- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

pablo and keith get what they deserve
by Barry Wellman 27 May '03

27 May '03

I am delighted to report the two winners of the International Communication Association's bi-annual best dissertation award in communication technology: Pablo Boczkowski. "Affording Flexibility: Transforming Information Practices in Online Newspapers" (Cornell University, Department of Science and Technology Studies, 2001; Advisor: Trevor Pinch). Now Assistant Professor at the Sloan School of Business, MIT. Kith Hampton. 2001. "Living the Wired Life in the Wired Suburb: Netville, Glocalization and Civic Society." Doctoral dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of Toronto. (Advisor: Barry Wellman). Now Assistant Professor of Urban Studies and Technology, MIT. Barry _____________________________________________________________________ Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 _____________________________________________________________________

1 0

International PhD scholarships at Curtin University, Australia
by Matthew Allen 26 May '03

26 May '03

Dear list Each year Curtin University offers up to 10 scholarships to international (ie non-Australian) students for the purposes of doctoral study at Curtin University. The scholarship cpplication process is highly competitive. Internet Studies would like to encourage suitably qualified students to apply for one of the these scholarships, to be taken up in the Internet Studies program, Dept of Media and Information. Please contact me for more information if interested. Dr Matthew Allen Associate Professor Internet Studies Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia m.allen(a)curtin.edu.au http://smi.curtin.edu.au/internet +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3152 (f) Program Chair, Internet Research Conference Toronto 2003 'Broadening the Band' http://www.aoir.org/2003

1 0

RE: ECSCW 2003
by Michele Jackson 25 May '03

25 May '03

Hello - Perhaps I missed this information in the message, but where will ECSCW 2003 be held? Is there a conference website to visit for more information? thanks, mj Michele H. Jackson, PhD Dept of Communication University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0270 303-492-8139 jackson(a)colorado.edu http://comm.colorado.edu/mjackson

2 1

a nice workshop at ecsw
by Barry Wellman 25 May '03

25 May '03

fyi Barry _____________________________________________________________________ Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 _____________________________________________________________________ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 13:53:53 -0700 From: Danyel Fisher <danyelf(a)acm.org> To: Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca> Subject: Re: workshop? I think this workshop, held in conjunction with the ECSCW 2003 Conference, might be of interest. I apologize for any duplicates. Moving From Analysis to Design: Social Networks in the CSCW Context At ECSCW 2003, 14 - 18 September 2003, Helsinki, Finland The CSCW (Computer Supported Collaborative Work) community has a tradition of adopting social and analytical theories to understand groups and group processes as well as when designing new systems to support and augment cooperative work. Social networks have a long tradition in sociology and cultural anthropology, but as yet, they have not broken into the CSCW mainstream. The key notion from network analysis, that the interconnections between people can be used to understand and improve their interactions, is one that has direct implications for CSCW research. Network models have clear implications for research into communication systems, teamwork, and knowledge management. This full-day workshop seeks participation from social scientists and system designers to address the ways in which social networks can be adapted for use in analyzing cooperation and as a framework for considering new system designs. The workshop will consider four specific topics: Collection- How are social networks being collected (automatically, manually, quantitatively, qualitatively)? What do these networks actually represent? How are the networks validated? Tools- What is the state-of-the-art for analyzing, visualizing and representing social networks? In what context are these tools useful and how can the tools be adapted to specific CSCW situations? Application- Systems are embedding social networks into the fabric of system design. How are system designers adopting social networks? How are social networks supported by the system, software, or architecture? Evaluation- How does the use of a social network change, facilitate, or hinder users and their collaborations? JOINING THE WORKSHOP Individuals interested in participating in the workshop should submit a 4-page position paper describing work in one or more of the workshop topic areas above. Position papers will be reviewed by the organizers and authors will be notified by July 11th of acceptance to the workshop. One goal of the workshop is to nurture interdisciplinary applications of social networks that specifically consider CSCW perspective. Attention will be paid to representing a diverse spectrum of positions. The workshop will be limited to 15 participants. More information can be found at the workshop web site: http://www.ischool.washington.edu/mcdonald/ecscw03/ David W. McDonald, Assistant Professor, University of Washington, The Information School. dwmc(a)u.washington.edu Danyel Fisher, University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Science. danyelf(a)ics.uci.edu Position Paper Deadline: June 25, 2003 Notification of Workshop Acceptance: July 11, 2003

1 0

Call for Papers - Urban Vulnerability and Network Failure
by Barry Wellman 25 May '03

