- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

RE: [Air-l] reflexive content
by Ellis Godard 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

Ehh, oops... Try again... IIUC, yes. Meta-content in an online setting (!) might generalize about online discussions. Reflexive content would talk (not take!) about itself. This discussion for example, has entered meta-content in some sense, but hadn't been reflexive - until this sentence. :) -eg

1 0

RE: [Air-l] reflexive content
by Ellis Godard 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

IIUC, yes. Meta-content in an online might generalize about online discussions. Reflexive content would take about itself. This discussion for example, has entered meta-content in some sense, but hadn't been reflexive - until this sentence. :) -eg > -----Original Message----- > From: air-l-aoir.org-bounces(a)listserv.aoir.org > [mailto:air-l-aoir.org-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf > Of jeremy hunsinger > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 5:21 AM > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: [Air-l] reflexive content > > > I'd be inclined to say reflexive content is content in which the > content takes into account its strategies in relation/regard > to itself. > it is as such not meta, which would allow it to be external, > reflexivity requires both internal and externality.

1 0

RE: [Air-l] Re: Air-l-aoir.org Digest, Vol 4, Issue 20
by Rowin Young 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

> > Before I answer the first question, could you please define > > "reflexive content?" > > Content about itself. Ideas about ideas. Interactions about interactions. > Is that the same as meta-content?

2 1

Re: research on distinctions between personal/work email
by Matzat, U. 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

Dear Catherine, On 8 Dec 2004 at 11:01, air-l-aoir.org-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > Hello all, > > phones). One of the things we're interested in is whether people make > distinctions between using their device for personal or for > work/professional usage. At the moment, we've got a specific interest > in email usage, but would also be interested in knowing about similar > distinctions being made for web surfing, IM or mobile phone calls. > > I haven't had much luck finding anything on this topic in the > communications databases in our library. I do expect that there is > some work out there on this topic, and am hoping that someone on the > list may be able to point us in the right direction. You might want to have a look at a paper of Sonja Utz: Strategic Email Use. It addresses exactly the distinction between private and professional usage of email. The abstract is available at http://www.dgof.de/gor02/index_en_4.html (You have to scroll down somewhat.) Regards, Uwe Matzat ======================================= Uwe Matzat Sociology Section Department of Technology Management Eindhoven University of Technology P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands --------------- phone: +31 40 247-8392 email: u.matzat(a)tm.tue.nl http://www.tue-tm-soc.nl/~matzat/ =======================================

1 0

Fwd: [Interpretation&methods] Faculty Position Announcement
by jeremy hunsinger 08 Dec '04

08 Dec '04

> distribute as appropriate > > > SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS > > GOVERNMENT AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PROGRAM > > VIRGINIA TECH > > > > Theories of Globalization > > > > The Program on Government and International Affairs (GIA) invites > applications for a tenure-track position at the rank of Assistant > Professor, focused on the theories and processes of globalization. > Candidates should have strong, broad training in social, political, or > cultural theory, and be able to work within an interdisciplinary > setting with other colleagues in the School of Public and > International Affairs (SPIA) on the School’s Master of Public and > International Affairs degree as well as the Public and International > Affairs stream within an existing college PhD program that GIA now > manages. In addition, this hire will collaborate with a new > cross-college doctoral program in the humanities and social sciences, > ASPECT (Alliance for Social Political Ethical and Cultural Thought). > Both of these interdisciplinary organizations address contemporary > political challenges, cultural conflicts, and social problems. In > particular, we would be interested in individuals who take a > comparative approach to broad systemic challenges posed by > globalization, including cultural conflict, economic development, > state building, institutional democratization, collective security, or > rapid urbanization. A Ph.D. in sociology, political science, cultural > anthropology, human geography, international studies, or a closely > related discipline is required for appointment as an Assistant > Professor. > > > > To be considered complete, applications must include a full c.v., > three letters of recommendation, a sample of written work, and > teaching evaluations. Applicants also should submit a cover letter > that addresses how they position their work in relation to > globalization theory, a statement about their current and future > research agendas, and an overview of their teaching experience in this > area to demonstrate their potential for excellence in research, > teaching, and service. > > > > Interested candidates should apply online at www.jobs.vt.edu and > arrange for references to send letters to: Dr, Timothy W. Luke, Chair, > Globalization Theory Search Committee, c/o Ms. Krystal Wright, SPIA, > 110 Architecture Annex (0113), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; > Phone: (540) 231-2291 or send them electronically to Krystal Wright > (krystal(a)vt.edu) Faculty Search Assistant, SPIA. The search will > remain open until the position is filled, but to be assured full > consideration, applications should be received by January 21, 2005. > > > > Virginia Tech has a strong commitment to diversity and seeks a broad > spectrum of candidates, including women, minorities, and people with > disabilities. Individuals with disabilities desiring accommodations > in the application process should notify the Chair of the Search > Committee or the Virginia Tech Relay Service, 1-800-828-1120. > > > > For further information on GIA and SPIA, see www.spia.vt.edu as well > as www.mpia.vt.edu or www.gia.vt.edu. > > > > > > ______________________ > > > > Krystal Wright > > School of Public and International Affairs (0113) > > College of Architecture and Urban Studies > > Virginia Tech > > Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 > > krystal(a)vt.edu > > (540) 231-2291 > > Fax: (540) 231-3367 > > > Jeremy Hunsinger Center for Digital Discourse and Culture () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments

1 0

Fwd: [isworld] Int J of Technology and Human Interaction, Inaugural Issue
by jeremy hunsinger 08 Dec '04

08 Dec '04

Begin forwarded message: > From: Frank Land <f.land(a)LSE.AC.UK> > Date: December 8, 2004 10:55:58 AM EST > To: SOCIOTECH(a)JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Fw: [isworld] Int J of Technology and Human Interaction, > Inaugural Issue > Reply-To: Frank Land <f.land(a)LSE.AC.UK> > > Dear Colleagues > > I thought this new journal is relevant for our pursuits. > > Frank > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bernd Carsten Stahl" <bstahl(a)dmu.ac.uk> > To: "ISWORLD Information Systems World Network" > <isworld(a)lyris.isworld.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:51 PM > Subject: [isworld] Int J of Technology and Human Interaction, Inaugural > Issue > > >> Dear Colleagues >> I am delighted to announce that the first issue of the >> >> International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction >> (http://www.idea-group.com/ijthi) >> >> is now available. >> >> Table of Content: >> >> Giving Voice to Feminist Projects in MIS Research >> Lynette Kvasny, The Pennsylvania State University, USA >> Anita Greenhill, University of Manchester Institute of Science and >> Technology, UK >> Eileen M. Trauth, The Pennsylvania State University, USA >> >> >> A Taxonomy of Stakeholders: Human Roles in System Development >> Ian F. Alexander, Scenario Plus, London, UK >> >> >> Believe It or Not: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century >> Susan E. George, University of South Australia, Australia >> >> >> The Desire for Privacy: Insights into the Views and Nature of the >> Early >> Adopters of Privacy Services >> Sarah Spiekermann, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany >> >> Abstracts of the above papers can be found under: >> http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~bstahl/ijthi/volume_1.htm >> >> >> >> For more information, please visit the journal's websites: >> http://www.idea-group.com/ijthi or >> http://www.ijthi.net >> >> >> >> Dr. Bernd Carsten Stahl >> Editor-in-Chief >> International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction >> >> >> >> The ISWorld LISTSERV is a service of the Association for Information > Systems (http://www.aisnet.org) To unsubscribe, redirect, or change > subscription options please go to http://lyris.isworld.org/. You are > subscribed to isworld as: f.land(a)lse.ac.uk. Each Sender assumes > responsibility that his or her message conforms to the ISWorld LISTSERV > policy and conditions of use available at > http://lyris.isworld.org/isworldlist.htm. >> > > jeremy hunsinger jhuns(a)vt.edu www.cddc.vt.edu jeremy.tmttlt.com www.tmttlt.com () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments

1 0

RE: FW: [chineseinternetresearch] National Science Foundation to help CIA spy on IRC chatrooms
by Allan A Friedman 08 Dec '04

