- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

atlas etc at ASA
by Barry Wellman 12 Aug '06

12 Aug '06

If you're at the American Sociological Association meetings in Montreal thru Sunday, Ray Maieta (sp) is demo'ing and selling Atlas.ti and MDQ (I know I spelt that wrong) with knowledge and enthusiasm. He's in the book exhibits room, to the left as you walk in. Barry, who valued his grounded acquaintanceship with Anselm Strauss _____________________________________________________________________ Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 You're invited to visit & contribute to the new version of "Updating Cybertimes: It's Time to Bring Our Culture into Cyberspace" http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php _____________________________________________________________________

1 0

clothing Nud*ist
by Barry Wellman 12 Aug '06

12 Aug '06

Denise and someone else recommended Nud.ist and NVivo6. These are notes, and are by no means a recomendation or a disuassion. 1. There is now NVivo7 which is a combo of Nud.ist and NVivo. 2. Early reports say it is resource hungary and perhaps slow to run. 3. Tom and Lynn Richards, the Aussies who founded QSR (which begat Nud.ist and NVivo) have left active running of the company. 4. We haven't tested NVivo7 at NetLab yet. Would love to hear from those who have. I understand the program has already been upgraded, perhaps to install, load and run faster. I may have told this story before, but I love it. In the early 1990s, my wife took a Nud.ist workshop in the USA. (I think Lynn ran it.) A month later, we were in Bielefeld at the World Congress of Sociology. In an elevator, my wife saw someone who had taken the workshop with her. "Didn't I see you at the Nudist workshop?" she asked him abmidst a packed elevator! Gasps!! And the sound of silence. Barry _____________________________________________________________________ Barry Wellman Professor of Sociology NetLab Director wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162 You're invited to visit & contribute to the new version of "Updating Cybertimes: It's Time to Bring Our Culture into Cyberspace" http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php _____________________________________________________________________

1 0

Re: [Air-l] Ellis and Jeremy
by Jeremy Hunsinger 12 Aug '06

12 Aug '06

Just to be clear here, I have not, nor will I likely ever have a private conversation/dealings with Dr. Cornwell, his center or his work. My work and the work of my colleagues on Transdisciplinary Studies and other endeavors stands as is, in the context of its production, its editing and related affiliations, editorial boards and advisory boards. I just wanted to state the 'null relationship' because some people may have inferred that there is some past argument or discussion in the private sphere and there has been none. The current discussion appears to have been started by my discussion with Ellis about whether or not we can describe non-atomistic, systemic, or ecological effects. I think that discussion was fruitful for me, though I could have spent more time on it and I apologize to the list for spawning this recent interchange. jeremy hunsinger Assistant Professor Pratt Institute www.cddc.vt.edu wiki.tmttlt.com www.tmttlt.com () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments http://www.stswiki.org/ sts wiki http://cfp.learning-inquiry.info/ Learning Inquiry-the journal http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary Studies:the book series

1 0

CFP: Video Games and Writing Instruction
by Douglas Eyman 12 Aug '06

12 Aug '06

Just a quick reminder -- abstracts are due Tuesday! DE Apologies for cross-posting; please forward as appropriate, thanks! Call for Essays Play and Pedagogy: Video Games and Writing Instruction The editors of Play and Pedagogy: Video Games and Writing Instruction are seeking 15-25 page contributions that consider the multiple ways that digital gaming technologies, including console games, computer games, and massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs), can be used for composition instruction as objects or locations of inquiry and as modes of production. We invite both works that theorize games and gaming as compositional spaces and cases that discuss successful classroom practices that engage games in writing courses at the graduate and undergraduate level. Proposals should be submitted by August 15, 2006. Upon recommendation by the collection editors, authors will be asked to submit finished articles by January 15, 2007. Games and gaming as social experience are starting to be explored in depth through a variety of collections and special journal issues, but relatively little has been written about games and composition instruction (although much has recently been published on games and learning). The goal of this collection is to collect and synthesize theory, research, and practices of games and gaming as specifically applied to composition instruction. As such, the editors are interested in qualitative, theoretical, and/or rhetorical research as well as teaching case studies with topics that might address (but are not limited to) the following: *Empirical studies of games/gaming as they relate to composition practices *Historical studies of the evolution of games in teaching and learning, particularly as focused on composition theory-based arguments for the use of games/gaming in composition studies *Case studies of successes and non-successes of pedagogical implementations of games and gaming *Theorizations that address gaming as writing/composing practice using rhetorical, genre, social, or discourse theories *Game-based ethnographic work that addresses identity formation or other issues important to composition pedagogy *Examinations of the implications of gaming pedagogy as effective practices for ESL or nontraditional students Queries about submissions can be directed to any of the editors: Douglas Eyman eymandou(a)msu.edu Andréa Davis davisa28(a)msu.edu Stewart Whittemore whittem2(a)msu.edu Proposals should be sent via email (by August 15, 2006) to Douglas Eyman at eymandou(a)msu.edu. Proposals will be reviewed and responded to by the editors by September 15, 2006.