25 May '03

of possible interest to members of all 3 lists. thx to Tony Orum for calling it to my attention. >Urban Vulnerability and Network Failure: > Constructions and Experiences of Emergencies, Crises and Collapse > >CALL FOR ABSTRACTS > >An ESRC-Sponsored International Seminar >jointly hosted by SURF, University of Salford and GURU, University of >Newcastle >Manchester, United Kingdom, 29-30 April 2004 > >Rationale > > >In these times of 'globalisation' cities are being powerfully shaped >by >their relationships with socio-technical networks and infrastructures. >These organise, and mediate, the distribution of people, goods, >services, >information, wastes, capital, and energy between multiple scales >within >and between urban regions. The contemporary urban process, and >contemporary >social power, thus, more than ever, involve complex 'cyborg' liaisons >and >multiple, distanciated connections. These straddle many scales and link >bodies, places, and institutions continuously with more or less distant >elsewheres. By making possible a myriad of mobilities such >infrastructures >remake the spaces and times of urban life in the process. > >On the one hand, the everyday life and ideology of the modern city is >dependent on the seamless and continuous functioning, together, of a >vast >array of functioning technical systems(although, for vast numbers of >urbanites in the global South, the reality is often of little >connectivity >and worse reliability). On the other hand, large swathes of contemporary >corporate, state, and military power centres on the construction, >maintenance, legitimation and protection of vast arrays of extended >technological systems. Strung out across the world, and configured >carefully to support the 'glocal' geographies of power and connectivity >of >contemporary capitalism, these network spaces - fibre optic networks, >airport and airline spaces, Just-in-Time logistics systems, E-commerce >and >transactional flows, transnational energy systems, and so on -- are >critical strategic supports to neoliberal globalisation. Linking up, >and >mediating, key spaces and divisions of labour reliably, quickly and >seamlessly, the physical, energy, water and informational >infrastructures >that sustain contemporary capitalism are perhaps the most critical >strategic supports of contemporary global capitalism. > >A widening range of iconic infrastructure collapses serve as >opportunities >to learn about the cultural, political, social and material dimensions >of >the importance of infrastructural connection in contemporary urban, and >geopolitical, life. Since the early 1990s, to name but a few, iconic >collapsese and failures have included the Montreal ice storm, the >Auckland >power blackout, the gas attack on the Tokyo underground, the Sydney >drought, the California energy crisis, the Chicago heat wave, the >failure >of Hong Kong airport's freight system, the September 11th attacks, and >the >'Lovebug' virus. The infrastructural devastation of countless urban wars >also needs to be considered here. > >As seamless and 24 hour flows and connections become ever-more critical >for >capitalist urbanism, however, so massive political, discursive and >material >resources are being devoted to try and reduce the supposed >vulnerabilities that these systems exhibit to collapse, malfunctioning, >or >attack. This is especially so when the September 11th and Anthrax >attacks, >in particular, demonstrated that mobility systems, themselves, can be >appropriated as 'terrorist' weapons. 'Resilience', and 'critical >infrastructure protection', are ubiquitous buzz words in these times of >politically constructed moral panic, continuous states of emergency, >and >the ongoing Bush-led 'war on terror'. Huge resources and efforts are now >being devoted by States, infrastructure corporations, the military, >urban >infrastructure agencies, and corporate capital to reducing the supposed >vulnerability of telecommunications, transport, logistics, transaction, >electricity, and utilities systems to technical failure, sabotage, >natural >disasters or the failures caused by the reduced built in back-up that >often >comes with liberalised markets. The glaring fragility, and low >reliability, >of many computer-mediated communications and infrastructure systems is a >particular focus of concern here. Examples include government programmes >to >protect critical infrastructure, commercial services for network back >up, >and military (and terrorist groups') interest in the disrupting of >adversaries' infrastructure networks. Civil defence programmes designed >to >increase cities' resilience to attack and targeting, and so on, are also >reaching unprecedented levels. > >As Tim Luke has observed, networked connections and collapses also form >a >critical focus of cultural politics. Narratives and discourses of failed >flow and connection stalk many underground and dystopian scenes and >genres >of culture. Contemporary urban culture is full of accounts which reveal >a >fascination with such moments of what he calls 'decyborganisation'. >This >is because they reveal, however fleetingly, the utter reliance of >modern >urban life on distanciated flow and interaction. The cultural narratives >and representations that surround the failure and collapse of networked >infrastructures are a key aspect of their social importance. > >Conference Aim and Objective > >The core aim of this conference is to explore the ways in which >reactions >to, and experiences of, the collapse of technical and networked >infrastructures within and between cities are constructed, experienced, >imagined, represented, and contested. We seek in particular to explore >these themes under conditions of growing infrastructural stress, >re-regulation, globalisation, increasing concerns with failure, the >changing geopolitical situation surrounding the 'war on terror', and the >strong fascination for infrastructural collapse within contemporary >culture. By bringing together researchers representing a range of >disciplines, including geography, history, sociology, critical theory, >development studies, political economy, geopolitics, surveillance and >defence studies, the objective is to stimulate interdisciplinary >discussion >and collaboration that examines the meaning of connectivity and collapse >in >contemporary urban life, politics, governance, and culture. > >Seminar Themes > >(1) Conceptualising 'Cyborg' Urbanisation: How can urban, social and >critical theory conceptualise the socio-technologies of connection, >resilience, mobility, and collapse in contemporary cities ? > >(2) Urban Vulnerability and Network Failures: Constructions and >Experiences >of Emergencies, Crises and Collapse How do different disciplines >construct >concepts of urban vulnerability and network failure ? How does network >stress and failure operate materially and how is it represented >politically and culturally ? Why, how and where do technical networks >collapse? What can be learnt about the discursive, economic or material >role of technical connections in a globalised context by studying what >happens when connections fail ? How does the governance of cities, >spaces >and networked infrastructure intersect in various contexts to address >(and >exploit ?) perceptions of stress and risk. How are such politics shaped >by >broader political economies of globalisation, mobility, flow and >re-regulation ? How are corporate and popular fears of, and >vulnerabilities >to, the failure of connectivity addressed in such processes of >governance >? > >(3) Networked Collapses as States of Emergency : What can be learnt from >in-depth case studies of instances of network failures or collapse ? >What >happens when the normalisation of flow, mobility and connection breaks >down >? What social, economic, and cultural coping mechanisms and innovations >are developed to deal with the collapse ? How do political and >governance >coalitions at various scales, in states, cities and network spaces, >respond >to failure ? What are the longer term political, economic or cultural >consequences of network failure ? How are crises and collapse in >infrastructures, and wider processes of 'de-cyborgisation,' represented >in >contemporary culture ? > >(4) Networked Collape, Security, and Organised Violence How do various >state and non-state militaries and target and destroy adversaries' >infrastructure networks? In what ways are national, homeland and urban >'security' strategies, and critical infrastructure protection policies, >being reforged to address, or exploit, fears of networked collapse ? >What >political economic transitions do such strategies support? What >discursive, and linguistic constructions do such political strategies >rely >on ? Beyond the hype what is the real scope of 'cyberwar' ? What >strategies >and techniques are used? How effective, or widespread, is such >'network-based' warfare ? How does it relate to the current geopolitical >position (dominated by a single 'hyperpower' pursuing a 'war on terror' >without apparent end to further its geopolitical interests in the Middle >East and Central Asia)? > >Abstract Submission > >Please submit a 250 words abstract to Steve Graham >s.d.n.graham(a)ncl.ac.uk >and Simon Marvin S.Marvin(a)salford.ac.uk. before September 1st 2003. >Papers >will be required for pre-circulation before the seminar that will be >hosted >in central Manchester, United Kingdom in April 2004. > > > > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Stephen Graham e-mail s.d.n.graham(a)ncl.ac.uk >Professor of Urban Technology Telephone +44(0) 191 222 6808 >Global Urban Research Unit (GURU) Fax +44(0) 191 222 8811 >School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape >3rd Floor, Claremont Tower >University of Newcastle upon Tyne >Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K. > >Global Urban Research Unit (GURU) http://www.ncl.ac.uk/guru > >Surveillance and Society Web Journal >http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/ >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

