- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

JOB: Project Manager, Platform Cooperativism Consortium
by Joly MacFie 15 Feb '20

15 Feb '20

You may have seen my webcasts of the Platform Coop events at The New School in NYC. The program's project manager has absconded to run Bernie's advance team. Thus the immediate vacancy https://careers.newschool.edu/postings/18802 The Platform Cooperativism Consortium (PCC) is a global hub for research, community building, and advocacy of digital co-operative enterprises. The PCC supports the growth and conversion of hundreds of platform co-op businesses with tens of thousands of worker-owners around the world. The Project Manager plays a leading role in organizing the Consortium, the Institute for the Cooperative Digital Economy, and the Platform Co-op Development Kit, a 2-year grant project funded by Google.org. The Project Manager supports the Director in advancing these initiatives across the university and around the world, collaborating with a variety of internal and external stakeholders: undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, external researchers and academics, policymakers, technologists, entrepreneurs, foundation officers, traditional cooperative leaders, union organizers, freelancers, and many others. The duration of this position is contingent on continued external funding. -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

ICYMI: Steven Levy on Social Science Foo Camp
by Joly MacFie 15 Feb '20

15 Feb '20

https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-social-network-becomes-social-science-… *The Social Network Becomes a Social Science Subject* *STEVEN LEVY * The Plain View Last weekend I attended an event called Social Science Foo Camp, an “unconference” where attendees spontaneously schedule discussion sessions to create a lively agenda. The venue was Facebook’s headquarters in Menlo Park, California. One of the more interesting sessions I attended concerned a project called Social Science One <https://socialscience.one/>. Social Science One is an effort to get the Holy Grail of data sets into the hands of private researchers. That Holy Grail is Facebook data. Yep, that same unthinkably massive trove that brought us Cambridge Analytica. In the Foo Camp session, Stanford Law School’s Nate Persily, cohead of Social Science One, said that after 20 months of negotiations, Facebook was finally releasing the data to researchers. (The researchers had thought all of that would be settled in two months.) A Facebook data scientist who worked on the team dedicated to this project beamed in confirmation. Indeed, the official announcement came a few days later. It’s an unprecedented drop, involving a data set of 10 trillion numbers. The information centers on URLs shared by Facebook’s billions of users—specifically, the 38 million of these that were shared more than 100 times on Facebook between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2019. Researchers can isolate URLs by characteristics like whether they were fact-checked or flagged as hate speech, and they can see (in the aggregate) who viewed them, liked them, shared them, or even whether they shared the links without viewing them. “This dataset enables social scientists to study some of the most important questions of our time about the effects of social media on democracy and elections with information to which they have never before had access,” reads the Social Science One press release. <https://socialscience.one/blog/unprecedented-facebook-urls-dataset-now-avai…> The reason it took so long is that Facebook, quite understandably, wanted to protect the privacy of its users. Simply aggregating the information so that no individual’s activity can be identified wasn’t enough for Facebook, which insisted on also encoding the data via a technology called differential privacy. It’s a great way to protect privacy, but because it works by adding digital noise to the data set to prevent exposure of individuals, the technique limits what research can be done. The Social Science One people think Facebook is excessively cautious. “But I didn’t just get a $5 billion fine from the FTC,” acknowledges Persily, referring to the penalty assessed on Facebook last summer for its privacy sins. This is a new chapter in the somewhat tortured history of Facebook data research. The company hires top data scientists, sociologists, and statisticians, but their primary job is not to conduct academic research, it’s to use research to improve Facebook’s products and promote growth. These internal researchers sometimes do publish their findings, but after a disastrous 2014 Facebook study <https://www.wired.com/2014/06/everything-you-need-to-know-about-facebooks-m…> that involved showing users negative posts to see if their mood was affected, the company became super cautious about what it shared publicly. So this week’s data drop really is a big step in transparency, especially since there’s some likelihood that the researchers may discover uncomfortable truths about the way Facebook spreads lies and misinformation. The Foo Camp session was packed with researchers from inside and outside of Facebook, and there was a heady ebullience. You could almost hear the virtual popping of champagne. *Finally, the public will get its shot at the treasure trove,* the feeling went. Yet I suspect that the actual users of Facebook might not be so excited. They don’t use the service so they can participate in experiments or contribute to research, and they don’t get to opt out of these studies. While Social Science One touts the benefit to society of slicing and dicing the data to gain insights, no one is benefiting more than the researchers themselves—their papers are going to be awesome! So, at the risk of turning the room against me, I posed the question: "Why should Facebook be turning over its data to outsiders?" Persily had a compelling answer: “We are now living in a society where the most important data relating to data and communications is locked up in one company.” It’s for the good of everyone, he says, for academics to get their hands on it. All of this begs another question: Why does Facebook’s mother-of-all-data-sets exist at all? Pending resolution of that matter, I await the conclusions of the Social Science One researchers. -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

