- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Re: [Air-L] Studies on Meta and partisanship
by Marco T. Bastos 28 Jul '23

28 Jul '23

"But [it] neither affected people's existing political attitudes or polarization." Unless I'm missing something, in order for the study to have found the algorithms to be consequential the participants should have started attending protests or rallies, signing petitions, contributing money to candidates, or trying to convince people to vote. They expected these changes to take place within the 3-month period of the study, which also happened during an election cycle. Participants didn't start giving money to politicians nor started protesting and therefore the algorithm "doesn't affect people's existing political attitudes or polarization." That’s for H3. H1 is based on the “issue polarization scale” that measures attitudes towards immigration, healthcare, unemployment, COVID-19 restrictions et caterva. H2 sets similarly high bars for election knowledge. The study expected significant changes to opinion on immigration or election knowledge within this 3-month period when users were given a respite from the algorithms. Meanwhile they also found that the algorithms increased exposure to uncivil content and removed political content, particularly content from moderate friends and ideologically mixed audiences. And yes, the algorithm was found to dramatically increase time spent on FB and IG. It also seems that these conclusions are drawn from a convenience sample of just over 20K participants. Lastly, removing the algorithms decreased exposure to both cross-cutting and like-minded sources, but the effect on the latter is twice as large as the effect on the former (i.e., the algorithms maximize exposure to like-minded content more so than cross-cutting). And yet, “it neither affected people's existing political attitudes or polarization." Surely I must’ve missed something. -- mtb -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:39:01 -0400 From: Joly MacFie <joly(a)punkcast.com> To: aoir list <air-l(a)aoir.org> Subject: [Air-L] Studies on Meta and partisanship > From POLITICO's Digital Future Daily <https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily> The article does not link to the studies. Maybe someone could provide? <snip> The studies released Thursday tried to tease out the influence of particular factors, such as Facebook's algorithm for serving up content to users. Two studies published in the journal Science that examined the effects of Facebook?s algorithm and reshare feature during the fall of 2020 found that both features increased user engagement ? but neither affected people's existing political attitudes or polarization. A separate study published in the journal Nature found that reducing users? exposure to sources that echo their existing beliefs didn't affect their political attitudes either. Meta trumpeted the results in a memo circulated ahead of the studies? release: ?Despite the common assertions that social media is ?destroying democracy,?? the company wrote, ?the evidence in these and many other studies shows something very different.? Social media critics ? many of whom have spent years sounding the alarm about the ways it has changed American politics ? suggested the studies were too limited, and too close to Meta itself, to be persuasive, including Frances Haugen, the former Facebook executive who leaked internal company files in 2021, and Jesse Lehrich, co-founder of Accountable Tech, an advocacy group focused on information controls for social media. A fourth study, also published in Science, found that a cluster of news sources consumed by conservatives produced most of the misinformation flagged by the platform?s third-party fact-checking system. (A study co-author, Sandra Gonz?lez-Bail?n of the University of Pennsylvania, declined to provide a list of those sources.) The studies were the result of a collaboration between Meta and 17 outside researchers from universities including Northeastern, Stanford and Princeton. An independent rapporteur tasked with evaluating the collaboration vouched for the soundness of its results, but said its framework gave Meta influence over the ways in which outside researchers evaluated its platforms. ?Meta set the agenda in ways that affected the overall independence of the researchers,? wrote Michael Wagner, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison?s School of Journalism and Mass Communication. </snip> Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/27/meta-partisanship-00108553 -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

Studies on Meta and partisanship
by Joly MacFie 27 Jul '23

27 Jul '23

>From POLITICO's Digital Future Daily <https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily> The article does not link to the studies. Maybe someone could provide? <snip> The studies released Thursday tried to tease out the influence of particular factors, such as Facebook's algorithm for serving up content to users. Two studies published in the journal Science that examined the effects of Facebook’s algorithm and reshare feature during the fall of 2020 found that both features increased user engagement — but neither affected people's existing political attitudes or polarization. A separate study published in the journal Nature found that reducing users’ exposure to sources that echo their existing beliefs didn't affect their political attitudes either. Meta trumpeted the results in a memo circulated ahead of the studies’ release: “Despite the common assertions that social media is ‘destroying democracy,’” the company wrote, “the evidence in these and many other studies shows something very different.” Social media critics — many of whom have spent years sounding the alarm about the ways it has changed American politics — suggested the studies were too limited, and too close to Meta itself, to be persuasive, including Frances Haugen, the former Facebook executive who leaked internal company files in 2021, and Jesse Lehrich, co-founder of Accountable Tech, an advocacy group focused on information controls for social media. A fourth study, also published in Science, found that a cluster of news sources consumed by conservatives produced most of the misinformation flagged by the platform’s third-party fact-checking system. (A study co-author, Sandra González-Bailón of the University of Pennsylvania, declined to provide a list of those sources.) The studies were the result of a collaboration between Meta and 17 outside researchers from universities including Northeastern, Stanford and Princeton. An independent rapporteur tasked with evaluating the collaboration vouched for the soundness of its results, but said its framework gave Meta influence over the ways in which outside researchers evaluated its platforms. “Meta set the agenda in ways that affected the overall independence of the researchers,” wrote Michael Wagner, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication. </snip> Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/27/meta-partisanship-00108553 -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

2 1

Run a Wikipedia assignment in Fall 2023 and give your students the digital literacy tools they need today!
by Helaine Blumenthal 27 Jul '23

