- Air-L - lists.aoir.org

IAMCR Communication Policy & Technology Leicester 2016 - CfP deadline in 2 weeks
by Jo Pierson 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

COMMUNICATION POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY (CP&T) section - Call for Papers International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Academic Conference, July 27-31, 2016, Leicester (UK) http://iamcr.org/news/cfp2016 The Communication Policy and Technology (CP&T) Section of the International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) invites submissions for the IAMCR 2016 conference to be held from July 27-31, 2015 in Leicester (UK). The deadline for submissions of abstracts for papers and panel proposals is February 15, 2016. The conference will be held under the general theme: 'Memory, Commemoration and Communication: Looking Forward, Looking Back'. The latter seeks to explore the relationship between memory, commemoration and communication. This theme anticipates the 60th anniversary of the IAMCR in 2017, an organisation which has played a strong role in the development of media and communication studies. Although scholars have long been interested in memory and culture, advancements in technologies are providing new and innovative opportunities to think about how it is created, preserved, passed on, and archived. Starting from the remit of the Communication Policy and Technology section, we focus on the role and meaning of media and communication technologies, both analogue and digital, in past, current and future societies, as well as their policy implications. For the IAMCR conference in Leicester we especially invite papers that analyse and discuss the interrelationship between society, analogue and digital media and the shifting borders between public, private and corporate space in past, current and future societies. We refer to media, communication technologies and online platforms, ranging from print-cultures, telecommunication, social media to sharing economy applications in different domains of society (health, hospitality, transport, education, surveillance, etc.). We are interested in the politics of these media platforms and communication technologies and how they relate to the transformation of public, private and corporate space. With public space in a state of flux, the relations between (state) institutions, citizens, and corporations are being fundamentally reconfigured. There is a strong push to limit and reduce the role of state institutions in the organization of public space, whereas citizens and corporations claim and are also expected to fulfil key public functions. Although this push should be understood as part of the long-term development of the neoliberal mode of governance, the rapid rise of digital media platforms appears to both accelerate and further complicate this development. A key aspect of these developments is the collection, storage, processing, (re)use and commodification of (personal) data, based on the ‘datafication’ in all areas of life. We need to critically assess from interdisciplinary perspective what this means for the (dis)empowerment of users/citizens/consumers as (not) being in control (any more) regarding identity, security, privacy and publicness. The CP&T section therefore invites submissions that critically engage with these issues. In addition we welcome papers and panel proposals addressing the following more particular themes that fit in the general call for papers and are relevant to the section: - Technologies of/for memory: the social, political, economic and policy implications of digital media for archives, museums, broadcasters and public and private heritage institutions as well as individuals, families and organisations. Especially in relation to access, ephemerality and obsolescence, creative and cultural industry policy, data citizenship - Technologies of digital media storage for researchers: the social, political, economic and policy implications of digital media for data archives, data repositories and especially access to publicly funded research data - Digital media and contested spaces of commemoration: mobile networked media and digital platforms provide new tools for recording, sharing and contesting formal rituals of commemoration - from state occasions to family and group memorials. How are they used to reshape boundaries between public and private and to contest official 'he-stories'? - Internet governance and the implications of the safe harbour ruling in relation to transnational data exchange between Europe and the United States: Post Schrems ruling and implications for privacy - Social media governance and online harassment, trolling and cyberbullying particularly as it relates to gender, race, class etc. - Emerging implications of ubiquitous and embedded computing and networking especially in relation to smart cities, the internet of things - Issues around institutional or activists’ memories, linking past and present in social and political struggles to affect policy or discursive change - Issues around archiving and securing social movement content at risk of disappearing through corporate or state repression - Issues around too much memory, the right to be forgotten rather than remembered - Issues around big data and memory, linked to the point above - Policy issues around media and communication technology pluralism, diversity and concentration - Policies and debates around public service broadcasting and the public interest - Policies and research into digital literacy and the digital