New Posts: Professor/Reader and Senior Lecturer/Lecturer in Digital Media & Communication - University of Huddersfield
by Cornel Sandvoss 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Dear Colleagues, We are currently advertising three new posts at Full Professor/Reader (x1) and Senior Lecturer/Lecturer (x2) level and are very much hoping these will attract interest in the AoIR community. Successful applicants will join an ambitious, yet friendly and supportive department, become part of our Research Centre for Participatory Culture and will have an opportunity to shape our new degree programmes in Digital Media and Communication and our Masters programme in Participatory and Social Media. We welcome applications from internet researchers at all career stages. Please find further details under the links: Professor or Reader in Digital Media and Communication (Closing Date: 8 March 2020): http://hud.ac/gjg Senior Lecturer or Lecturer in Digital Media and Communication (Closing Date: 24 February 2020): http://hud.ac/ggc Senior Lecturer or Lecturer in Media and Communication (Closing Date: 24 February 2020): http://hud.ac/ggi If you have any questions, or are interested in an informal discussion of any of these posts, please get in touch. I would be very grateful if you also share these details widely with other colleagues who might be interested. We very much welcome applicants from any background and of any nationality - please don't let Brexit deter you from applying if you are currently outside the UK. Best wishes, Cornel University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals. [http://marketing.hud.ac.uk/_HOSTED/EmailSig2014/EmailSigFooterMarch2019.jpg] This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will accept no liability.

