- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

last call for manuscripts>>copyright>>computers and composition
by martine courant rife 24 Aug '09

24 Aug '09

Dear Everyone - the 9-15-09 deadline for *manuscripts* for the special issue of C&C is fast approaching. Please don't hesitate to ask any of us questions>>see below! *** I've included below and provided a link to a call for manuscripts for a special issue of Computers and Composition (scheduled as volume 27 issue 3, September 2010) on Copyright, Culture, Creativity, and the Commons. https://www.msu.edu/~courantm/CFP_CC_copyright.pdf Please do feel free to send questions to or run ideas by any of the four of us guest editing the special issue. (Our contact info appears below and in the call.) Danielle Nicole DeVoss, Martine Courant Rife, Steve Westbrook, and John Logie *************************************************** CALL FOR MANUSCRIPTS special issue of Computers and Composition, volume 27 issue 3, September 2010 Copyright, Culture, Creativity, and the Commons In 1998, Computers and Composition and Kairos both published special issues related to intellectual property. Much has changed in the 11 years since those special issues, including new legislation, proposed legislation, and the rise and fall of file-sharing spaces like Napster and Kazaa. Further, issues not addressed in the earlier special issue require the attention of computers and writing scholars, including global and international issues related to intellectual property, feminist and ecofeminist research in intellectual property, and issues of cultural cannibalism and intellectual commons. This special issue will attend to these—and other—issues, with a particular focus on the cultural consequences of our expanded sense of what counts as “property” in digital spaces. Questions we invite authors to consider and respond to include, but are not limited to: * Where are the significant intersections between intellectual property and computers and composition? What intersections have thus far remained invisible or buried? * What significant changes have occurred in U.S. copyright law in the past 15 years? In international copyright law, policies, and approaches? * What global, international, or cross-cultural intellectual property issues should we be attentive to? * How might our understandings of “the commons,” the concept of shared or “community-owned knowledge,” and the notion of “cultural appropriation” contribute to conversations on copyright and/or intellectual property? * What are some of the ways in which feminist/ecofeminist scholarship in intellectual property, and understandings of sustainability can inform or extend our approaches to intellectual property? * What are some of the ways in which cultural rhetorics scholarship in intellectual property can inform or extend our approaches to intellectual property? For example, is there a connection between racism and the commodification of culture via intellectual property regimes? A connection with sexism? Where are the intersections between discourses of race and/or gender and intellectual property-related discourse? * Are there better vocabularies, terms, and theories for us to drawn upon to situate and study “intellectual property?” Is it possible to recognize and/or attribute “intellectual property” in places other than formal legal regimes? * How have intellectual property issues become more immediate with regard to the continual growth of and use for digital writing spaces? New media texts? * In what ways can our long history of analyzing authorship and ownership of texts, including our discussions on issues of plagiarism and attribution, contribute to how we approach intellectual property issues? In what was does this long history perhaps submerge issues we might be discussing? * In what ways can writing instructors and researchers enter into public discussions about intellectual property? The special issue will consist of: 1) a special issue editors’ introduction, which will provide some historical, legal, and philosophical context; 2) approximately 6–7 articles addressing issues of intellectual property, focusing on those issues that have arisen since the 1998 special issues; and 3) a roundtable-style-discussion piece capturing the interactions of key figures in intellectual property scholarship within and beyond computers and writing (e.g., Jim Porter, Ty Herrington, Jessica Reyman, Jessica Litman, Kembrew McLeod, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Rebecca Moore Howard, Vandana Shiva, Johndan Johnson-Eilola, and Peter Yu). Deadline for manuscripts: September 15, 2009 (response by November 15) Deadline for final manuscripts: January 15, 2010 Please direct questions and email manuscripts to the special issue editors: Martine Courant Rife Lansing Community College martinerife(a)gmail.com Steve Westbrook California State University, Fullerton swestbrook(a)fullerton.edu Dànielle Nicole DeVoss Michigan State University devossda(a)msu.edu John Logie University of Minnesota logie(a)umn.edu -- Martine Courant Rife, JD, PhD Professor, Writing Program Lansing Community College Communication Department Arts & Sciences Building, 211G, 517/4839906 martinerife(a)gmail.com *** Editor, Intellectual Property Committee/Caucus NCTE Newsletter