divide. In addition we also strongly invite abstract proposals for a panel on Internet governance co-sponsored by the Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GigaNet). Topics may include but are not limited to technical and legal questions of Internet governance, governance mechanisms and their implementation and the analysis of key Internet governance concepts such as net neutrality, multi-stakeholderism and cyber-security. The CP&T Section will also look for additional opportunities for hosting joint sessions with other IAMCR Sections and Working groups. Submission information The CP&T section welcomes proposals for papers bearing on the above or related issues by submitting an abstract. Abstracts should contain title, main question or research problem, theoretical framework, method(s) used, and – if applicable – (expected) empirical outcomes. Submitted abstracts will be evaluated by a double blind review on the basis of: (1) theoretical contribution, (2) methods, (3) quality of writing, (4) literature review, (5) relevance of the submission to the work of the CP&T section, and (6) originality and/or significance of the work. The scholarly presentation of accepted submissions can take place in two types of sessions: paper presentation sessions (i.e. 4-5 presenters each with 12-15 minutes, requiring full paper submitted on time) and high intensity sessions (i.e. 6-8 presenters each with 5-7 minutes). Proposals for panels of 90 minutes are also welcome. A complete CP&T panel proposal must have 4 to 5 papers and include: 1. The panel description text, including, the panel title, a framing text, the names of the panelists and the titles of their papers. The framing text (maximum 350 words) should contain the overall idea and goal of the panel, and how it responds to the CP&T section call. A panel chair and a discussant should also be proposed. 2. An abstract for each paper, including title and author(s). The panel description text and the individual abstracts must be submitted individually. Thus a panel with 5 papers involves making 6 separate submissions via the Open Conference System (OCS). Abstracts can be submitted directly by the panel authors or the panel coordinator can submit them on the authors’ behalf. All abstract submissions in a panel must indicate “PANEL:” as the first word of their title and the complete title of the panel must appear in the first line of each abstract. The panel proposal will be reviewed and based on this review we will accept, accept with revisions, or decline the panel. Submission of abstracts, panel proposals and (if accepted) full papers must be submitted through the online Open Conference System (OCS) at http://iamcr-ocs.org from 1 December 2015 until 15 February 2016. Early submission is strongly encouraged. There are to be no email submissions of abstracts addressed to any Section or Working Group Head. It is expected that for the most part, only one (1) abstract will be submitted per person for consideration by the Conference. However, under no circumstances should there be more than two (2) abstracts bearing the name of the same applicant either individually or as part of any group of authors. Please note also that the same abstract or another version with minor variations in title or content must not be submitted to other Sections or Working Groups of the Association for consideration, after an initial submission. Such submissions will be deemed to be in breach of the conference guidelines and will be automatically rejected by the Open Conference System, by the relevant Head or by the Conference Programme Reviewer. Such applicants risk being removed entirely from the conference programme. Upon submission of an abstract, you will be asked to confirm that your submission is original and that it has not been previously published in the form presented. You will also be given an opportunity to declare if your submission is currently before another conference for consideration. Presenters are expected to bring fully developed work to the conference. Prior to the conference, it is expected that a completed paper will be submitted to Section, Session Chairs, and Discussants. If a proposal is accepted, the presenter must also register for conference participation in order to be included in the final conference programme of the Section. A CP&T best paper award prize may be awarded to one of the paper presenters, based on the full papers submitted in time. Please note following deadlines and key dates for the 2016 IAMCR Conference: 1 December 2015: Open Computer System (OCS) available for abstract submission at http://iamcr-ocs.org 15 February 2016: OCS closes - final deadline for submission of extended abstracts and panels (submissions will be assessed by double blind review) 8 April 2016: Notification of acceptances of abstracts 28 April 2016: Confirmation of participation by presenters 20 May 2016: Deadline for early bird registration 30 June 2016: Deadline for full paper submission via OCS (around 7,500 words, excluding notes and references). There is no second round of reviewing for acceptance. 27-31 July 2016: IAMCR Leicester 2016 conference (UK) Additional questions about the CP&T sessions (submission, themes, panels etc.) at the IAMCR 2016 conference can be addressed to Aphra Kerr (aphra.kerr [AT] nuim.ie). For further information, please consult the IAMCR website (http://iamcr.org/leicester2016/cfp) For general information on the CP&T section (http://iamcr.org/s-wg/section/cp-t) Section Chair: Jo Pierson / Vice-Chairs: Aphra Kerr and Bart Cammaerts