1 0

Fwd: [CONFERENCE] - Words instead of Numbers. The status of software in the Qualitative Research World - 2006-09-29 - London
by Ben Anderson 11 Aug '06

11 Aug '06

given the recent discussion of qualitative analysis tools this seems relevant. Ben Begin forwarded message: > From: Randy Banks <randy(a)essex.ac.uk> > Date: 11 August 2006 13:43:58 BDT > To: ASC Announcements <asc.announce(a)essex.ac.uk> > Subject: [CONFERENCE] - ASC - Words instead of Numbers Programme - > 2006-09-29 - London > Reply-To: admin(a)asc.org.uk > > ************************************************************** > *** an announcement from The Association for Survey Computing. > *** Apologies for any cross-postings > ************************************************************** > > Words instead of Numbers. The status of software in the Qualitative > Research > World. A one-day conference on Friday 29th September 2006 at > Imperial College, > London > > The programme for the conference is now available and includes: > > * Keynote Address - Malcolm Rigg; PSI > > * Introducing Framework and its role in increasing quality and > transparency in the analysis of qualitative data - O'Connor, > Woodfield & Gerrard; NatCen > > * Exploiting Digital Records: New Resource Tools for Qualitative > Research in Contemporary Social Science – Crabtree et al; > University of Nottingham > > * CAQDAS versus Desktop Search Engines: Access without Coding - > Rettie; > Kingston University > > * Managing Large Scale Qualitative Research, Two Case Studies - > Butler & Vince; > Ipsos MORI > > * Toward an Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Text > Analysis Methods – Peladeau; Provalis Research > > * Practices, Methods and Community Tools for Sharing Qualitative > Data – Corti; UK Data Archive > > Full details about the confence, as well as a booking form, can be > found on the ASC web site at http://www.asc.org.uk/ > > Potential exhibitors should contact the ASC at the address below. > > Many thanks for your attention to this. > > Randy Banks > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please reply to: > > Diana Elder, Administrator (admin(a)asc.org.uk) > ASC, PO Box 60, Chesham, Bucks, UK HP5 3QH > tel/fax: +44 (0)1494 793033 > http://www.asc.org.uk > > This message has been sent on behalf the ASC by: > > Randy Banks (randy(a)essex.ac.uk) > Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) > University of Essex, Colchester, UK CO4 3SQ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: [Air-l] qualitative analysis of discussion board postings
by Alison Muirhead 11 Aug '06

11 Aug '06

Dear All, I'd definitely agree with what you've posted Yanuar, the software should only be thought of as assisting the process (i.e. ease of storage and retrieval) it still relies on the researchers own skill in developing and applying the coding frame. I'm currently using MAXqda2(see http://www.maxqda.com/ for the 30 day demo version). It's not terribly cheap but I found it easier to pick up than Nvivo, and have used it for coding interviews, learning journals, and even project documentation. It is also very easy to display e.g. "all segments coded against x", or "all segments coded against x for subject a" etc and many other variations which were sometimes problematic in Nvivo. I think it's worth checking out. I'd be interested to hear more about the framing theory mentioned, I don't think I've come across it before. Best wishes, Alison Muirhead Inspire Research www.inspire-research.co.uk

1 0

Re: [Air-l] qualitative analysis of discussion board postings
by Sam Ladner 11 Aug '06

