has been > making for more than 200 years, that open societies give rise to the most > lasting progress, that the rule of law is the firmest foundation for > justice and peace, and that innovation thrives where ideas of all kinds > are aired and explored. This is not a bet on computers or mobile phones. > It’s a bet on people. We’re confident that together with those partners in > government and people around the world who are making the same bet by > hewing to universal rights that underpin open societies, we’ll preserve the > Internet as an open space for all. And that will pay long-term gains for > our shared progress and prosperity. The United States will continue to > promote an Internet where people’s rights are protected and that it is open > to innovation, interoperable all over the world, secure enough to hold > people’s trust, and reliable enough to support their work. Video/audio: https://archive.org/details/hillary-clinton-internet-freedom Transcript: https://archive.org/download/hillary-clinton-internet-freedom/Hillary_Clint… - - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

EXTENSION: The value of blockchains for the media industries
by Indrek Ibrus 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

DEADLINE EXTENSION Symposium: The value of blockchains for the media industries https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/symposium/ <https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/symposium/> Tallinn University organises a symposium to investigate both the existing visions for and the real-world endeavours and practices of using blockchains in the media and cultural industries. The symposium, which will take place on 23–24 May (in Tallinn), invites empirical as well as theoretical contributions that focus on the value of blockchains as specific technologies for data governance in the media industries. What value is being pursued/sought, who is creating value, who is extracting it and who is governing the exchange of that created value? The symposium’s keynote talk will be provided by Professor Ellie Rennie (RMIT University) and select industry leaders. The new deadline for submitting abstracts is February 29th. Decisions will be communicated back to authors by March 5th. Abstract submission: https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/submission/ <https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/submission/> All presenters will be invited to submit their papers to the special issue of the Baltic Screen Media Review that will be published at the end of 2024. Select papers with a policy focus will be invited to join an edited book currently discussed with the MIT Press. Participation fee: 75 euros (covering all meals, including a conference dinner) Agenda The perceived and experienced value of blockchains for the media industries While the expectations for blockchains are sometimes downplayed, these technologies are often also highly promoted. In the upcoming symposium, we will therefore be interested in the evidence of real contexts of technology development – where are the normative discourses coming from, why are experiments being carried out, what are their actual results, what are the gains and what are the emerging problems? While we are interested in critical takes, we are also genuinely interested in the opportunities that these technologies have provided. That is, we are interested in exploring their claimed transformative potential in the media industries, including in relation to enhancing transparency, efficiency and security across various operations. Amid the centralising tendencies of Web 2.0 platforms, the potential of blockchains to democratise and decentralise market dynamics on the Internet towards “Web3” needs careful attention. When it comes to practical uses, then, first, blockchain technology is claimed to hold significant potential for content authentication and copyright management. It employs digital fingerprinting to establish ownership records, aiming to reduce piracy and unauthorized content use. This is seen as crucial in an environment where intellectual property rights are frequently contested. Smart contracts in blockchain promise more equitable, efficient and transparent royalty distribution, automating payments and reducing dependence on intermediaries. Second, blockchains can open avenues for direct content monetisation and audience engagement. Creators can use blockchains for direct sales and micro-transactions, bypassing conventional distribution channels and thereby fostering closer audience connections. This approach could democratise media access and create a more diverse media landscape. Another often-seen benefit is blockchain’s ability to combat fake news through immutable records, thereby enhancing media source credibility and reliability. In essence, blockchain’s decentralised nature has been celebrated for not only fortifying security against data breaches but also promoting a more democratic and equitable media industry. It is argued to empower creators, reward audience participation and ensure integrity in content dissemination and monetisation. This technology is often seen not just as a tool for operational improvement but as a catalyst for a more transparent, more efficient and more user-centric media ecosystem. The risks of blockchains for the media industries Yet, incorporating blockchain technology into the media industries, while promising, comes with its own set of risks and challenges. On the technical side, one of the often addressed practical