May 2019 - Air-L - lists.aoir.org

ASIA.LIVE: Locating Livestreaming in Asia - virtual workshop [Call for video contributions]
by Gabriele de Seta 23 May '19

23 May '19

===================================================================== Call for Contributions: Virtual Workshop 'ASIA.LIVE: Locating Livestreaming in Asia' ===================================================================== Hosts: Leiden University, the Leiden Asia Centre, and Asiascape: Digital Asia Organisers: Florian Schneider, Dino Ge Zhang, Gabriele de Seta Date: 13 September 2019 Abstract Deadline: 20 June 2019 The practice of broadcasting live video through the internet has recently seen a resurgence, as livestreaming platforms recuperated the format pioneered by cam sites from around the early 2000s (Senft, 2008). From Periscope and Twitch to YouTube and Facebook Live, livestreaming video is today a popular media format, especially among gaming communities, Esports audiences, and popular media commentators (Taylor, 2018). The uptake of livestreaming in Asia around 2013 is, as of yet, a largely untold story. In the distinct digital ecosystems of the Asia region (Steinberg & Li, 2017), this format has been embraced not only by gamers and their audiences but by a diverse range of communities and performers, fuelling the rise of livestreaming genres like the South Korean mukbang (social eating) or the Chinese huwai zhibo (outdoor livestreams). This local uptake and regional diversification is accompanied by the rise of Asian livestreaming platforms. These are either revamped from established video streaming sites, such as afreecaTV in Korea, Niconico Namahosho in Japan, or Bilibili Live in China, or they come in the new forms of mobile-exclusive apps such as Bigo Live in South East Asia or Inke in China. There are also local scenes of livestreaming cultures on international platforms such as Facebook Live, Twitch, and YouTube. The local ecologies of Western and Asian platforms in Asian national contexts are home to intricate networks of regional livestreaming cultures, and these cultures interact in complicated ways with geopolitical flows and borders (Steinberg & Li, 2017). Livestreaming in Asia has become a veritable 'live' laboratory of screen cultures in which new genres, performativities, personalities, audiences, and commenting practices emerge. Workshop topics: ASIA.LIVE aims to bring together researchers interested in Asian livestreaming cultures and practices. Through our 'virtual workshop' format, we support and encourage a live dialogue around this emergent, ephemeral, and often undocumented domain of contemporary digital culture. The workshop invites submissions of audio-visual presentations discussing the following issues and beyond: * Emerging theories of liveness and real-timeness. * Microhistories of live video in Asia. * Situated genres of livestream performance. * Live comment cultures. * The platformisation of Asian livestreaming. * Livestreaming apps and mobility. * Representation and intersectionality in livestreaming cultures. * Livestreamed localism, nationalism, and regionalism. Workshop format: As a 'virtual workshop', ASIA.LIVE is structured around pre-recorded audio-visual presentations that will be broadcasted online, along with livestreamed Q&A sessions, on the date of the event. Submissions must be 15-minute-long videos. However, the format can range from traditional slides with voiceover or webcam talk to video essays or even more experimental genres (archival footage remixes, mini documentaries, performance pieces, livestreamer interviews, etc.). Although it will be possible and encouraged to join us at Leiden University during the livestream event, participation will be largely remote via a livestream. Submissions: Interested contributors should submit a 250-word abstract with a short bio detailing their idea for the video presentation in order to be considered for the workshop. Please submit abstracts to live.asia.workshop(a)gmail.com<mailto:live.asia.workshop@gmail.com> by 20 June 2019 and we will respond to your expression of interests on 1 July 2019. If your abstracts are selected, you will be invited to submit your video file before 1 September 2019. Journal special issue: Particularly promising contributions to the conference may later be included in the form of research articles in a special issue of the peer-reviewed academic journal Asiascape: Digital Asia (Brill), to be published in the spring of 2021. The deadline for these articles will be 1 April 2020. References: Senft, T. M. (2008). Celebrity & Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang. Steinberg, M., & Li, J. (2017). Introduction: Regional Platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 4, 173-183. Taylor, T. L. (2018). Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Best, Florian, Dino & Gabriele

