- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Global statistics on teenager and young adult online media production
by Dan Perkel 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

[Apologies for cross-posting for those that are subscribed to multiple related lists.] Hi all, Over the past five years there have been a few studies by the Pew Center and others (Ezster Hargittai/colleagues) that have given us some nice descriptive statistics of the percentage of American teenagers and young adults circulating various kinds of media content online: writing, photographs, art work, music, and others. I was wondering if anyone on this list knows of any similar statistics from other countries or global regions, either at a country level, a regional level, or even of a group that is argued to be representative of larger regions (e.g. Hargittai's studies of college freshmen). Some studies of American populations: Hargittai and Walejko 2008. The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age. http://webuse.org/p/a23/ Lenhart et al. 2007. Teen Content Creators. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/670/teen-content-creators Lenhart et al. 2010. Social Media and Young Adults. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx (If there are studies of American populations that might enhance some of these numbers, or even challenge them, that would be nice to know as well.) I couldn't find anything in the EU Kids Go Online project specifically on "content creation" or "creative production" but I easily may have missed something there. The Creative Commons' study on "Defining Non-commercial production" is helpful. (https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/17127) Any study with broad descriptive statistics of these kinds of activities would be helpful, even if it's only with adults, however that legal category may defined in various countries. Thanks in advance for any assistance, Dan ------------------------------------ Dan Perkel PhD Candidate School of Information, Berkeley Center for New Media UC Berkeley http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~dperkel

1 0

Soliciting Reviewers for IR 12
by loriken＠illinois.edu 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

I am soliciting people willing to review abstracts for IR 12. If you are willing to review, please log into the submission system at https://www.conftool.net/aoir-ir12/, click on "Select Priority Topics," and indicate the topics for which you feel you can serve as a reviewer. (If you have not already done so, you will need to create an account on the system.) You can serve as a reviewer even if you plan to submit a proposal or have already done so. You can expect to receive reviewing instructions and review assignments sometime in March, and reviews will be due approximately 3 weeks following assignment. Thanks in advance, and I hope to see you in Seattle! Lori Kendall Program Chair

1 0

Papers on elderly and technology
by gene loeb 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

Hi. I am requesting submissions of papers and articles on ELDERLY USING TECHNOLOGY in relation to communities for the JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY INFORMATICS. It is a peer-reviewed online journal (www.ci-journal.org) iI am editing an issue on elderly and technology. I extended the deadline to get submissions from other parts of the world and some from Air-L members. New Deadline is MARCH 15TH. Let me know right away if interested. -- With Sincerest Best Wishes , Gene Gene Loeb, Ph.D.

1 0

IR 12 Resistance and Technology Roundtable
by Ted Coopman 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

All, I am putting together a Roundtable to submit to IR 12 (see below). Besides myself, Amoshuan Toft ( U of WA Bothell) and John Anderson (U of IL) have signed on. Of particular interest are those whose research/experience crosses collective action/social movements, media and new media, and personal experiences with resistance movements. Diverse and interesting perspectives are welcome including but not limited to legal, regulatory, political, social, cultural, rhetorical, technical..., well, you get the idea. Please contact me directly at ted.coopman(a)sjsu.edu by Feb. 21 if you are interested. Resistance and Technology Roundtable (Brief DRAFT version) Recent successful and unsuccessful resistance actions such as the revolts in Iran, Tunisian, and Egypt, hackivism by Anonymous on corporate and organizational websites as well as the ongoing Wikileaks release of State Department documents highlight the role of digital technology in resistance to power. The limits and legitimacy of this activity is currently the subject of much debate. Issues include the definition of journalism and journalist, the limits and responsibilities of information and service providers, and the scope of legitimate action in digital environments and the relevance of physical space analogies to such actions. Even the role of the efficacy and centrality of digital communication in protest actions or movements has been hotly contested. While the use of technology in protests from the barricade to radio to Twitter play a role in resistance, the question is to what degree do these technologies enable or shape resistance and influence outcomes in comparison to other social, political, and cultural factors? -TED -- Ted M. Coopman Ph.D. Lecturer Department of Communication Studies San Jose State University http://www.sjsu.edu/people/ted.coopman/