concerns is the complexity and scalability of blockchain systems. Implementing such technology requires significant investment, in terms of both financial resources and expertise. This complexity extends to the regulatory environment, which remains in a state of flux. Media firms venturing into blockchain must navigate a landscape filled with legal uncertainties, especially concerning copyright laws, data protection and financial regulations related to cryptocurrencies. Significantly, the decentralised approach of blockchain might also pose challenges for traditional media business models, which rely on centralised control for content management and monetisation. Furthermore, if media companies incorporate cryptocurrencies into their business models, they expose themselves and their partners to the notorious volatility of these digital assets, which can significantly impact financial stability and revenue projections. With cryptocurrencies also comes the risk that early investors could gain a significant hold over relevant currencies and other assets, thus undoing the promise of greater decentralisation and fairer wealth distribution. Paper topics All these factors collectively highlight the need for a cautious and well-informed approach to integrating blockchain technologies in the media sector. Hence, we are inviting papers that critically examine the above-mentioned phenomena, addressing both the risks and the opportunities. As the implementation of blockchains in the media industries assumes knowledge from multiple domains, we are inviting and encouraging submissions from those in the fields of media and communications studies, computer science, law, economics, management, public administration and related fields. The papers could focus on any of the following (non-exhaustive) set of topics: • transparency and accountability: papers investigating how blockchains can enhance transparency in media production and distribution, and their impact on accountability within the media industries; • content authentication and copyright protection: papers exploring the role of blockchains in the governance of intellectual property rights; • monetisation and micro-transactions: papers analysing blockchain-based monetisation schemes in the media industries, including micro-transactions and direct artist-to-audience revenue models; • data privacy and consumer protection: papers examining the implications of blockchains on data privacy and their potential role in safeguarding consumer information; • ethical implications of blockchain technology in media industries: papers discussing the ethical uses of blockchains in content creation and distribution; • decentralisation of media platforms: papers assessing the cultural and economic impact of blockchain-based distributed social networks and content platforms; • impact on advertising models: papers investigating how blockchains can transform advertising models in media, particularly in terms of transparency, efficiency and fraud; • tokenisation of media assets: papers exploring the implications of tokenising media assets (like films, music, books) on the industry, including issues related to ownership and trade; • blockchains in journalism: papers delving into the use of blockchains in journalism, addressing issues like source verification, combating fake news and ensuring ethical reporting; • regulatory and legal challenges: papers analysing the legal and regulatory hurdles and pathways towards implementing blockchains in the media industries; • global accessibility and inclusivity: papers considering how blockchains are implemented in different cultural and economic contexts and/or what their effects are on global inclusiveness and accessibility of content; • innovation in content delivery models: papers exploring innovative content delivery models enabled by blockchains, such as decentralised streaming; • blockchains and audience engagement: papers assessing how blockchain technology can be used to enhance audience engagement and participation in media production and curation; • future of the Internet: papers theorising the role of blockchains in the future iterations of the Internet (metaverse, Web3) and what these bring about for contemporary media industries; • blockchains and wealth distribution: papers assessing critically the effects of blockchains on wealth distribution in media and cultural industries. More information about the symposium can be found here: https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/symposium/ <https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/symposium/> ________________________________________________________________________ Meediainnovatsiooni professor, Balti Filmi, Meedia ja Kunstide Instituut (BFM), Tallinna Ülikool Telefon: 56978885 Email: indrek.ibrus(a)tlu.ee Professor of media innovation, Baltic Film, Media and Arts School (BFM), Tallinn University Tel: +37256978885 Email: indrek.ibrus(a)tlu.ee Recent publications Järvekülg M, Ibrus I & Rohn, U (2023) Shifting from Web2 to Web3: The adaptive creator experiences on blockchain-based video-sharing and streaming platforms. Convergence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135485652312141 Ibrus, I., Karjus, A., Zemaityte, V., Rohn, U., & Schich, M. (2023). Quantifying Public Value Creation by Public Service Media Using Big Programming Data. International Journal of Communication, 17, 6741-6763. Main research projects Public Value of Open Cultural Data: https://publicvalueofdata.tlu.ee/ CresCine: https://www.crescine.eu/