27 Jul '23

Deadline Extended! The deadline to run a Wikipedia assignment in Fall 2023 is now September 15! Find out how you can invigorate your course this fall with real world work by visiting teach.wikiedu.org <https://wikiedu.org/teach-with-wikipedia/>. Attend an upcoming workshop! Attend <https://wikiedu.org/webinars/>one of our upcoming workshops to learn more about this unique pedagogical opportunity. Click here <https://wikiedu.org/webinars/> to register for a session. The next one will be Tuesday, August 8 at 12 PM Pacific. Drop in for Office Hours! If you just have some questions or want help getting started, drop into one of our upcoming Office Hours where Wiki Education staff will be available to help . * August 3 at 12:00 PM Pacific. Click here <https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZAud-2grT0oG9zC1TmG3J8AjFy04m3T_K…>to join. Wiki Education's support is fully funded, and there are no fees to participate. The program is open to post-secondary institutions in the U.S. and Canada. Empower your students to become public scholars this year! -- Helaine Blumenthal,Ph.D. (she/her) Senior Program Manager Wiki Education teach.wikiedu.org <https://wikiedu.org/teach-with-wikipedia/> Twitter <https://twitter.com/WikiEducation?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7C…>, Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/WikiEducationFoundation/>

1 0

Open Faculty Position: Sociology and Tech Ethics
by Nicole McAlee 27 Jul '23

27 Jul '23

Hello all, Please find below information about a job posting at the University of Notre Dame in Notre Dame, IN, USA: *Open Faculty Position: Sociology and Tech Ethics* *The Department of Sociology at the University of Notre Dame invites applications for an open-rank (tenure-track or tenured) position set to begin in the fall of 2024. Seeking a candidate who studies the effects of technology on society, the department is particularly interested in scholars who conduct empirical work informed by sociological theory on the implications of technology for inequalities in the areas of racial-ethnicity, the criminal justice system, health, labor markets, education, politics, media, and other areas. Sociology will be the home department for the position, but it will also bring an affiliation with the Notre Dame Technology Ethics Center (ND TEC). **Learn More About the Position <https://techethics.nd.edu/news-and-events/news/open-faculty-position-depart…>* Questions can be directed to David Gibson at dgibson1(a)nd.edu. Many thanks, Nicole -- *Nicole McAlee* Program Manager Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Lab 204 O'Shaughnessy Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556

1 0

CfP: Tech work and its discontens
by Gnisa, Felix (ITAS) 27 Jul '23

27 Jul '23

Dear colleagues, we are happy to invite you to submit papers for a special issue of Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation on tech worker and political mobilization in the tech industry. The deadline for submissions is November 30th. For further information see the link and call below: https://wolg.wordpress.com/special-issues/call-for-papers-tech-work-and-its… All best, Felix Gnisa Call for papers: Tech work and its discontents The expansion of tech companies in recent decades has changed the role and perception of their workforces. With the growing market power of corporations such as Amazon, Google and Tencent, the figure of the software engineer has received much attention. From industry narratives to pop culture, software engineers and other IT employees are portrayed as (generally male) techno-prodigies enabling futuristic endeavours such as the automation of work or artificial intelligence (Daub, 2020). However, the shiny figure of the tech or software employee has stood in striking contrast to the surging number of warehouse workers, platform gig workers or content moderators - often subsumed under the term 'digital workers' - who mostly toil under precarious conditions for these same companies (Irani, 2015; Huws, 2019). To date there has been no generally agreed definition of what kind of labour the term 'tech work' actually refers to, representing something of a lacuna in the literature. While some scholars only label highly qualified workers in the tech sector as 'tech workers' (eg Dorschel, 2022, Selling/Strimling 2023), others stress the commonalities of IT workers across sectors (eg Ziegler, 2022). Both perspectives raise the question what role and power tech workers effectively hold within current capitalist economies, and how their ambivalent class position materializes in the workplace (Roy 2021). Research in the traditions of workers' consciousness studies and class theory has shown that the conception of 'tech work' is important for comprehending workers' self-understanding, subjectivities and culture in relation to their actual class position. In addition to this more analytical debate, there have also been major shifts in the image and material reality of tech work in the context of the recent economic crisis, the rise of authoritarian politics and struggles over the regulation of platforms and of AI. Even the higher-paid layers of the tech industry have faced a series of conflicts, protests and unionisation campaigns (Tarnoff, 2020; Jaffe, 2021; Tan & Weigel, 2022). More and more employees in the industry now deliberately refer to themselves as tech workers, signalling a shift towards a more class-conscious self-understanding. Large parts of the tech workers' movement also emphasise how their efforts are tied to the struggles of low-income service workers in the industry (Tarnoff, 2020). Currently tech workers' organisation has evolved around typical labour issues (working time, fair pay and health or safety issues), but also around feminist, anti-fascist and socialist demands. From feminist organising at the Google walkouts of 2019 to organising against climate change, racism and border regimes, a variety of issues have come up. Furthermore, tech workers have questioned the social effects of digital technology and thereby also their role as technical professionals in reproducing social inequality. All of these issues are raising important questions relating to the debate between traditional trade union issues versus more political issues (social justice and common good) as well as the relationships between white collar workers and unions in tech (Rothstein, 2022). Such developments have stirred a range of questions. From the dynamics and specificities of tech workers' organisation, the question whether tech work has become 'proletarianised' (Steinhoff, 2022), to the defining characteristics of 'tech', its corporations and workers. The current rise of labour conflicts in the industry also raises questions about its labour history (Haeyoung, 2021), about the relation to trade unions and about possible emancipatory horizons for the field and beyond. Another important dimension concerns the ways in which these issues are shaped by mobility patterns and migration regimes (Xiang, 2011; Amrute, 2016). The call In this special issue, we want to examine these aspects and address the following questions: § How should we understand the field of 'tech' and its terminology (tech work, tech company, tech industry)? How is this terminology suitable for understanding current configurations of capitalism and its dynamics, especially in regard to its underpinning workforce? § How have the working and employment conditions of tech workers changed in recent years? To what extent are these workers benefiting from workplace privileges or being affected by insecure contracts and poor working conditions? § What have been the impacts on tech workers of the crisis in the tech industry and associated layoffs? § How have tech workers around the world been organising in recent years? How can the debate between traditional trade union issues versus more political issues (social justice and common good) be understood? What are the relationships between white collar workers and unions in tech? § What is the composition of the tech workforce? What are its gendered aspects and what impacts do they have? How does the role of software engineers and other tech workers differ in various parts of the world? How do mobility patterns and migration regimes (visa policies, entry barriers) shape the work, self-understanding and organising of tech workers? § Which attitudes, orientations and collective forms of consciousness do tech workers develop as wage earners, professionals and political subjects? How are these linked to forms of organisation and interest politics? § How have ideologies and the production of subjectivity in the tech industry changed? What are the continuities and ruptures of 'Californian Ideology' (Barbrook/Cameron 1996)? Have they changed since the rise of new right-wing movements around the world and their entanglements with tech firms? § Which emancipatory perspectives on tech work arise from the current conflicts around labour in the field and beyond? We welcome articles from a range of disciplinary perspectives including (but not limited to) labour sociology, organisation studies, political economy, social anthropology, economic geography, policy analysis and gender studies. Articles may draw on the authors' original quantitative, qualitative or theoretical research but must demonstrate a clear contribution to knowledge and go beyond mere literature reviews. The editors This special issue will be edited by Felix Gnisa, research assistant at Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, Valentin Niebler, doctoral researcher at Humboldt University of Berlin, Sandra Sieron, research assistant at Humboldt University of Berlin and Helene Thaa, research assistant at University of Basel. The Journal Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation is an independent, international, interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, founded in 2006. For more information please see https://wolg.wordpress.com<https://wolg.wordpress.com/> All submitted articles are subjected to double-blind peer review. Deadline and Guidelines The deadline for submissions is November 30th, 2023. The article should be no longer than 6,000 words (excluding footnotes and bibliography). Articles should be submitted in two forms: an anonymised version in which all references to the authors' institution and publications are omitted; and a full version including the authors' titles and institutional affiliations. Articles should be sent to the editor: ursulahuws(a)analyticapublications.co.uk<mailto:ursulahuws@analyticapublications.co.uk> --- Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) Institute for Technology Assessment and System Analysis (ITAS) Research Group Digital Technology and Social Change (DIGIT) M.A. Felix Gnisa Graduate Research Assistent Karlsstraße 11 76021 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-22265 Mail: felix.gnisa(a)kit.edu<mailto:felix.gnisa@kit.edu> KIT - The Research University in the Helmholtz Association --- Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) Institute for Technology Assessment and System Analysis (ITAS) Research Group Digital Technology and Social Change (DIGIT) M.A. Felix Gnisa Graduate Research Assistent Karlsstraße 11 76021 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-22265 Mail: felix.gnisa(a)kit.edu<mailto:felix.gnisa@kit.edu> KIT - The Research University in the Helmholtz Association