1 0

Flickr Research
by Mayo FM 24 Aug '09

24 Aug '09

Hello! I hope that you are fine! I am Mayo Fuster Morell Phd Candidate on Online creation communities governance at the European University Institute (http://www.onlinecreation.info) Do you know previous research on Flicrk? I am particularly interested on the interaction dynamics amogn Flickr users/community and the relationship between Flickrs users/community and the service provider (Yahoo). Though the case stydy of Flickr I am trying to analyse the relationship between commercial providers of online platforms and the community generated in terms of power distribution and mutual dependency. Thank you in advance! In solidarity! Mayo -- Mayo Fuster Morell E-mail: lilaroja(a)gmx.net Skype: mayoneti http://www.onlinecreation.info http://www.openelibrary.info http://www.openesf.net http://www.networked-politics.info http://www.euromovements.info GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

3 4

Call for Participation: Mobile LIfe 2009 in Barcelona
by Prof. I. Kushchu 23 Aug '09

23 Aug '09

Dear Colleagues The final program for Mobile Life Conferences (mGOVERNMENT, mSOCIETY and mDEVELOPMENT) to be held in Barcelona 2-4 September is now posted on the conference web site: http://www.m4life.org Key SPEAKERS include: -- Serge Ferre, NOKIA, Vice President Corporate and Head of EU Representation -- Bruno Jacob feuerborn, Deutsche Telekom - Board Member of T-Mobile Germany and T-Home. -- Evelyne Rys, CISCO, Sales and Business Development Manager, EMEA Public Sector Vertical, Cisco Systems -- Ken Banks, Kiwanja Net -- Micheal Bull, Professor, University Sussex BACKGROUND: mLife Events form A Platform for Socially Responsible Organizations in Mobile Value Chain The influences of mobile technologies range from personal relations to interaction in society, and from the transformation of the public sector to the dynamics of economic development. mLife conference and exhibitions are prime events for all organizations and professionals who would like to monitor, take part in, and shape the development of the social impact of the mobile revolution. They provide opportunities to businesses, public sector organizations and researchers to explore the frontiers of the social mobile revolution and be informed in order to reach their goals. The three conferences will cover all aspects of mobile life, technology, services, implementation as they relate to individuals, society, economies and governments. ORGANIZERS and SUPPORTERS: mLIfe Events are organized by the MObile Government Consortium Int, and Barcelona City Council and Sponsored / Supported by CISCO, BlackBerry (RIM) and SPIDER ONLINE REGISTRATIONs and for further information please refer to the http://www.m4life.org/ or email conf(a)m4life.org Regards Kushchu ------- IBRAHIM KUSHCHU, MBA, MSC., PHD Associate Professor and Founding Director, Mobile Government Consortium International, UK http://www.mgovernment.org ik(a)mgovernment.org +44 1273 777853

1 0

ratios/absolutes - retractions
by Barry Wellman 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Well, the number of retractions is up more than tenfold, 95 out of 1M+ is trivial. Another case of media blowing up a minor phenomenon? YMMV. PS: # of publications expected varies by field. In sociology, we have had to repeatedly educate senior administrators that where there average size page is 7pp, our's is 35pp+, and we have fewer venues for publication. I also believe that top schools don't merely count, but read the papers of decent candidates. (And also their letters of recc.) So quality still counts. In any event, one of my doc students just named her baby Albert Li, after Mr Einstein. Barry Wellman _______________________________________________________________________ S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab Director Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388 University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 twitter:barrywellman http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax:+1-416-978-3963 Updating history: http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php _______________________________________________________________________

1 0

Roommate found-thanks!
by Kris M. Markman 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Hi all, I have found myself a roommate for IR 10 thanks to the awesomeness of this list! I look forward to seeing everyone in Milwaukee. -Kris ---------- ---------- ---------- Kris M. Markman, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Communication University of Memphis https://umdrive.memphis.edu/kmmrkman/www/index.html