CALL FOR REVIEWERS: new books in cyberculture studies
by david silver 25 May '03

25 May '03

*** feel free to distribute *** The Resource Center for Cyberculture Studies at the University of Washington <www.com.washington.edu/rccs> invites academics, artists, and activists to review a new batch of recently received books. The reviews reflect a modest attempt to locate critically various contours of the emerging and interdisciplinary field of cyberculture studies. Reviewers are sought for the following titles: Chong-En Bai & Chi-Wa Yuen (Eds.), Technology and the New Economy (MIT Press, 2003) Susan B. Barnes, Online Connections: Internet Interpersonal Relationships (Hampton Press, 2001) Bernard Batinic, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, & Michael Bosnjak (Eds.), Online Social Sciences (Hogrefe & Huber Pub, 2002) Michael H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (Academic Press, 2000) Sharon K. Black, Telecommunications Law in the Internet Age (Morgan Kaufmann, 2001) Jonah Blank, Mullahs on the Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras (University of Chicago Press, 2002) Jayne Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet : Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications (Academic Press, 1998) Kevin A. Hill & John E. Hughes, Cyberpolitics (Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, 1998) Shanthi Kalathil & Taylor C. Boas, Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2003) Kevin Kawamoto, Media and Society in the Digital Age (Allyn & Bacon, 2002) Sandeep Krishnamurthy, E-Commerce Management: Text and Cases (South-Western College Pub, 2002) David M. Levy, Scrolling Forward: Making Sense of Documents in the Digital Age (Arcade Publishing, 2001) Geert Lovink, Uncanny Networks : Dialogues with the Virtual Intelligentsia (MIT Press, 2003) Martha McCaughey & Michael D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2003) John Durham Peters, Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication (University of Chicago Press, 2000) Steven Poole, Trigger Happy: Videogames and the Entertainment Revolution (Arcade Publishing, 2000) Diana Saco, Cybering Democracy: Public Space and the Internet (Univ of Minnesota Press, 2002) Gitte Stald & Thomas Tufte (Eds.), Global Encounters: Media and Cultural Transformation (University of Luton Press, July 2002) Joseph Tabbi, Cognitive Fictions (Univ of Minnesota Press, 2002) Phillip Thurtle & Robert E. Mitchell (Eds.), Semiotic Flesh: Information and the Human Body (University of Washington Press, 2002) Darren Tofts, Annemarie Jonson, & Alessio Cavallaro (Eds.), Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History (MIT Press, 2003) Barry Wellman & Caroline A. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life (Blackwell Publishers, 2003) In general, RCCS book reviews run about 1500-2000 words. They are offered to the widest possible community of cyberculture scholars, including academic scholars from across the disciplines, community activists, digital artists, teachers, students, explorers, and builders of cyberculture. If interested in reviewing one (please select only one) of these titles, respond directly to Adrienne Massanari <alm2(a)u.washington.edu>. IMPORTANT: In your e-mail, please include your name, affiliation, and a brief statement of your qualifications to review the selected title. DEADLINE for expressing interest in reviewing a book: MAY 31, 2003. Thank you for your time, david silver http://faculty.washington.edu/dsilver

1 0

CFP - Inhabiting Virtual Places: Social Context in Online Work Places
by Quentin (Gad) Jones 25 May '03