1 0

Last day for paper submissions: IEEE Tech. Co-sponsored Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) Conference, San Luis Obispo, Calif., June 2020
by Lee, Mark 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ CALL FOR PAPERS AND PROPOSALS iLRN 2020: 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network June 21–25, 2020, San Luis Obispo, California, USA Technically co-sponsored by the IEEE Education Society, with proceedings to be submitted for inclusion in IEEE Xplore® Conference theme: "Vision 20/20: Hindsight, Insight, and Foresight in XR and Immersive Learning" +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Conference website: http://immersivelrn.org/ilrn2020 Full CFP available at: http://bit.ly/2ki4gzb (PDF), http://bit.ly/2lUcpdG (HTML) The Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) is a burgeoning global network of researchers and practitioners collaborating to develop the scientific, technical, and applied potential of immersive learning. Its annual conference is the premier scholarly event focusing on advances in the use of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and other extended reality (XR) technologies to support learners and learning. Leading scholars and professionals operating in formal education settings as well as those representing diverse industry sectors will converge on the historic and picturesque coastal city of San Luis Obispo, California for iLRN 2020, where they will share their research findings, experiences, and insights; network and establish partnerships to envision and shape the future of XR and immersive technologies for learning; and contribute to the emerging scholarly knowledge base on how these technologies can be used to create experiences that educate, engage, and excite learners. ##### TOPIC AREAS ##### XR and immersive learning in/for: - Serious Games - Medical & Healthcare - Workforce & Industry - Culture & Language - K-12 - Museums & Libraries - Special Education - Geosciences - Data Visualization With Special Tracks on: - Playful Immersive Learning Experiences - Place, Presence, & Perspective - Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Access & Social Justice (IDEAS) - Self & Co-regulated Learning - Immersive & Engaging Educational Experiences - Digital Transformation & Humanities ##### SESSSION TYPES & SESSION FORMATS ##### *** Academic Stream *** (Refereed papers for proceedings) - Full or short paper for oral presentation - Short or work-in-progress paper for poster presentation - Work-in-progress paper for doctoral colloquium *** Practitioner Stream *** (No paper – refereed on the basis of abstract) - Oral presentation - Poster presentation - Demo showcase *** Non-Traditional Formats *** - Pre-conference workshops - Special sessions - Panel sessions Please see the conference website for templates and guidelines. ##### IMPORTANT DATES ##### - Main submission deadline* - FINAL EXTENSION: 2020-02-14 - Main-round notifications: 2020-03-23 - Camera-ready papers (Main): 2020-04-06 - Late submission deadline*: 2020-03-30 - Late-round notifications: 2020-04-27 - Camera-ready papers (Late): 2020-05-11 - Conference: 2020-06-21 to 2020-06-25 *Full and short papers can only be submitted in the main round. ##### PUBLICATION & INDEXING ##### Accepted and registered papers presented at iLRN 2020 will be published in the conference proceedings and submitted to the IEEE Xplore® digital library. IEEE makes Xplore content available to its abstracting & indexing partners, including Elsevier (Scopus, Ei Compendex) and Clarivate Analytics (CPCI - part of Web of Science). In addition, the authors of selected papers may be invited to submit revised and expanded versions of their papers for possible publication in the IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (2018 JCR Impact Factor: 2.315), the Journal of Universal Computer Science (2018 JCR Impact Factor: 0.91), or another Scopus and/or Web of Science-indexed journal, subject to the relevant journal’s regular editorial and peer-review policies and procedures. ##### CONTACT ##### conference(a)immersivelrn.org | ALBURY-WODONGA | BATHURST | BRISBANE | CANBERRA | DUBBO | GOULBURN | MELBOURNE | ORANGE | PORT MACQUARIE | SYDNEY | WAGGA WAGGA | LEGAL NOTICE This email (and any attachment) is confidential and is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose it to anyone. Any confidentiality is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery. Email should be checked for viruses and defects before opening. Charles Sturt University does not accept liability for viruses or any consequence which arise as a result of this email transmission. Email communications with Charles Sturt University may be subject to automated email filtering, which could result in the delay or deletion of a legitimate email before it is read at Charles Sturt University. The views expressed in this email are not necessarily those of Charles Sturt University. Charles Sturt University in Australia The Grange Chancellery, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst NSW Australia 2795 (ABN: 83 878 708 551; CRICOS Provider Number: 00005F (National)). TEQSA Provider Number: PV12018 Consider the environment before printing this email.

1 0

Digital Sociology
by inbar michelzon 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Hi I'm Inbar Michelzon Drori, and I research Instagram by class analysis from a Bourdieu perspective. I was wondering; are they any researchers that attend Dublin, and are interesting in taking part in a meeting on Digital sociology? meaning the methodology and the theoretical perspective according to theories by the sociologist. I Will be happy to hear from you Inbar

1 1

Please vote for my works!
by Waliya, Yohanna Joseph 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Please vote now either for Momenta, Homosalus, Véritologie or Cyberpoetry for DHAWARD2019 as the BEST USE OF DH FOR FUN on http://dhawards.org/dhawards2019/voting Waliya, Yohanna Joseph Enseignant et chercheur à l'université de Calabar. Auteur de La récolte de vie, Quand l'Afrique se lèvera, Monde 2.0 etc. Mail: waliyayohannajoseph(a)unical.edu.ng Mobile:+2348038940016. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-7458 https://www.unical.edu.ng/staff/user/profile-yohanna https://unical-ng.academia.edu/WALIYAYOHANNAJOSEPH https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Waliya_Yohanna_Joseph http://www.vispo.com/guests/waliya/index.html