1 0

cfp: Internet and Emotions
by Eran Fisher 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

*Call for chapters in an edited volume on* *Internet and Emotions * Research Network 11 of the European Sociological Association (Sociology of Emotions) is engaged in editing a series of books that will focus on various aspects of emotions in society. The intended volume on *Emotions and Internet* is part of this endeavor. It emerged out of discussions in recent conferences and the interest of members of RN 11 in studying the interplay between new forms of virtual environment enabled by the internet and emotions. The book will collect cutting-edge articles that deal empirically and theoretically with internet and emotions, as well as make an attempt to map and theorize this emerging scholarly field. * * During the last couple of decades, at least two novel processes that are of interest to our planned project have been evolving. The first is the penetration of the Internet into virtually every sphere of social life. From friendship, dating, and shopping to economic, political, cultural, and social practices, from social networking to virtual conferencing, no aspect of life as we knew and understood it has remained unaffected. It can be claimed that the Internet is no longer just another tool that people use, but an environment within which people operate and live. The second development that has occurred during these two decades has been the advent of the sociological study of emotions. Theoretical and empirical scholarship has refined our understanding of emotions and the emotional world and has demonstrated that emotions are present in every aspect of social life and play an important role in central processes and structures. The purpose of the present book is to explore the emotional aspects and processes occurring within this new socio-virtual environment. As new emotional practices emerge, new emotional feed-back loops are built, and new emotional language and manifestations crystallize on the Internet, we need to study them empirically and to theorize them. There are ample examples of possible questions. For example, the phenomenon of flaming has received attention among communications scholars but the general question of the language of emotions that is evolving on internet communication has not been explored before. Or the question of feeling rules and emotions display rules in the virtual world; the ways in which anonymity and disembodiment affect the disclosure of emotions on the Internet; the differences and similarities among various genres of CMC as far as the expression of emotions is concerned, etc. are yet to be explored. We are seeking both theoretical and empirical contributions that focus on issues that emerge at the intersection of emotions and Internet at three levels of social organization: The micro level, of the individual and dyadic relations; the mezzo level of groups, organizations, social movements and community, and the macro societal, transnational networks level. Internet and media scholars dealing with some aspect of emotions are particularly welcome to submit their work. Please submit abstracts of no more than 300 words to Dr. Tova Benski via email: tbenski(a)colman.ac.il Deadline for submission: *April 15 2011.* * * *Tova Benski, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences College of Management Rishon Leziyon, Israel* * * *Eran Fisher, Kreitman School for Advanced Graduate Studies * *& The Department of Communication Studies * *Ben Gurion Univer**sity, Israel * -- Eran Fisher, PhD Postdoctoral Fellow Kreitman School for Advanced Graduate Studies & The Department of Communication Studies Ben Gurion University, Israel ד"ר ערן פישר עמית מחקר פוסט-דוקטורט בית הספר ללימודי מחקר מתקדמים ע"ש קרייטמן והמחלקה לתקשורת אוניברסיטת בן גוריון בנגב --- *Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age*. Palgrave. 2010<http://www.amazon.com/Media-New-Capitalism-Digital-Age/dp/0230616070> *קפיטליזם בעידן התקשורת הדיגיטלית*. רסלינג. 2011 --- Address: Department of Communication Ben Gurion University P.O. Box 653, Be'er Sheva 84105 Israel

3 2

post
by sasha sakhar 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

Hi there, I would like to post to the mail list Thanks -- Best regards, Aliaksandra Sakhar graduate assistant MA in Media Studies The New School NYC 917 767 0884 alexandrasakhar(a)gmail.com

2 1

FW: Blogpost: Immiserating the Poor: We Have An App For That (Social Media vs. the iPhone in Egypt and a Kenyan slum)
by Michael Gurstein 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