1 0

online learning evaluation
by Murray Turoff 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Any one interested in online learning and the good evaluations that were done should get the book that roxanne was first editor of and which summarized all the findings based upon the many evaluation studies sponsored over two decades of online learning. check her website http://is.njit.edu/hiltz for the references under "virtual classroom" she also had a book in the 80's called "virtual classroom" which covered the early work. On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:00 AM, <air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org> wrote: > Send Air-L mailing list submissions to > air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. eies nostalgia (Barry Wellman) > 2. F2F, Hybrid, Online Efficacy Research (Charlie Balch) > 3. 14-yr-old Teen blogger's top ten pet peeves of Facebook > behavior (Yosem Companys) > 4. Re: F2F, Hybrid, Online Efficacy Research (Kevin Guidry) > 5. NewBook > Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to > Education (McKiernan, Gerard [LIB]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:41:48 -0400 > From: Barry Wellman <wellman(a)chass.utoronto.ca> > To: aoir list <air-l(a)aoir.org>, "turoff, murray -- Murray Turoff" > <murray.turoff(a)gmail.com>, <turoff(a)njit.edu> > Subject: [Air-L] eies nostalgia > Message-ID: > <Pine.SGI.4.40.0908201839440.28741474-100000(a)origin.chass.utoronto.ca> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Murray, et al, I agree with you (and am thinking fondly back to the 1970s) > that EIES was the best system, with the default being signed, but also > allowing for pseudonyms and anonymity on demand -- providing anonymous > posts could be tracked when libelous. > > Barry Wellman > _______________________________________________________________________ > > S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab Director > Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388 > University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 twitter:barrywellman > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax:+1-416-978-3963 > Updating history: http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:30:47 -0700 > From: "Charlie Balch" <charlie(a)balch.org> > To: <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> > Subject: [Air-L] F2F, Hybrid, Online Efficacy Research > Message-ID: <094001ca21ee$3f00a3a0$bd01eae0$@org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I've read much about how students claim to prefer F2F but sign up for online > classes. However, I am not much about which instructional modalities are > most effective. I'd appreciate some references regarding the comparative > efficacy of F2F, Online, and hybrid instruction. > > I appreciate that many factors are involved and instructional efficacy is > not a well defined construct. I also know that hybrid classes are in > fashion. > > My particular interest is in comparisons of these methods for teaching > computer programming but would appreciate anything that's a good read. I'm > also interested in opinions based on experience. > > For what it is worth, I find teaching completely online has the best student > learning outcomes. > > Thanks, > Charles Balch PhD > Charles.balch(a)azwestern.edu > Professor of Computer Information Systems > Arizona Western College > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:30:43 -0400 > From: Yosem Companys <ycompanys(a)gmail.com> > To: aoir list <air-l(a)aoir.org>, > stanford-persuasive-technology-lab(a)googlegroups.com > Subject: [Air-L] 14-yr-old Teen blogger's top ten pet peeves of > Facebook behavior > Message-ID: > <def432400908201930i3c4c2763n57cef45f2f85795c(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >> >> My name's Izzie. I'm a fourteen (almost fifteen) year old girl, entering >> the years of highschool and jobs and driving and life. Good years of my life >> have past. Are the best yet to come? Find out with me. > > >> I have come up with a list of teen trends that are boring, stupid, >> irritating, or all of the above. I hope you enjoy reading this as much as I >> enjoyed trashing everyone else's hobbies. > > >> So behold: In no particular order, top ten teen trends I really, really >> hate. > > >> http://bit.ly/2HzwQB > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:40:25 -0400 > From: Kevin Guidry <krguidry(a)gmail.com> > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: Re: [Air-L] F2F, Hybrid, Online Efficacy Research > Message-ID: > <3d273fe80908202140v21ee017vf57360bb51ebeb57(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > As a mere PhD student (our "credentials" discussion is fresh in my > mind), I feel compelled to prominently proclaim that I am not speaking > on behalf of my employer or colleagues but offering my own viewpoint > and opinions. > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Charlie Balch<charlie(a)balch.org> wrote: >> I'd appreciate some references