1 0

Cheque et clôture de compt
by Bartira Lins 23 May '19

23 May '19

Bonjour Mme Adhnet, J’ai un chèque de la université pour mon inscription. J’ai l’argent pour l’encaissement des lundi. J’ai besoin pour qui ça ne retourne pas. Si vou pouvez me prévenir je vous remercie. D’autre côté , je voudrais fermer mon compt a la fin du mois , vous rendre les chèques et la carte et payer la somme qui soit présente. J’ai déjà résilié tous les prélèvements, sauf santiane encore. Bien cordialmente, Bartira Lins

1 0

Postdoc opportunity - Dept of Communication - University of Salzburg
by Christine Lohmeier 23 May '19

23 May '19

6-year postdoc-position at the Department of Communication The University of Salzburg (Dept. ofCommunication) is now inviting applications from qualified candidates fora position as university assistant (Postdoc) according to § 26Collective Agreement (Kollektivvertrag) in research and teaching according toUG 2002 and Employee Act (Angestelltengesetz). (Remuneration group: B1; € 3.803,90 (gross,14×year)). - Start of employment: October 1st, 2019 - Duration of employment: 6 years - Weekly working hours: 40 by arrangement - Job description: Independent scientific research and teaching, scientific support in research and teaching as well as participation in administrative tasks of the faculty, especially in the Department of Media Usage and Digital Cultures (Prof. Dr. Christine Lohmeier), - independent teaching to the extent of 4 hours per week per semester. - Key areas of work and research are: - Media usage and media appropriation processes; - Challenges of media usage in times of AI and datafication; - Processes of digital, social and cultural change; - Qualitative and ethnographic survey methods and their further development and combination e.g. with digital methods. - Applicants are expected to independently apply for external funding and to independently conduct research and teaching in the department’s main areas of expertise, as well as to publish in journals and present at and co-organise (international) conferences. Furthermore, publications in journals in English and German are expected, as well as participation in national and international conferences. - The successful candidate has the opportunity to complete a Habilitation. Upon completing this qualification within the contract period, the temporary employment will be changed into a permanent position. Offer Requirements/Skills/Qualifications - Employment conditions: Doctorate in social science, communication studies or a related discipline and (at least partly) published dissertation; notable scientific reputation, proven in particular by relevant publications and presentations; teaching experience. - Desired additional qualifications: Strong involvement in the international scientific community (presentation activities, organization of conferences and research-related events, reviewing activities), ability to teach courses and examinations in English (higher level). - Desired personal qualities: highly motivated, ability to work in a team and great enthusiasm for all areas of academic work, excellent communication skills and experience in conducting and managing research projects (national and international). - Please submit your application electronically including the usual documents to: a) Document your activitiesand achievements in research; b) Present your experiencesin teaching (and possibly in training junior researchers); c) Present concepts forfuture research and teaching to contribute to the scientific profile of thedepartment; d) Reflect on yourcontribution to knowledge transfer and research management; e) Provide evidence of yoursocial competences and other skills. Further information will beprovided via Tel. +43/662/8044-4152 or email christine.lohmeier(a)sbg.ac.at Application deadline: 05 June 2019 Please send your application with reference “GZ A 0084/1-2019” to bewerbung(a)sbg.ac.at

1 0

Social Media/Adwords Data From Squatty Potty Viral Video Available
by John Dinsmore 23 May '19

23 May '19

I published a business case and lesson plan on Squatty Potty's highly successful viral video campaign (video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbYWhdLO43Q) that features Squatty Potty's actual data, including: * Social Media Targeting, Results (likes, shares, purchases--direct & via Amazon) * Paid Ads Linked to Views and Sales (direct & via Amazon) of Squatty Potties If you are teaching digital marketing/communications, social media, or analytics-related classes, this may be a good tool for you. Free educator copies of cases and data (registration required) are available at the following sites: Ivey Publishing (Cheaper) https://www.iveycases.com/ProductView.aspx?id=90742 Harvard Publishing https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/W18005-PDF-ENG?Ntt=squatty+potty&itemFindi… If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Cheers, John B. Dinsmore, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Marketing Raj Soin College of Business *Wright State University* 271 Rike Hall 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway Dayton, Ohio 45435 john.dinsmore(a)wright.edu www.johndinsmore.com (804) 237-9574 (mobile)

