- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

Re: [Air-L] mobile media studies
by Andrew Herman 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

I would like to know this as well! Andrew Herman, Ph. D. Associate Professor and Chairperson Department of Communication Studies Graduate Program in Cultural Analysis and Social Theory Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5 CANADA 519 884-1970 x3693 >>> Greg Wise <Greg.Wise(a)asu.edu> 08/03/10 6:20 PM >>> Hi folks, Any recent (2009-2010) research out there on mobile multimedia (both TV and video watching, internet surfing, etc.) via iPhone, iPod Touch, and the ilk? Looking for a reading or two for an undergrad class on media and everyday life. I'd like to have something current that speaks to everyday uses and habits regarding such devices (besides as a phone). I've got a number of things from 2008 and before. Cheers, Greg Dr. J. Macgregor Wise Professor Communication Studies Arizona State University 4701 West Thunderbird Road Glendale, AZ 85306-4908 (602) 543 6646; (602) 543 6004 (fax) Editor, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies Author of Cultural Globalization: A User's Guide (2008, Blackwell) _______________________________________________ The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/

3 2

Nielsen Report: How People Watch ? The Global State of Video Consumption
by Stephen J Cavrak Jr 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

Report: How People Watch ? The Global State of Video Consumption August 4, 2010 http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/report-how-we-watch-the-global-s… Video consumption across multiple platforms is now a global phenomenon. Consumers in all regions are proving their insatiable appetite for video information and entertainment ? thus far adding screens to their media mix, not replacing them. To get a better sense for how the world is watching video, today, Nielsen recently completed a survey of more than 27,000 online consumers in 55 countries, asking simple questions about how they watch video. Internet access still varies considerably by region, so the results of an online survey are not representative of the total global population, but show us how an important subset of the global population (the connected population) is consuming video across multiple platforms. The results from the survey, with corresponding syndicated Nielsen insights where available, were released today in a new report, ?How People Watch ? A Global Nielsen Consumer Report.?

1 0

TweetClouds > TagClouds From Twitter Postings
by Gerry McKiernan 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

The Ever-Growing Services That Use The Twitter API / Access Include Tweet Visualization >>> Googled (twitter or tweet*) and (tagcloud* or tag cloud* or visualization*) And Found A Compendium >>> Twitter Fan Wiki > Visual Not All Visualizations Per Se But Many Worth A Test >>> A Sampling >>> • Cloud Search - Search for your favorite topic through an intuitive visualization. Generates a tag cloud based on the popularity of related terms. [snip] [snip] • Tweet Cloud - This Tweet Cloud shows you the major words found in the most recent tweets of all users or those of a specific user. This changes by the minute! Experiment with the composition of tweets to reveal interesting trends, connections, attitudes, relationships. [snip] [snip] • Tweetag - Browse the twittosphere with nested tagclouds. You can visualize what are the most talked topics related to your search [snip] • Twitterfall - View a 'waterfall' of tweets of the current trends on Twitter in near-realtime with a really simple interface. [snip] [snip] Links To All Listed Items Available At [ http://bit.ly/ccttmM ] [ )-:] > Not All Entries Accessible Or Available < [:-(] See Also > 17 Ways to Visualize the Twitter Universe [snip] Certainly > If Tweets Can Be Visualized, Why Not E-Mail > RSS Feeds > Etc? >>> >>> If You Have Others > Please Post As A Comment >>> e-JOY ! /Gerry Gerry McKiernan Associate Professor Science and Technology Librarian Iowa State University Library Ames IA 50011 Follow Me On Twitter > http://twitter.com/GMcKBlogs " !!! Our Minds Must Not Be Confined Nor Defined By Our Place Or Time Or Technology !!! " [ http://bit.ly/cQWU8U ]

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in the Digital Age
by Jana Herwig 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

In addition to Alex Halavais' (non-apologetic) notion of 'cheating good', I'd like to add that 'copying' or rather imitating can be an effective strategy in language-learning, again, if done right. I'll add a link to a paper on 'microplagiarism' as I dubbed it in preparation of the 2007 microlearning conference in Innsbruck, which looks at specifically this aspect: http://www.scribd.com/mobile/documents/32515468 The full conference proceedings should also still be available on microlearning.org best wishes Jana Herwig University of Vienna, Austria