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Workshop on Generative AI Models
by ijwa dline.info 27 Jul '23

27 Jul '23

Hi David I do agree. Regulation & Governance is important. As we focus on model generation we left it. However, we will add it. We welcome your submissions. Best regards Simon ________________________________ From: David Levi-Faur <davidlevifaur(a)gmail.com> Sent: 26 July 2023 14:49 To: ijwa dline.info <ijwa(a)dline.info> Cc: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Workshop on Generative AI Models well done. One critical issue is missing from the agenda Perhaps the most important one. Regulation & Governance On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 12:08, ijwa dline.info<http://dline.info> via Air-L <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l@listserv.aoir.org>> wrote: First Workshop on "Next-Generation Models for Generative AI" (In conjunction with the Third International Conference on Digital Data Processing 2023) University of Bedfordshire, Luton. UK. November 27-29, 2023 https://socio.org.uk/ddp/workshop (IEEE CPS will publish the proceedings, and papers should follow the IEEE template) AI models use billions of parameters to detect and retrieve text and images. The currently available LL models are experimented with for their efficiency, and at the same time, newer models are being developed. There are many challenges associated with generative AI. The pre-training volume and efficiency are a focus. To leverage the training set with comprehensiveness and accuracy, billions of parameters are injected into the LLM. Current GPTs face criticism, and governments issue a caution to their use. For example, Zhuang Rongwen, China’s cyberspace chief, raises concerns over the power of generative AI and pledges to make it ‘controllable'. The agenda for the future Generative AI is not clear. Improved generative tools should be capable of characterising extremist narratives in corpora to reveal different contexts, which may lead to building semantic-rich content for end-users. Testing the current models and their results may contribute to future research. Considering these issues, we framed a workshop to address the theme, Next Generation Models. The workshop themes include but are not limited to the following. Text, Image, Code, Video, 3D models Domain-specific models Compositional generative models Foundation models Energy-based models Deep equilibrium models Impact of Generative AI on Teaching and Learning Knowledge and Semantic Issues in Generative AI Future LLM AI Ethical Issues AI and NLP Embedding in AI Reinforcement learning Data Support and Datasets in AI Standards and Benchmarks Workshop Chairs Gloria Tengyue Li North China University of Technology Beijing China Simon Fong University of Macau Macau Hathairat Ketmaneechairat King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand Important Dates Full Paper Submission: September 10, 2023 Notification of Acceptance/Rejection: October 10, 2023 Registration Due: November 10, 2023 Camera Ready Due: November 10, 2023 Workshops/Tutorials/Demos: November 28, 2023 Main conference: November 27-29, 2023 Post-conference proceedings: December 20, 2023 Paper Submission: http://socio.org.uk/ddp/paper-submission/ Contact: stm(a)socio.org.uk<mailto:stm@socio.org.uk> _______________________________________________ The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L@listserv.aoir.org> mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ -- My homepage<http://levifaur.wiki.huji.ac.il/>; Maavarim-IL<https://maavarim-il.org/> Regulation & Governance Journal<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991> Regulation and Governance Theories<https://regulationandgovernance.org/home/webinars/> The Dead Sea Project<https://maavarim-il.org/dead-sea/>