regarding the comparative >> efficacy of F2F, Online, and hybrid instruction. > > We've looked at this a few times in my shop, Indiana University's > Center for Postsecondary Research. We annually administer several > large scale surveys, most prominently the National Survey of Student > Engagement (NSSE), and occasionally we've focused on technology as it > relates to our measures of engagement and other proxy measures of > learning. We've been conducting the NSSE for 10 years now and I'm > starting to compile all of our technology-related work. It seems that > every time we look at this issue there is a significant positive > correlation between technology use and nearly every thing we measure. > Our most recent work, which I presented a few months ago at the > meeting of the American Education Research Association, focused > specifically on how the relative number of online courses relates to > the things we measure. Even when we controlled for a bunch of things > (age, gender, enrollment status, major, institution type, etc.) the > same generally positive correlations remained: increased use of > technology positively correlated with measures of engagement and > learning. Our paper can be found at > http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/Engaging%20Online%20Learners.pdf if anyone > is interested in digging into this more. > But "technology is good!" isn't a very useful or nuanced finding, > right? We're continuing to dig in to this more; we have another large > set of data from this year's survey we're working to analyze. We > asked more specific and different questions this time around so we > should learn some new things. But we're also pretty limited by our > methods and resources. We can make some really good generalizations > with really impressive numbers of respondents but we can't ever answer > the "why" and "how" questions. > >> I appreciate that many factors are involved and instructional efficacy is >> not a well defined construct. > > The things in which we're all really interested are very subtle and > hard to define much less measure. Many, many things are conflated and > confused. And it's difficult and often irresponsible to generalize > findings. > > > Kevin > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:03:38 -0500 > From: "McKiernan, Gerard [LIB]" <gerrymck(a)iastate.edu> > To: <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> > Cc: "McKiernan, Gerard \[LIB\]" <gerrymck(a)mail.adp.iastate.edu> > Subject: [Air-L] NewBook > Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell > Phones to Education > Message-ID: > <4F6D7F02E570D846825FD3A8B8C252650158FEA5(a)exchs018.its.iastate.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Colleagues/ > > > > A Most Excellent Friday PM (CT) Discovery ! > > > > /Gerry > > > > Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to Education. Liz Kolb / > International Society for Technology in Education / 2008 / ISBN > 978-1-56484-247-3 / 240 pp. / $ 24.45 (Member) > > > > Liz Kolb / International Society for Technology in Education / 2008 / > ISBN 978-1-56484-247-3 / 240 pp. / $ 24.45 (Member) > > > >>>>General Table Of Contents<<< > > > > Introduction > > Chapter 1 > Cell Phones as Learning Tools > > Chapter 2 > Concerns with Cell Phones in the Classroom > > Chapter 3 > Conferencing, and Mobile Notes > > Chapter 4 > Cell Phones as Cameras and Camcorders > > Chapter 5 > Developing Classroom Projects for Cell Phones > > Chapter 6 > Cell Phones as Research and Organizational Tools > > Chapter 7 > Cell Phones as Management Tools > > Chapter 8 > Cell Phones in Preschool and Lower Elementary Learning > > Chapter 9 > The Future of Cell Phones in Schools > > Chapter 10> More Web 2.0 Resources for Cell Phones > > References > > National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS) > > Index > > Credits > > > > Links To > > > >>Detailed Table Of Contents Available > > > >>Chapter Excerpts > > > >>Introduction; Chapter 1: Cell Phones as Learning Tools, Chapter 2: > Concerns with Cell Phones in the Classroom. (PDF, 23 pages) > > > >>Associated Webinar > > > > >From Toy to Tool: Cell Phones in Learning > A Conversation About > Integrating Student Cell Phones Into Classroom Curricula / Liz Klob Blog > > > > >>Cell Phones in Learning With Liz and Jeff (blogtalkradio) > > > > Available At > > > > [ http://tinyurl.com/l2xy6l ] > > > > EnJOY! > > > > /Gerry > > > > Gerry McKiernan > > Associate Professor > > Science and Technology Librarian > > Iowa State University Library > > Ames IA 50011 > > > > gerrymck(a)iastate.edu > > > > There Are No Answers, Only Solutions / Olde Irish Saying > > > > The Future Is Already Here, It's Just Not Evenly Distributed / > > Attributed To William Gibson, SciFi Author / Coined 'Cyberspace > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ > > End of Air-L Digest, Vol 61, Issue 20 > ************************************* > -- Distinguished Professor Emeritus Information Systems, NJIT homepage: http://is.njit.edu/turoff