1 0

NYU report: Social Media Monitoring: How DHS Uses Digital Data in the Name of National Security
by Richard Forno 23 May '19

23 May '19

(h/t Tama!) (x-posted) Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law Social Media Monitoring: How the Department of Homeland Security Uses Digital Data in the Name of National Security PUBLISHED MAY 22, 2019 By Faiza Patel, Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Sophia Den Uyl, and Raya Koreh https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019_DHS-Soc… --- Dr. Richard Forno Senior Lecturer, CSEE Director, Graduate Cybersecurity Program Assistant Director, UMBC Center for Cybersecurity

1 0

Lecturer positions at New Media and Digital Culture, University of Amsterdam
by Esther Weltevrede 23 May '19

23 May '19

Hello AoIR, I would like to draw your attention to junior and senior lecturer vacancies in New Media and Digital Culture at the University of Amsterdam. Deadline for application is 4 June 2019. Junior Lecturers (recently graduated): https://www.uva.nl/shared-content/uva/en/vacancies/2019/05/19-311-junior-le… and Senior Lecturers (with PhD): https://www.uva.nl/shared-content/uva/en/vacancies/2019/05/19-312-senior-le… Best, Esther -- Esther Weltevrede | Assistant Professor | Program Director MA New Media and Digital Culture | International Exchange Officer Media Studies | University of Amsterdam | Turfdraagsterpad 9 | 1012 XT Amsterdam | The Netherlands http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/e.j.t.weltevrede | https://www.digitalmethods.net | @esthr

1 0

1st Call for Tutorials: CHIIR 2020
by Toine Bogers 23 May '19

23 May '19

CHIIR 2020, 14–18 March, 2020 • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada CHIIR 2020 is pleased to invite proposals for tutorials to be given in conjunction with the conference. The goal of the tutorials is to provide conference attendees, including early-career researchers and researchers crossing-over from related disciplines, with an opportunity to learn about concepts and techniques for research into user-centered aspects of information interaction and information retrieval. Tutorials also serve as a venue to share presenters’ expertise with the global community of user-centered information retrieval researchers and practitioners. Tutorials focus on specific topics including, but not limited to: * Information seeking, including task-based and exploratory studies * Search interfaces, including those for specialized tasks, populations and domains * User-centered design approaches to humans interacting with information and systems * Interaction techniques for information retrieval and discovery * Online information seeking, including log analysis of search and browsing * Modeling and simulation of information interaction * Information use, including measures of use as well as broader sense-making * Field and case studies relevant to understanding prerequisites for information searching, design and access * User-centered evaluation methods and measures, including measures of user experience and performance, experiment and search task design, eye-tracking and neuro-physiological approaches, data analysis methods, and usability * Human interaction and experience with conversational information systems * Context-aware and personalized search, including design, contextual features and analysis of information interaction * Information visualization and visual analytics, including search result presentation * Collaborative information seeking and social search, including social utility and network analysis for information interaction * Conversational search and other types of stateful and multi-turn interactions between users and search applications * Insights and analyses related to human experiences and usage trends with recommendation technologies * Information interaction and seeking with mobile devices and services Tutorials could be either full-day or half-day, and the length of your proposed tutorial should be commensurate with the presented materials and the projected interest of the CHIIR community in the tutorial topic. We actively encourage both researchers and industry practitioners to submit tutorial proposals that target different levels of expertise and different interests. We also encourage the submission of hands-on tutorials that combine theoretical concepts with practical exercises. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION The tutorial proposal should be a PDF document no more than 4 pages long (including references), submitted by e-mail to tutorials.chiir2020(a)gmail.com<mailto:tutorials.chiir2020@gmail.com> and organized as follows: * Title and abstract: Propose a title and an abstract that allows conference attendees to quickly and accurately understand the subject matter of the tutorial. * Format of the tutorial: Full-day or half-day. * Tutorial presenter(s): Name, email address, and affiliation of tutorial presenter(s). Each listed presenter must present in person at the conference. Please include relevant teaching experiences and history of prior tutorials by the presenter(s) as well as a list of relevant publications by the presenter(s). * Motivation: Explain why your topic is important to the CHIIR community and what you hope the participants will learn by attending your tutorial. * Focus: In this section, please provide a syllabus outlining the content of the tutorial and the learning outcomes. This syllabus should be realistic given the time available. Please also describe your use of the time available (e.g., morning lectures: fundamentals and case studies; afternoon panel discussion or brainstorming sessions, etc.). * Target audience: (introductory, intermediate, advanced) and prerequisite knowledge or skills. * Special requirements: If relevant, include a list of special requirements for the tutorial room (e.g., flipcharts, other visual aids). * Availability of materials: We encourage (but do not require) the inclusion of a statement that the materials (slides, readings, and/or code) used/mentioned in the tutorial will be publicly available after the tutorial. EVALUATION CRITERIA Tutorial proposals will be reviewed according to: (1) ability of the tutorial to contribute to strengthening the foundations of research into user-centered aspects of information interaction and information retrieval, or to broadening the field to look at important new challenges and techniques, (2) experience and skill of the presenter(s), and (3) the value of any materials released with the tutorial for the community. IMPORTANT DATES * Tutorial proposal submission deadline: Tuesday October 1, 2019 * Tutorial proposal notification: Tuesday October 23, 2019 * Camera-ready tutorial summary deadline: Monday January 13, 2020 * Tutorial date: Saturday March 14, 2020 Deadlines refer to 23:59 (11:59pm) in the AoE (Anywhere on Earth) time zone. TUTORIAL CHAIRS * Toine Bogers, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark * Maria Gäde, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany Please contact the chairs on tutorials.chiir2020(a)gmail.com<mailto:tutorials.chiir2020@gmail.com> if you have any questions.