1 0

Call for participation (responses requested by August 11): October Tech & Society Symposium on the Roles Funders Play in Digital/Data Rights, Justice, Equity, and Inclusion
by Becky Lentz 26 Jul '23

26 Jul '23

Dear AOIR Colleagues, As the COVID-19 pandemic made clear, being online has become essential to everyday life worldwide. Yet, while the digital world seems here to stay, to what extent do we get to choose to be part of it, or not? What are the risks of being either online or offline? Being online carries many harms and risks <https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/> associated with misinformation, surveillance, artificial intelligence (AI), datafication, discrimination, tracking, profiling, etc. Being offline, whether by choice or circumstance, means being cut off from essential services and also experiencing social isolation. And what are the necessary protections or remedies to address these risks or harms? Globally, these are the concerns of those working to advance digital/data rights <https://digitalfreedomfund.org/digital-rights-for-all/>, justice <https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/pathways-to-digital-justice/>, equity <https://ctu.ieee.org/what-is-digital-equity/>, and inclusion <https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/general/Defin…>. And all of these efforts require funding. Yet the issue of “funding” is often the "elephant in the room”. An important concern for everyone, but something many don’t talk about. This is likely because, as experts <https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo23530413.html> have noted, “Philanthropy is everywhere…[It] is not just a beneficent activity or a funding mechanism. It can also be a form of power”. For example in the U.S.: A September 2022 report <https://bit.ly/46UvOx0> examining U.S. philanthropic giving toward digital equity found that in spite of the pandemic highlighting the urgency of addressing digital inequity, philanthropic funding in this space has largely remained stagnant. According to the report, “Funding for digital equity makes up less than 1% of overall giving by large foundations”. We invite you to join the RGK Center at the LBJ School of Public Affairs in co-creating a timely, inclusive, and robust exchange of diverse ideas and perspectives to build and share knowledge together about the many roles funders play in the fields of digital/data rights, justice, equity, and inclusion worldwide. Our questions include: · What is the state of scholarship on the roles funders (governmental, corporate, or philanthropic) have been playing to help prevent or remedy the many risks and harms of living in a digital society? · What are lessons learned, success stories, and best practices related to funding in these fields? What’s working and what’s not? What challenges have funders and grantseekers faced? · What should funders focus on next, why, and how? Our goals invite collaboration to… · Identify under-resourced types of interventions necessary to keep people safe in a digital society. · Generate ideas about how to strengthen and expand equitable access to funding ecosystems to advance the fields of digital/data rights, justice, equity, and inclusion worldwide. · Initiate collaborations that build, share, and mobilize necessary knowledge to inform governmental, corporate, and philanthropic investments in these fields of work. We seek a wide variety of participants (scholars, policy advocates, community leaders, public officials, technologists, policymakers, journalists, funders, etc.) from the following sectors: · Government (public sector) · Corporate (private sector) · Social sector (civil society/civic sector) I hope we will have the privilege of your involvement in our effort to catalyze and connect conversations about the funding ecosystems needed to support those working to advance digital/data rights, justice, equity, and inclusion not just in the U.S., but globally. Please consider downloading symposium details and joining this conversation by adding your insights, questions, and participation preferences here: https://rgk.lbj.utexas.edu/call-participation Best regards, Becky Lentz, PhD Director of the Tech & Society Initiative LBJ School of Public Affairs (RGK Center on Philanthropy and Community Service) University of Texas at Austin USA ——— Becky Lentz <https://lbj.utexas.edu/becky-lentz>, PhD | Faculty Associate | LBJ School of Public Affairs at UT Austin --Director of the Tech & Society Initiative at the RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service <https://rgkcenter.org/about> --Public Voices Fellow <https://www.theopedproject.org/fellowships> with The OpEd Project <https://www.theopedproject.org/mission> (https://shorturl.at/pwxBR) > On Jul 24, 2023, at 3:00 PM, air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > > Send Air-L mailing list submissions to > air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > air-l-owner(a)listserv.aoir.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. CFP: ?Streaming Diversity?" Journal of Convergence special > issue (Maura Edmond) > 2. Launch of Platform Governance Archive (PGA) v2 with new data > set, access options, website and data paper** (Christian Katzenbach) > 3. Job opportunity - Research Associate on the Everyday > Misinformation Project (Part-time from September 2023 until > February 2024) (Cristian Vaccari) > 4. Sonia Livingstone on the CaMP blog (Ilana Gershon) > 5. CSCW Workshop CfP: A Toolbox of Feminist Wonder ? Theories > and methods that can make a difference (Karin Hansson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:07:54 +1000 > From: Maura Edmond <maura.edmond(a)monash.edu> > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: [Air-L] CFP: ?Streaming Diversity?" Journal of Convergence > special issue > Message-ID: > <CA+RJq5MPmVexhcNHGLEpT2=2KAYomsHpuzEigaXv+GfKQPTBuQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > *Call For Papers: ?Streaming Diversity? On and off-screen diversity in an > era of automated media culture? * > > Abstracts due 22 Sept 2023 > > Special Issue of *Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into > New Media Technologies* > > Guest editors: Dr Maura Edmond, Dr Olivia Khoo, Dr Claire Perkins and Dr > Verity Trott, from @Gender&MediaLab <https://twitter.com/gendermedialab> in > the School of Media, Film and Journalism at Monash University, Australia. > > Deadline for abstracts: *22 September 2023* | Expected publication date: > August 2024 > > The unprecedented growth of video-on-demand streaming platforms has brought > both new optimism and new complications to concerns around screen ?diversity?. > Without the limitations of linear television, streaming services have far > greater capacity for producing and distributing more diverse screen > content. Many of the streaming platforms have made high profile public > commitments to diversity, such as Netflix?s ?Inclusion Report?, introducing > new policies and commissioning processes intended to support culturally > diverse representation and content production. Large global SVODs and > smaller region-specific and genre-specific platforms have also launched > original series and commissioned content that has been widely marketed as > and celebrated for its diverse representations. Together, this has created > a popular impression that streaming platforms are improving diversity in > terms of both representation and practical opportunities for screen > creatives. This special issue of Convergence will critically explore the > impacts of video streaming platforms on different dimensions of ?diversity?. > > Existing studies on diversity in the screen sector have consistently > demonstrated long standing and entrenched inequality regimes affecting > women and non-dominant groups, but there remains limited research on how > this plays out at the streaming services specifically. Research on > SVOD-related impacts have focused instead on understanding how major global > companies like Netflix have interacted with existing local screen > industries and production ecosystems, affected global distribution and > content flows, and created overall regulatory imbalances. We are calling > for papers that will examine the impacts of video streaming platforms that > extend our understanding of diversity in an era of automated, on-demand > video. > > In keeping with the themes of this issue, we welcome proposals looking at > streaming services and experiences outside US contexts. > > Questions of interest include, but are not limited to: > > - How is diversity represented and made discoverable via platform features > such as the image tiles and categories used in catalogues? > > - How do recommendation systems understand and operationalise ?diversity?? > > - What values and messages about diversity are being communicated by the > content commissioned by streaming services? > > - What are we to make of existing policies and practices intended to > support diversity, equity and inclusion at the streaming platforms? > > - What policy options are