08 Dec '04

I am curious what the major issue of concern is here. Is it that the CIA is involved clandestinely? While I agree that is somehat troublesome, the NSF has many portfolios in which the security community might (and probably does) take an active interest. Are we surprised that there is some sort of "reverse technology transfer"? Should we be upset by this? Alternatively, we could be upset at the monitoring of chat rooms. I have little experience in this sort of research, but Camtempe, Krishnamoorthy and Yener[1] describe an interesting system that finds clusters of social activity. But this occurs on an *open* system. There are countless ways to use Privacy Enhancing Technologies for group communication. IRC is not only unencrypted, but the protocol was designed to enable lurking. It's not even covert lurking though: the authors make no attempt to modify their IRC bot so that channel users are cannot see the surveilling bot. What is the privacy zone we should expect in open communication forums? If there is information to be gained by monitoring this sort of thing, why should any interested actor not exploit it? Companies like Intelliseek are already moving to capture and quantify consumer buzz. Whether they can successfully turn data into useful information is an interesting research and business strategy problem, but I am not sure that it is cause for concern. Using info gleaned from chat rooms for warrants, or intentionally mapping from an online identity to a legal identity--these seem like Bad Ideas. But is there a strong case for protecting an open system from passive surveillance? /\llan Allan Friedman Doctoral Student, Public Policy Kennedy School of Government [1] http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~yener/PAPERS/35.pdf

3 3

FW: [chineseinternetresearch] National Science Foundation to help CIA spy on IRC chatrooms
by Charles Ess 08 Dec '04

08 Dec '04

So shall we invite the CIA to the next AoIR conference? (smile) In seriousness, I thought this report would be of considerable to many Airists who know something about chatroom research and how easy it is to profile users... (_not_ smiling this time...) Charles Ess Fall '04: Fulbright Senior Scholar Universität Trier Fachbereich II Fakultäten der Medienwissenschaft, Sinologie Universitätsring 15 54296 Trier (Germany) Office phone: (49) (0)651-201-3744 Sekretariat: (49) (0)651-201-3203 Fax: (49) (0)651-201-3741 Distinguished Research Professor, Interdisciplinary Studies Drury University 900 N. Benton Ave. Voice: 417-873-7230 Springfield, MO 65802 USA FAX: 417-873-7435 Home page: http://www.drury.edu/ess/ess.html Co-chair, CATaC: http://www.it.murdoch.edu.au/catac/ Exemplary persons seek harmony, not sameness. -- Analects 13.23 ------ Forwarded Message From: George Lessard <media(a)web.net> Reply-To: <chineseinternetresearch(a)yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:05:50 -0700 To: Chinese Internet Research List <chineseinternetresearch(a)yahoogroups.com> Cc: L mediamentor <mediamentor(a)yahoogroups.com> Subject: [chineseinternetresearch] National Science Foundation to help CIA spy on IRC chatrooms <http://management.silicon.com/government/0,39024677,39126120,00.htm>http:// management.silicon.com/government/0,39024677,39126120,00.htm CIA checks out chatrooms November 25 2004 by Declan McCullagh [Excerpts] In April 2003, the CIA agreed to fund a series of research projects that the documents indicate were intended to create "new capabilities to combat terrorism through advanced technology". One of those projects is research at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., devoted to automated monitoring and profiling of the behaviour of chatroom users. Even though the money ostensibly comes from the National Science Foundation, CIA officials were involved in selecting recipients for the research grants, according to a contract between the two agencies obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and reviewed by silicon.com sister site CNET News.com. EPIC director Marc Rotenberg, whose nonprofit group obtained the documents through the Freedom of Information Act, said the CIA's clandestine involvement was worrisome. "The intelligence community is changing the priorities of scientific research in the US," Rotenberg said. "You have to be careful that the National Science Foundation doesn't become the National Spy Foundation." A CIA representative would not answer questions, saying the agency's policy is never to talk about funding. The two Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute researchers involved, Bulent Yener and Mukkai Krishnamoorthy, did not respond to interview requests. Yener and Krishnamoorthy, both associate professors of computer science, wrote that their research would involve writing a program for "silently listening" to an Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channel and "logging all the messages". A June 2004 paper they published, also funded by the NSF, described a project that quietly monitored users of the popular Undernet network, which has about 144,000 users and 50,000 channels. In the paper, Yener and Krishnamoorthy predicted their work "could aid [the] intelligence community to eavesdrop in chatrooms, profile chatters and identify hidden groups of chatters in a cost-effective way" and that their future research will focus on identifying "topic-based information". -- -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Via / By / Excerpted / From / Tip from / Thanks to: JULES SIEGEL Apdo. 1764 77501-Cancun Q. Roo Mexico http://www.cafecancun.com/portfolio Newsroom-l, news and issues for journalists http://www.newsroom-l.net/blog © info http://members.tripod.com/~media002/disclaimer.htm Due to the nature of email & the WWW, check ALL sources. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129e02o8a/M=296572.5585671.6651487.3001176/D=gr oups/S=1705004924:HM/EXP=1101748008/A=2343726/R=0/SIG=12ivg7cu0/*http://clk. atdmt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/&time=1101661608093081> Get unlimited calls to U.S./Canada <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129e02o8a/M=296572.5585671.6651487.3001176/D=gr oups/S=1705004924:HM/EXP=1101748008/A=2343726/R=1/SIG=12ivg7cu0/*http://clk. atdmt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/&time=1101661608093081> Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chineseinternetresearch/ * * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: * chineseinternetresearch-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com <mailto:chineseinternetresearch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscr ibe> * * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . ------ End of Forwarded Message