25 May '03

* The European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2003 * Workshop on Inhabiting Virtual Places: Social Context in Online Work Places WORKSHOP AIMS As work becomes more global and distributed, being able to support informal interactions that are not face to face becomes more important. Modern communication technologies increasingly situate interpersonal interactions virtually. This has had an enormous impact on people’s social networks and work relationships, as communication media increasingly allow being able to connect people, wherever they might be, synchronously, as well as asynchronously. While, these changes have not lessened the importance of place, be it virtual or physical, in shaping interaction patterns and discourse, they have altered the resources available for individuals to make decisions about those they are working with, and thus their behavior. This workshop aims to explore the myriad of ways that: 1) The design of virtual or hybrid spaces / places sets up the conditions for ongoing interactions 2) Work groups use interactions in virtual spaces to create shared meaning. These explorations will in turn be used to examine aspects of social and cognitive behavior online, and how they might differ between work and leisure related virtual places. Organizers Christine A. Halverson Social Computing Group, IBM T. J. Watson Research Quentin Jones Information Systems Department, College of Computing Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology Important Information: Send submissions to: krys(a)us.ibm.com Deadline for submission: June 7, 2003 Notification of Acceptance: by June 23, 2003 Workshop Date: Monday, September 15, 2003 GOALS and OBJECTIVES Many kinds of work are becoming more global and distributed, while increased costs often demand, not that people hop on planes, but that business be conducted in some other way: telephone, video, and increasingly via instant messaging (IM), online portals, and virtual communities. Situating interpersonal interactions virtually is impacting people’s social networks, work relationships, and work practices—a trend that has always accompanied distributed work (Chalmers 2001) .Place, whether virtual or physical, is still vital in shaping interaction patterns and discourse. However, the medium may have altered the resources available for individuals to make decisions about those they are working with, and thus their behavior. While we have moved away from the notion that virtualization of interpersonal communications has necessarily led, as Meyrowitz’s (Meyrowitz 1985) describes it, to a sense of placeless-ness we do not yet understand how "place-ness" comes to be in a virtual space (Harrison and Dourish 1996) . It is widely accepted among computer-mediated communication researchers that cyberspace abounds with virtual places within which vibrant interactions occur and some of which become associated with community (Rheingold 1993; Preece 1998) . Our goal is to better understand how virtual places are successfully inhabited. This task is made even more pressing by our burgeoning understanding of the importance of informal interactions in the workplace (Bellotti and Bly 1996; Isaacs, Walendowski et al. 2002) .We posit that creating virtual community, whether for work or leisure, requires not just a virtual space/place, but inhabiting it successfully. Living in a virtual place, like a physical place, engages our perception and cognition. We need cues to perceive others' behavior, and we need to make inferences about what that behavior means in order to successfully interact with them (Erickson, Smith et al. 1999) . This workshop aims to explore how the design of virtual spaces sets up the conditions for ongoing interactions, and how work groups use interactions in virtual spaces to create shared meaning. Among the questions we hope participants will take on are the following: · Is ease of habitation designed into place? Are social rules dictated? Or renewed and altered through interactions on some regular basis? · What cues provide a context for understanding online behavior? · What's the balance between play and seriousness in a work place? · How does the supporting technology impact users' interactions? · What is the interaction between the design of user interfaces and the ability of the participants to create a viable place for social interaction? · What theoretical constructs have been useful to you in understanding how interactions in community places have enabled people to stays tied together? A variety of disciplines are pertinent to these explorations, including architecture, sociology, linguistic and discourse analyses, and design. Each one approaches the ideas of place and common ground for interaction from a slightly different perspective, and level of detail. Other disciplines may have pertinent insights and approaches. For example, facial expression, gesture, and audible cues are all prevalent in face to face interaction. Online cues might be extended to auditory and haptic modalities. We would like to encourage them all. There have been a number of past community workshops, covering formation of communities, construction of infrastructures and understanding aspects of group formation and vitality. Recently there has been more emphasis on how to study and understand active communities. We would like to expand this to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved as they relate to inhabiting virtual space, thus creating place and community. WORKSHOP ORGANIZATION If participants agree, activities will start with dinner at a local restaurant the night preceding the full day workshop[1]. Prior to ordering dinner a general orientation of the workshop will be given by the organizers, along with introductions. During dinner participants