1 0

SRC deadline extended
by dawn m. armfield 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hi all, This is a great opportunity for your students to participate in a conference, get funding, and present interesting research. It's for both undergrad and grad students, so please let them know! This year, SIGDOC is holding its second annual competition for undergraduate and graduate students, the Student Research Competition (SRC). Students can present their research; network in Arlington, Virginia; and compete for the chance to win cash prizes (up to $500) sponsored by the Association for Computing Machinery and Microsoft. Students also receive $500 in travel money to attend the conference. The website is open for proposals from now until February 8, 2016. Learn more about the SRC here: http://sigdoc.acm.org/conference/2016/student-research-competition/ and encourage students to submit their proposals at http://tinyurl.com/sigdocsrc If you have questions, feel free to email the SRC chair, Stephanie Vie, at ( Stephanie.Vie(a)ucf.edu) We hope you'll encourage your students to apply! -- dawn m. armfield frostburg state university SIGDOC'16 Conference Chair http://about.me/darmfield

2 1

CFP: First Person Scholar
by Gerald Voorhees 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hi all, Apologies for the necessary cross posting. Posting on behalf of the editor; please email them, not me. At *First Person Scholar* (http://www.firstpersonscholar.com/) we seek to develop and expand the role of the game critic through the publication of timely, rigorous, and accessible criticism that challenges all players to engage in *critical play*. As Mary Flanagan writes, “Critical play is characterized by a careful examination of social, cultural, political, or even personal themes that function as alternates to popular play spaces” (*Critical Play* 6). The articles we publish encourage players—be them developers, scholars, critics, or enthusiasts—to consider alternatives to popular interpretations of games and game play. Through this discourse we seek to establish and sustain a critical conversation amongst those producing and playing games, demonstrating in the process that the game critic is a figure capable of enriching and challenging our understanding of games and what they are capable of. To that end we are seeking submissions that exemplify the virtues of critical play, including those that demonstrate the extensibility of game scholarship and the value of alternative interpretations. More specifically, we are looking for unique and diverse perspectives that may be underrepresented in gaming media, as well as those that exist between the more industry-driven journalistic view and the more traditional academic position. FPS publishes articles in three broad categories. ESSAYS: Essay submissions for FPS are meant to address critical, theoretical, and methodological considerations as they pertain to game studies. Editor: Betsy Brey (betsy.brey(a)firstpersonscholar.com) COMMENTARIES: Our commentaries include intelligent discussion of games and games culture that deviate from the format of the traditional academic essay. Editor: Alexandra Orlando (alexandra.orlando(a)firstpersonscholar.com) BOOK REVIEWS: The purpose of the book reviews is two-fold: to act as a resource for game scholars and to critique and comment on the book’s arguments. Editor: Chris Lawrence (chris.lawrence(a)firstpersonscholar.com) For the full CFP, including guidelines for submission, please visit http://www.firstpersonscholar.com/about/

1 0

Call for Participation: Workshop on Internet Policy in Eastern Partnership Countries
by Ben Wagner 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Apologies for cross-posting — Please circulate widely Call for Participation Workshop on Internet Policy in Eastern Partnership Countries March 8, 2016, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder) How is internet policy developed in countries of the Eastern Partnership? Will shifting geopolitical alliances have an impact on internet policy in Ukraine or Armenia? What is the impact of economic factors on internet policy in those countries? What role does civil society play? On March 8, we will bring together scholars interested in answering those questions. If you would like to participate in this workshop, please send an email to event(a)cihr.eu <mailto:event@cihr.eu> with a CV or a short bio. If you are interested in presenting your research, please send a short abstract as well. Applications will be considered on a rolling basis. Travel support is available for limited number of participants. We will confirm your participation as soon as possible, but not later than February 15, 2016. This workshop is addressed to all interested students and scholars of international relations, law, sociology, economics and the social sciences more broadly. It is also open to non-academic experts from civil society, think tanks, journalists, etc. Link: https://cihr.eu/participate-in-workshop-on-march8/ <https://cihr.eu/participate-in-workshop-on-march8/> About the workshop To understand how global human rights challenges of the digital age, we need to know more how Internet policies are developed at the national level. We think it is particularly important to research internet policies in countries, which are at the borders of large geopolitical systems. At the periphery of the global system, internet policy is often not so strongly institutionalised as a result of which human rights norms are more in flux. At this workshop, we want to take a closer look at internet polices in the Eastern Partnership countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Torn between two large geopolitical block, those six countries are very vulnerable to the growing mistrust between Brussels and Moscow. Strong trade and investment links to both Russia and Europe force them to make decisions, which can be politically hard and economically costly. Internet policy is one of the areas most affected by competing human rights discourses and trade interests. Our working hypothesis is that geopolitics will affect how Internet policy is developed, but can be mitigated by other economic or social factors, such as the strength of actors from private sector or civil society. The workshop will be divided into four thematic blocks: Internet policy in Eastern Partnership: While there might be similarities across the six countries, each of them has a unique landscape of internet policies and distinct process of developing them. How is internet policy actually made in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine? Keynote: Professor Andrii Paziuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geopolitics and Internet Governance. In global debates about internet policy, the EU has strongly backed the multistakeholder model, while Russia has been one of the strongest supporters of a multilateral model, which emphasises sovereignty of states. Will shifting geopolitical alliances have an impact on internet policy in countries like Armenia or the Ukraine? Speaker: Dr. Andrea Calderaro, Cardiff University. Civil Society and Human Rights: NGOs and experts who participate in Internet policy-development are often highly interconnected on the global level. They belong to ‘communities of practice’ serving as mediators of norms and practices between the global and national policy levels. What role does civil society play in embedding human rights in internet policy in Eastern Partnership countries? Speaker: Tatyana Lokot, Merrill College of Journalism. Digital Economy and Trade: The European Union intends to extend Digital Single Market to the Eastern Partnership, while Russia remains a key investor in the region. At the same time, the influence of multinational corporations is growing. What is the impact of economic factors on internet policy in those countries? Speaker: tbc This workshop is organized by the Centre for the Internet and Human Rights (https://cihr.eu/) in collaboration with the B/ORDERS IN MOTION Centre (https://www.borders-in-motion.de/) both at European University Viadrina. CIHR is a vibrant hub for academic research about technology and society at Viadrina. Our goal is to inform current public and academic debates by producing high-quality research grounded in theory and empirical data. You can find out more information about the project on CIHR website: https://cihr.eu/internet-policy-in-eastern- partnership-countries/ Dr. Ben Wagner Centre for Internet & Human Rights European University Viadrina https://cihr.eu <https://cihr.eu/> Twitter: @benwagne_r Office: +49 335 5534 2832 Mobile: +49 170 110 2881 GPG Key Id: 494604B0A3479DBB