there for regulating ?diversity?? > > - How do audiences, users and communities engage with streaming platforms > to discover, view or value ?diverse? content? > > Please submit a 500-word abstract & 100 word bio by 22 September 2023 to: > > streamingdiversity(a)gmail.com > > Authors of accepted abstracts will be notified by 20 October 2023. Full > articles will be due 01 March 2024 > > No payment from the authors will be required > > Dr Maura Edmond > > Senior Lecturer > School of Media, Film and Journalism > > Building B, Room B4.31 > Monash University > Caulfield East VIC 3145 > Australia > > t: +61 3 990 34119 > e: maura.edmond(a)monash.edu > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:58:00 +0200 > From: Christian Katzenbach <christian.katzenbach(a)gmail.com> > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: [Air-L] Launch of Platform Governance Archive (PGA) v2 with > new data set, access options, website and data paper** > Message-ID: <DC24FFC6-A143-4C15-BF61-33C75CCF7C65(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Dear colleagues, > > I am happy and proud to announce that our team at my PGMT lab in Bremen, in collaboration with Open Terms Archive and the Alexander von Humboldt Institut for Internet and Society (HIIG), has relaunched the Platform Governance Archive as PGA v2, now constituting a complete resource for researchers, journalists and interested people for exploring and comparing platform policies of major platforms, partly going back to founding years in the mid 2000s. We are now offering new datasets, complete access and bulk download options, a new website and a data paper to document the data. > > https://www.platformgovernancearchive.org/ > > Below you find the full announcement. Please don?t hesitate to reach out if you have questions or ideas. Please note, that we will organise a workshop later this year to bring together people working with platform policies and content moderation guidelines. > > Looking forward, > Christian > > ? > Prof. Dr. Christian Katzenbach > > Professor of Media and Communication > Head of Lab ?Platform Governance Media, and Technology? > Director of MA program ?Digital Media and Society" > Centre for Media, Communication & Information Research (ZeMKI), University of Bremen > www.uni-bremen.de/zemki > https://platform-governance.org <https://platform-governance.org/> > > Associated Researcher > Alexander von Humboldt Institut for Internet and Society (HIIG) > www.hiig.de > > > > > Launch of the Platform Governance Archive (PGA) v2 with new data set, access options, website and data paper > > The Lab Platform Governance, Media and Technology (PGMT) at the ZeMKI, Centre for Media, Communication and Information Research, and the Alexander von Humboldt Institut for Internet and Society (HIIG) launch this week an updated version of its pioneering open-access repository of platform policies, the Platform Governance Archive (PGA). The extensive update includes the launch of a new website, which enables easier data access, the publication of a data paper, which gives a holistic overview of building the PGA, and the release of an updated dataset, which widens the scope of the PGA to cover more platforms and policies. > > The power of social media platforms has been a focal point of critical discussion and research ? long before Musk took over Twitter. Platforms corporate policies are a key measure of the way platforms govern and order public discourse as they articulate which kind of content and conduct is allowed and prohibited on their services. These rulebooks are the subject of the Platform Governance Archive (PGA), an open-access repository of platform policies which aims to enable collaborative research on/critical engagement with how and when and why platforms are changing their rules founded by the Alexander von Humboldt Institut for Internet and Society (HIIG) and now hosted at the University of Bremen. > > The need for the systematic study of platform policies > > When first launched in April 2021, the PGA emerged out of the need to systematically study the historical evolution of platform policies and due to the lack of coherently collected data in this area, which did not rely on the platforms? own corporate archives. The resulting PGA v1 dataset <https://www.platformgovernancearchive.org/data/dataset-pga-v1-historical-da…>contains all historical versions of the Terms of Service, Community Guidelines and Privacy Policies by Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Instagram (with the exception of YouTube?s Community Guidelines) from the time when they were first introduced through late 2021. > > New download option and data paper > > The dataset was built through a combination of automated and manual approaches of data collection and data cleaning which are explained in detail in our newly published data paper <https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/2331>. The paper also lays out the conceptual set up of the PGA and gives a detailed overview of the specificities of the included policies as well as some of the general trends and patterns which run through the historical evolution of the PGA v1 corpus. > > As part of the new PGA website <https://www.platformgovernancearchive.org/>, the dataset is now available as a direct download <https://github.com/PlatformGovernanceArchive/pga-corpus/releases/>. Overall, the corpus of the PGA v1 contains 153 policy documents with a total of 6,036 pages, which are provided in PDF, HTML and Markdown formats. The downloadable archive furthermore contains additional material and tools that were used in the data collection process. > > Collaboration with Open Terms Archive: New dataset includes more platforms and policies > > With the relaunch of PGA, we are also publishing a new dataset <https://www.platformgovernancearchive.org/data/dataset-pga-v2-ongoing-colle…> which widens the scope of the PGA to cover 18 platforms and currently 79 policies. The dataset is generated in collaboration with Open Terms Archive <https://opentermsarchive.org/> (OTA), an open source initiative which is dedicated to increase the transparency and democratic oversight of digital services. > > The timeline of the PGA v2 dataset goes back to April 2022 and is automatically updated on a daily basis to enable the continuous tracking of changes in the selected policies. Whenever a change is made to one of the tracked policies, the system stores a snapshot to a Github repository where the change can be examined by ways of a change visualisation. The dataset can also be downloaded as a bulk download as an archive of Markdown files. > > Funding for the PGA has been provided by the hosting institutions as well as by different partners and funding schemes such as the EU Horizon 2020 project reCreating Europe <https://www.recreating.eu/>, Wikimedia Deutschland and the Data Science Center (DSC) at the University of Bremen. > > Future directions > > In the future, the PGMT Lab will continue developing the PGA by merging the historical dataset with the ongoing data collection into an integrated dataset. The roadmap also includes the addition of more platforms and more language versions. The PGA has been used for a growing body of research on platform policies <https://www.platformgovernancearchive.org/research/> and enables researchers, journalists and the public to answer questions on the historical evolution of platform policies. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:24:11 +0100 > From: Cristian Vaccari <cristian.vaccari(a)gmail.com> > To: air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org > Subject: [Air-L] Job opportunity - Research Associate on the Everyday > Misinformation Project (Part-time from September 2023 until February > 2024) > Message-ID: > <CANbKZGtpEgBcKB492NNuvSEMMH=XFZqfhx_xDVjwx9Rw0DLoWQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We are recruiting a Research Associate to assist us in the final phase of > the Everyday Misinformation Project (https://everyday-mis.info/) > Information on the post is available below and at > https://vacancies.lboro.ac.uk/tlive_webrecruitment/wrd/run/ETREC107GF.open?