1 0

Fwd: 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions - Thomson Reuters analysis
by jeremy hunsinger 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Begin forwarded message: > From: Karen Weaver <melvil4u(a)GMAIL.COM> > Date: August 21, 2009 7:23:28 PM EDT > To: JESSE(a)LISTSERV.UTK.EDU > Subject: 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions - > Thomson Reuters analysis > Reply-To: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <JESSE(a)LISTSERV.UTK.EDU> > > 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions > Retractions up tenfold > > http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=40… > > 20 August 2009 > > By Zoë Corbyn > > Excerpts from the full article linked above / best, kw > > ..."The rate at which scientific journal articles are being > retracted has increased roughly tenfold over the past two decades, > an exclusive analysis for Times Higher Education reveals." ... > ..."Growth in research fraud as a result of greater pressure on > researchers to publish, improved detection and demands on editors to > take action have been raised as possible factors in the change." ... > ..."The study, by the academic-data provider Thomson Reuters, > follows the retraction last month of a paper on the creation of > sperm from human embryonic stem cells." ... > > > ..."The Thomson Reuters analysis charts the number of peer-reviewed > scientific-journal articles produced each year from 1990 and the > number of retractions."... > "It shows that over nearly 20 years the number of articles produced > has doubled, but the number of retractions - still a small fraction > of the literature - has increased 20 times. This is equal to a > tenfold increase, factoring in the growth of articles."... > > ..."The data are extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science > citation database, and apply to the journals covered by its Science > Citation Index Expanded." > ..."Whereas in 1990, just five of the nearly 690,000 journal > articles that were produced worldwide were retracted, last year the > figure was 95 of the 1.4 million papers published." ... Please > see COMPLETE article linked above / kw > > ------------------------------ > Karen Weaver, MLS, Adjunct Faculty, Cataloging & Classification, The > iSchool at Drexel University, College of Information Science & > Technology, Philadelphia PA email: karen.weaver(a)ischool.drexel.edu / > Electronic Resources Statistician, Duquesne University, Gumberg > Library, Pittsburgh PA email: weaverk(a)duq.edu >

2 1

NewBook > Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to Education
by McKiernan, Gerard [LIB] 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Colleagues/ A Most Excellent Friday PM (CT) Discovery ! /Gerry Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to Education. Liz Kolb / International Society for Technology in Education / 2008 / ISBN 978-1-56484-247-3 / 240 pp. / $ 24.45 (Member) Liz Kolb / International Society for Technology in Education / 2008 / ISBN 978-1-56484-247-3 / 240 pp. / $ 24.45 (Member) >>>General Table Of Contents<<< Introduction Chapter 1 > Cell Phones as Learning Tools Chapter 2 > Concerns with Cell Phones in the Classroom Chapter 3 > Conferencing, and Mobile Notes Chapter 4 > Cell Phones as Cameras and Camcorders Chapter 5 > Developing Classroom Projects for Cell Phones Chapter 6 > Cell Phones as Research and Organizational Tools Chapter 7 > Cell Phones as Management Tools Chapter 8 > Cell Phones in Preschool and Lower Elementary Learning Chapter 9 > The Future of Cell Phones in Schools Chapter 10> More Web 2.0 Resources for Cell Phones References National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS) Index Credits Links To >Detailed Table Of Contents Available >Chapter Excerpts >Introduction; Chapter 1: Cell Phones as Learning Tools, Chapter 2: Concerns with Cell Phones in the Classroom. (PDF, 23 pages) >Associated Webinar >From Toy to Tool: Cell Phones in Learning > A Conversation About Integrating Student Cell Phones Into Classroom Curricula / Liz Klob Blog >Cell Phones in Learning With Liz and Jeff (blogtalkradio) Available At [ http://tinyurl.com/l2xy6l ] EnJOY! /Gerry Gerry McKiernan Associate Professor Science and Technology Librarian Iowa State University Library Ames IA 50011 gerrymck(a)iastate.edu There Are No Answers, Only Solutions / Olde Irish Saying The Future Is Already Here, It's Just Not Evenly Distributed / Attributed To William Gibson, SciFi Author / Coined 'Cyberspace

1 0

eies nostalgia
by Barry Wellman 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Murray, et al, I agree with you (and am thinking fondly back to the 1970s) that EIES was the best system, with the default being signed, but also allowing for pseudonyms and anonymity on demand -- providing anonymous posts could be tracked when libelous. Barry Wellman _______________________________________________________________________ S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC NetLab Director Department of Sociology 725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388 University of Toronto Toronto Canada M5S 2J4 twitter:barrywellman http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman fax:+1-416-978-3963 Updating history: http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php _______________________________________________________________________

3 2

14-yr-old Teen blogger's top ten pet peeves of Facebook behavior
by Yosem Companys 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

> > My name's Izzie. I'm a fourteen (almost fifteen) year old girl, entering > the years of highschool and jobs and driving and life. Good years of my life > have past. Are the best yet to come? Find out with me. > I have come up with a list of teen trends that are boring, stupid, > irritating, or all of the above. I hope you enjoy reading this as much as I > enjoyed trashing everyone else's hobbies. > So behold: In no particular order, top ten teen trends I really, really > hate. > http://bit.ly/2HzwQB

1 0