2 2

call for papers IPSA
by Marcus Abílio Gomes Pereira 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

Call for papers: IPSA/USP fevereiro de 2011 The IPSA-ECPR joint conference Whatever Happened to North-South?, hosted by the Brazilian Political Science Association at the U. of Sao Paulo. The conference will be held from February 16 to 19, 2011. The Call for Papers will open on Monday, June 28 and close on Friday, August 6, 2010. Conference Theme: Political Regimes, Democratic Consolidation and the Quality of Democracy [1]Section: Parties, Institutions and the Quality of Democracy [2] Can NICT enhance the quality of democracies? Latin America's good practices in e-democracy Chair: Prof. Marcus Abilio Pereira, email: magopebh(a)hotmail.com Institution: UFMG/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Co-Chair Name: Prof. Sérgio Braga, email: ssbraga(a)uol.com.br Institution: UFPR/Universidade Federal do Paraná The search for deepening democracy has as its basic points the increase of government transparency as well as the creation of deliberative spaces between society and political system. Despite the obstacles arising from the digital divide, the use of new information and communication technologies (NICT) has been expanding in Latin American countries, generating high expectations about the possibility of an increase in the quality of their democracies. Experiences in different countries have shown that expanded forms of political participation have been developed through the use of NICT, promoting new opportunities for interaction between civil society and the political system. These virtual spaces of interaction allow a reduction of informational asymmetry between political system and society, enriching the state actors' information repertoire about interests and demands of citizens, thereby contributing to the improvement of decision-making processes. This panel seeks to create a space for dialogue to researchers who have produced qualitative and quantitative studies related to different e-democracy practices in countries of the "third wave of democratization," emphasizing "best practices" that can produce effective results in the creation of new and better spaces for political deliberation and participation of citizens in the various institutions that are part of democratic political systems of such countries. Submit Source URL: http://saopaulo2011.ipsa.org/panel/can-nict-enhance-quality-democracies-lat… Links: [1] http://saopaulo2011.ipsa.org/theme/political-regimes-democratic-consolidati… [2] http://saopaulo2011.ipsa.org/section/parties-institutions-and-quality-democ… ssbraga(a)uol.com.br skype: ssbraga2 blog: http://netandpolfrombrazil.blogspot.com/

1 0

cfp: JITP 2011: The Future of Computational Social Science
by David Berry 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