will present their submissions. They will be given a maximum of 3 minutes to speak. This dinner meeting will enable us to maximize the full day workshop. Accepted participants will be expected to have read the positions papers before attending the dinner and the workshop. The full day will be divided into a number of interactive sessions, rather than just presentation of position papers. The exact details will depend upon the position papers received, however we hope to: 1) Explore participants’ examples of how the design of virtual place provides common ground for user interactions; 2) Examine how communities use public interactions in virtual spaces to create shared meaning; and 3) Look at the impact of virtual behavior on community development and maintenance. and the final organization will be adapted to take into account the number expected and the range of submissions. Ideally, we expect about 12-15 participants, but could expand up to 20. If size approaches the maximum we will adjust the workshop organization to spend some time broken into small groups so that the quality of the discussions remains high. By the end of the workshop participants will have catalogued design differences, cues, and behaviors in various virtual settings, and explored how they support behavior in work related spaces. If attendance is high we may break into subgroups for more intense discussion. If this is the case then each smaller group will report back with their key ideas PARTICIPATION Participants will be selected on the basis of position papers submitted prior to the workshop. Proposals should be no longer than 6 pages and should include description of the following aspects. 1) An existing place used to support community (or communities), including information about whether or not it is a work community and ; 2) An examination of how the place/s under consideration provides cues and common ground for user interactions, and ; 3) Theoretical ideas or approaches that help you understand context and social interaction, or; 4) Analysis of similarities or differences between a work related and a leisure related community. Position papers should explain how the author’s work relates to the workshop theme. We are particularly interested in seeing perspectives at a variety of levels, ranging from meta views to micro-scale analyses. Position papers will be reviewed by the workshop organizers Submissions should be sent to krys(a)us.ibm.com by June 7, 2003. Position papers will be reviewed by the workshop organizers and notification of acceptance will be by June 23, 2003. We encourage a wide range of participants. System architects and designers who have thought about and implemented supports for social interaction, social psychologists, linguists and sociologists who have studied online interactions, and others we may not have previously considered. ORGANIZERS' BIOS Christine Halverson is a researcher in the Social Computing Group at IBM Research. She is involved with the development and analysis of systems to help work groups interact collaboratively over networks. Her analytic approaches have included visualizations, linguistic analysis, online participation and observations among others. Her research group has designed and deployed a number of online systems including BABBLE & Loops. http://www.research.ibm.com/SocialComputing/ Quentin (Gad) Jones is an Assistant Professor at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Prior to his current position, Quentin was a researcher at AT&T Labs, New Jersey. Before living in the United States he was a doctoral student in Information Systems at Hebrew and Haifa Universities Israel. Quentin's research focus is on understanding mass interaction ecologies that result in thriving virtual communities. His current community projects include ContactMap, and GeoMemory. RELATED PAST WORKSHOPS Jones, Q. and Halverson, C. The Role of Place in Shaping Virtual Community, CSCW 2002 Erickson T., Herring S., Sack W., Discourse Architectures: The Design and Analysis of Computer-Mediated Conversation. CHI 2002. Erickson T., and Herring S., "Persistent Conversation" workshops at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) from 1999-2002 Farnham S., Smith M., et. al. Integrating Diverse Research and Development Approaches to the Construction of Social Cyberspaces. CHI 2001 Bruckman A., Erickson T., et. al. Dealing with Community Data, CSCW 2000 Muller M., and Friedman J., Electronic Communities: Places and Spaces, Contents and Boundaries. CHI 2000 Barbesino et. al. Designing Across Borders: The Community Design of Community Networks. CSCW 1998. Toomey L., Tang J., Adams L., and Gloria Mark Designing Virtual Communities for Work. CSCW 1998 Bruckman A., Erickson T., et. al. Workshop on Research Issues in the Design of Online Communities. CHI 1999 REFERENCES Bellotti, V. and S. Bly (1996). Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, MA, ACM. Chalmers, M. (2001). "Place, media, and activity." ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin 22(3): 38-42. Erickson, T., D. N. Smith, et al. (1999). Socially Translucent Systems: Social Proxies, Persistent Conversation, and the Design of Babble. Human Factors in Computing: The Proceedings of CHI 99, Pittsburgh, PA, ACM Press. Harrison, S. and P. Dourish (1996). Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, MA, ACM. Isaacs, E., A. Walendowski, et al. (2002). The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), New Orleans, LA, ACM. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. New York, Oxford University Press. Preece, J. (1998). "Empathic communities: reaching out across the Web." interactions 5(2): 32-43. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Homsteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA., Addison-Wesley.