… > . > > > > Please feel free to share this information with anyone whom you think may > be interested. > > > > *Postdoctoral Research Associate (Everyday Misinformation Project)* > > > > *Part-time (0.6 FTE/ 22 hours per week) and fixed term from 18th September > 2023 until 29th February 2024* > > > > The Online Civic Culture Centre (O3C) at Loughborough University is seeking > to appoint an enthusiastic and highly motivated postdoctoral researcher to > work with Professor Andrew Chadwick and Professor Cristian Vaccari on the > Leverhulme-funded *Everyday Misinformation Project* ( > http://everyday-mis.info) > > > > This is a part-time (0.6 FTE) postdoctoral research role that runs until > February 29, 2024. The vacancy arises due to the appointment of current > PDRA, Dr Brendan Lawson, to a Lectureship. The researcher?s main > responsibilities will be to contribute to project management; gather, > organize, and analyze quantitative and some qualitative data; arrange > events and meetings relating to research online and/or in person; and > contribute actively to the writing and sharing of the research findings in > high quality academic publications and public reports and at conferences > and workshops. Quantitative skills, including experience of multivariate > analysis of longitudinal survey data using regression with lagged > variables, autoregression, and similar techniques, are essential. > Experience of using either SPSS, or STATA or R is essential. Familiarity > with NVivo for qualitative analysis is desirable but not essential. > > > > In addition to working with the team, the appointee will have the > opportunity to lead on publications based on their own analyses of survey > data gathered by the project. > > > > The successful applicant will be an experienced researcher with PhD-level > social science training in either communication and media, journalism > studies, political science, sociology, social psychology, or a cognate > discipline or interdisciplinary field, such as behavioural science. They > will have substantial knowledge of research on misinformation, be a team > player, have excellent written and spoken English, presentational, and time > management skills, be highly technologically literate, and be committed to > the development of original social science theory and concepts. An awarded > PhD *at time of application* is an essential criterion. This is not a > remote working position, but requests to work away from campus will be > considered in light of the University?s Dynamic Working policies. > > > > The researcher will primarily work with Professor Andrew Chadwick > (Principal Investigator) and Professor Cristian Vaccari (Co-Investigator). > They will also collaborate with the project?s full-time postdoctoral > researcher Dr Natalie-Anne Hall. > > > > In the latest UK Research Excellence Framework (2021), Communication and > Media at Loughborough was ranked 5th in the UK and submitted 40 > researchers. Overall, 65% of its research was assessed as ?world > leading??the highest possible rating of 4 stars. Its research environment > and research impact were both awarded the maximum possible rating of 100% > 4-star quality. The department is ranked top in the Complete University > Guide, and third in both the Times/Sunday Times Good University Guide and > the Guardian guide. > > > > Full job description, person specification are available at > https://vacancies.lboro.ac.uk/jobdesc/REQ230880.PDF > > > > *Informal queries * > > Professor Andrew Chadwick, director, Online Civic Culture Centre (O3C), > Communication and Media, Loughborough University: a.chadwick(a)lboro.ac.uk > > > > *Application closing date*: 11th August 2023. > > Late applications will not be considered. > > > > *Visa Sponsorship: * > > For candidates who would require sponsorship to work in the UK to achieve > sufficient points under the Points Based Immigration System, it is likely > that you will either need to: > > - Have completed a PhD in a subject relevant to the job. > > OR > > - Qualify as a ?new entrant?. For more information on this please see > paragraphs SW 12.1 - SW 12.7 of the Immigration Rules Appendix Skilled > Worker > <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rules/immigration-rules-appendix-sk…>, > available at > https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rules/immigration-rules-appendix-sk… > > > > > All the best, > > > > Cristian Vaccari, he/him/his > ************************* > Professor of Political Communication, Loughborough University > <http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/socialsciences/staff/cristian-vaccari/> > Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Press/Politics > <http://hij.sagepub.com/> > ************************* > New book: Outside the Bubble: > <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/outside-the-bubble-9780190858483?la…>Social > Media and Political Participation in Western Democracies > <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/outside-the-bubble-9780190858483?la…> > New project: Everyday Sharing of Misinformation on Private > <https://everyday-mis.info/>Social Media <https://everyday-mis.info/> > ************************* > Personal website: https://cristianvaccari.com/ > Google Scholar profile > <https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3_TethEAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao> > > Mastodon: @cvaccari@mastodon.social <https://mastodon.social/@cvaccari> > Twitter: @prof_vaccari <https://twitter.com/prof_vaccari> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:22:00 -0500 > From: Ilana Gershon <imgershon(a)gmail.com> > To: Mediaanthropology EASA <medianthro(a)lists.easaonline.org>, > LING-ETHNOG(a)jiscmail.ac.uk, "Linguistic Anthropology Discussion Group > (LINGANTH(a)listserv.linguistlist.org)" > <linganth(a)listserv.linguistlist.org>, Air list > <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> > Subject: [Air-L] Sonia Livingstone on the CaMP blog > Message-ID: > <CAO8u+-OpWZ1QkZVgP5Q5KwOVKnG=HCtmqWjBMEhBvNF_1H0iug(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Dear Colleagues, > Today on the CaMP blog, Ashley McDermott interviews Sonia Livingstone about > her co-authored book, Parenting for a Digital Future. > > https://campanthropology.org/ > > Best, > Ilana > > Press blurb: In the decades it takes to bring up a child, parents face > challenges that are both helped and hindered by the fact that they are > living through a period of unprecedented digital innovation. In Parenting > for a Digital Future, Sonia Livingstone and Alicia Blum-Ross draw on > extensive and diverse qualitative and quantitative research with a range of > parents in the UK to reveal how digital technologies characterize parenting > in late modernity, as parents determine how to forge new territory with > little precedent or support. They chart how parents often enact authority > and values through digital technologies since "screen time," games, and > social media have become both ways of being together and of setting > boundaries. Parenting for a Digital Future moves beyond the panicky > headlines to offer a deeply researched exploration of what it means to > parent in a period of significant social and technological change. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:05:14 +0000 > From: Karin Hansson <khansson(a)dsv.su.se> > To: "air-l(a)aoir.org" <air-l(a)aoir.org> > Subject: [Air-L] CSCW Workshop CfP: A Toolbox of Feminist Wonder ? > Theories and methods that can make a difference > Message-ID: <D132BF8C-405D-402E-94B5-98746F283A69(a)sh.se> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > The call for paper is now open for ?A Toolbox of Feminist Wonder ? Theories and methods that can make a difference?, a hybrid workshop at CSCW 2023 (https://cscw.acm.org/2023/) October 15 in Minneapolis, MN, USA. > > This one-day hybrid workshop builds on previous feminist CSCW workshops to explore feminist theoretical and methodological approaches in HCI. Since its inception over a decade ago, feminist HCI has progressed from the margins to mainstream HCI. While feminist approaches have grown in popularity and become mainstream, it is getting more difficult to distinguish the feminist emancipatory core from other attempts of developing and improving society in various ways. In this workshop, we therefore want to revisit our feminist roots, where theory is a liberatory and creative practice, motivated by affect, curiosity, and wonder. The goal of this workshop is to; 1) create an inventory of feminist theories and concepts that have had an impact on our work as designers, educators, researchers, and activists; 2) develop a feminist toolbox for the CSCW community to strengthen our feminist literacy. > > Call for paper: > To participate, submit a 2-4 pages position paper where you suggest one or more feminist theories and methods that have been useful in your previous research. Describe the theory/method and explain how you have used them. As this is a hybrid workshop, notify if you intend to participate online or offline. > Use the templates found here: https://authors.acm.org/proceedings/production-information/taps-production-… > E-mail your submission to: atoolboxofwonder(a)gmail.com<mailto:atoolboxofwonder@gmail.com> > > ? First round submission deadline: August 18, 2023 (decision notification: August 25) > ? Second round submission deadline: September 22, 2023 (decision notification: September 28) > > Information: https://blogg.sh.se/a-toolbox-of-feminist-wonder/ > > For more information contact Karin Hansson (Karin.hansson(a)sh.se<mailto:Karin.hansson@sh.se>) or Adrian Petterson (a.petterson(a)mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:a.petterson@mail.utoronto.ca>) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Air-L Digest, Vol 228, Issue 20 > ************************************** >>> This message is from an external sender. Learn more about why this << >>> matters at https://links.utexas.edu/rtyclf. << >