JITP 2011: The Future of Computational Social Science CALL FOR PAPERS May 16 & 17, 2011 at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA The 3rd annual, two-day Journal of Information Technology & Politics (JITP) thematic conference will be in Seattle, Washington, coordinated by the Department of Political Science and the Center for American Politics and Public Policy (CAPPP) at the University of Washington. APPROACH Computational social science is an emergent field and source of new theoretical and methodological innovation for social science more broadly. Multidisciplinary teams of social and computer scientists are increasingly common in the lab and at workshops where cross-fertilization occurs in the areas of theory, data, methods, and tools. Peer-reviewed interdisciplinary work is becoming more common as the computational tools and techniques of computer science are being used by social scientists. Previously, large-scale computational processing was the purview of expensive, university-centric computing labs. Now, with the democratization of technology, universities and for-profit firms increasingly provide large amounts of inexpensive computing power to researchers and citizens alike. It is the potential of these new computational technologies and related Web-based platforms for research, politics, and governance that led to the creation of the Journal of Information Technology & Politics. Previous special issues on "Text Annotation for Political Science" 5(1), "Politics: Web 2.0" 6(3/4), "YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States" 7(2/3), and "The Politics of Open Source" (in production) have focused the attention of researchers on the expansive new landscape of digital democracy as well as the architecture and tools that underpin it. In their 2009 Science article, David Lazer and colleagues highlighted some of the future challenges for scholars working in this area. "Computational social science could become the exclusive domain of private companies and government agencies. Alternatively, there might emerge a privileged set of academic researchers presiding over private data from which they produce papers that cannot be critiqued or replicated. Neither scenario will serve the long-term public interest of accumulating, verifying, and disseminating knowledge." Luckily, the phenomenon of computational social science is distributed so widely and found in such variety that these scenarios are unlikely. The trends towards openness and data and tool sharing are notable breakthroughs in a sphere where proprietary approaches dominate. Data, method, and tool transparency are increasingly watchwords for governments and researchers. With this background in mind, we invite a wide range of paper submissions on the future of computational social science. Submissions may include, but are not limited to: * Applications of information theory to social science research * Methodologies and tools for studying users and information on social media services * Projects featuring novel uses of computer assisted qualitative data analysis software * Large-scale empirical analysis and modeling * Web technologies and data mining * Interdisciplinary methodologies in collaborative research * Pedagogical issues in computational social science * Computer simulations in political science education and training * Concepts from social sciences enhanced by computation, such as social network analysis * Innovation in socio-technical network and infrastructure analysis PAPER SUBMISSIONS Authors are invited to prepare and submit to JITP a research paper, policy viewpoint, workbench note, or teaching innovation manuscript by January 1, 2011. Proposals for full panel presentations will also be accepted. Please contact the conference manager to discuss panels. Papers accepted for publication will be invited to revise and resubmit their articles for publication in a special issue, or double issue, of JITP. Authors should "establish membership" at the JITP website, http://www.jitp.net, to submit a paper. Follow the instructions for regular article submissions, being sure to indicate that the paper is for JITP2011 in the comments section. Papers will be put through an expedited, blind peer review process by the Program Committee, and authors will be notified about a decision by March 1, 2011. A small number of papers will be accepted for presentation at the conference. Other paper authors will be invited to present a poster during an evening reception. BEST PAPER AND POSTER CASH PRIZES The author (or authors) of the best research paper will receive a cash prize. The creator (or creators) of the best poster/research presentation will also receive a cash prize. PROGRAM COMMITTEE Gil ad Ariely, Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya Paul M. Baker, Georgia Institute of Technology David M. Berry, Swansea University, UK. Chris Bronk, Rice University Jana Diesner, Carnegie Mellon University Muzammil M. Hussain, University of Washington Daniel Katz, Fellow, University of Michigan, Center for the Study of Complex Systems Jacob Groshek, Iowa State University Baden Hughes, University of Melbourne Andrea Kavanaugh, Virginia Tech Georgios Lappas, Technological Educational Institution of Western Macedonia, Greece Azi Lev-On, Ariel University Center Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano, Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Chicago Bruce Neubauer, Albany State University Andre Oboler, Monash University, Australia Justin Reedy, University of Washington Joseph W. Roberts, Roger Williams University Scott Robertson, University of Hawaii Derek Ruths, McGill University Chirag Shah, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Mack Shelley, Iowa State University Stuart Shulman, University of Massachusetts Amherst, co-chair Anas Tawileh, Cardiff University, UK John Wilkerson, University of Washington, co-chair --- Dr. David M. Berry Department of Political and Cultural Studies Room JC015 James Callaghan Building Swansea University Singleton Campus Swansea SA2 8PP Tel: 01792 602633 http://www.swan.ac.uk/staff/academic/ArtsHumanities/berryd/

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age
by Sarah Roberts 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