11 Aug '06

Hello all, I would also suggest NVivo, which is relatively easy to figure out, though it has some user interface issues that are annoying. That said, however, I was once in a jam with no access to qualitative software at all. I used the "open sort" method, which can be done very well with a few tools: 1. post it notes 2. pens 3. a really big wall 4. no wind I coded the transcripts from interviews this way with a pile of the transcripts on my lap, and a ready post-it note, on which I scribbled a new theme every time it came up. Eventually, you find yourself repeating....yourself. And then you just start arranging and re-arranging the post its into over-arching themes. This method works very well with groups as well, and I employ it regularly in my work at a Web agency (we frequently have to organize large amounts of technical requirements and map those back to user research we have done). And about grounded theory, well, I think that person may have been talking about poor uses of grounded theory. One should only employ this is one is looking to develop an actual theory about, say, technical requirements gathering. I could conceive of a theory like, "determinants of technical requirements gathering include; socio-political context; timing; and technical architecture" or something. But lord knows that this term has been abused because people think they are using grounded theory if they "ground" their work in "theory. " Bah. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sam Ladner Account Planner CRITICAL MASS 12th Floor 11 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 4C7 e: saml(a)criticalmass.com v: 416.673.5275 ext. 3244 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ > -----Original Message----- > From: air-l-bounces(a)listserv.aoir.org [mailto:air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Hunsinger > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:40 AM > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: Re: [Air-l] qualitative analysis of discussion board postings > > this "grounded theory has been busted for the nonsense that it is" > sounds suspiciously like what i termed methodological ideology. If > it isn't ideological, perhaps it is just a form of methodological > orthodoxy. I'm not going to say that grounded theory is good or > great personally, as i've only read a few texts and never used it, it > does seem to be one of the major theories that frames qualitative > analysis. I think the key to grounded theory is to realize that is > designed to discover theories, which is a problematic concept in some > ways. if you aren't in the process of 'theory development' then it > might not be the model for you. in any case, there is a ton of > dissertations, and related 'quality' scholarship in using grounded > theory that to the casual observer indicates that it has some > usefulness. i'd propose suspending judgement until sufficient > citations are provided. > > There are many ways of thinking and analyzing the world that would be > antagonistic toward grounded theory. i can imagine if one is a > practice-turn ethnographer that the facility for theory discovery > seems less necessary in the face of the brute facts of the > experiences that you describe. But, I don't know. > > i think the best way to think of methods is methodological pluralism, > which in my mind argues that there are many ways to access knowledge > and that the knowledge generated is always the same sort about the > same thing, but in the end the application of one suite of > methodoligical tools to its appropriate data is as valuable as > another suite and that any given analysis is likely to be limited by > the methods used. > > > > On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:11 AM, Denise N. Rall wrote: > > > Dear Ulla et al.- > > > > Thanks for the framing theory. I was going to > > recommend *anything but* grounded theory - as Georgina > > Born said recently in Masterclass (sorry but she's > > cool) - "grounded theory has been busted for the > > nonsense it is" but unfortunately I forget who said > > this. She's an ethnographer so there might be some > > bias built in there. > > > > Cheers, Denise > > > > > > Jeremy Hunsinger > School of Library and Information Science > Pratt Institute > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail > /\ - against microsoft attachments > > http://www.aoir.org The Association of Internet Researchers > http://www.stswiki.org/ stswiki > http://cfp.learning-inquiry.info/ LI-the journal > http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary > Studies:the book series > > > _______________________________________________ > The air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l- > aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ The information contained in this message is confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity named above or their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message.

3 3

ACM CHIMIT '07: CHI for Management of IT (fwd)
by elw＠stderr.org 10 Aug '06

10 Aug '06

Of possible interest. ---e ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:33:22 PDT From: Jim Thornton <jthornton(a)PARC.COM> Subject: ACM CHIMIT '07: CHI for Management of IT Hello, If you have studied social networks that relate to the management of computing systems, please consider writing up your discoveries for the new CHIMIT conference either as a paper (deadline in just a few weeks, sorry for the late notice) or a poster (deadline Oct 27). Please see the full call below for more information. CALL FOR PAPERS ACM CHIMIT '07: 1st ACM Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology March 30-31, 2007 - Cambridge, MA, USA http://chimit.cs.tufts.edu Over the years, IT systems have become increasingly complex such that management is now a serious bottleneck to personal and organizational productivity. IT service delivery costs are now dominated by operating expenses, and end-user productivity suffers as a consequence. Simply put, we are at a turning point in IT: Further advances in technology, business efficiency, and growth require fundamentally new approaches to system design and management. Solutions will require a broad understanding of technology, people, organizations, and business. This symposium aims to bring together stakeholders, researchers, practitioners, and designers from diverse fields such as human-computer interaction, human factors, computer science, management science, social sciences, and service sciences, to identify issues, put forward a research agenda, and propose solutions. TOPICS Original contributions are sought broadly on workplace studies, processes and practices, organizational knowledge, models and metrics, design, experimental studies, tools, and automation approaches for IT management. More specifically topics of interest include but are not limited to: * Workspace Studies - Ethnographic studies of IT work in context - Patterns of work for various IT processes - Requirements for the design of new technologies - Issues related to new technology adoption - Role and forms of organization for effective work * Processes and Practices - Development and use of processes in IT - Best practices in problem solving strategies - Impact of business decisions on IT - Standards and guidelines of IT management - Experiences in policy development and use * Organizational Knowledge - Case studies and techniques for expertise-finding - Approaches to supporting communities of practice - Relationship computing and role management - Studies of collaboration and coordination - Knowledge management and training in IT * Models and Metrics - Models and metrics of key performance indicators - Quality analysis of models and metrics - Techniques for dynamic data collection - Development of early problem indicators * Design - Design of human-centered IT systems - Architectural considerations for user experience - Design methodologies for complexity and risk * Experimental Studies - Models of interaction with complex IT systems - Language in human-machine interaction - Evaluations of system management interfaces - Experiments on human error and attention - Cognitive issues in complex display design - Studies of decision-making for complex problems * Tools and Techniques - Interaction techniques for system management - Collaborative system administration workspaces - Visualizations of complex system behavior - Management tools for personal computing - Script and tool development environments * Automation - Automation/Policy languages - Human interfaces to automation - Policy-based interaction and control - Trust management in automation - Human-automation work division and redundancy - Agent-based automation and control SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Papers must be in standard ACM two-column format and cannot exceed 10 pages in total length, including the abstract, figures and references, and must be formatted according to the detailed ACM SIG publication instructions. Posters must be in standard ACM two-column format and cannot exceed 2 pages in total length. Please visit the CHIMIT '07 web site for further information. IMPORTANT DATES September 1, 2006: Papers Submission October 13, 2006: Papers Notification October 27, 2006: Posters Submission November 17, 2006: Posters Notification GENERAL CHAIRS PROGRAM CHAIRS Alva Couch, Tufts Patricia Jones, NASA Ames Paul Maglio, IBM Eser Kandogan, IBM STEERING COMMITTEE John Bailey, IBM Tom Sheridan, MIT Stephen Barley, Stanford Ben Shneiderman, Maryland AEleen Frisch, Exponential Tony Temple, IBM David Woods, Ohio State PROGRAM COMMITTEE Ismail Ari, HP Labs Paul Luff, Kings College London Jim Barlow, NCSA Wayne Lutters, Maryland, BC David Blank-Edelman, Northeastern David Kaber, North Carolina State Jeannette Blomberg, IBM Emre Kiciman, Microsoft Geoff Bowker, Santa Clara Rob Kolstadt Mark Burgess, University College Oslo Luke Kowalski, Oracle Terrel Cox, Microsoft Hanan Lutfiyya, Western Ontario Catalina Danis, IBM Gloria Mark, UC, Irvine Mica Endsley, SA Technologies Mustapha Mouloua, UCF Christine Halverson, IBM Susan Leigh Star, Santa Clara Pam Hinds, Stanford Jim Thornton, PARC Erik Hollnagel, École des Mines de Paris TREASURER REGISTRATION CHAIR Asaf Degani, NASA Ames Chris Campbell, IBM PUBLICITY Jim Thornton, PARC