2 1

Sharing Generative Media Lab Project Proposal
by Hamlet Lopez 26 Jul '23

26 Jul '23

Dear colleagues, I wanted to share a project proposal I have drafted for establishing a Media Lab focused on empowering cultural and creative industries in the Global South with generative AI capabilities. While I do not currently have the means to implement this lab myself, I hope this proposal document may serve as a useful starting point or source of ideas for anyone interested in establishing similar initiatives oriented towards empowering local creative communities with generative AI. The proposal covers key aspects like objectives, methodology, timeline, estimated budget in euros, etc. It is available here: https://www.datoeneltejado.com/generative_artificial_intelligence_media_lab I openly share this proposal under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication license so you are welcome to reuse or adapt any portion that may be helpful in your own projects. Although this is just a conceptual document, I'm happy to provide any additional context or answer questions to the best of my ability. My goal is to contribute ideas and momentum towards seeing more accessible medialabs emerge across the Global South to explore generative AI. If this proposal helps inspire or inform real projects in any way, I would consider that a valuable outcome. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any feedback or thoughts on the proposal. I'm eager to see where others may take these ideas! Best wishes, Hamlet -- Dr.C. Hamlet López García Investigador Instituto Cubano de Investigación Cultural "Juan Marinello" Profesor Universidad de la Habana