1 0

Call for Papers - AoIR and the Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
by Charles M. Ess 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Dear AoIRists, copy to Simon Rogerson, aline shakti franzke, In light of the impending March 1 deadline for proposals to be submitted for this year's conference in Dublin, I regret that we are bringing this to your attention later than we would have liked. But we hope that many of you will find the CFP to be sufficiently exciting and interesting that you can send along your proposals as outlined below as quickly as possible so that we can coordinate these into ethics panel proposals in time to meet the deadline. Please feel free to address any questions to either me and/or Simon Rogerson as seems best. == CFP – Special theme issue, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society: Ethics, society and the internet – AoIR 2020 Background Since its inception, the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) has fostered critical reflection on the ethical and social dimensions of the internet and internet-facilitated communication. These reflections and analyses have been at work in innumerable conference presentations and conference-related publications, as well as in the Association’s signature development of ethical guidelines for internet research ethics (IRE). Given the nature of ethics, there will be continuing debate and disagreement: over the years, nonetheless, there have emerged both defining and characteristic commitments to ethical norms and imperatives. The AoIR 2014 statements on Diversity and Inclusivity articulate defining commitments to “the most fundamental principles of academic freedom, equality of opportunity, and human dignity” (https://aoir.org/diversity-and-inclusivity/) These commitments have been manifest from the beginning of AoIR in manifold panels and presentations informed by focus on basic rights to privacy, personality (Persönlichkeitsrecht – the right to shape and define who one is as a free person, including one’s sexual identities, preferences, etc.), freedom of expression, democratic political engagement, etc., as based on fundamental norms of emancipation, equality and gender equality, justice, fairness, and so on – and all of this from global / cross-cultural perspectives. They are further evoked throughout the list of thematics for the AoIR 2020 conference call, beginning with Power, justice, and inequality in digitally mediated lives; Life, sex, and death on, through, and with social media; and Political life online (https://aoir.org/aoir2020/cfp/) Concomitantly, Simon Rogerson, Chief Editor of the Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (JICES), describes the Journal as aiming to “…promote thoughtful dialogue regarding the wider social and ethical issues related to the planning, development, implementation and use of new media and information and communication technologies. Drawing from a wide authorship it provides necessary interdisciplinary, culturally and geographically diverse works essential to understanding the impacts of the pervasive new media and information and communication technologies.” JICES and AoIR thus share central interests in the ethical and social dimensions of the internet and internet-facilitated communication. As part of a collaboration aimed at giving AoIR conference presentations and papers broader publicity via JICES, we invite proposals for ethically-focused presentations and panels at AoIR’s 21st annual meeting, to be held in Dublin, Ireland, 28-31 October 2020. Papers generated by these presentations and panels will then be published in a theme issue of JICES in 2021. (See Ess 2020 - ref. 1) Most briefly, we hope to attract papers in a first Special Issue of JICES that blend theory and practice in ways that will have the potential to make a real difference in the field. We invite proposals that take up one or more specific ethical and/or social dimension of the internet and internet-facilitated communication. The following list of topics is meant to be suggestive only – by no means comprehensive or exclusive: • uses of these technologies to exploit, attack and/or defend both “everyday users” and those rendered more vulnerable by given social, political, and/or economic structures. Possible topics here range within and across a heuristic taxonomy: macro-level analyses and evaluations of, e.g., authoritarian surveillance and/or surveillance capitalism; repression of dissent, freedom of expression, and political organization (e.g., the Hong Kong umbrella movement); “ethics by design,” perhaps vis-à-vis ethics washing by multinational corporations, professional organizations and/or NGOs; meso-level analyses and evaluations of, e.g., emancipatory uses of internet-facilitated communication by minority populations, women, children, LGBQt+, indigenous peoples, the poor, refugees and immigrants … vs. repressive / oppressive counter-uses of these technologies, e.g., cyber stalking, location-tracking and image-based abuse – see Tanczer et al (ref. 2) micro-level analyses and evaluations of specific examples and case-studies illustrating more individual- and group-level phenomena, e.g., democratically-oriented uses of these technologies for whistle-blowing and corporate / nation-state efforts to suppress these; and so on • good lives and flourishing in a