1 0

qualitative analysis of discussion board postings
by Ulrike Pfeil 10 Aug '06

10 Aug '06

Dear All I am currently starting my PhD in the area of CMC. I am especially interested in the phenomenon of empathy and how it manifests in online communication. In my current study, I investigate message postings from a (quite emotional) discussion board and through grounded theory came up with a detailed categorisation scheme of the content. Apart from the basic statistics with the codings, I would like to relate the patterns I found in the online discussion board to the phenomenon of empathy in offline communication. However, I struggle with the approach I should take. I have read about different kinds of qualitative analysis (like thematic analysis, discourse analysis and some parts of content analysis...) but I am not sure how exactly to go about it. Does anybody have experience with this kind of analysis (relation of coding results to general characteristics of a phenomenon like empathy) or can recommend literature that might help me? It would not be a problem to write about it but I am searching for a more "prescribed procedure". Does anybody know of similar studies? I also thought about using word frequencies and concordances for the analysis - does anybody have any recommendation concerning this? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Kind regards, Ulrike -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

10 10

Re: [Air-l] conceptual lexicon
by Ellis Godard 10 Aug '06

10 Aug '06

Jeremy wrote: > It is actually unclear that we can extrapolate a collective identity > from a multitude of identities, though that is what many > believe.... That is, at least in part (arguably a large part), because it is also actually unclear whether any "collective identity" exists, for any collective. Any atomized unit or interaction might enunciate such an identity, but each unit might enunciate something different, and/or differently encunciate something somewhat comparable. What is "American culture"? Or pick a smaller collective: What is the "collective identity" of this list? Or even smaller: How often or likely do all members of any nuclear family similarly define their collective identity? Here's an hypothesis: For all collectives (known or knowable, demonstrated or demonstrable, accountable or conceivable), less than a majority (probably far less) have (or even could have) a collective identity. Even if collective identities exist (anywhere, much less everywhere), such a description then begs an explanation: Under what conditions (if any) are collective identities more likely to occur? > It is just one theoretical tradition that accepts that aggregation or > the whole is equal to the some of the parts, others believe that the > whole is less than and/or greater than the some of the parts. Screw belief; show me evidence - and evidence that has descriptive (if not also explanatory, and perhaps even practical) application. I'm not simply asking for an account of a collective identity for any particular collective, though that would be a good starting point. I'm challenging whether "the whole is" is even meaningful. The whole isn't. It isn't simply that a collective's "identity" is dubious; in much of modern life, boundary conditions for "collective" are, too. -eg

10 15