1 0

Edited Collection CFP Collaboration
by Trent M Kays 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hello! I’m putting together an edited collection CFP focused on open access, open knowledge, and open education. If you’re interested in co-editing, email me, and we can chat about collaborating. Thanks! tmk –– Trent M Kays Assistant Professor | Department of English and Foreign Languages Hampton University | trentmkays.com "To educate is essentially to form."–Paulo Freire

1 0

CFP Extended: SIGDOC 2016
by dawn m. armfield 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Due to a number of requests, the proposal submission deadline for SIGDOC ’16 in Arlington, VA *has been extended to* *FEBRUARY 8*. Below is a link to the proposal system, an outline of the CFP, and a list of key dates. *Clarification regarding word count and references:*A reference list is not necessary in the proposal stage, but in-text citations are welcome. We look forward to receiving your abstracts and seeing you in Arlington this September. Proposals can be submitted to: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1UL66KS7IMOn9rkdg7FVpELUNV3-_rRyNLJAPR-X5px… *CFP* The ACM Special Interest Group on the Design of Communication (ACM SIGDOC) invites you to submit a research or technical paper, experience report, or interactive poster on the design of communication. This year’s conference asks how contexts affect how we design communication experiences. For example, How have communication design practices evolved to meet the needs of new contexts/audiences? How has UX design evolved to respond to technology used in multiple contexts? How does mobile use (checking mobile devices while riding in a car, cooking dinner, walking around town, etc.) affect how we communicate and use information? Industry and academic researchers (including graduate and undergraduate students) are encouraged to submit research papers, experience reports, and posters. Contributions may include studies of design processes, research methods, pedagogical practices, deployment analyses, and situated-use studies related to the design and use of communication systems and artifacts. SIGDOC will be located in Arlington, Virginia, right outside Washington, DC September 21-23, 2016. *Submission process* First, short proposals (500 words) will be submitted for review. Once a proposal is reviewed and accepted, the author(s) will submit either: · a full-length paper (research and technical papers or experience reports; final papers are not to exceed 10 pages), or · an extended abstract (posters and panels; final abstracts are not to exceed 6 pages). The full-length papers and extended abstracts will then be reviewed, sent back to the authors for final edits and ACM formatting, and resubmitted as “camera-ready” submissions. Papers and extended abstracts will be published in the Conference Proceedings and in the ACM Digital Library. Full CFP may be found at http://sigdoc.acm.org/conference/2016/call-for-papers/ *Important Dates* The timeline for the conference is as follows: · January 11, 2016: Proposal system open for submissions · February 1 extended to February 8, 2016: Research and technical paper, Experience report, Poster, Panel, and Workshop proposals due by 11:59 EST. · February 29, 2016: Proposal reviews completed. · April 18, 2016: Research and technical papers, Experience reports, Posters, and Panel/extended abstracts due. · June 6, 2016: Full-length reviews completed. · July 11, 2016: “Camera-ready” paper/extended abstract revisions and final posters due. If you have any questions, please email the program chair: Sarah Gunning at sgunning(a)towson.edu -- dawn m. armfield frostburg state university SIGDOC'16 Conference Chair http://about.me/darmfield