Immiserating the Poor: We Have An App For That (Social Media vs. the iPhone in Egypt and a Kenyan slum) The app culture is one of individuals and individualized approaches. Apps enable and empower the individual as a consumer, as a communicator, as an information handler. However, many of the major issues in a developing world (and other) environment are not ones that lend themselves readily to individualized responses or individual solution. http://wp.me/pJQl5-5P Michael Gurstein

1 0

Last Call: Social and Emergent Use Cases of Library Linked Data - Feb 15, 2011
by Uldis Bojars 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

If you have in mind social or emergent use cases for library linked data, please send them to the public-lld(a)w3.org mailing list. Detailed information about the call below. > ================================================================ > Call for Use Cases: Social uses and other new uses of Library Linked Data > The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group - > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/ > Requested by February 15th, 2011 > ================================================================ > > Do you use library-related data -- like reading lists, library > materials (articles, books, videos, cultural heritage or archival > materials, etc), bookmarks, or annotations -- on the Web and mobile > Web? > > Are you currently using social features in library-related information > systems or sites, or plan to do so in the near future? We are > particularly interested in uses that are related to or could benefit > from the use of linked data [1]. > > > The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group is soliciting SOCIAL and > EMERGENT use cases for library-related linked data: > > What new or innovative uses do you see (or envision) integrating > library and cultural heritage data into applications on the Web and in > social media? > How are social features used in library-related information systems? > What are the emergent uses of library-related data on the Web and mobile Web? > How could linked data technology [1] > - enhance the use of library-related data in a social context? > - contribute to systems for sharing, filtering, recommending, or > machine reading? > - support new uses we may not have envisioned or achieved yet? > > Some examples have been discussed in this thread [4]. > > Please tell us more by filling in the questionnaire below and sending > it back to us or to public-lld(a)w3.org, preferably before February > 15th, 2011. > > > > The information you provide will be influential in guiding the activities the > Library Linked Data Incubator Group will undertake to help increase global > interoperability of library data on the Web. The information you provide will > be curated and published on the group wikispace at [3]. > > We understand that your time is precious, so please don't feel you have to > answer every question. Some sections of the templates are clearly marked as > optional. However, the more information you can provide, the easier it will be > for the Incubator Group to understand your case. And, of course, please do not > hesitate to contact us if you have any trouble answering our questions. > Editorial guidance on specific points is provided at [2], and examples are > available at [3]. > > At this time, we are particularly interested in use cases describing > the social media and emergent uses for library linked data.The > Incubator Group will carefully consider all submissions we receive. > > On behalf of the Incubator Group, thanks in advance for your time, > > Jodi Schneider (jodi.schneider_deri.org) and Uldis Bojārs > (uldis.bojars_gmail.com) > > [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UCCuration > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Jan/0006.html > > ================================================================ > > === Name === > > A short name by which we can refer to the use case in discussions. > > === Owner === > > The contact person for this use case. > > === Background and Current Practice === > > Where this use case takes place in a specific domain, and so requires some prior > information to understand, this section is used to describe that domain. As far > as possible, please put explanation of the domain in here, to keep the scenario > as short as possible. If this scenario is best illustrated by showing > how applying > technology could replace current existing practice, then this section > can be used > to describe the current practice. Often, the key to why a use case is important > also lies in what problem would occur if it was not achieved, or what problem > means it is hard to achieve. > > === Goal === > > Two short statements stating (1) what is achieved in the scenario without > reference to linked data, and (2) how we use linked data technology to achieve > this goal. > > === Target Audience === > > The main audience of your case. For example scholars, the general > public, service > providers, archivists, computer programs... > > === Use Case Scenario === > > The use case scenario itself, described as a story in which actors interact with > systems. This section should focus on the user needs in this scenario. Do not > mention technical aspects and/or the use of linked data. > > === Application of linked data for the given use case === > > This section describes how linked data technology could be used to support the > use case above. Try to focus on linked data on an abstract level, without > mentioning concrete applications and/or vocabularies. Hint: Nothing library > domain specific. > > === Existing Work (optional) === > > This section is used to refer to existing technologies or approaches > which achieve > the use case (Hint: Specific approaches in the library domain). It may > especially > refer to running prototypes or applications. > > === Related Vocabularies (optional) === > > Here you can list and clarify the use of vocabularies (element sets and value > vocabularies) which can be helpful and applied within this context. > > === Problems and Limitations (optional) === > > This section lists reasons why this scenario is or may be difficult to achieve, > including pre-requisites which may not be met, technological obstacles > etc. Please > explicitly list here the technical challenges made apparent by this > use case. This > will aid in creating a roadmap to overcome those challenges. > > === Related Use Cases and Unanticipated Uses (optional) === > > The scenario above describes a particular case of using linked data. However, by > allowing this scenario to take place, the likely solution allows for other use > cases. This section captures unanticipated uses of the same system > apparent in the > use case scenario. > > === References (optional) === > > This section is used to refer to cited literature and quoted websites. >