3 5

research on distinctions between personal/work email
by catherine middleton 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

Hello all, I'm working with a colleague on a new project looking at the adoption of mobile devices (mainly palm pilots/blackberry type devices, but it's becoming harder to consider these as separate from mobile phones). One of the things we're interested in is whether people make distinctions between using their device for personal or for work/professional usage. At the moment, we've got a specific interest in email usage, but would also be interested in knowing about similar distinctions being made for web surfing, IM or mobile phone calls. I haven't had much luck finding anything on this topic in the communications databases in our library. I do expect that there is some work out there on this topic, and am hoping that someone on the list may be able to point us in the right direction. Thanks in advance, catherine middleton

1 0

E-democracy Best Practices Research
by Steven Clift 07 Dec '04

07 Dec '04

How would you like to convert some of your research on e-democracy practices into a "Brief" format as part of the global E-democracy Best Practices effort? I've seen a number of web content surveys of government (local government is our main focus) web sites and whether they have X or Y democratic feature. Our goal is to describe many of the things you might evaluate, suggest the benefits of such features, offer a few tips on how to best apply them along with links to best known implementations around the world from any level of government. Sound like something you'd like to do during your December and January academic lulls (if you have one or for others you know)? I have some small honorariums - 50 GBP for accepted Briefs (about $90 US via PayPal only) and a larger amounts for full project-oriented case studies (more soon). The full details and links: ------- Forwarded message follows ------- To: do-wire(a)lists.umn.edu Subject: BP - Join the E-democracy Best Practices Team Date sent: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:23:58 -0600 My vacation is over. The time to collaboratively generate the best collection of practical e-democracy advice for governments and local communities to date begins now. If you would like to participate in this UK government-funded effort, simply fill out submission form "6. Join the E-democracy Best Practices Leadership Team" from: http://dowire.org/submit Our first step will be to generate a set of "Briefs" on e-democracy features - technologies, techniques, online features, etc. This will be a descriptive laundry list of the top items - - from e-mail notices to webcasting public meetings - a government can or should do online to fulfill their democratic responsibilities. As part of the team you can help draft a "Brief" or simply comment or contribute to the creation of these short documents. (Think future one page, two column PDF files with a list of links to real implementation and top sources for further information.) Those drafting accepted quality briefs or future project-oriented case studies will also receive honorariums for their service. You will also know that you will be contributing to a collection of useful materials that will be read around the world for years to come. For more information on the International E-democracy Best Practice effort, see: http://dowire.org/bp Please forward far and wide. Thanks, Steven Clift Democracies Online Newswire http://dowire.org Steven Clift - http://publicus.net - Reply to: clift(a)publicus.net Join DoWire: http://dowire.org E-Democracy: http://e-democracy.org

1 0