digital era, including as these are specifically evoked in the conference topics “Machines and the good life: ethical principles versus ethical practices,” and “Health, wellbeing, and the internet.” That is, “the good life” and “wellbeing” are signature concepts and aims of virtue ethics – where virtue ethics has become increasingly central in analyses of the social and ethical impacts of ICTS. • analyses of the impacts and implications of internet-facilitated communication through the lenses of additional ethical and philosophical frameworks such as deontology, utilitarianism, care ethics, global ethical traditions such as Confucian thought, Buddhism, and so on. • existential media studies perspectives and analyses, as these conjoin a number of such frameworks, beginning with virtue ethics and care ethics, with classic existential analyses, now refined and transformed for apt analyses and guidance for our lives as mortal and thus vulnerable beings (Lagerkvist - ref. 3). Existential media studies further intersect with the work of media scholars such as Paddy Scannell and John Durham Peters – and specifically with the AoIR 2020 conference theme of “Death online.” • internet research ethics, beginning with its basic elements (see franzke et al 2020 - ref.4) as well as current examples and case studies, e.g., mis/uses of corporate data – e.g., Humphreys 2019 (ref.5); how to discern and foster researchers’ ethical capacities and responsibilities, e.g. Lammers et al 2019 (ref. 6); unfolding implications of GDPR for research ethics, and so on. Procedures In the first stage, proposals should be sent to Charles Ess (c.m.ess(a)media.uio.no – subject: AoIR-JICES). Proposals will be jointly reviewed by Charles Ess and JICES Chief Editor Simon Rogerson: accepted proposals will be collected within one or more ethics panels to be proposed to the AoIR conference as part of the regular submission and review process. (AoIR submission deadline: March 1) Proposals should include author name(s), title, a brief abstract (5-10 lines) plus one or two essential references. Please be as clear as possible as to how your proposed presentation addresses a central ethical theme, challenge, etc. (whether included in the above list or not) and how the presentation addresses the JICES thematics of "thoughtful dialogue regarding the wider social and ethical issues related to the planning, development, implementation and use of new media and information and communication technologies. Drawing from a wide authorship it provides necessary interdisciplinary, culturally and geographically diverse works essential to understanding the impacts of the pervasive new media and information and communication technologies." Please keep in mind the important restriction on submissions: In the interest of diversity and collegiality, each conference participant is limited to presenting one individual paper and one paper in a panel, and to participating in one roundtable. You can be a co-author on additional papers, but you must not be the scheduled presenter of these papers. Please do not submit as a presenter for any more papers than this, to allow everyone an opportunity to participate in the conference. Again, our regrets for the comparatively short notice of this CFP - but we hope to hear quickly from many of you! All best, charles ess References 1. For an initial overview, see: Charles M. Ess, Viewpoint: at the intersections of information, computing and internet research, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JICES-01-2020-0001/full… 2. Tanczer, L M, Dragiewicz, M, O’Neale, R, Harris, B and Kennedy, J (2019), “Technology-facilitated abuse: How tech is transforming coercion, control, and violence”, panel presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, 2-5 October, Brisbane, Australia. Abstract available at https://www.conftool.org/aoir2019/index.php?page=browseSessions&presentatio… 3. Lagerkvist, A. (2019) Digital Existence: An Introduction. In: Lagerkvist, A. [Ed.] Digital Existence: Ontology, Ethics and Transcendence in Digital Culture. London: Routledge. 4. franzke, a s, Bechmann, A, Zimmer, M, Ess, C and the Association of Internet Researchers (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf 5. Humphreys, S (2019), “The Challenges of Ethical Data Use for Commercial Enterprises”, paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, 2-5 October, Brisbane, Australia. Abstract available at https://www.conftool.org/aoir2019/index.php?page=browseSessions&presentatio… 6. Lammers, J C, Curwood, J C, Tekobbe, C, Magnifico, A M, Stornaiuolo, A (2019), “Respectful Ethical Decision Making: Positioning the Online Researcher as a Bearer of Moral Consequence”, panel presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, 2-5 October, Brisbane, Australia. Abstract available at https://www.conftool.org/aoir2019/index.php?page=browseSessions&presentatio… -- Professor in Media Studies Department of Media and Communication University of Oslo <http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/people/aca/charlees/index.html> Co-chair & Editor, Internet Research Ethics 3.0 <https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf> 3rd edition of Digital Media Ethics out soon! <http://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509533428> Postboks 1093 Blindern 0317 Oslo, Norway c.m.ess(a)media.uio.no