1 0

UT Austin Postdoctoral Fellow, Work at the Human-AI Frontier
by Fleischmann, Kenneth R 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

Postdoctoral Fellow, Work at the Human-AI Frontier<https://apply.interfolio.com/140430> The University of Texas at Austin: School of Information Location Austin, Texas Description Good Systems<https://bridgingbarriers.utexas.edu/good-systems/>, Ethical AI at UT Austin, is recruiting a postdoctoral fellow to conduct research on the theme of “Work at the Human-AI Frontier” as it relates to Good Systems core research projects, which investigate the ethical implications of AI technologies in society in the areas of surveillance and privacy, racial equity, smart cities, mis- and dis-information, human-robot interaction, and smart hand tools and the future of work. Possible research directions may include but are not limited to the following: * The role of AI in the future workplace: How can AI be used to improve conditions for workers (e.g., safety, empowerment, worker autonomy), and how can we avoid some of the potential pitfalls of AI in the workplace (e.g., surveillance, disinformation)? How can we expand the workforce in terms of workers with a wide range of abilities? * The future of the labor market with continuous proliferation of AI: What policies do we need to ensure that AI allows for a smooth transition in the labor markets to mitigate job losses and unwanted displacement? How can AI eliminate disparities in the workforce? * Safe and equitable skilled trade work: How can we put AI in the hands of skilled trade workers, giving them more power in their work, reducing the potential for exploitation and discrimination in the workplace by giving them a way to document their work and its quality, and safeguarding their physical safety and well-being using AI-enabled technologies such as smart hand tools? * Urban AI deployments: how will AI and robots impact the future of life, work, and economic development in smart cities? * Generative AI and work: How can generative AI tools such as large language models and generative adversarial networks be used to improve work efficiency? (E.g. What prompt engineering skills do workers need?) * Human values of work and AI: How can AI be aligned with the values of all stakeholders involved in work, including workers, employers, customers, etc.? How does AI impact human workers’ agency in the workplace? Responsibilities * Become familiar with the six Good Systems core research projects<https://bridgingbarriers.utexas.edu/good-systems/projects> by meeting with team leadership, attending team meetings, and reading project scholarly outputs. * Develop, collect, and refine ideas for cross-project research opportunities on the theme “Work at the Human-AI Frontier, and collaborate with relevant core project researchers to explore and develop a cross-cutting research topic. * Lead writing of manuscript(s) related to “Work at the Human-AI Frontier,” submit to conferences and/or journals, and present and disseminate findings. * Lead, develop, and submit external funding proposals. Weekly Scheduled Hours: 40 Expected Start Date: September 1, 2024 (earlier start date can be negotiated) Position Duration: This is a 12-month position, with the possibility for renewal subject to securing external funding. Salary: $75,000 Working Conditions: standard office and laboratory conditions; repetitive use of keyboard at a workstation Qualifications Required Qualifications * Applicants must hold or receive a Ph.D. in a relevant field before the start of the appointment. Ph.D. must have been received within the last three years. * Ability to lead collaborative research projects. * Strong writing skills demonstrated by first-authored peer-reviewed journal papers or peer-reviewed conference proceedings papers. Preferred Qualifications * Research focus connected to the intersection of work and ethical AI, broadly defined. * An educational background that is interdisciplinary or that spans multiple disciplines, ideally ranging across the socio-technical spectrum. * Interest in broader societal dimensions of AI, including social, policy, and regulatory aspects. Application Instructions Required Materials * Cover Letter (general fit with position, 1-2 pages) * CV * Research Statement (proposed project that you would be interested in pursuing, 2-3 pages) * List of References Deadline Review of applications will begin on March 1, and will continue until the position is filled. About About Good Systems: Good Systems is a University of Texas at Austin research grand challenge that seeks to design AI technologies alongside broader policy and decision-making systems that can protect and improve our world. Our interdisciplinary campus-wide research effort brings together humanists, social scientists, and technologists to investigate how to define, evaluate, and build ethical AI systems that will transform society for the better. About UT Austin: UT Austin ranks among the 40 best universities in the world, and is a leading research university, attracting more than $650 million annually for discovery. UT Austin embraces interdisciplinary research and is home to more the 200 dedicated research units, centers, and research grand challenges, including Good Systems. About Austin: Austin has a vibrant, internationally renowned music, film, and art scene, along with a thriving economy that leads the way in the technology, engineering, and health care sectors. Often referred to as the “Live Music Capital of the World,” Austin hosts major annual events such as the Austin City Limits Music Festival and South by Southwest (SXSW). Austin serves as the home for corporate headquarters and research and development centers for many Fortune 500 companies and new startups, providing opportunities for collaboration and student placements for internships and careers. Inquiries Please direct any general questions about the position to Lea Sabatini, Good Systems Program Director (lea.sabatini(a)austin.utexas.edu)<mailto:lea.sabatini@austin.utexas.edu> https://apply.interfolio.com/140430 Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Ph.D. | Professor Good Systems: Ethical AI at UT-Austin<http://goodsystems.utexas.edu/> | Founding Chair B.S.I./B.A. in Informatics<https://ischool.utexas.edu/programs/informatics> | Founding Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Information M.S. in Information Security and Privacy<https://msisp.ischool.utexas.edu/> | Chair, Graduate Studies Committee The University of Texas at Austin | School of Information Public Interest Technology University Network<https://pitcases.org/> | Chair, Working Group on PIT@NSF IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on AI Ethics and Trust<https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/ex/2023/06> | Guest Co-Editor ACM Journal on Responsible Computing<https://dl.acm.org/journal/jrc> | Founding Editor-in-Chief