I think it is right to question many of the assumptions at work in the article (and in the general discourse around this issue), including the presented below. The preoccupation with _technologically-enabled_ and enhanced plagiarism is certainly something to approach intellectually and it begs elucidation, in my opinion, and also also tends to obfuscate or take the spotlight many other, much more crucial (and less glamorous) issues. These include such as the problematic nature of ever-growing class size coupled with downsizing of teaching assistants, graduate student labor and the like who are often critical in coaching and teaching about proper writing, attribution, and so on. In addition, if we keep constantly reminding this generation of "born digitals," or whatever you wan to call them, about how they all plagiarize, none of them can learn proper attribution and generally have low expectations for them, won't they just start to parrot back those attitudes and beliefs about themselves? (It reminds me of all the handwringing over "slackers" at the dawn of the 90s. Where are all those plaid shirt-wearing, Pearl Jam-listening slackers now? Probably somewhere financial services, or IT, or otherwise somehow paying off a mortgage on a suburban home, or reading this list right now, unless I miss my guess.) The plagiarism hysteria also has the peculiar characteristic of contributing to the changing atmosphere of the classroom, turning into something resembling more a situation of policing and a paradigm of can I get away with it vs. gotcha, and even leads, in the worst case, to the reliance on third-party and for profit utilities that turn the entire writing and evaluation process into a scientifically managed database check. I mean, this is just the tip of the iceberg with these tools. Is plagiarism a problem in the university (and elsewhere)? Undoubtedly. But the hysteria around it, and the reactions levied against, in both the form of the changed tenor of the student-teacher relationship into one of surveillance and policing, as as well as dubious and problematic panaceas like plagiarism detection services, strike me as scarier still. --Sarah On Aug 4, 2010, at 5:00 PM, air-l-request(a)listserv.aoir.org wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:33:37 +1000 > From: Margaret Borschke <Margaret.Borschke(a)unsw.edu.au> > To: "air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org> > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age > > What if we question the premise: that is that students plagiarise more than they once did. Is it really true? > > These charges have a distinct whiff of anxiety about "kids today" and the effects of digital and network technologies about them. > > Copy and paste capacities might make it easier to lift entire passages but the same technologies also made it easier to find them. Students know this. For one, most know they will be are assumed guilty before being proven innocent by commercial services that universities subscribe to such as Turn it in. > > Whenever I read these "corrupting influence of the internet" stories, I like to counter them with this beautiful confession by Kevin Kopelson about his own old school adventures in plagiarism and his more recent experiences teaching: > > http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n10/kevin-kopelson/diary --- S a r a h T. R o b e r t s Doctoral Student and Fellow, Information in Society Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) http://www.lis.illinois.edu/people/students/sarah-roberts-phd-student University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://www.lis.illinois.edu/programs/phd/infosociety/

1 0

Web 2.0 Marketing/Branding
by Arash Raeisi 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hello I hope you are all doing well. I am doing my PhD on marketing over Social Networking Sites such as Facebook. I have not been able to find enough academic papers relevant to my research area. I really appreciate if you recommend authors, sources or relevant academic papers which are related to my research topic. Any recent (2009-2010) research out there on Web 2.0 and Web 2.0 marketing or branding Regards Arash ---------------------------------------------------------------- Concerns about content should be sent to abuse(a)salford.ac.uk

1 0

Re: [Air-L] Primary text on affordances
by ELIZABETH MAURER 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi there, Those who've pointed to Norman and Gibson have already answered your question, but I thought I'd throw my hat in the ring anyway. I recently defended my thesis which looks at affordances as part of a larger examination of genre innovation and evolution. https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/7719/ubc_2009_spring_maurer_eli… For those who are interested, chapter four (which looks at e-petitions) is the main place where I discuss this: "Petitioning Canada Online: Genre Adaptation and Local Genre Systems." A very useful though short article from Norman that I draw upon (Caroline has this in her list) elaborates on an important distinction he makes between "affordances" and "percieved affordances." He reminds us: Please don’t confuse affordances with perceived affordances. Don’t confuse affordances with conventions. Affordances reflect the possible relationships among actors and objects: they are properties of the world. Conventions, conversely, are arbitrary, artificial, and learned. Once learned, they help us master the intricacies of daily life, whether they be conventions for courtesy, for writing style, or for operating a word processor. (1999, 42) The reference for that article is here: Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions 6(3), 38-42. Cheers, Elizabeth Maurer, PhD Communications Manager, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources BC Public Service ----- Original Message ----- From: "Denise N. Rall" Date: Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:06 pm Subject: [Air-L] Primary text on affordances To: air-l(a)aoir.org > Dear AIR-ERS - > > I have some colleagues here who have recently become interested > in the concept of affordances (they are working in the field of > visual arts). > > I know the term comes from engineering but if anyone has the > primary reference at their fingertips it would be much appreciated. > > Cheers, Denise > > (writing from the island of Bali where the the celebrations of > the Kite Festival has filled the skies each afternoon with > amazing kites) > > > Denise N. Rall, PhD. Special Projects, Faculty of Arts & > Science > Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW AUSTRALIA Mobile > +(61)(0)438 233344 > http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/staff/pages/drall/Popular > Culture Association of Australia & Zealand POPCANNZ Conf. > Auckland, New Zealand July 2011 > > > > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ >

1 0

google alarm
by Seda Guerses 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

http://fffff.at/google-alarm/ get notified when google is monitoring your web browsing. friends have already started organizing office tournaments to see who gets the lowest/highest ranking. :) cheers, s. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

1 0