1 0

Call for abstracts: 4S/EASST 2020 - Panel 82 Human-(itarian) technologies
by Martin Perez Comisso 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Please, consider submitting your work if you have relevant work or research in the area. -- An invitation/remainder for 4S/EASST 2020! Prague, Czech Republic. August 18th-21st, 2020 More details: https://www.easst4s2020prague.org/ Deadline: Feb 29th, 2020 Call for abstracts Panel 82. Human-(itarian) technologies: How to “make a better world” for humans with technologies? >From at least the WWII ideas such as technological fixes, humanitarian technologies, and tech4dev, PIT, etc. has been transnationally framed, promoted, and funded, to solve or to assist human communities with their “basic needs” based in technical solutions. In particular, during emergency context, like natural disasters or a massive migration, or in the case of “resourceless” communities (due to physical, economic or political imbalances), humanitarian technologies are a path of action to “make a better world.” At the same time, local responses have been emerging (like appropriated technologies, PLACTED or Civic tech), to contest colonial assumptions and practices around these projects. Shortcomings related to technological adoption, implementation or deploy performed by universities, international agencies, governments, and other privileged people are particularly relevant for those critiques. Imbalance and inequities of power, agency, and control have been largely discussed in study cases by STS and beyond. Nevertheless, there is an opportunity to propose alternatives, ways to engage and understand in those projects when which enact “techno-humanitarian systems” This panel welcomes contributions and experiences from researchers, practitioners and communities making and thinking questions “above and beyond” human-itarian technologies: What it means “make a better world” with using technology? Which values and paradigms share technologies to “make the world better”? Which good practices must replicate, and misconceptions must eradicate? Whose and how humans are benefited by these projects around the world? Note: The format proposed for this open panel will not be based in 10 min presentations. Instead, will encourage conversation, and sharing materials before the event from selected contributors. It is expected to dedicate a larger amount of time in this panel to work-together around common topics, to be discussed via mail after acceptation. -- Organizer: Martin Andrés Perez Comisso, SFIS – Arizona State University Questions about this panel? Please send a mail to maperezc(a)asu.edu -- -- Martín Pérez Comisso / @mapc <https://twitter.com/mapc> Ph.D. Student, Human and Social Dimension of Science and Technolgy <https://isearch.asu.edu/profile/3108937> School for the Future of Innovation in Society 土龍 Oscillating from 1988 http://about.me/mapc +1 (480) 859 2660 (US)

1 0

New book: An Internet for the People: The Politics and Promise of craigslist
by Lingel, Jessa 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