1 0

Data-viz of Facebook Oversight Board major rulings
by Joly MacFie 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

Impressive! https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/facebook-meta-oversight-b… -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

Seeking researchers of online communities for interview study
by Liz Dowthwaite 14 Feb '24

14 Feb '24

Have you conducted research with online communities? If so, would you be willing for us to interview you to ask you about your experiences? We are a group of University of Nottingham researchers in the School of Computer Science, Horizon Digital Economy Research, and we have just started a one-year project in partnership with the Internet Society which we hope you may be interested in - EFRESH: Effective, Responsible and Safe Research on Online Communities. EFRESH will explore challenges related to researching groups online. We are particularly interested in research involving groups that are difficult to access (e.g. choose to communicate in private online spaces) and research involving online communities that may react with hostility to being the focus of research attention. We are particularly interested in identifying best practices for research in this area that can be shared with others. Through our research we plan to produce guidance for researchers and research institutions to address these (and other) challenges. You can find more information about our project here<https://www.horizon.ac.uk/effective-responsible-and-safe-research-on-online…>. Towards the end of the study, we also plan to run some workshops to discuss our findings and co create guidance relevant to individual researchers, research groups and research institutions. This guidance will identify practices to promote research on online communities that is effective, responsible, and safe. Please get in touch if you would like to take part in an interview, or find out more information and give us your contact details and consent here<https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=7qe9Z4D970GskTWEGCkKHp2…>. Many thanks, Liz ___________ Dr Liz Dowthwaite Senior Research Fellow, Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute<http://horizon.ac.uk/>, Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Hub<https://tas.ac.uk/>, Responsible AI UK<https://www.rai.ac.uk/> Secretary, IEEE P7003 Algorithmic Bias Working Group<http://sites.ieee.org/sagroups-7003/> Section Editor, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice<https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/> University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU Twitter: @Lima_India_Zulu<https://twitter.com/Lima_India_Zulu> BlueSky: lizdowthwaite.bsky.social<https://bsky.app/profile/lizdowthwaite.bsky.social> Blog: dowthwaite.wordpress.com<http://www.dowthwaite.wordpress.com/> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.

1 0