1 0

WEBCAST WED-FRI: Partnership for Progress on the Digital Divide 2019 International Conference
by Joly MacFie 22 May '19

22 May '19

Apologies for the slightly delayed notice on this. Hands full setting up 4 rooms! Highlight this morning was Geoffrey Starks' maiden speech as an FCC Commissioner, after which he was duly grilled by Gigi Sohn. Also speaking were Avi Gillis from the UK DCMS, and Hopeton S. Dunn from Jamaica. Be sure to tune in Friday morning for Larry Irving and Vint Cerf. And big thanks to Vint & Google for sponsoring the live captioning. [image: livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ppdd2019>*Partnership for Progress on the Digital Divide <http://www.ppdd.org/> *(PPDD) is the only academic professional organization in the world focused solely on the digital divide and on connecting research to policymaking and practice to strategize actions and catalyze solutions to this pressing societal concern. The academic research, policymaker, and practitioner community represented by PPDD stands ready to advance the agenda on broadband and the digital divide, to address the many challenges and opportunities presented by the digital world, and to further evidence-based policymaking and practice so that all citizens can participate fully in the digital, networked age. On *May 21-23 2019* the interdisciplinary *Partnership for Progress on the Digital Divide 2019 International Conference <http://www.ppdd.org/conferences/ppdd2019/>* brings together researchers, policymakers, and practitioners for an extended, in-depth dialogue about key issues that inform information and communication technologies and the digital divide around the world. The Conference works to identify new areas of necessary, productive focus, foster greater understanding, advance research, and enlighten policy and practice going forward. PPDD 2019 is particularly significant as it marks the 25th anniversary of the recognition of the digital divide through social scientific research. And, within PPDD 2019, we plan to have the largest worldwide gathering of experts on technology, disability, and the digital divide ever. The plenary sessions and breakouts will be webcast live on the *Internet Society Livestream Channel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/>*. Other breakouts will be recorded and streamed later. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://bit.ly/ppddlive <https://bit.ly/ppddlive>* *AGENDA: https://bit.ly/ppddagenda <https://bit.ly/ppddagenda>* *TWITTER: #ppdd2019 https://bit.ly/ppdd2019 <https://bit.ly/ppdd2019>* *Permalink* https://isoc.live/11075/ -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 1