Hi AoIR friends, I'm excited to announce that my new book, An Internet for the People is out now from Princeton University Press<https://press.princeton.edu/ideas/jessa-lingel-on-an-internet-for-the-people>. Online since 1996 and with more monthly page visits than the New York Times or ESPN, craigslist has been incredibly successful without giving up on key tenets of Web 1.0 politics (and aesthetics), like anonymity and transparent business models. Using interviews with insiders and users, the book uses craigslist as a lens for thinking about how digital culture has (and hasn't) changed in the last 25 years. The first chapter is available at the Social Media Collective blog<https://socialmediacollective.org/2020/02/04/an-internet-for-the-people-fir…>. Thanks, Jessa Jessa Lingel {she/her/hers | assistant professor} {Annenberg School for Communication} {core faculty | GSWS<https://www.sas.upenn.edu/gsws/>} {University of Pennsylvania} {tumblr<http://jessalingel.tumblr.com> | medium<http://medium.com/@jessa.lingel>}

2 1

Conference: Log Out! 2: Workers Confronting Digital Capitalism - March 13, 2020
by Yujie Julie Chen 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

Sorry for cross-listing. I am happy to announce that Log Out! 2: Workers Confronting Digital Capitalism, an international conference, will take place in downtown Toronto. Please RSVP! Friday March 13, 2020 International Conference 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Faculty of Information, University of Toronto (140 George Street) Digital capitalism is a terrain of social conflict. Work is increasingly shaped by the technologies used to reorganize the labour process and devise new forms of value generation. Technologies that allow to decompose or outsource jobs make workers increasingly replaceable. New surveillance techniques are used to control and discipline workers, and despotism is on the rise. But a long cycle of struggles has shown that workers don’t passively obey the rules of the digital workplace. Look no further than drivers in the ride-hailing industry in the streets of the world, domestic workers and freelancers in North America and Asia, food-delivery couriers in Europe and Canada, warehouse workers in urban peripheries across the globe, software engineers from China to California, or game designers and tech workers in cities across North America. The ubiquitous penetration of digital technologies in warehouses, workshops, offices, and app-based workplaces is met with novel workarounds and struggles. New forms of class composition boost solidarity and organizing in the digitally-mediated work environment. Workers log out from and subvert digital labour. Building on the success of the 2018 edition <https://www.mcluhancentre.ca/logout>, Log Out! 2 brings together researchers and workers to discuss how digital capitalism can be confronted and subverted. SPEAKERS Sareeta Amrute [University of Washington and Data & Society] Sreyan Chatterjee [Vidhi Center for Legal Policy, New Delhi] Nicole Cohen [University of Toronto] Niels van Doorn [University of Amsterdam] Silvia Masiero [Loughborough University] Nataliya Nedzhvetskaya [University of California Berkeley] Rida Qadri [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] Greig de Peuter [Wilfrid Laurier University] Winifred Poster [Washington University St. Louis] Jack Qiu [Chinese University of Hong Kong] Tanay Gandhi [Center for Internet and Society, New Delhi] Noopur Raval [University of California Irvine] Michael Siciliano [Queen’s University] Jamie Woodcock [Open University] WORKER ORGANIZATIONS ROUNDTABLE Foodsters United Vice Union Tech Worker Coalition Game Workers Unite! Attendance is free. Please confirm your presence on EVENTBRITE <https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/91162915735> A detailed program will be published shortly. The conference is organized by the McLuhan Centre for Culture and Technology with support from the Institute of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology <https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/iccit/institute-communication-culture-informati…> Organizing committee: Julie Chen, Nicole Cohen, Alessandro Delfanti, Greig de Peuter, Julian Posada, Brendan Smith -- - julie _____________________________ Yujie "Julie" Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor University of Toronto Institute of Communication, Culture, Information & Technology (ICCIT) (Mississauga) Faculty of Information (St. George) *Latest Publications: * - “Temporal Arbitrage, the Fragmented Rush, and Opportunistic Behaviors: The labor politics of time in the platform economy <https://www.academia.edu/41110279/Temporal_Arbitrage_the_Fragmented_Rush_an…>,” *New Media & Society *(forthcoming, 2020) - "Digital Utility: Datafication, Regulation, Labor, and DiDi’s Platformization of Urban Transport in China <https://www.academia.edu/38968638/Digital_Utility_Datafication_Regulation_L…> ," *Chinese Journal of Communication *(2019)

1 0