1 0

Last reminder - Call for Papers: Network Standards and Culture (AOIR 2016 Panel)
by Elinor Carmi 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hi everyone, This is a last reminder calling panelists for an #AOIR2016 panel Robert W. Gehl and I are organizing on the relationship between network standards and culture. By 'standards' we (broadly) mean technical rules, laws, and norms of technical features/infrastructure/objects related to media technologies, that are constructed by various individual/private/government/NGO actors. We are particularly interested in papers that articulate these rules with cultural practices within and through digital media. To be considered for this panel, we would need the AOIR-standard 1200-word abstract by *February 5, 2016* sent to e.carmi(a)gold.ac.uk. We will notify our selected panelists by February 20 with any revisions required ahead of the AOIR deadline of March 1. Best regards, Elinor Carmi Robert W. Gehl

1 0

Request for support in reaching audience for mini-surveys
by Ansgar Koene 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

For the next couple of weeks we are running a Twitter campaign to increase awareness and collect public opinions regarding the use of digital personal data. The campaign consists of daily Tweets mentioning an instance of reported data usage where there were concerns about the level of informed consent that was involved. Each Tweet contains a link to a mini-survey to ask people's opinion regarding that use of data. Once we receive ten or more responses the outcomes of each mini-survey will be published/updated on our blog site. In order to reach a broad public I would like to ask if Twitter users on the list would be willing to help us spread the tweets to potentially interested publics. For this campaign we are using the hashtag #AnalyzeMyData<https://twitter.com/hashtag/AnalyzeMyData?src=hash>. More information about this campaign is available at: http://casma.wp.horizon.ac.uk/casma-projects/ccasmd/consent-to-analyzemydat… Thank for your support, Ansgar Dr. Ansgar Koene CaSMa - Citizen centric approaches to social media analysis Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute University of Nottingham https://sites.google.com/site/arkoene/ http://casma.wp.horizon.ac.uk/ http://www.horizon.ac.uk/ This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