1 0

Kindle highlight/quote sharing.
by Peter Timusk 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

I am enjoying highlighting academic books on my Kindle and then sharing these quotes on facebook and twitter. Kindle offers this experimental service. Many friends share web pages from traditional media to start debates or express opinions on facebook. Being slightly more academic than many of my friends I can now share book quotes. The potential for academic debate within a social network platform is improved. This is a new academic forum I suppose. Peter Timusk at571(a)ncf.ca ptimusk(a)sympatico.ca web: www.crystalcomputing.net blogs www.cyborgcitizen.org

1 0

Global perspectives on media piracy: Joe Karaganis and Ravi Sundaram (Melbourne, 24 March)
by Ramon Lobato 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

*With apologies for cross-posting* The Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Creative Industries and Innovation present an evening of public lectures by Joe Karaganis (Social Science Research Council, New York) and Ravi Sundaram (Sarai/Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi) on the topic of media piracy and informal economies. 1. MEDIA PIRACY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES: Joe Karaganis This presentation will introduce a major collaborative study of music, film, and software piracy conducted in India, Brazil, South Africa, Russia, and Mexico between 2007 and 2010. The study focuses on the relationship between the licit and illicit media markets in these countries, and on the emergence of enforcement as a primary concern of the knowledge economy. Joe Karaganis is Media, Technology and Culture program director at the Social Science Research Council in New York. His work focuses on changes in the organization of cultural production in the digital context and on the intersection between information policy and social practice. He is editor of the collection Structures of Participation in Digital Culture (SSRC, 2007). 2. POSTCOLONIAL MEDIA AFTER THE INFORMAL: Ravi Sundaram Informality has arrived on the postcolonial media landscape with a kinetic force in the last two decades. More media is now distributed through bazaars, small markets, street vendors and neighbourhood retail that ever before. Informality is seen as a threat by large media industries, who see it as distributing pirate media or simply indifferent to the Law of Property. Informality, once a grey zone of paralegal production and work for economists, now presents media research with a series of new research questions. What are the stakes for media after the informal? What is the relationship between the practices of postcolonial informality and the larger landscape of new media? Is there a connection between the street market and the world after Wikileaks? This lecture will suggest that we are entering a new media condition today that may disrupt many of the received models of cultural modernity of the last 100 years. Ravi Sundaram is a Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi and Co-Director of the Sarai programme on media and urban culture. He is the author of Pirate Modernity: Delhi's Media Urbanism (Routledge, 2009). Respondents: Stuart Cunningham (ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, QUT), Kathy Bowrey (Faculty of Law, UNSW), Julian Thomas (Institute for Social Research, Swinburne). DATE: Thursday March 24, 2011 TIME: 6pm-8pm VENUE: Village Roadshow Theatrette, State Library of Victoria (enter via 179 La Trobe St) CONTACT: Ramon Lobato, Swinburne Institute for Social Research - rlobato(a)swin.edu.au / (03) 9214 8637 ALL WELCOME

1 0