1 0

Fwd: Call for Papers on Digital Visual Research (fwd)
by Barry Wellman 24 May '03

24 May '03

fyi Barry _____________________________________________________________________ Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 _____________________________________________________________________ ----- Forwarded message from Brian Rusted <rusted(a)UCALGARY.CA> ----- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:44:42 -0600 From: Brian Rusted <rusted(a)UCALGARY.CA> Reply-To: IVSA International Visual Sociology Association <IVSA(a)PDOMAIN.UWINDSOR.CA> Subject: Call for Papers on Digital Visual Research To: IVSA(a)PDOMAIN.UWINDSOR.CA VISUAL STUDIES Call for Papers Special Issue Digital and New Media Research Visual Studies invites submissions for a special issue on the role of digital and multimedia in visual research. Technological changes associated with such new media are having significant impacts on the practice of Visual Sociology and critical, interpretive research on visual culture. Transformations are occurring in fieldwork practices, research dissemination, and in the social practices associated with visual media. This issue will address the implications of these changes in terms of method, theory, and subject in visual research. The issue seeks articles that might include (but are not limited to) the following: 1. The role of digital media as tools in field or research settings, including a. multimedia ethnography b. digital elicitation c. participatory research and camcorders d. database management tools, qualitative analysis software, etc. 2. The status of multimedia formats (Web/CD/DVD etc.) in the representation and dissemination of visual research. a. digital museums, archives, and object oriented repositories b. interactive field/web sites c. multimedia and the politics of representation 3. Research on the social uses of new media technologies (web, digital home mode, gaming, etc.). a. subcultures identified through digital visual practice b. social impact of digital technology on professional visual practices c. critical accounts of the visual construction of digital practices d. digital technology and new social movements. e. new media or digital media artworlds Visual Studies is a Routledge journal published twice a year on behalf of the International Visual Sociology Association. The journal provides a key resource where issues of a visual nature, whether they be epistemological, methodological, empirical, symbolic, or ethical may be aired and debated. It includes articles on a broad cross-section of topics and is interested in all work that is visually oriented. The cross-disciplinary and multi-modal nature of the journal is reflected by the coverage of anthropology, sociology, cultural studies, media studies, visual culture, symbolic interaction, documentary photography (moving and still images) information technology, visual literacy, visual intelligence, and communication studies. It is expected that visual material will support or form the basis of submissions. There may be opportunities for online links to multimedia components of submitted articles. For questions about this issue, please contact the guest editor at the address below. Submission deadline is September 1, 2003. Dr. Brian Rusted Faculty of Communication & Culture University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta CANADA T2N 1N4 Fax: 403-282-6716 Office: 403-220-7766 email: rusted(a)ucalgary.ca ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Judith J. Friedman, Dept. of Sociology, Rutgers University, 54 Joyce Kilmer Ave., Piscataway,NJ 08854. 732.247.9791 FAX 732.445.0974