1 0

Deadline Extended to April 1st: Special issue on “Digital Evidence” for “Philosophy & Technology”
by Judith Simon 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Dear colleagues, the deadline for the submission of papers for our special issue on “Digital Evidence” for the journal “Philosophy & Technology” has been extended to APRIL 1st 2016. A pdf-version of the cfp is also available here: http://www.shannonvallor.net/uploads/4/4/8/0/44807815/digitalevidencecfp.pdf <http://www.shannonvallor.net/uploads/4/4/8/0/44807815/digitalevidencecfp.pdf> With best wishes, Judith Simon & Shannon Vallor --------------------------- Call for Papers for Philosophy and Technology’s special issue on Digital Evidence GUEST EDITORS Judith Simon (IT University Copenhagen & University of Vienna) Shannon Vallor (Santa Clara University) INTRODUCTION Digital technologies of the 21st century are profoundly transforming the nature of evidence and evidential practices in a wide range of domains, including science, medicine, law, education, journalism, government, public policy and global, national and domestic security. These changes call for rigorous analysis and critical reflection across a range of related topics and disciplines. The effects and uses are as diverse as the technologies themselves. The much-heralded power of “Big Data” on an unprecedented scale is radically changing how, and from where, social science researchers, marketers and insurers draw their evidence of human behavior, desires and attitudes. Digital neuroimaging technologies are reshaping norms of evidence in the courtroom, in research labs and in doctors’ offices. Varied forms of drone imaging affect how military pilots and intelligence agencies identify and even define legitimate targets, how archeologists, marine biologists, geologists and conservation scientists understand and measure natural phenomena, and how local law enforcement agencies perceive crime and social unrest. Cellphone cameras, body cameras, webcams and hacked ‘data dumps’ have radically changed how, and what, the public sees and knows. Future innovations in digital evidence promise to destabilize traditional evidential norms and practices even further. The philosophical questions raised by such transformations are many. What if any conceptual shifts in traditional metaphysics and epistemology do these new evidential practices suggest? Are new ontologies of evidence, or new standards of justified belief and knowledge, needed to account for them? What normative considerations (epistemic, political, ethical or legal), should be brought to bear upon these developments? How do new digital technologies condition the relationship between evidence, knowledge, belief and trust? How do these changes affect our understanding of scientific inquiry and explanation, or the role of evidential practices in human cognition, affectivity and action? How are these technologies impacting the distribution of the social and political power of evidence? These are just a few of the critical questions that new and emerging evidential practices invite us to ask. TOPICS We solicit the submission of papers that investigate the way in which new and emerging digital technologies are changing evidential norms and practices, within any relevant practical context or contexts (e.g. natural or social science, law, journalism, public policy, medicine, security or intelligence, etc). While the motivating questions should be of a philosophical nature, we welcome submissions from any discipline and/or subdiscipline (for example: philosophy/sociology of science, ethics, metaphysics, epistemology, logic, law, psychology, media studies, criminal justice, political philosophy/science, and so on.) Topics of special interest include: the impact of digital evidence on scientific research standards and practices; on the role of expertise; on notions of justification, confirmation and reasonable belief; on epistemic assessments of trust, reliability, objectivity and/or truth; on the cultivation of intellectual or moral virtues; on the relationship between modes of perception, affect, reflection and judgment; on individual, group and institutional practices of deliberation, verification and decision; or on the collection, dissemination, integrity and authority of information. TIMETABLE April 1, 2016: Deadline for paper submissions June 1, 2016: Deadline reviews papers July 1, 2016: Deadline revised papers 2016: Publication of the special issue SUBMISSION DETAILS To submit a paper for this special issue, authors should go to the journal’s Editorial Manager http://www.editorialmanager.com/phte/ <http://www.editorialmanager.com/phte/> The author (or a corresponding author for each submission in case of co- authored papers) must register into EM. The author must then select the special article type: "DIGITAL EVIDENCE” from the selection provided in the submission process. This is needed in order to assign the submissions to the Guest Editors. Submissions will then be assessed according to the following procedure: New Submission => Journal Editorial Office => Guest Editor(s) => Reviewers => Reviewers’ Recommendations => Guest Editor(s)’ Recommendation => Editor-in-Chief’s Final Decision => Author Notification of the Decision. The process will be reiterated in case of requests for revisions. For any further information please contact: Judith Simon, jusi(a)itu.dk <mailto:jusi@itu.dk> Shannon Vallor, svallor(a)scu.edu <mailto:svallor@scu.edu> —————— Judith Simon <https://univie.academia.edu/JudithSimon> Technologies in Practice Group <http://itu.dk/tip/>- IT University Copenhagen (Associate Professor for Philosophy of Science and Technology <http://itu.dk/tip/?p=2661>) Department of Philosophy <http://philosophie.univie.ac.at/> - University of Vienna (PI: Epistemic Trust in Socio-Technical Epistemic Systems <http://www.fwf.ac.at/en/abstracts/abstract.asp?L=E&PROJ=P23770>) Co-Editor: Big Data & Society Associate Editor: Philosophy & Technology

1 0

Dating and Hook Up Apps Bibliography
by Ben Light 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

Hi folks, I’ve just set up a Zotero group for a library on dating and hook up apps. I chose Zotero as it’s freely available for group set up. Please do consider joining and adding to the library here: https://www.zotero.org/groups/dating_and_hooking_up_with_digital_media I’ve entered what I have so far, but I know there’s more to come! You can also see the contents of the library on my website if you are a cut and paste kinda person: http://benlight.me/hookupapps/ Cheers, Ben. Ben Light Professor of Digital Media Studies / Chief Investigator - DMRC http://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/lightb/ http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Light,_Ben.html http://www.benlight.me Ph: +617 3138 8280 | Email: ben.light(a)qut.edu.au<mailto:ben.light@qut.edu.au> | Twitter: @doggyb QUT Digital Media Research Centre Creative Industries Faculty | Queensland University of Technology Z1-515 | Musk Ave | Kelvin Grove QLD 4059 | Ph: +617 3138 3889 Website: www.qut.edu.au/research/dmrc<http://www.qut.edu.au/research/dmrc> | Twitter: @qutdmrc | Centre email: dmrc(a)qut.edu.au<mailto:dmrc@qut.edu.au>

1 0