Searching for Swedish collaborator(s)
by Lucas Wright 22 May '19

22 May '19

Hi everyone, I'm working with an organization called the Dangerous Speech Project <http://dangerousspeech.org> on a study of a Swedish Facebook group that comments with positive messages on articles related to controversial topics, hoping to encourage other positive posts and discourage hate speech. We're planning on analyzing the effect of their interventions on the quality of the discourse on the pages they target, and we're looking for at least one Swedish social scientist to collaborate with. Please reach out to me if you're interested or know someone who might be. Best, Lucas Wright

1 0

CfP: Money talks? The impact of corporate funding on academic research in information law and policy
by Balázs Bodó 22 May '19

22 May '19

APOLOGIES FOR CROSS-POSTING Call for papers, workshops, interventions for Money talks? - The impact of corporate funding on academic research in information law and policy An event by the European Hub of the Global Network of Centers for Internet and Society (NoC), organized by the Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam. October 23, 2019, Amsterdam Concerns about the corporate funding of scientific research, and about the presence of corporate sponsors in scientific events are not an exceptional issue in the academic field. For decades, scientific domains like medicine, climate research[1], health [2] and nutrition [3] science have been struggling with controversies [4] and dilemmas around the direct and indirect impact of corporate funding [5] on the quality of their scholarship, integrity, independence, both actual, and as perceived by others. Research in the domain of the information society is not immune to these controversies. For example, the emerging giants of the information society are active research funders, and promote academic research as a way to influence public policy, or at least are perceived to do so. The information industry is also increasingly in exclusive control of fundamental research resources, such as data, or technology design. The 2017 Campaign for Accountability (CA) [6] controversy perfectly captures the complexity of the situation this creates around science. CA was apparently set out to identify Google’s influence on information policy research and (controversially) identified 329 research papers on public policy matters that were directly or indirectly funded by the search company. Only later it turned out that one of the funders of CA was Oracle [7], which at the same time was fighting Google in Court, and perceived CA as part of that effort. In September 2018 a wide group of academics raised concerns [8] about the role of surveillance technology company Palantir as sponsor of academic events on data privacy. The subsequent debate raised important questions about the dimensions in which different corporations active in the online world should be critically assessed, and the terms on which science can engage with them. The growing concerns about the influence of corporate funding of academic research in all disciplines can be attributed to the effects of several connected factors. For a number of financial, political and social reasons there is a significant pressure on academics to be entrepreneurial, and attract and pursue funding from private sources [9]. Large corporations have been responding to this situation with often substantial amounts of funding, and various forms of collaborations. On the other hand, access to private funders and corporate sponsors may carry benefits: corporate participation is a prerequisite of a substantive and inclusive dialogue on contentious issues and policy developments. It can also foster collaborations, and provide scientists access to information, data, people, which would otherwise remain beyond reach. However, the intentions of corporations to invest in academic research are not always transparent. Some consider it to be relatively harmless when corporate sponsorship is motivated by the desire to associate their brand with academia, or to contribute to society to boost the public company image. Others claim that corporations may decide to fund research with malevolent intentions in order to influence the public debate, or pursue some hidden agenda. It often remains unclear for the public what motivates a company to fund academic research. Corporate sponsorship may be seen as suspicious, and detrimental to the results of the scientific outcomes, even if it was done with the right motivation, an ultimately it may also have an impact on the public trust in science. In order to prevent a conflict of interest and to ensure objectivity and transparency in research, institutions [10] and governments have been developing [11] policies [12] and guidelines [13] to foster integrity. The resulting codes of conducts are based on several widely supported fundamental principles which are translated into more specific standards for good research practices. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity [14], for instance, is built around four principles: reliability, honesty, respect and accountability. Yet, it remains to be seen how effectively such international [15], European, national, and domain specific codes of conducts can be monitored, and enforced, and how effective they can be in safeguarding both the integrity of research, and it’s public perception. Recent events and the call for an action-oriented discussion on corporate sponsorship therefore warrant the impact of corporate funding on academic research as the theme for the next meeting for the European Hub of the Global Network of Centers for Internet and Society (NoC). The conference strives to bring together scholars within the information law discipline, as well as related fields to discuss questions such as: Understanding the problem: the scope, structure, amount, topics and beneficiaries of corporate funding in research ● How big corporate influence is in the first place? How much money are we talking about? ● What are the forms of (corporate) research funding, such as financial support, funded positions, data access, etc.? ● What drives corporate funding decisions? Internal safeguards of research independence and integrity ● What are the best ways to safeguard research independence and integrity? ● Are the current principles and safeguards that guide engagement with corporate sponsors and funders adequate? ● What are the limitations of current integrity safeguards? Is there room for improvement? ● Are there specific/additional principles that should to inform such engagement in the area of information law and policy? ● Does it make sense to differentiate between different forms of sponsoring (institutional/project, in-kind/access/money)? Interfaces and firewalls between academia and industry ● What kind of integrity-infrastructure does academia need for the future where more and more essential resources are going to be in the exclusive control of corporations? ● What legal and policy innovations are needed to ensure due access to privately held or controller data sources? ● How could standards be set for the acceptance of corporate funding? What are the existing methods of standard setting? ● What is a proper way to signal the company support without creating the impression of industry research? The impact of corporate funding ● How to manage public trust in academia which is increasingly funded by private parties? ● What are the effects of increased acceptance of private funding of academic research on government spending on science? ● Are some geographies, institutions, and initiatives more dependent on, or more exposed to corporate funding? How to address these differences? ● Are there neglected research topics because they do not attract corporate funding? ● How to deal with public funding from authoritarian regimes? We welcome individual paper proposals and panel and workshop proposals, and other forms of interventions and actions. Please submit paper abstracts, and panel proposals of no more than a 1000 words to the following email address: money.talks(a)ivir.nl <mailto:money.talks@ivir.nl> by July 1st, 2019. Acceptance decisions will be communicated in about a month. References: [1] Farrell, Justin. “Corporate Funding and Ideological Polarization about Climate Change.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, November 19, 2015, 201509433. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112. [2] Besley, John C., Aaron M. McCright, Nagwan R. Zahry, Kevin C. Elliott, Norbert E. Kaminski, and Joseph D. Martin. “Perceived Conflict of Interest in Health Science Partnerships.” PLOS ONE 12, no. 4 (April 20, 2017): e0175643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175643. [3] Aveyard, Paul, Derek Yach, Anna B. Gilmore, and Simon Capewell. “Should We Welcome Food Industry Funding of Public Health Research?” BMJ 353 (April 20, 2016): i2161. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2161. [4] https://www.ucsusa.org/disguising-corporate-influence-science-about-sugar-a… [5] Krimsky, Sheldon. “Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research?: An Inquiry into the ‘Funding Effect’ Hypothesis.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, September 20, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912456271. [6] https://campaignforaccountability.org/new-report-reveals-googles-extensive-… [7] http://fortune.com/2016/08/19/google-transparency-project-2/ [8] https://fundingmatters.tech/ [9] Holloway, Kelly Joslin. “Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40, no. 5 (September 1, 2015): 744–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915576004. [10] https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-m… [11] https://www.vsnu.nl/en_GB/news-items/nieuwsbericht/471-new-netherlands-code… [12] http://archives.esf.org/media-centre/ext-single-news/article/the-european-c… [13] https://www.knaw.nl/nl/thematisch/ethiek/wetenschappelijke-integriteit [14] https://www.allea.org/allea-publishes-revised-edition-european-code-conduct… [15] https://www.knaw.nl/shared/resources/thematisch/bestanden/MontrealStatement… ---------------------------------------- Balázs Bodó, PhD research scientist Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam <http://www.ivir.nl/> http://www.ivir.nl/ Blockchain & Society Policy Research Lab <https://blockchain-society.science/> https://blockchain-society.science/

1 0