1 0

AoIR Elections announcement & Call for Nominations
by Steve Jones 24 May '03

24 May '03

The current executive committee of the Association of Internet Researchers was elected two years ago this fall. We are now beginning the process of electing a new executive committee. All dues paying members are eligible to run and any dues-paying member of AoIR is invited to run or to nominate someone to run. You are all urged to participate to your fullest by raising the issues of importance to you and by voting. If you are not a dues-paying member of AoIR, becoming one now (or renewing) enables you to participate in this process (and provides other benefits -- see http://www.aoir.org for more information). What follows is a brief overview of the positions at stake, procedural information on nominating, and detailed descriptions of the positions. TIME FRAME OF THE ELECTION: 1. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: Now! <---------------------- 2. END OF NOMINATION PERIOD: June 13, 2003 3. DISCUSSION PERIOD BEGINS: June 20, 2003 4. DISCUSSION PERIOD ENDS: July 11, 2003 3. VOTING PERIOD BEGINS: July 14, 2003 4. VOTING PERIOD ENDS: July 28, 2003 5. NEW COMMITTEE ASSUMES DUTIES: At the end of the General Meeting at the fourth annual AoIR conference, October 16 - 19, 2003. Note that voting instructions will be provided later and separately from this message. A QUICK ELECTION PRIMER: The organizational structure of AoIR is simple. There are 4 officers, 3 open seat representatives, and 4 appointed positions who together make up the 11 member executive committee that runs the show. In this election, you are invited to nominate yourself or anyone else whom you think would do a good job, for any position other than the President (as the current Vice President assumes the Presidency). Here are brief descriptions of each position (full descriptions from the bylaws are at the end of this message): The 4 OFFICERS (President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer): 1. President -- "CEO," supervises the organization. 2 year term. 2. Vice President (President-elect) - "Back up" for President, handles variety of duties as they arise. 2 year term as VP, followed by 2 years as President. 3. Secretary: Handles membership and records. 2 year term. 4. Treasurer: Handles the money. 2 year term. OPEN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SEATS: 5 - 7. Three open Seats on the Executive Committee, one of which is a designated Graduate Student Representative: Represent membership of AoIR, contribute to decision making, and handle variety of duties as they arise. 2 year terms. WHO CAN RUN AND WHO CAN NOMINATE: Anyone may nominate anyone else for an office, but only a dues-paying member of AoIR can run for a position. If nominated for more than one position a nominee must choose to run for one (and only one) position in this election. If you have opinions about what you would like this organization to become or the kinds of things you think it should be doing, then you should put those opinions into action by running. If you have talents or experience that you think AoIR could use, and you'd like to put them to use for AoIR, you should run. Just about all of AoIR's business is conducted online, apart from meetings at the annual conference. WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO DO TO NOMINATE SOMEONE? Nominations can be made via the air-l list (and if sent there should include "nomination" in the subject line) or e-mailed off-list to Jeremy Hunsinger at nominate(a)aoir.org. <mailto:nominate@aoir.org.> Self Nominations: Email nominate(a)aoir.org and you will be added to the list and given space for your bio and platform and instructions as to how to submit them. Nominating Others: Email nominate(a)aoir.org with the name of the person you want to nominate, the position for which you are nominating this person, contact information for that person, and an indication of whether you know if this person would accept this nomination (if you don't know, we'll contact them and ask). Once a nomination has been accepted by the nominee, the nominee will be asked to proceed as described above. Nominees will be expected to provide answer to the questions below, have the answers posted on the AoIR web site, and participate in an online candidate forum. If you would like to contribute a question the executive committee may consider asking nominees please email it to Steve Jones at sjones(a)uic.edu. 1) What is your interest in this position? 2) How have you participated in AoIR in the past? 3) What are your qualifications for this position? 4) What two or three issues do you believe AoIR should focus on in the next one to two years? Please give a rationale for each issue. 5) What are your long-term goals for AoIR? 6) What else should voters consider when deciding whether or not to vote for you? Position Specific: Treasurer 1) What experience do you have in managing money for an organization? Position Specific: Open Seat 1) How would you define the duties of the Open Seat you wish to occupy and why? Position Specific: Graduate Student Rep 1) What do you think AoIR should do for graduate students, and how will you facilitate these goals? From the Bylaws, here are the full duties of each elected role: DUTIES OF PRESIDENT The President shall be the chief executive officer of the corporation and shall, subject to the control of the Board of Directors, supervise and control the affairs of the corporation and the activities of the officers. He or she shall perform all duties incident to her or his office and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, or which may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors or membership. Unless another person is specifically appointed as Chairperson of the Board of Directors, the President shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and at all meetings of the members. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or these Bylaws, he or she shall, in the name of the corporation, execute such deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts, checks, or other instruments which may from time to time be authorized by the Board of Directors or the membership. SECTION 7. DUTIES OF VICE PRESIDENT In the absence of the President, or in the event of her or his inability or refusal to act, the Vice President shall perform all the duties of the President, and when so acting shall have all the powers and be subject to all the restrictions on, the President. The Vice President shall have other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by law, the Articles of Incorporation, these Bylaws, or as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or membership. SECTION 8. DUTIES OF SECRETARY Certify and keep at the principal office of the corporation the original, or a copy, of these Bylaws as amended or otherwise altered to date. Keep at the principal office of the corporation or at such other place as the board may determine, a book of minutes of all meetings of the directors, the members, and if applicable, meetings of committees of directors and of members, recording therein the time and place of holding, whether regular or special, how called, how notice thereof was given, the names of those present or represented at the meeting, and the proceedings thereof. See that all notices are duly given in accordance with the provisions of these Bylaws or as required by law. Be custodian of the records and of the seal of the corporation and affix the seal, as authorized by law or the provisions of these Bylaws, to duly executed documents of the corporation. Keep at the principal office of the corporation a membership book containing the name, address, and dues status of all members, and, in the case where any membership has been terminated, he or she shall record such fact in the membership book together with the date on which such membership ceased. Exhibit at all reasonable times to any director or officer of the corporation, or to her or his agent or attorney, on request therefor, the Bylaws, the membership book, and the minutes of the proceedings of the directors and other units of the corporation. In general, perform all duties incident to the office of Secretary and such other duties as may be required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws or which may be assigned to him or her from time to time by the Board of Directors or the membership. SECTION 9. DUTIES OF TREASURER Have charge and custody of, and be responsible for, all funds and securities of the corporation, and deposit all such funds in the name of the corporation in such banks, trust companies, or other depositories as shall be selected by the Board of Directors. Receive, and give receipt for, monies due and payable to the corporation from any source whatsoever. Disburse, or cause to be disbursed, the funds of the corporation as may be directed by the Board of Directors or Executive Committee, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements. Keep and maintain adequate and correct accounts of the corporation's properties and business transactions, including accounts of assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses. Exhibit at all reasonable times the books of account and financial records to any director or officer of the corporation, or to her or his agent or attorney, on request therefor. Render to the President and directors, whenever requested, an account of any or all of his or her transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the corporation. Prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify or cause to be certified, the financial statements to be included in any required reports. In general, perform all duties incident to the office Treasurer and such other duties as may be required by law, the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation, or by these Bylaws, or which may be assigned to her or him from time to time by the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee or the membership. SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Executive Committee shall direct the day-to-day operations of the corporation. It shall consist of eleven members. the five elected officers, and the Past President will serve on the Executive Committee. Additionally the membership, during regular elections of officers, will also elect three open seats. Duties are flexible, consisting largely of: Committee and project assignments, as assigned by the Executive Committee.. Two other members shall be appointed by the Executive Committee to serve as officers. The Systems Administrator is responsible for the association's technical systems on which its Web site, e-mail list and other means of Internet communication operate. The Systems Manager is responsible for the content and appearance of the association's Web site and other means of Internet communication (except its e-mail lists). The Systems Administrator and Systems Manager will coordinate their efforts to the best of their abilities. The Board of Directors may delegate to the Executive Committee the powers and authority of the board in the management and affairs of the corporation, to the extent permitted and except as may otherwise be provided, by provisions of law. By a majority vote of its members, the Board of Directors may at any time revoke or modify any or all of the Executive Committee authority so delegated. The Executive Committee shall keep regular minutes of its proceedings, cause them to be filed with the corporate records, and report the same to the Board from time to time as the board may require. Thank you. Steve Jones President, AoIR

1 0

call for chapters on mobile phones and young people
by Nalini Kotamraju 24 May '03

24 May '03

Dr. Nina Wakeford and I ran a workshop at the Annenberg Center for Communication in October 2002, presenting the results of our research on mobile phones and the cultural worlds of young people. We presented some of these findings at AOIR 2002. We are now in talks with a publisher about a volume on mobile phones and young people. Before we finalize the proposal, we would like to invite researchers with recent, empirically-based work in this area to contribute. We are particularly interested in research that might be considered innovative, for example, in terms of methodology, areas of the world or types of people discussed. If you would like to suggest a chapter for consideration, please send either one of us an email by JUNE 1 with a few sentences describing your possible contribution. Thank you. Nalini Kotamraju nalinik(a)socrates.berkeley.edu Nina Wakeford n.wakeford(a)soc.surrey.ac.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------------- nalini p. kotamraju ph.d candidate, department of sociology university of california at berkeley mailto:nalinik@socrates.berkeley.edu | http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~nalinik

2 2