1 0

Workshop on Generative AI Models
by ijwa dline.info 26 Jul '23

26 Jul '23

First Workshop on "Next-Generation Models for Generative AI" (In conjunction with the Third International Conference on Digital Data Processing 2023) University of Bedfordshire, Luton. UK. November 27-29, 2023 https://socio.org.uk/ddp/workshop (IEEE CPS will publish the proceedings, and papers should follow the IEEE template) AI models use billions of parameters to detect and retrieve text and images. The currently available LL models are experimented with for their efficiency, and at the same time, newer models are being developed. There are many challenges associated with generative AI. The pre-training volume and efficiency are a focus. To leverage the training set with comprehensiveness and accuracy, billions of parameters are injected into the LLM. Current GPTs face criticism, and governments issue a caution to their use. For example, Zhuang Rongwen, China’s cyberspace chief, raises concerns over the power of generative AI and pledges to make it ‘controllable'. The agenda for the future Generative AI is not clear. Improved generative tools should be capable of characterising extremist narratives in corpora to reveal different contexts, which may lead to building semantic-rich content for end-users. Testing the current models and their results may contribute to future research. Considering these issues, we framed a workshop to address the theme, Next Generation Models. The workshop themes include but are not limited to the following. Text, Image, Code, Video, 3D models Domain-specific models Compositional generative models Foundation models Energy-based models Deep equilibrium models Impact of Generative AI on Teaching and Learning Knowledge and Semantic Issues in Generative AI Future LLM AI Ethical Issues AI and NLP Embedding in AI Reinforcement learning Data Support and Datasets in AI Standards and Benchmarks Workshop Chairs Gloria Tengyue Li North China University of Technology Beijing China Simon Fong University of Macau Macau Hathairat Ketmaneechairat King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand Important Dates Full Paper Submission: September 10, 2023 Notification of Acceptance/Rejection: October 10, 2023 Registration Due: November 10, 2023 Camera Ready Due: November 10, 2023 Workshops/Tutorials/Demos: November 28, 2023 Main conference: November 27-29, 2023 Post-conference proceedings: December 20, 2023 Paper Submission: http://socio.org.uk/ddp/paper-submission/ Contact: stm(a)socio.org.uk

1 0

AI Regulation & Responsible Innovation Roundtable, 28th September (Technology, Internet, & Policy Group)
by McLoughlin, Liam 25 Jul '23

25 Jul '23

Dear Friends, I would like to invite you all to the Technology, Internet, & Policy Group’s roundtable on AI Regulation & Responsible Innovation. Date: Thursday 28th September 2023, 3:00 – 4:30pm (GMT+1) Time Zone Converter <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20230928T140000&p…> Location: Online Registration link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/ai-regulation-responsible-innovation-roundta…<https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/ai-regulation-responsible-innovation-roundta…> The roundtable brings together an international panel of experts to discuss comparative AI governance, & regulation across the EU, UK and US. The roundtable will discuss the impact of recent regulation and innovations of AI in the space, with talking points including: data use, cross-border regulation, jurisdiction, sovereignty, and the competing pressures of regulation and innovation. Speakers: * Helena Quinn – Principal Policy Adviser for AI & Data Science at the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the UK data protection regulator. Helena was a principal author of the ICO’s guidance, ‘Explaining decisions made with AI’. * Jack Stilgoe -Professor in science and technology studies at University College London (UCL), where he researches the governance of emerging technologies. He is principal investigator of the ESRC Driverless Futures project (2019-2021), and author of ‘Who’s Driving Innovation?’ (2020, Palgrave). * Giovanni De Gregorio - PLMJ Chair in Law and Technology at Católica Global School of Law and Católica Lisbon School of Law. Giovanni is the author of the monograph ‘Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society’ (Cambridge University Press 2022). * Kai Zenner – Head of Office and Digital Policy Adviser for MEP Axel Voss in the European Parliament. Kai Zenner is a digital enthusiast focusing on Artificial Intelligence, data and the EU’s digital transition. * (Discussant) Giulia Gentile – LSE Law School Fellow. Giulia Gentile is Fellow in Law at the LSE Law School. About TIP The Technology, Internet, & Policy Specialist Group (TIP) is a group of academics, practitioners, campaigners, journalists, and others with an interest in technology and the internet. The group seeks to promote academic engagement in policy debates and discourse which may impact policy, in particular by facilitating the exchange of ideas between academia and practitioners from various fields. Membership is free, and The Group is based at the Political Studies Association. Website: https://www.psa.ac.uk/specialist-groups/technology-internet-and-policy-tip Twitter (or is it now X? Who knows): https://twitter.com/psa_TIP Dr Liam McLoughlin (he/him) Lecturer in Communication & Media University of Liverpool, Department of Communication and Media Twitter: @Leelum<http://www.twitter.com/leelum> Website: https://Leelum.com<https://leelum.com/> Technology, Internet, & Policy Specialist Group Co-convenor @PSA_TIP<https://twitter.com/psa_TIP> Website: https://www.psa.ac.uk/specialist-groups/technology-internet-and-policy-tip Latest software publication: McLoughlin & Ezeh (2022). Cactool: An easy way to collaboratively code social media posts for manual content and discourse analysis (BETA). Available via GitHub.<https://github.com/cactool/cactool>

1 0